Linux users on suicide watch

>>55864265
Daily reminder you can use PC-BSD if you want a system that just works is very polished: https://www.pcbsd.org/

The words of every single user who has tried it:

>and honestly the OS just feels put together more nicely. Almost as if Linux was held together by tape, and BSD is held together by industrial strength glue

>>55864265
>>55864286
Why are FreeBSD so butthurt about people preferring Linux?

I run FreeBSD on my servers, and Linux on my works station because I'm not autistic and can only use a single OS.

>>55864265
why is he sucking the dick of beastie?

>>55864265
>why there's no rational reason not to use it over Linux
I don't care. What are reasons to use it over Linux?

>There's now a deep review
That link has snapshots on waybackmachine dating to 2010. As usual BSD users brains are as slow as their system and it takes 6 years to process something so simple.

>>55864265
>Maybe BSD doesn't have support on a par with Linux on that. Maybe it does. I dunno, and it'll probably change between the time I write this and the time you read it.
10/10 would laugh at again

>>55864340
The less people who use GPL'd software the quicker the cancerous FSF will die

>>55864380
I like the GPL.

>>55864412
Teenaged communist edgelord detected

>>55864265
Probably bait
>"But Linux has more programs than BSD!"
>How do you figure? Most of these "programs" you're so hot about are things that are open source or source-available anyway. If it's written reasonably portably, 95% or better of it will compile right off on any vaguely POSIX-compliant system.
Because everyone has a shit ton of time to compile programs, r-right?

Some of us have actual work to do; if I want to install a new program, it shouldn't take me more than 5 seconds.

>>55864425
That's surely how you convince me to use BSD.

>Drivers
>Performance
>Systemd
There you go.

>>55864425
The GPL is socialist, not communist.
As communism and anarchism are the same, the BSD/MIT licences are more communist.

>>55864829
>society
>community
what's the difference? peaceful socialism is a step toward violent communism

communism and anarchism are two completely different perspectives

>>55864265
I would use BSD if the graphics driver support was as good as Linux.
>>55864431
Also this. Updating is a pain in the ass

>>55864829
Anarchism is not the same as Communism. Its a spectrum just as socialism and communism are in the liberal spectrum.

>>55864829
The BSD license is more libertarian than communistic.

>>55864958
No, libertarians would be closed source, not BSD.

>>55864325
Wouldn't you?

>>55864265
Just switch to linux already

>>55864946
>Its a spectrum just as socialism and communism are in the liberal spectrum.
Haha, no.

>>55864425
Don't beat yourself up, you'll grow out of it in a few years.

>>55864974
Libertarian would allow you to do what you want. You're thinking of corporatism

>>55864306
Because these are shills who get paid to shill BSD.

>>55865084
>>55864974
>>55864958
>>55864946
>>55864879
>>55864829
>>55864425
>ITT: We call licenses different political ideologies we don't like

why the need to shill your shit OS? nobody wants to run an OS barely on par with windows 3.1 features

File: FOSS vs. socialism.png (98KB, 700x500px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 700x500px

>>55864425

>>55864286
PC-BSD is just FreeBSD with a GUI. It's the Linux Mint of BSDs. I prefer OpenBSD because of how simple it is. Literally got it installed in 10 minutes. It's amazing.