NVIDIA SHILLS BTFO!!

>$210
Isn't the 480 supposed to be $200? AMD full of shit yet again.

File: AMD small details.jpg (859KB, 3120x4208px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 3120x4208px

Look at this box shot. I mean how do the manage to fuck up everything down to even the copy on the packaging?

>>55913397

What's wrong with it

>>55913396
AMD is the poor man's jew

>>55913416
Editor notes everywhere.

Read the phrases in parentheses.

>>55913396
I'm new here, is this what you guys call bait?

>>55913396
Yeah, I support AMD and this doesn't make sense to me. I'd rather just pay 40$ more for the 480

t. pajeet

>>55913432
It also says
>40% more effecient
so the editor didn't even put it through a spell checker

>>55913432
Oh shit, didn't see it. That's awful.

>>55913416
They cant handle how effecient it is

File: 470.png (276KB, 1401x507px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1401x507px

>>55913385

>i-it's okay when amd does it!

They're done. The 1080 Ti will be the nail in the coffin.

>$10 more than a 480

Jesus christ AMD fix your fucking pricing

>>55913480
that's the 8gb version dipshit.

>>55913522

Isn't the 8gb 480 $239 as well over there?

>>55913480
Not the same card, retard.

File: 470.png (115KB, 986x533px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 986x533px

>>55913522

>i-it's okay when amd does it!

>>55913534
the 8gb 480 is around 250-270ish depending on cooler.
but the prices for this generation of card is all fucked up and no one is releasing anything so reference cards are expensive which as fucked the pricing for AIB cards.

>>55913572
AMD marketing department is officially retarded.

>>55913572
>matching a nitro+ with a stock card
try harder and do it with a 480 nitro+

>>55913572
Lol what are they doing

>>55913591
>AMD is officially retarded
fixt

>>55913596
the nitro+ is like 1% improvement over the reference. still has terrible temps in OC headroom

>Vega comes out in 2017
>barely matches 1080 Ti despite being pushed to the limit and no OC headroom
>Nvidia drops Volta just for giggles

They are a whole gen behind now. You can't come back.

290 performance for what should be $180. Nice.

>>55913580

Oh right, 239 was the msrp.
So yeah, seems to me they're hopping on the price hike caused by the mining craze, and overpriced another card hoping miners also clean these out.

Way to fucking go, amd. When I saw the benchmarks this morning I thought I made an huge mistake by grabbing an used 280x for 140€. Now I'm glad I did when I found it. This should be a decent stopgap from my 760.

>>55913396
reference is 'supposed' to be

they never made that promise for custom PCBs

>>55913646
They own the budget market now. Nvidia can't compete.

File: HAHAHAMD.jpg (14KB, 213x237px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 213x237px

>>55913680
stupid AMDrone ignoring the reality of the 1060

>>55913696
>1060

Top kek why anyone would buy the 1060 when you can just buy two 480s for the same price and get performances that come close to match a 1080 ?

>>55913718
What

>>55913718
probably because modern-day releases that support mGPU are the exception to the norm

>>55913696
>1060

File: k.png (170KB, 1012x540px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1012x540px

>>55913726
this is what.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVVJPbFRDEc

>>55913572
does what, you faggot?

>>55913801
Comes up with a stupid pricing policy.

Cheapest GTX 1060
>269€ (AIB!)

Cheapest RX 480
>269€ (Stock shit!)

Cheapest RX 470
>279€ (AIB)


I really don't get how AMD makes any profit at all with these prices.

>>55914106
Apparently the RX 470 is better than RX 480 in coin mining for some reason.

>>55914137
10% slower, 25 ~ 30% cheaper, and if I'm not mistaken, less power consumption. Reference, of course.

>>55914176
>25 ~ 30% cheaper
What are you smoking?

yurop pricing going full retard as well

>4gb is 220-240€
>8gb is 280€

480 will cannibalize this, either vram amount version of it is only 20€ more

>>55914278
Yeah, I can get a 1060 for £240 with two fans, but on the sapphire nitro AIB is £240.

GTX 1060

>>55914278
None of the 470's or AIB 480's even have a shipping date in Europe.
It's either reference 480 (don't do that) or AIB GTX 1060 which has some cards in stock for 279€.
Really disappointed with the pricing and availability AMD has pulled with Polaris.

File: 1466569823964.jpg (128KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 960x720px

So I have an R9 290 and I bought it on release and it works great except for that now the driver crashes constantly while I play games so I need to replace it. Would the RX 480 be worth buying if I am only looking to spend about $250?

>>55914587
Yeah they got absolutely tripped up by the carpet Nvidia pulled from under them.

Mind you I set August as an upgrade date so I don't keep putting stuff off forever.

>>55913652
>what should be $180

>>55913397
kek

To be fair I could see this happening to basically any one of the Taiwanese AIBs (Nvidia or AMD) when they rush out something new. There is no shortage of Engrish/cringe marketing in the graphics card world.

>>55913680
>budget market
>above 200

yeah, no

>>55914512
Based

>>55914595

You sure it's the gpu dying? That's a sidegrade, or a very slight upgrade at best.
Clean the card and replace the thermal paste, see what happens. If you can, see what it does on a windows fresh install.

>>55914814
yeah its a well known issue that a lot of people who bought the first batch have. I tried everything. I dont really need more power.
Thanks though.

>>55913761
>Benchmark
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Let's see how that shit turns out when a game has shit multi GPU support
For example, most of them.

>>55913385
2 of these (assuming you could get your hands on them) would most likely crush the 1070 in DX12/Vulkan games while probably holding their own in DX11 at a not-embarrassingly-high power consumption level.

Based MAD.

>>55914952
>shit multi GPU support
Isn't this kind of a stale meme at this point? I mean, day 1 SLI/crossfire support has always been dodgy but I can't remember a game that just straight up didn't function with a second GPU if it could actually make use of it.

>>55913385
>only 4 gigs
1060 6GB FTW

>>55913385
>BTFO
By what? I don't get it

>>55913385
>480 cost 200
:D

>>55913596
It's obvious that they are trying to get all the pre-orders for the RX 480 to jump on the RX 470.

>>55913718
>Top kek why anyone would buy the 1060 when you can just buy two 480s for the same price
You can't buy two 480's for the price of a 1060 you mongoloid

>>55914996
>480 reference-AIDS board costs $199

Yeah, no thanks.

>>55913397

>that heatsink scribbled in paint

The text was funny but that made me laugh IRL.

>>55913397

Man, that design is sad. Couldn't they hire someone to do a decent graphic design there? Just look at that shadow, lol.

>>55914106
The reason the cards are priced so high is because AMD cant keep them in stock. Buttcoin miners buying all the cards.

>>55915008
its crazy that you can get cheapest AIB 1060 at 50euros more than 470. Who the would buy 470 in there right mind? 1060 just wtf rapes it. I have no doubt now that 1050ti with 3gb ram will yet again be cheap gpu of choice.

>>55915124
Nvidia will market 1050ti as 189$ card with 970gtx performance.

>>55914982
Crysis 2. 9800 GX2 owners were buttblasted:
> black textures
> no performance improvements in comparison with 9800GTX
> Can't disable a second chip to fix textures

>>55913385
>costs more than a 480 that can flash to 8GB

Pass

>>55913385
INB4 OP'S HOUSE CATCHES FIRE