GTX 1080ti

Yeah but it won't come out for a while. Maybe in like 6 months or so.

Seems likely. There's been talk of a 1090 dual GPU.

It will be called the Titan X10
>have 24GB HBM
>2GHz boost clock
>8Ghz Memory Clock Rate

and it still wont play Crysis at 60 fps

>>55995610
>>55995619
>>55995657
Are you gonna shop?

>>55995657
is that the Titan X Pascal?

>>55995736
sorry man just making shit up I have no clue but when you think about it:
>titan has 6GB vram
>titan z has two card with "12" (not spreadable)
>titan x has 12gb of vram

to me they just keep doubling the ram in the titan line of cards so it would considered logical increments at this point since they have done with three generations already (with pascal being the third).
as far as the boost clock and memory clock just threw numbers as a fridge

>>55995584
Don't expect the 1080TI to be out till the RX 490 or some other AMD high end card is announced.

Nvidia probably already has the card made and is waiting to rain on AMD's party like they did with the RX-480 VS GTX 1060

File: NVIDIA-GeForce-X80-X80Ti-X80-TITAN.png (60KB, 882x520px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 882x520px

>>55995584

OP I'm really tired of this whole gpu hype, it's here everyday on this board since over three months

That said, I'm considering titan x pascal even with a titan x maxwell just because I'm interested in the factory clock of 1.5ghz to 2ghz

This generation is just a dud run and the next one should be better.

I'm just buying flagship cycles and this generations titan x kinda sucks on the paper compared to what GP100 and hbm promised

Already confirmed. They're waiting on HBM2 supplies though. Expect it shortly after AMD unless they decide to do a paper launch again, which I doubt they will after all the flak they got.

>>55995584
Stop being poor and just buy a Titan x

>>55995925

with seeing such a radial jump from the memory interface of 512 to 4096, how does that translate in terms of real world example because I just see it as a number other consumers will jerk to because it's such a large jump with HBM2, hell nvidia isn't even going to go with HBM? major differences between the two?

>>55995584
Yes, they will release it to crush Vega when it launches

>>55995584
I just want my 1050 and be done with it.

File: 1469133415679.gif (2MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x250px

What could you possibly be doing that a 1080ti could handle but a 1080 couldn't?

>>55995973

BS lol. 1080ti will be g5x memory.

Volta will be hbm2

>>55996025
100+hz gaming on 1440p
60+hz gaming maxed on 4k

>>/gcg/

>>55996045
1080 can do 100+ at 1440p just fine. 4K isn't widespread enough to bother wasting money on yet, much like the early HD TVs

>>55996069
>1080 can do 100+ at 1440p just fine
No it can't, you aren't going to get 100hz+ stabily in games like Witcher 3 / Total war Warhammer Maxed out with a 1080

>>55996069
>his eyesight is so bad he can't enjoy 4K

My condolences.

File: Isurprisinglyonlyhavesmugnonanimepictures_0d503600aabe6275de10fb2032e271fd.jpg (7KB, 250x230px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x230px

>>55996089
>falling for the early adoption meme

I bet you own a VR headset too

>>55996069

Try sli

>>55996114
Not him, but I fell for the HBMeme. I thought it would be good to adopt early.
Still the best AMD card, but that 4gb really hurts sometimes now.

I bought 980ti less than a year ago.

>>55996069
Suppose I'm playing at 1080p. Is a gtx 1080 overkill and should I get a 1070 or should I wait for the 1080ti? Not investing in a new telly at the moment.

>>55996215
Yes. 1070 is fine for 1080p

>>55995584
fucking nigger i saw this thread and thought
they announced it!

eat shit

>>55996114
Nope, I don't.

There's no games for it.

Not that it's an expensive product.

>>55996243
t. Wagecuck

>>55996006

HBM2 on midrange nvidia cards won't show up anytime soon because there's a supply shortage and the prices are high. There are rumors for a titan x black with hbm2 with the full chip next year, however I'm not sure whether Nvidia would just release it out of cycle, they're probably keeping it in stock in case Vega kicks ass.

In a real world example, it really depends on your usage and whether you have a 4k output to take advantage of HBM2 bandwidth, the adoption of 4k displays is slow due to the sheer bandwidth consumption in broadband and storage. I'm using these cards for video rendering and the current pascal gen is aimed towards deep learning rather than pure processing, the performance is very similar to last generation. So don't fret too much about HBM2 because we need to move towards Kaby Lake and Union Point 200 chipsets to fully take advantage from the shift.

>>55996069

Right, yet 4k is great you know, I don't mean to shill but if you're getting a display get a tv. I'm getting like 22ms latency in game mode and 40ms in pc mode.

The fact is high end 4k TVs currently supports 120hz but the displays are capped to an effective 60hz. Thing is just do whatever you want, I'm used to TV displays (HBAO, SSAO is amazing with HDR). Besides the ideal pixel per inch for a 4k is 43 inches, it's all relative.

You can search everything you need to know about 4K TV refresh rates in one post, 120hz is currently a reality. Fast Sync that stuff in nvidia inspector. DP 1.4 cables support freesync natively so gsync is kind of a buzz.

>>55996287
I never said it was bad, just overpriced at the moment. Also 22ms is quite significant

>>55996315

agreed but it's still cool to have fast paced wall in 4k. specs are specs when you don't see it irl. the connector boxes with the 8 core cpus can also be upgraded separately from the panel. but hey, I got tired of playing the waiting game 4k is nice

Next year only for 1080 Ti

>>55996215

They are overkill unless your're looking for cards that will do 144hz on every single title with maximum settings.

When will we see a single card that can handle 4K 60fps at max settings? Titan XPascal?

>>55995584
Would the smartest be to get the 1060 and wait for the 2017 flagships for proper 4k support?

>>55995584
It depends on how close AMD can get to the performance of the 1080