ayy lmao
>1920x1080
What about 4k?
sippin nvidiot tears xd
>>55905683
>4K on a fucking midrange GPU
But here it is anyhow.
>>55905709
Amd still sucks
>>55905683
>~~~~$200 a $250~~~~ card
>run it on a 4K monitor
Nigger you don't buy a ~~$200 card to run a 4K monitor.
even the nvidia 1080 shill edition can't fully max out on a 4K monitor. What you expect with a $200 one? Low settings for 40fps???
>>55905735
sucks for nvidiots trying to spare their feelings indeed
>>55905754
>>55905754
>calling nvidia owners idiots
>youre the one sitting here proving nothing to no one but other amd owners.
Congrats kid
>>55905754
All Nvidia have is less power usage and a few more fps in DX11 games. But RX 480 is beating them on overall value for money. Even with coin mining the RX 480 is beating GTX 1060 on the new Steam survey (+0.6% vs 0.3%). Yeah I know the RX 480 has been out longer.
>>55905771
>being this triggered by what people say online
lmao stay insecure son
>>55905810
yup
>>55905844
wrong one sorry
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/directx/
>>55905666
Only applicable on some regions. In my country a custom GTX 1060 is cheaper than a reference RX 480
>>55905810
>$290
>value for money
end urself
>>55905736
Reminder that Witcher 3 benchmarks on ultra settings are not representative of the games most people spend 95% of their time playing.
RX 480 is perfectly capable of maxing less demanding games at 4k and can probably still do Witcher 3 at medium settings.
If you ever come across a game you can't run at 4k you can just render it at 1920x1080 and upscale.
>>55905810
>Even with coin mining
stop posting this meme
>>55907354
>In my country a custom GTX 1060 is cheaper than a reference RX 480
how does it feel to be a slav
Dang, so I get one performance for one dollar?
>>55905666
GTX 950!!! :D