AMDrones raging hard as fuck lmao!!!

File: Screenshot_20160729-065043.png (254KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 720x1280px

>>55866577
No... Not really. How do you feel anon about being cucked?

LOL says the novideo loser with no asynch compute

enjoy your legacy 980ti

>>55866607

>4GB
>HBM
>no overclockability

jesus fucking christ

are people really buying these?

>>55866648
better than 3.5 GB VRAM

>>55866611
>needs async compute to fix shit utilization

>>55866678
>it still doesn't fix it

File: 1_3xd3Jictg5qH4BwHJxoSrA.gif (718KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 500x375px

>>55866655
Savage

File: 1468697909745-pol.jpg (23KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 499x499px

>>55866678
>>55866727
Brutal

File: 1457582595441.jpg (73KB, 482x886px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 482x886px

>>55866577
This is a pretty good article about Maxwell architecture efficiency, too bad the OP posted it with some retard bait subject, and now it will just be full of shitflinging like every other GPU thread.

>>55866772
>>55866729
>>55866655
>6 IPs in the thread (7 now that I posted)
still samefagging like a dumb summershit you are

>>55866831
hard as fuck lmao

File: 1469494590745-g.gif (1MB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x200px

>>55866831
Round and round we go.

>>55866611
>async
here's the amdrone buzzwords

File: 1469979746487-g.png (335KB, 537x556px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 537x556px

>>55866874
Hay bud guess what! That last post isn't mine you cuck. Vaporize yourself.

File: stupid.png (8KB, 404x131px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 404x131px

>>55866874
swing and a miss

File: 1469463086662-g.gif (2MB, 287x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 287x240px

I'm at work on lunch nvidicucks.
>implying I'm a newfag
Does acid burn or melt anon?

File: 1464530508119.jpg (12KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 251x242px

>>55866655

AMD loses again

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>55866577
DELETE

File: lolpng.png (149KB, 1120x977px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1120x977px

>>55866577
>mfw comments
>j-just wait for vega it will BTFO nvidia in efficiency and performance

File: 1448683151506.jpg (23KB, 598x399px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 598x399px

>>55866577
>anandshill

File: power_multimon.png (29KB, 500x610px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x610px

AHAHAHA

>>55867071
I'd hope so. AMD has had plenty of time to make something good.

>>55867089
>73W idling
AHAHAHHAHAH

>>55866831
>>55866293

where do you think you are?

>>55866577
shit, I might just buy a GTX1060

>>55866577
Radeons could do tile based rendering since the x360 gpu.

>>55867089
Where are the high refresh test you niggers? Nvidia does terrible on them.
You would think they kept whatever they did on Fiji, fucking dammit AMD.

File: id say the fermi release was a huge success. now they HAVE to upgrade.jpg (33KB, 500x390px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x390px

>>55866655
[Bonfire Lit]

every single one of you are cucks

>>55868146
You say that like it's a bad thing?

My wife's bull loves playing GTA on my 1080

>>55867257

On an imageboard that discusses technology and not 24/7 consumer electronics shilling?

On actual topic, the problem with the whole intermediate based rendering to tile based rendering is that whatever "secret sauce" algorithms/code in the drivers that's doing the conversion must not be perfect or very good and probably would explain why there has been artifacting problems on Maxwell and Pascal. I'm guessing there's probably also stuff in GameWorks as well which works well with tile-based rendering and is why they are pushing developers to use it.

Intel also uses that

Now if AMD is smart they reverse engineer this shit (which they should have done along time ago)

>>55869065
If you were smart you wouldn't make such a retarded post.

>>55867089
I wish AMD actually used 3 different performance VRAM speed options, rather than 2. I just down clock my VRAM to a slower speed, and my 390 idles about 12-15 watts.

Whatever Nvidia did with 970 is some next level workaround coding. Can't force mine to use more than 3.5 gigs of vram in GTA 5, Lords of the Fallen uses it but it seems like the last 512 partition is dedicated to some low priority lod rendering cuz I honestly can't see a performance drop. It's hard to tell anyway cuz slapping something like 8x msaa to force your card into using 4 gigs of vram butchers frames on every GPU.

>>55869416
>Can't force mine to use more than 3.5 gigs of vram in GTA 5
I sit between 3.6gb and 3.8gb with my settings. No performance hit that I can tell

>>55869438
sometimes when you die and teleport to hospital, memory bus usage hits the ceiling and framerate drops
but maybe they fixed that in new drivers or gta update

>>55869438
Ultra setting, 2x msaa, extended shadows and rendering distance set to maximum - game says it might use up to 3.8 gigs of vram but in reality it's 3.4. don't know how to bump it without upscaling to 4k or touching msaa since both options butcher everything that isn't 1080

File: GTA5_2015_09_26_02_27_41_343.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>55869479
The in game vram usage is never right, I'm going off of what MSI Afterburner says

Basically what I'm using as far as settings go

>>55869514
the game gives you an upper level estimate, it's not supposed to be average

File: 1439775773675.png (36KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x600px

>hahahah GTX 970 HAS LE 3.5 GB!!!
And yet it still wrecked the shit out of AMD's equivalent , has the highest marketshare on Steam, and it took AMD 2 YEARS to match it with the RX480
stay mad AMDrones

File: AMDmath.png (1MB, 1663x546px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1663x546px

>>55869559
>970 is $70 cheaper than 480RX in UK. Will probably be $150 cheaper during Black Friday.

>>55867089
>40W is bad
>literally lightbulb tier

We argue about the dumbest shit these days.

>>55869584
What's the pic trying to imply?

>>55867089
that is some scary shit

>>55869638
Some AMD shill in old thread BTFOing himself by linking a vid to benchmark and stating that 480RX destroys 970 gtx.

File: GTA5ss.png (3MB, 2560x1080px)

3MB, 2560x1080px

>>55869514
I'm still impressed by how good this game looks. If it wasn't for low ress textures and jagged edges here and there it would be close to being photorealistic.

>>55866607
is the fury worth it? I am afraid because of the 4gb, wanted to buy the 390x

>>55866577
And?

If that doesn't help increase performance then it's useless. Power savings doesn't matter in the high end cards since they will be drawing a ton of power no matter what they do.

>>55870194
Honestly Fury was a disappointment. Wait and see what Vega holds, then go from there

File: tq8lJlR.jpg (52KB, 1282x752px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1282x752px

>>55866577
And this out it was nothing.
Radeon 6670 was AMD card used in this test.
In newer architectures AMD seems to use something similar.

>>55870602
increasing bandwidth efficiency will improve performance of bandwidth bound operations

it also increases ROP utilization by avoiding stalls due to reading from vram

and lower power use means the gpu can boost higher

>>55866577
This video should be the standard response to AMD fanboys'
>Only 256bit Bus Width
shit flinging.

>>55870607
Well I will play at 1080p and deciding between fury and r9 390x. 20€ difference. I am just afraid because of the 4gb and don't want to wait for the 480 nitro which costs 320€

File: DirectX 12 Async Compute Performance.png (26KB, 640x544px)

26KB, 640x544px

>>55866907
literally losing fps

>>55871787
literally no source

>>55866655
tfw 970 user simply because every other card of interest was universally out of stock when I was building

File: Lords_of_the_Fallen_07.04.2016_15.21.48.04.DVR.webm (3MB, 1920x810px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x810px

>>55866655
>muh 3.5 meme

File: perfrel_1920_1080.png (99KB, 500x770px)

99KB, 500x770px

>>55866607
>fury

Nice meme

>>55867089
It's using those idle watts to make your PSU more efficient ;)

>>55871787
Because Ashes of Singularity is the greatest masterpiece of all time and no other game must be played, right?

Its always amazing how much cherrypicking and mental gymnastics AMDrones do.

>>55869613
this

>>55869613
40w is bad when the competition is 6w.

That's a 666% difference, AMD is literally satan here

>>55869764
>Low res textures
Literally where? You can see the fucking leather grain in the car seats and shit.

>amd

>>55871911

File: Capture.jpg (25KB, 574x126px)

25KB, 574x126px

>>55871844

>>55871983
>implying the lawsuit was about the vram
Kys tech illiterate fuck

File: 1449098521825.jpg (9KB, 288x268px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 288x268px

>>55868160
Kek'd

>>55872000
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/07/nvidia-offers-30-to-gtx-970-customers-in-class-action-lawsuit-over-ram/

K.
Y.
S.

File: faggot.jpg (159KB, 733x871px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 733x871px

>>55872000
>>55872103
BLOWN
THE
FUCK
OUT
STUPID
NIGGER

>>55866655
>better than 3.5 GB VRAM
Bu..but you get $30 back with every purchase of a 970

>>55869559
>>And yet it still wrecked the shit out of AMD's equivalent
the 390 was not "wrecked"at all by the 970, they where roughly equal.

How much money can I get selling a used R9 280X?

How do I protect myself from getting scammed by shady eBay purchasers?

I live in a small city, so it probably won't move if I post on craigslist.

>>55872128
Nvidia is getting sued for releasing a card with 4gb vram and advertising it as 4gb vram?

Wow, you guys must be really desperate for that 50c refund

>>55872192
Are you dense?

>>55872166

the most money you can make is by shilling it to an underage kid with a dumb dad who will buy it for an unreasonable price

File: gtx970_vram_alloc_test_opengl-glslhacker.png (303KB, 730x503px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 730x503px

>>55872218
Are you?
It's a 4GB card regardless how you look at it.

>>55866577
>tiling rasterizers
enjoy your embedded (READ: phone and tabled crap) tier gpu, cucks

>>55872255
Not as advertised it isn't.

>>55873413
So it can't use 4gb vram?
Pretty sure it is in that pic you replied to.
Stop being a brain dead AMDrone sheep

>>55872255
The extra 0.5GB of RAM doesn't run at the same speed as the rest of the 3.5GB but the entire 4GB was marketed the same, which is false advertising.

If you bought a computer that claimed to have 16GB of DDR4-2400 but really had 8GB of DDR4-2400 and 8GB of DDR4-1600 would you say that was acceptable because it was still 16GB of RAM and half of it was running at advertised speed?

It's basically the same thing, a portion of the VRAM on the 970 was handicapped.

File: 1422604926067.png (226KB, 935x1157px)

226KB, 935x1157px

>>55873437
>So it can't use 4gb vram?
Correct. It cannot use 4GB of VRAM at the speed that was advertised. Which is why Nvidia is being sued over it.

>Pretty sure it is in that pic you replied to.
It's not. Did you actually read the image you replied to a few posts back? You should check it out if you haven't yet.
>>55872128

>Stop being a brain dead AMDrone sheep
Boy, you sure convinced me with those hot opinions.

>>55873491
But did they say all 4gb will have the same speed, or did they just say 4gb?

>>55873502
No one said anything about speed, we're talking about accessible vram.

>>55873514
>But did they say all 4gb will have the same speed, or did they just say 4gb?
The speed and memory bus is always on the box and on NVidia's site.

>>55873514
>No one said anything about speed, we're talking about accessible vram.
Did you actually read the image you replied to a few posts back? You should check it out if you haven't yet.
>>55872128

File: nvidia.jpg (920KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

920KB, 1920x1200px

Anyone confused as to what the 3.5 970 memes are please read this

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-Discloses-Full-Memory-Structure-and-Limitations-GTX-970

>>55873557
Yep, 4gb accessible vram.

>>55871922
>a 0.0002 CENT difference per year is huge
yeah, no.

>>55873680
In countries where electricity is expensive (e.g. Singapore, Japan), it can make a difference.

File: trump_by_znoflats_.jpg (142KB, 612x764px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 612x764px

>>55866577
Why can Nvidia not stop winning?

>>55873624
>Yep, 4gb accessible vram.
Did you actually read the image you replied to a few posts back? You should check it out if you haven't yet.
>>55872128

>>55867712
>Where are the high refresh test you niggers? Nvidia does terrible on them.
120hz monitors are fine, it's only weird shit that's not a multiple of 60 that nvidia cards freak out on like 144 or 165hz. Also, it's only on specific drivers which is really weird. Cards idle fine with 144hz monitors on some drivers but they keep fixing and breaking it every other week.

File: 1468545991405s.jpg (2KB, 123x125px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 123x125px

>>55866655
> mfw amd gpu causes a house fire

>>55869584
If so, i might get another 970, and buy an sli bridge.

File: 1467322047208.jpg (540KB, 1100x1002px)

540KB, 1100x1002px

>>55871851

DELETE THIS

>>55874102
The tower needs to be on fire

>>55874149
this

>>55873514
>But did they say all 4gb will have the same speed, or did they just say 4gb?
Yes, a 256 bit buffer, which is false. It's the same thing as saying the Jaguar was a 64 bit system because 32+32 is 64

>>55871150
look at benchmarks and realize that you may need to turn textures down a bit in some games going forward, if that's acceptable to you, the fury will be overall stronger.

>>55866648
Nitro has a custom PCB. 100-150MHz overclocks are possible.

>>55874102
Change Coca Cora to Coca Cobra and it'll be pefect

>captcha: 970

>>55867103
if vega is double what a polaris has, without the 5-14% they leave on the table to multi gpu or crossfire, then yea, it will beat out a 1080, especially in apis that can feed it, will most likely be behind in dx11 though.

and no, 1200$ for a titan x, or what nvidia fanboys are hoping for 900$ for a 1080ti is fucking retarded.

you can keep your 'fastest gpu available' title, ill stick to reasonable 200-300 is mid range and 400-700 is the high end cap before you go into pro cards.

>>55866577
>tile based rasterization
Enjoy your input lag.

>>55874676

>You can keep your "good hardware" I'll stick to mediocrity. 1080p for life!

AMD in a nutshell.

>>55874676

amd is not going to sell a flagship for hundreds of dollars less than nvidia, if the 1080ti is $900 you can expect amd's competitor to be around the same price, maybe $50 cheaper is it's considerably behind.

>>55874102
a person actually took his time to create this picture lmao

>>55874217
except the jaguar was actually 64bit where it mattered

>>55874724
not paying 900-1200 minimum for a gpu, not fucking happening unless i'm making serious money off the gpu, and by that point, i'm not looking at a gamer gpu.

>>55874726
the fury, till nvidia got wind and put the 980ti out would have been the card to go in between a 980 and a titan, they had what, a range of 550-1100 to play with? why do you think nvidia put the 980ti out for 650? if amd priced the furyx at 800$ why, knowing the jew shit nvidia does constantly, would they put the 980ti out for less than 800?

amd had the ability to dictate the price of a fury x, and they chose 650 when they could have put it as high as 1000 and still would have been justified.

>>55869613
Fucking seriously.
Inb4
>muh temps
>muh fan noise
I have a 270x with dual monitors and it sounds exactly the same as with a single monitor. Maybe if i had fallen for the mini itx meme id be bothered by the shit case flow not being able to keep up.

>>55873680
I don't think you understand just how much more cooling performance a 40W TDP takes. AMD has notoriously shit coolers too, so that just makes it worse.

>>55876508
>implying implications of an implicit value.
both companies make shit reference coolers. If youre the kind of impatient child who bought reference instead of waiting for 20 dollar more expensive aftermarket solutions with factory oc, better binning, and backplates for vrms, thats your problem.

>>55866607
Figureheads called, they want there robot back

>>55876642
Fun fact: You could flash the bios of an 8gb 480 onto the 4gb ones to unlock the extra memory

Why are GPUtards so mad and dumb all the time?