Is the SD801 the 2500k of smartphone SoCs?

Pretty much
The Galaxy s5 is one of the most coolest running phones I have ever used.

Plus it still has better battery life than any other Samsung phone, it was really only beaten by the z3 compact

>>55803576
No, that's the snapdragon 805

>>55803679
801 = sandy bridge
805 = ivy bridge
810 = haswell
820 = skylake

My Z3c is going strong

File: 107.jpg (134KB, 680x709px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 680x709px

>snap ovens
>no exynos

>>55803663
Someone is selling me an s5 for €200, and i want to buy it since the op3 costs €150 more than what i'm willing to spend.

Is the s5 a good phone to have in 2016 considering i'm going to install cm13 on it as soon as i have it?

>>55803807
>exynos

It's like you want your phone to be dead on arrival

>>55803827
ya s5 is good mayne. im running stock 6.0.1 on mine.

File: 1455677086097.jpg (68KB, 599x535px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 599x535px

>>55803827
S5 sells for 120~ usd, where do you live?

>>55803827
The s5 is still an amazing phone, it even trumps more modern ones

It is still way more than capable enough
Its battery life is still better than most phones
Even under extreme load, only gets a tad warm(this is more important than you think)
Top notch dac
Great screen
Its back firing speaker is actually the best I have ever heard(for a back firing speaker)
Water resistant to boot

Though the camera isn't all that great, terrible low light and everything looks all watery

>tfw Snapdildo 800

>>55803663
S7 active would like to have a word with you.

>>55805238
S5 wasnt XBAWX HUEG
the s4 active before wasn't either

Phone operating systems should never be so badly coded that they need super powerful mobile CPUs to run them. I think Android is deliberately unoptimized and shoddy to force you to use the newest phone. Google aren't stupid.