What is your favorite text editor /g/?

>>55800205
GNU Emacs. Unlimited power and I like using it as an IDE.

File: Screenshot - 07282016 - 11:03:57 AM.png (46KB, 659x410px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 659x410px

The only correct answer.

dontdon't know . gedit, mousepad, nano all do the job.

Atom and gedit

>>55800205
Sublime Text
Vim and Emacs are alright
Atom is shit
VS Code is better than Atom but still shit

GNU Emacs is the only right answer.

>>55800355
>GNU Nano
It's not even a part of the GNU project as of 2.6.0. Also, I can't even move by words in this abomination.

File: .png (78KB, 656x343px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 656x343px

SUBLIME
T
E
X
T

EMACS IS THE BEST EMACS IS THE BEST EMACS IS THE BEST EMACS IS THE BEST EMACS IS THE BEST EMACS IS THE BEST

>>55801726
I GOT ANOTHER CONFESSION TO MAKE

>>55800205
I switched from sublime to vim (setup for python, has a map and a tree view of files) preferring it so far

File: q.jpg (125KB, 727x1000px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 727x1000px

Why do people keep making new text editors when vim exists?

>>55801914
Vim is like the Firefox of text editors.
>multiprocessing is the new thing that vimfags are hyped about

GNU Emacs is the only editor you should use.

>>55801697
That's textmate you fucking neanderthal

>>55802025
no it's bbedit

>>55802064

r u sure m8.

Ganoo Emacs, although it can't beat VS Code for TypeScript/JS and IntelliJ IDEA for Java. Those two exceptions aside, Emacs is godly.

File: bbedit lite.jpg (128KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 640x480px

>>55802075
yes. looks like it at least.

>>55800355
Nanofags think they're hot shit because they're not using notepad.

I havent found an editor that doesnt bother me in one way or another. Is use brackets at work but all it is for is pasting things into, all the real work is done in intellij.

>>55802219
this. PyCharm for projects. Sublime for experimenting or writing small standalone scripts

Vim. Emacs fags think they're superior but I don't even use all of the features Vim has to offer. Fucking thing even has mouse support.

>>55802273
Can you multiprocess?
Fuck off.
Also:
>modal editing

>>55802273
I can use Vim keybindings in Emacs (Viper mode) and not have to torture myself with VimScript.
Checkm8.

Started using emacs + evil mode a year ago, haven't looked back since.
It depends on the language you're using though. I develop in Python and Go mainly and they both have amazing emacs packages with everything you could want like linting, autocompletion etc.
Modern IDEs have all these amazing features but the text editing and navigating is basically on the same level as Word. Emacs/Vim is so much more productive.

>>55802325
Vimscript is god tier retard

>>55801942
emacs fags would be hyped about multithreading too...
at least I would

>all these fags using that extremely bloated piece of shit OS called emacs
still missing a good text editor desu

>>55802292
>what is neovim

>>55802292
Modal editing is infinitely better than "Carpal TunnelMACS"

>>55802459
>what is neovim
Heresy

>>55802459
>what is vim 8.0?

>>55802497
>>what is vim 8.0?
late.

>>55802495
Bram please

>>55802436
GNU Emacs does that all the time.
>httpd
>grep
>compiling stuff in the background
There are a lot of things that take advantage of that.

>>55802491
>rebind control to caps lock
>Emacs pinky is gone

>>55802497
>https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/runtime/doc/version8.txt
>breakindent
That's pretty

Atom or nvim, depending on what i do

>>55800205
i personally like notepad ++

>>55800205
Vim master race.

Nano.
No straight copy+paste but it gets teh job done

gedit 2bh
geany for lightweight scripty stuff

vim's good too, I guess