/g/entlemen, how do we fix JavaScript?

Don't use it on websites

>>56067741
Static typing.

Boom. All the weird edge cases and hacks fixed.

Add pointers.

Did CoffeeScript catch on?

>>56067741
>/g/entlemen, how do we fix JavaScript?
hahaha, good luck with that

Kill the Node.js meme.

I'm here just to do shitposting. I don't want fix anything.

I only use Javascript on my website for image galleries, cookie notices, ads and obfuscating my email.

Without Javascript nothing of value would be lost.

start from scratch

Use it for what it should be used and that's it.

>>56067741
We kill it, then kill anyone who would create a successor.

>>56067741

I just avoid it at all costs

>>56067741
It's literally perfect.

>>56067741
include zepto or at least jquery in the nonexistent standard library

>>56068516
So you only go to 5 websites total.

>>56067741
By using the latest ES version and not touching anything that resembles a framework in the slightest.

Javascript is perfect, the only thing it was lacking was lexical scope and thats fixed with let. I like Ruby a lot, but Ruby is actually an example of how OO and classes can constrain you. Ruby is moving toward being something like Clojure or Elixir where everything is an immutable object and only accessed by reference. That can be nice in certain situations but for doing things like what javascript was meant to do it would be a disaster. Javascript is perfect, just use coffeescript if you dont like the C syntax.

File: dualmo.jpg (1MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1936px

It's all dead my friend's everything is gone.
java it's dead because of over usage and people making new os's of it and pajeets touching .net was good until pajeets

>>56067741
We don't.