>>55919897
with open networks you can just set your wireless card to monitor mode and just sniff traffic like that
with WPA2 et al it becomes harder (e.g. you actually have to know the PSK and catch the M1-M4 messages of your target's handshake, etc)
>>55919940
What does any of that have to do with the question?
>>55919897
Depends on the wires but if you can get physical access you probably hook up a transmitter, but in an environment where they look out for bugs it'd probably get found easily
>>55919957
i assumed it was a meme way of asking whether there's a way to intercept wireless traffic, especially considering the wi-fi logo in the OP
guess I was wrong
>>55919897
It's called a reflective attack.
The nsa develops snooper hardware to do this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mJdGlNGSqY