What is the best Aero solution for Windows 10?

realizing that aero looks like shit and moving on

install gentoo

>>55940852
>/thread

Aero is only good at a decent resolution. OP's screenshot, for example, is fugly.

>>55940821
Install 7 or gnu/linux

>>55940821
But, it doesn't

S E V E N

Or a linux distro if you can find a aero theme

>>55940821
Does windows 10 have a setting to 'select for best performance' with respect to desktop and window effects. This made xp and windows seven pretty usable. Just add the seconds you have to wait for every damn click to finish swooshing and that's time stolen from your life.

>>55945009
Same place as always.

>>55945009
Yes, but you can't disable "Aero" on 8 and 10.
You're stick with GPU accelerated GUI, which will fuck up performance in some cases.

>>55940821
man

people used to look at that and go:

>yeah, that looks good

yeesh

>>55945540
sure If by "fuck up" you mean "make better"

>>55945673
No, learn how computers work.

>>55945700
enlighten me lol

>>55945778
These get reduced performance if you enable DWM (GPU accelerated GUI aka "Aero"):
1. playing games in windowed (non-exclusive) mode
2. desktop screen recording

It's easy to test it yourself, but you need Windows 7 with Aero off to make a comparison.

>>55945836
proofs?

You do know that DWM isn't constantly using the GPU right?

>>55945857
>proofs?
What kind of proof do you want?
Try it or search for multiple reports on the matter.

>>55945664
I used to spent nights ricing out my Linux to look exactly like that.

>>55945857
Games have settings to disable aero you dumb underage shit. It also takes part of your vram.

>>55945887
Works on my machine

you got literally anything to back up your claim? If anything it improves performance by offloading work from the CPU

>>55945917
>Games have settings to disable aero you dumb underage shit

Yeah, for compatibility issues retard. Unused ram is wasted ram

>>55945949
>for compatibility issues
Just kill yourself. DWM takes gpu ram and cycles. It has performance impact on low end systems if you want to play games.

>>55945968
>It has performance impact on low end systems if you want to play games.

please. You'll have a hard time noticing anything even with integrated graphics. Please educate yourself

File: Capture.jpg (39KB, 784x212px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 784x212px

>>55945979
forgot pic

File: 66.png (20KB, 420x442px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 420x442px

>>55945991

>>55945996
and?

I remember when /g/ hated aero.

>>55945933
I can tell you didn't try it. Probably an underage fag who didn't even use 7 much before switching to the latest most shilled version.

It will not impact performance in every case, which is why I listed those two cases as examples.

>>55945991
A tenth of a second in UI responsiveness is massive.

>>55946010
Do you know why fullscreen exclusive mode even exists? Because aero can bring stutter if your system is potato.

>>55946050
you make up for it with improved redraw capabilities and offloading the CPU

>>55946049
I can tell you don't actually have any proofs behind your claims

>>55946067
Sure, that's why Vista was so fast compared to XP, right?

>>55946049
I can tell he has never run games in w7 on gpu with 256MB ram while aero takes half of it.

>>55946152
It was pretty close

>>55946189
Confirmed underage b&.

>>55946197
nice meme opinion

File: whore.jpg (12KB, 138x175px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 138x175px

>>55946244
Stay buttblasted or take some 10yo pc from the dumpster and try it yourself underage dipshit.

File: 316.gif (842KB, 300x221px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 300x221px

>>55946262
I'm not buttblasted your just an idiot

XP had a very fast and efficient GUI. Shame we'll probably never have something like this again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToFgYylqP_U

>>55946309
MS had top talent around win2000/xp era. Pajeets took over after that.

>>55946309
I don't think XP has hardware gdi

>>55946371
It was 2d but still had HW acceleration. Vista brough 3d.

>>55946371
Yes it does:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff729480(v=vs.85).aspx

MS rewrote a lot from Vista on and while I'm sure there are some benefits, performance is still worse than XP.

You can do that Explorer CPU usage test (fast scrolling), XP still smokes everything else.

>>55940821
Jesus christ, how horrifying

>>55946424
That page has nothing to do with XP