Tinfoil hats on suicide watch

>>55973615
Wtf I hate https everywhere now

>>55973615
My wife's son said it was safe

>>55973615
>>55973629
>>55973650
Haha, memes.

I read it twice and still can't follow his complaint.

Yes, in an ideal world everything would use TLS, and adding an 's' to URIs wouldn't be needed.

File: gaiusbaltargs0.jpg (12KB, 210x213px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 210x213px

>>55973615
>mfw people will most likely not read the whole thing and only the title
>mfw TBL makes good points as usual
>mfw we are still using URIs and not hashes to identify the content we want.

so does this mean i need to uninstall https everywhere now??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? please respong

>>55973845
No, the point, as far as I can tell, is the author feels that using https breaks the backward compatibility of the web.

>>55973845
You have to reinstall your OS now.

>>55973615
I consider this mistaken.

HTTPS Everywhere is a user side action. It doesn't "break the web" any more than an adblocker choosing what your browser will request.

HTTPS Everywhere is just an automated choice; if the site has https I will use it, if it doesn't then I won't use the site.

This is a clickbait thread without anime tiddies.

What the fuck? I feel cheated desu.

>>55974120
Kill you'reself

>>55974120

wtf i hate clickbait now

I don't get it. They don't like https because existing http links wont automatically lead to https?

>>55973615
tl dr: "muh backwards compatibility, or muh ancient as fuck abandonsites"

>>55974043
Even still I don't think httpseverywhere breaks the web. On your first contact with the website, you're automatically upgraded to https so there is no breakage in terms of normal cookies v secure cookies etc...

File: 1465700535000.jpg (60KB, 353x295px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 353x295px

>>55974120

>>55973615
>A bunch of academic complaints with a stupid headline

File: 1470287349775.jpg (48KB, 586x720px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 586x720px

>>55973615

>2015-02-15

>>55973615
Bruh, a 301 redirect. They use the old URI, I forward that shit transparently on my server, like BAM. Here's your secure page without you having to type an S and destroy the interweb link-o-sphere with a letter.

>>55974405
wtf i hate memes now

>>55973650
I'm your wife's son's dad and I say it isn't.

>>55974818
wtf i hate tinfoil now

>>55974764
Doesn't google hate 300/301 redirects?

yeah cloudflare started thinking I'm a VPN around last week

Only a problem for normies.

File: 1447464927209.gif (4MB, 640x333px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 640x333px

>his browser needs an add-on to enforce HTTPS

>pajeet is mad his "backwards compatibility" is broken
>pajeet can't affor 2$ ssl certificate
>too dumb to install a lets encrypt cert

Don't worry

>>55978050
The one who you call "pajeet" is simply one of the most important men in the world, cocksucker. Without him, there's no Internet.

>>55973767
In an ideal world, TLS would be banned given that it's already completely deprecated and unsafe.

>>55978321
t. pajeet son of rajesh

Fuck all this web shit desu senpai. Just use SSH port forwarding and Gopher.

File: 1470507625665.jpg (40KB, 640x628px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 640x628px

>>55973615
>3 column layout for the content

>>55973615
We won't need HTTPS everywhere in 2017 when every site is using HTTPS and not HTTP anymore.

File: shiba-inu.jpg (46KB, 500x433px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x433px

>Date: 2015-02-15, last change: $Date: 2015/03/27 21:20:42 $

>This is not a formal W3C director view, nor view of the TAG or the Consortium as a whole.