So i got recommended Sandisk Ultra II SSD as supposedly best

>>55959457
Own both, sandisk is better

they're both nvme correct? I'm only asking because your picture is

>>55960991
Thank you. Additionally, kingston is m.2 structure/whatever and is supposedly much faster then sandisk (according to logical increments). Is it noticeable difference?

>>55961011
one is normal sandisk ultra II and other m.2 brand new tech or whatever, i am not an expert.

Why not Samsung Evo?

>>55961029
if you can get a samsung pci-e m.2 its about 4x faster than most things on the market.

>>55961589
>>55961645
just checked samsungs m.2 and its expensive as fuck. almost 200 dollaros for 250Gb. shit son i dont know if i can justify it in my head.

>>55961645
Can confirm. My samsung m.2 can read at >1200 MB/s.

>>55962011
>The newer and faster type is M.2 PCIe (PCI-Express). The PCIe drives can transfer data at up to 3900 MB/s.

wonder which ssd can actually do that

>>55961993
950 or 850? 850 is relatively cheap

If your m.2 is sata get the cheapest one, speed is useless because of sata bottleneck

If its a pcie m.2 then get that

>>55962277
yes but 950 cost not even twice as much but is 4 times faster. if i were to get one it would be 950 but its expensive.