Intel CPU's are fucking tanks

>>56038716
Nice anecdotal evidence, faggot

>>56038736
Idgaf about the antidotes but those are some nice tits

>>56038794
Yeah they're the only reason I'm itt, regardless OP is a fucking retard.

File: 1469292074291.jpg (272KB, 1002x982px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1002x982px

>>56038716
My AMD CPU has held up since 2010 but it noticeably raises the temperature of my room even on idle. I'm waiting to die in a fire.

>>56038716
>the processor literally shit itself
>implying processors poop

>>56039007
You bloody well know they do

File: gpu-failure-rate.jpg (139KB, 1404x579px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1404x579px

>>56038716
AMD has an awful failure rate

Their parts are just cheap shit

OP is not wrong, I've abused the fuck out of intel CPUs and they never die
AMD fags are delusional autists

>>56038716
I've never personally had a processor fail dating back to the Athlon XP days and I've owned a mix of both Intel and AMD stuff.

I've seen a shit ton of Intel procs fail at my work but they've been thoroughly thrashed.

>>56038716
my amd duron works fine. maybe you should not overclock them too much.

>>56039428

You are a liar or an ignorant. That graphic is about old Asus gpus only.

who is this semen demon and where can I buy one?

>>56038716
Failure rates for modern processors are very close to 1% over a decade assuming normal voltage and temperature. This is true for all modern chips. If a cpu does fail before that, it's more than likely the discrete components attached to the package rather than the die itself. The reason other hardware fails more often is because it has more discrete components than a processor. Motherboards have the highest failure rates because they have the most components, then video cards with the exclusion of mechanical hard drives.

Essentially if a CPU die passes the testing at the factory after being fabricated, it's more or less perfect and will remain that way.

Intel's quality control is REALLY good.
They test their processors in particle accelerators to simulate cosmic rays hitting their CPUs. They test them in accelerated aging ovens, and they really have high standards for their longevity.

That said, AMD processors have the same kind of quality control (probably a little less, but intel's is extreme) so you should have really bad luck if you actually ever have a CPU fail on you.
Usually it's the motherboard. And then if it's the CPU it's usually the motherboard that kills it, or the PSU, or the user from overvolting.

GPUs are a different matter, they're robust but they're stressed a lot harder.

The thought of a CPU every dying is just bizarre to me.
On laptops, the BGA cracking, or flip chip shit, sure, but never on a desktop. Fucking ever.

The government requires botnet processors to only fail when they say they have to fail.

sauce?

>>56038716
If you knew anything about cpus you would know that if you put them inside your pc and they work they will probably work forever. They have no reason to fail like other hardware. Doesnt matter intel or amd.

nonami takizawa