Can we have another one of these? I missed the last one and I

bump, any other 6800k's or 5820k's out there?

Ay b0ss can somebody give da benchmarks plz

File: sadasd.png (51KB, 805x402px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 805x402px

>>55971793
>implying I can read white text on bright yellow background

>>55971953
it's the ASRock way.

>>55972012
My ASRock board is beautiful dark red.

>>55972074
yea, and mine is annodized blue and black, just their version of cpu-z is ugly.

>>55972372
Why would you even use it is my question?

File: bench2.png (14KB, 402x407px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 402x407px

>>55972404
u rite, here u go

File: Untitled.png (32KB, 804x396px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 804x396px

You had to w8 7 years to double your performance

File: cpuz results.png (49KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 806x402px

>>55971793
3rd gen i7, performs fairly well for a laptop cpu

File: cpuz-bench.png (42KB, 801x399px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 801x399px

>>55971851
Running a 6800K here. Have it overclocked to 4.2 GHz with 1.27V.

File: cpuz.png (40KB, 827x414px)

40KB, 827x414px

Uh..she's at stock speeds right now, will probably OC. Thinking about getting an x5650 too.

Which would be a better option?

>>55972952
You do that 775 to 771 mod?

File: Untitled.png (130KB, 1606x910px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1606x910px

latitude e7450 paired with i7-5600u/2x8gb kingston hyperx c9 1600mhz ddr3l/ geforce 840m

>>55975086
>she

It's a processor, not a ship

File: benchmark.png (61KB, 822x407px)

61KB, 822x407px

What do you need performance for anyway

>>55975424
That's one sexy Intel logo. Also, what version of windows are you running?

>>55975438
That's Windows 7

File: cpuzbenchmark.png (53KB, 808x402px)

53KB, 808x402px

Might score higher with an overclock, running at turboboost 3.7ghz.

>>55971851
I've got 6800k at 4.0ghz 1.22v