>Nvidia's mighty 1060 has consistently higher performance

>>55793874

probably not. amd can't even get their euro pricing right. the most incompetent company there is right now.

>>55793874
$0.20 has been deposited into your PayPal account.

It's Nvidias job to BTFO AMDrones, which makes it all the more better when all their shilling and bullshittery gets wiped out in seconds by a single card with objectively better performance.

Cant wait for Nvidia to release something to kill AMD's workstation card with "muh 1tb vram!!!"

Yes, the more expensive card is better

>>55793995
>Cant wait for Nvidia to release something to kill AMD's workstation card with "muh 1tb vram!!!"
They don't have the fabric or engineering to manage this.

>>55793874
Dumb stupid poorboi AmD shills have been defecating all over /g/, and it is now time to put a stop to these legion of anus-cavities. Let us put all the facts on the table, eh?

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has excellent and spectacularly superb performance in FULL High Definition
-The AmD poorboi RX480 can only barely manage to play games in 1080p (1080p is a pathetic 75% LESS than ultra High Definition)

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is very quiet! You can barely hear it.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 generated dozens of DECIBELS of noise. Warning: Being in the vicinity of dozens-of-decibels CAN damage your hearing!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ consumes only a tiny amount of power. It is very efficient!
-The AmD poorboi RX480 has been seen to gulp down a cringe-inducing 167 Watts of power! 167 Watts can run several electronics devices simultaneously.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ can be had for as low as $249.99! An amazing and generous price.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is available for purchase for as much as $370! What a scam!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ uses advanced technology, such as Gameworks, G-sync, PhysX, SLI, and more!
-The AmD poorboi RX480 suffers from total and complete lack of features.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is from nVidia, a company that makes Graphics Processing Units. They are professionals.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is by AmD, ewwwwww!!!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has superior drivers with an excellent track record (more like chauffeurs, really).
-The AmD poorboi RX480 failed to offer better value thanks to their overwhelming driver overhead.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ will cool your house
-The AmD poorboi RX480 causes literal housefires (Google "RX480 California housefire of 1998")

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is beloved and admired by all
-There is literally no reason to buy the AmD poorboi RX480

(1/2, the idiocies of the disgusting AmD poorboi RX480 will be continued in the next post)

>>55794033
-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has a warranty for 2-3 YEARS! That shows the level of quality and commitment you get from nVidia.
-The AmD poorboi RX480's warranty is only a FEW dozen MONTHS. Pathetic!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is friendly, helpful, and nice to your motherboard.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 will FRY and DESTROY your motherboard, because it draws TOO MUCH power from the PCEi lanes! This cannot be fixed by poorboi AmD! (Google "RX480 PCEi power issue").

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ simply works.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 causes crashes when using Chrome.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ benchmarks speak for themselves. This is science and you cannot deny it.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 benchmarks comes from sites that were bribed or coerced into portraying AmD poorboi products in a positive light.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is often the choice of people who prefer democracy and peace.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 can be found in the homes of people who live in dictatorships. Be good, and do not support the suffering of these people.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is for independent thinkers, people who value freedom and dignity.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is known to have been purchased by Communists.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ will provide years and years of fantastic gaming performance.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is a gimped card, sold to the exploitable and uneducated masses.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ creates an aura of respect and professionalism.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is for, like, you know, losers, omg.

I respect myself. I am not a loser. I am not pathetic. That is why I will purchase the nVidia® GTX 1060™ (maybe two of them, for SLI). What about you? Are you a wonderful nVidia supporter, or an AmD poorboi loser?

File: xtomb-raider-1440p3.png.pagespeed.ic.ecaK2Rdg2u[1].jpg (97KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 600x600px

New review up.

http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/sapphire-rx-480-nitro-oc-4gb-8gb-review/

Needs a driver fix for target temperature. Temporary fix is to set target temp to 75c and then the fans and temps are what they should be. Temp under load is 74c which is 2c over what the Pascal cards achieve.

So no house fires as the Nvidia fanboys were saying because the other reviews did not set the target correctly.

Noise level of fans under load is 33dB gaming and 35dB using Furmark (extreme). GTX 1060 will be quiter for obvious reasons. It's no big deal though as your other system noise will no doubt make up for that unless you already run water cooling throughout.

Power consumption is total system 282w (8GB version) but take 100w off that for system and you are looking at around the 180w-200w mark depending. Thirsty yes. But GCN is like that. No idea what the multi-mon power consumption is for the Nitro but probably similar to ref.

Overclocking is an issue as of now because Trixx 3.0 is not out so no +mV can be applied above the default that Wattman gives. He still got to 1390Hz though. No benches were given at that clock rate however.

You pays your money...etc etc

>>55794033
>>55794040

Pajeet pls

>>55794033
>The nVidia® GTX 1060™ uses advanced technology, such as Gameworks, G-sync, PhysX, SLI
>SLI
lolnope

Everyone cries that AMD's GPU division existing is good for business, however despite a NVIDIA monopoly probably increasing prices and/or slowing down innovation, it would allow a better experience. Developers would only have a single graphic solution to develop and optimize for which would actually benefit consumers more than they realize.

>>55794064
This. People don't understand how an Nvidia monopoly would actually kick some serious ass, things would be a lot better.

>>55794064
>>55794075
>I want a monopoly.
You are uneducated.

File: hitman-1440p4[1].png (324KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 600x600px

>>55794052
As you can see Nvidia biased RotTR is worse case scenario. Of course it swings the other way with the more AMD biased Hitman. So it pretty much evens out across DX12 titles at present with Doom Vulkan as an outlier. This may change in the future though.

yo how much would my amd 6350 bottleneck a 1060? would i be better off with a lesser card? i have a 660 right now

>>55794064
Except nvidia's horribly locked down proprietary hellware would ruin it.
Hope you want to pay a monthly subscription for PhysX.

Progress would stagnate, too, as nvidia cuts their staff heavily because they don't need all those skilled people since they're not competing with anyone.
Look up lightbulb monopoly.
It broke eventually but imagine if instead of lightbulbs it was something that no-one else could start a company on due to the collosal startup costs

>>55794107
You're wrong.

File: xGTA5-1440p3.png.pagespeed.ic.R7nffFJUNY[1].jpg (93KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 600x600px

As we already know DX11 titles swing in favor of the GTX 1060. But not by very much. The reason I am posting 1440p instead of the target market 1080p is to demonstrate the differences between two GPU's with more than 4GB of VRAM and I will be gaming mostly on high settings (not ultra) on a 1440p Freesync monitor anyhow so I am more interested in that resolution.

>>55794139
Well we've seen it already, nvidia is the king of created locked-down proprietary shit and getting you to pay for it.

>>55794148
One other reason I am going the RX 480 route is because I demand low DPC latency for my music production which would be 'broken' by Pascal until they fix their drivers properly (It needs to be sub 500ms and the last Nvidia driver still does not fix that).

1060 is $100 AUD more so nvidia is finished here t͏bh

>>55794093
The point being AMD hasn't released a competitive product in a good while. NVIDIA is already a borderline monopoly. However since AMD is still in the game they're actively, though not intentionally, gimping whole PC enthusiast market.

AMD should exit the enthusiast market and focus strictly on embedded and OEM applications.

>>55794174
Literally only affects a very tiny percentage of users. To the extent that they only really released a hotfix for it instead of a WHQL driver.

Except in DX12/Vulkan games

kill urselves nvidiots

>>55794107
who the fuck cares. i aint gonna buy some overpriced garbage if i can get a 1060 which is better and cheaper.

>1060 aib
>£229

>480 aib
>£250

>>55793874
>1060 is clearly the superior card.
This is especially true in Sweden, since AMDs crappy euro pricing made them the exact same price.

>1060 is $70-$90 higher than an RX 480 in my country

CLASSIC! FUCK YOU!

>>55794040
I hope you didn't type this all out

>>55794178
Pajeet, Stop eating soo much fiber. All the blood rushing to your head from passing a semi liquid while you're at the designated street isn't helping you think straight.

>>55794190
>DX12
>implying anyone uses win10

>>55794213
AMD are street shitters. NVIDIA are rice eaters.

Get your memeing straight edgelord.

tfw just want the fucking 1080 hybrid to come out already

>>55794224
>edgelord
You have to be over 18 to use this site.

>>55794178
Just ~3-4 years ago, when nVidia had its Fermi disaster, the fanboys were wanting nVidia to cease its efforts. During the 8800 days, the fanboys wanted ATi to stop. The cycle continues, with one company dominating for a while, then the other.

Thankfully, no company listens to the fanboys of the opposition.

>>55794210
I did. Once.

>>55794245
Why can't we all just get along ;_;

https://www.amazon.fr/s/ref=sr_nr_i_0?fst=as%3Aoff&rh=k%3Agtx+1060%2Ci%3Aelectronics&keywords=gtx+1060&ie=UTF8&qid=1469694911

https://www.amazon.fr/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?__mk_fr_FR=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=rx+480&rh=n%3A13921051%2Ck%3Arx+480

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=sr_nr_i_0?fst=as%3Aoff&rh=k%3Agtx+1060%2Ci%3Acomputers&keywords=gtx+1060&ie=UTF8&qid=1469695014

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Dcomputers&field-keywords=rx+480&rh=n%3A340831031%2Ck%3Arx+480

https://www.amazon.ca/s/ref=nb_sb_noss/157-2665617-9467607?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=gtx+1060

https://www.amazon.ca/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=rx+480&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Arx+480

Prices seem to vary from country to country.

>>55794033
>>55794040
>10 rupees has been deposited in your account, Pajeet.

Your AMD bias is showing again. Are you going to claim you are archiving this from stupid posts by nvidiots in this thread too?

>>55793961
You can always spot the poorfaggot.

>>55794279
I have it copy/pasted. Feel free to copy/paste as well.

>>55794260
It's just like the special snowflakes with linux.

If all of that combined autism could focus on a single distro linux would have actually been relevant.

Same goes for AMD. They can't focus on a single solution. They don't have the resources to develop both CPU and GPU solutions, however their CPU market is much more relevant, so they should ideally drop or sell the GPU division.

However once again, die-hard autism like seen in this thread, causes them to stay around and be irrelevant in two fields instead of having a genuine chance on being actually competitive and relevant in a single field.

>>55794285
Nah. Biases makes it difficult sometimes to see the truth so I try to avoid being biased.

I'm so glad I have the tripfag filtered :)

>>55794155
I've redacted this statement. I didn't read tripfags posts correctly :/

>>55793874
>buying new cards
>new

File: 1376107787408.gif (259KB, 567x522px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 567x522px

Is it safe to say Vega is just around the corner? AMD can't let Nvidia get by for 2 generations can they?

>>55794384
>Is it safe to say Vega is just around the corner?
If by "just around the corner" you mean six months away, yes Vega is just around the corner.

>>55794384
Last I heard it was pushed to 2017, so not exactly "around the corner".

However, if it's anything like the Fury, which is a good possibility, it'll barely be on par with the 1080 and retail for 1.2x the price of it.

File: Shut it down.png (659KB, 1041x3977px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 1041x3977px

>>55794304
I keep seeing them referred to as irrelevant.
Please explain why we keep talking about it so often then. Couldn't be anything to do with Jewish tactics could it?

File: 1469690723990.jpg (695KB, 1551x753px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 1551x753px

>>55794410
>>55794393
I CAN'T WAIT ANYMORE. I HAVE TO REPLACE MY SHITTER 760, BUT I DON'T WANT THE 1080.

File: 1060vs480.png (667KB, 3882x2171px) Image search: [Google]

667KB, 3882x2171px

AMD is literally finished now.

Please just let them die peacefully so we can get an actual competitor in the GPU market because AMD is fucking retarded.

I bought an EVGA SSC 970 a few weeks before the 1060 announcement. Would it be worth the hassle of sending back in the card for the step up program and getting a 1060? It would be free assuming they're in stock.

Does anyone have any experience with Step Up?

>>55794424
>I DON'T WANT THE 1080.
Why not?

File: graphics-market-share.png (228KB, 2367x591px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 2367x591px

>>55794245
Look at AMD's market share.

It's been on a downward slope for a long long time now and it's reaching critically low levels.

It's really all over now, this is no joke.

>>55794439
>>55794439
yes

>>55794439
>Would it be worth the hassle of sending back in the card for the step up program and getting a 1060?
More performance, less power used, plus new tech? Not just yes but hell yes.

>>55794439
I've never done their step up myself, but I've heard good things and the process seems easy enough.

>>55794443
Too much money for a product that isn't future proof. I don't want to get DX12 gimped, and I don't want a product that won't be able to deliver 4K when it becomes more available.

What's the best video card to play chaotic fps games of some years ago on a 1080p screen with a stable and high framerate?

>>55794465
>Too much money for a product that isn't future proof.
What product is there on the market or in the foreseeable future is more "future proof?"

>>55794465
I'll bet you believe the 480 is more "future proof" than the 1070?

>>55794469
Vega for sure next year
Volta maybe

Dropping 200-250 dollars won't be that bad, especially when I can repackage the 1060/480 as a Christmas or birthday gift for my friend who is running a 770.

>>55794476
No, but I need a stop gap for my current card until the beefy cards come out. I don't see the 480 or the 1060 as cards that'll last more than 2 years tops depending on if you plan on moving on to 4K like I do.

>>55794465
Uhh the 1080 is actually a beast in DX12. There is literally nothing faster than it.

>>55794476
>Someone forgot about the 680 and the 7970

>>55794025
pajeet drew a card with his own shit on a sidewalk and said it needs 1tb of vram, everyone applauded.

amd fans will defend it when it comes out despite it's monstrous price tag and lackluster performance.

>>55794507
No, I did not forget how the 680 was not rebranded like the 7970 was for an extra two generations. I am quite clear on how Nvidia actually designed and manufactured new gpus.

>>55794190
those 14 dx12 games are split in terms of performance. dx12 isn't going to be widely adopted for years, get over it already.

Enjoy your continuing DPC Latency and frame stutter post driver fix Nvidiots.

http://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4tydge/dpc_latency_hotfix_driver_for_gtx_1060_1070_1080/

File: 731[1].jpg (54KB, 600x505px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x505px

>>55794515
>He thinks it's for gamers

>>55794516
Yes goyim, keep buying the newest architecture every year to use the latest gameworks tech.

>>55794612
>keep buying the newest architecture
Did you mislink? Nowhere in the post you linked to made any mention of "buying" anything. Either that or you are an idiot suffering from brand loyalty.

I might just wait for Deus Ex to come out, apparently it's super async heavy so will be biased towards AMD.

Plus it gives AMD a month to (paper) launch a 490 and their vega based Fury cards.

>>55794384

not until q1 2017, zen will be out around the same time as well.

According to wikipedo there are 13 games in development that support DX12 and over 40 using DX11 (probably with DX12/Vulkan patches later on). Next year I predict it will be half DX11 and half DX12. But will shall see. It took a number of years to transition from DX9 to DX11. This is the fastest cycle change over for DirectX ever. Yes 13 games may not sound like a lot right now. But like the old song goes. 'The times they are a changing'.

File: 7Tgb9pU.jpg (77KB, 499x750px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 499x750px

>>55794626
>deus ex come out
>its super async meme heavy
>somehow pascal cards are destroying amd aka "another major disappoint"
>pajeets screaming bloody murder in every thread on every website

>>55794657
The thing is the 1060 is still faster than the 480 in DX12.

So the more DX12 games will just make the 1060 even better.

>>55794623
Just like don't have to buy anything if you have a 7970 to use the newest API's But a 680....

>>55794677

it's an AMD sponsored game so AMD will likely win vs the 1060. 1070, 1080 and titan x will crush tho.

>>55794677
>pajeets screaming bloody murder in every thread on every website

That you can be sure of. These AMDtards get destroyed in every benchmark, so they have to spend all day making shit up on the internet to try to make AMD look good.

>>55794245
Fermi was a high end card and performed like one despite the thermal problems. AMD hasn't released anything to compete with 1080.

so how come GTX1060 is cheaper than RX480 in Europe ??

Got that shit for €269 - Gainward AIB version.

RX480 starts at 290€ wtf reference

>>55794686

depends on how hard AMD gimps. they turned hitman dx12 in a blurry mess for their cards and it boosted their numbers enormously.

>>55794703

480 has terrible yields and AIBs have been redesigning boards because of the out of spec power draw.

Enjoy your high DPC Latency and stutter Nvidiots. No the latest driver does not fix it.

File: 1464375737136.jpg (53KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 640x640px

>>55794759

no problems here with my GTX 970 :^)

>>55794774
It's a Pascal problem. Also screen flickering at the desktop.

>>55794759
>>55794791

I have zero flickering or stutter on my 1070

>>55794694
>Just like don't have to buy anything if you have a 7970 to use the newest API's
Thank you for making it clear you are an idiot suffering from brand loyalty.

>>55794774
970 LMFAO

>>55794694
I wonder if that might be because they kept rebranding the 7970 and making drivers for their current generation means making drivers for the 7970 as well. . . Hmmmm.

>>55794830
970 is one of the greatest GPUs of all time

>>55794439

No, that would be the most autistic "upgrade" I've ever heard of. You would be out of a graphics card for weeks just to get literal 5 fps gains.

If you're gonna step up, pay the extra money for a 1070. Assuming you paid full price for your 970, it would only be around ~$100.

When AMDs don't work as well in a game it is because Nvidia and Gameworks "gimps" AMD cards.

When Nvidia card's don't work as well in a game it is because AMD is "sponsors" or is "working closely with the developers."

>>55794901
>single 8-pin vs dual 6 pin
>actual 6gb vram
It's not that autistic. A side-grade, yes, but it's not completely without merit.

>>55793998
>germany
>rx 480 nitro: 319€
>palit gtx 1060: 279€

Top fucking kek amd. I really wanted to go with team red but this pricepoint and no high-range cards make me think they just gave up. I will wait some more but if nothing happens i will swallow the nvidiacock and buy gsync.

>>55794215
I'd say 90% of Windrones on /g/ use Windows 10

>>55795062
Source: My ass.

>>55794515
>Actually thinking its gonna be a mainstream card

>>55794871
>3.5gb
Keep on shilling

>>55795305
It's funny because the 3.5gb makes almost no difference. There's a good reason why the 970 is the #1 most popular card on Steam.

>>55794901
Being out a graphics card for a week should be no biggie. The 1060 also uses less power, puts off less heat and is quieter than the 970. It's a nice upgrade.

>>55794925

I mean the 1060 is definitely a better card than the 970, but there are people that would literally kill for the chance to pay $100 for a 1070 or $300 for a 1080 so why would you waste that chance just to get a little more VRAM?

File: 1469413482691.webm (1MB, 642x435px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 642x435px

>>55794515
>1TB of vram
Nvidiots, everyone.

>>55795352
It's not really a discount because he has to trade in the old card.

>>55795062
Not even close. I'd say it's closer to like 70% using xp/7/8 and like 29% on 10 with some random autists using 98.

>>55794985
>Implying Germany even matters.

>>55795352
>>55794901

Only asking because it'd be essentially free, I don't care about waiting a bit without a card. My monitor is 1080p and I have no plans to upgrade past that so a 1070 just feels like it'd be blowing money to me.

>>55794040
>>55794033
dis pasta es
top kek

>>55794054
>>55794060
>>55794279
GOD DAMNIT JUST GET THE JOKE
YOU FUCKING IDIOTS

>>55795399
There's nothing autistic about using 98.

>>55795505
FUCK YOU ONLY MY MUM GETS TO CALL ME IDIOT

>>55794453
#1: thats quarter by quarter sales
#2: does not include laptop
#3: does not include workstation
#4: does not include APU

>what are the actual numbers then
40% install base, 29% by sales in Q1 2016
with Pascal shortages, I expect sale percentage to jump

>>55795532
got any proof of your claims that isn't wccftech?

>>55794814
>>55794868
Its such a shame a company would support a card for more than 4 years huh?

>>55795548
JPR

that graph is sourced off MR btw, why would you trust Romanians with everything.

If you don't know the acronyms, you're not going to be able to view their reports anyways.

>>55795580
john peddie don't have anything saying amd have 40% market share or that they increased their quarterly share from 21% to 29% from q4 15 to q1 16. you're speaking out of your ass.

- cheaper
- freesync
- dx12 performance
- better long term support
- ideology of openness

File: laughing bill clinton.jpg (31KB, 560x420px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 560x420px

>>55795609
in their public report

File: tfw .jpg (73KB, 500x484px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x484px

>got excited by /g/ and jumped in for a 480
>1060 is released 2 weeks after and is better in anything for like $20 more
>my MB probably got damages from the week it took AMD to fix the PCIe problem

>>55795619
nope. still can't see anything confirming those numbers. most i can see is a 1% increase quarterly for amd.

everyone, discard this guys claims till he can provide actual proof.

>>55795617
>- better long term support
lol, AMD has a 2 years support for their cards now. Meanwhile a few month ago Nvidia released dx12 ready drivers for my 460GTX.

>>55795399
Autism level 100%

File: amd_lead.png (51KB, 522x683px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 522x683px

>>55795655
There is this thing that people noticed where AMD cards age better
adoredTV did some video on it, cant find it just by title on his youtube channel

anyway, just check how gtx780 and gtx780ti sits compared to r9 290 cards... at the time it was reviews and now in current benches...

File: 1469311822999.png (498KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 1920x1080px

>>55795726
a graph with no source, games tested or hardware setup showing random percentages is really believable. my picture basically confirms that amd are only showing gains when paired with a top i7 every few years which helps alleviate the driver overhead.

File: 1461015097339.jpg (559KB, 1100x1002px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1100x1002px

>>55794033
>>55794040

File: purple_haired_slut.gif (2MB, 1294x1338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1294x1338px

>>55795726
>no source graph
>no mention of cpus used
also
>adoredTV
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>55795415
>one of the world's biggest economy doesn't matter.

Uhm... yeah.

>>55795415
It's the same across Europe, smartass.
inb4 >Implying Europoors even matter.

>>55793874
how can you people be fans of a company that does not give a shit about you? are you so lonely and desperate?

be it intel/amd/nvidia

File: 1467921377412.png (24KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 240x240px

>>55795877
>Yukari
>slut

>>55795910
Just recognizing their objective superiority, bro. I'm not looking for anyone's approval.

RX 460

>>55795578
It's a shame that a company has little choice but to re-use the same product when they cannot make something new. Being stuck at 28nm really showed how much AMD banks on a new node.

>>55795922
fair enough

>>55795776
>i5 760 isn't over clocked

so what's the difference between a cuda core and a stream processor? if nvidia have more efficient cuda cores then does that mean if amd and nvidia build a gpu with the exact same amount of cores, will that translate to nvidia cards gaining a lot more than amd cards under dx12 when all cores at at 100% utilisation?

File: weeboo.jpg (55KB, 630x298px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 630x298px

>>55795776
>>55795877
I am not here to feed
its true, just go check techpowerup reviews
takes 1 minute to google review for gtx780 and then see how it stands in any recent review

and weeaboo retard should really kill himself

File: jew2_3463462.jpg (42KB, 491x491px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 491x491px

>blatant lies
you shills are getting obvious

>>55794233
>calling nvidia pajeet when amd is led by one

You are not an edgelord, you area full on autist amd fanfag

File: lolsuika.png (322KB, 729x717px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 729x717px

>>55796195
>mentions adoredtv
>has the gall to call someone a retard

>>55794040
I agree with this anonymous poster and that's why I'll be buying a nVidia card for my wife's son.

>>55794515
^See this, if you compare AMDrones to Nvidiots you will see AMDrones have a better technical knowledge of things. Their are some really stop AMD guys but not as much as the Nvidiots.

>>55796318
nigga what? every amd fanboy i've ever seen is some next level retard, especially the ones who get top comments in nvidia reviews on youtube and the fact all those hundreds of other amd fanboys are upvoting them stresses my point even more. i read some retarded comment the other day saying that amd wins in dx12 because dx12 increases amd ipc.

>>55794052
Why is that 1080 gaming x number so terrible?

>>55794453
>over a year ago
Its back up to 30% retard

File: cringgg.jpg (205KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1280x720px

>>55796251
post single thing that scottish cunt said/did unequivocally wrong you weeaboo loser

>>55795655
>fermi
>DX12
wew lad not even pascal supports the full feature set of DX12

>>55796587
source?

File: whore2.png (51KB, 222x148px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 222x148px

>>55796629
His videos are pure speculations and wishful thinking 90% of the time. Kill yourself cumguzzling cockmongering faggot.

File: weaabo.jpg (123KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 900x675px

>>55796664
Actually they are not.
It seems your comments are wishful thinking and speculations.

and everybody in your family hates you, you weeaboo kike

>>55796685
>defending adoredtv
spotted the retarded amdrone

>>55796723
well I am all ready here to see some proof of why he is a fuckup like you

>>55796664
this. the everything the guy has ever speculated has been wrong

>polaris will beat maxwell in terms of efficiency
>polaris will be multi gpu
>devs will stop optimizing for nvidia even if they're paid

etc. he's just some assblasted amdrone who's fans think hes totally unbiased even though he makes amd "master plan" videos and does exclusive interviews with amd employees.

>>55796663
Look for it yourself you lazy nigger

>>55796751
he never ever said anything of that sort

>>55794033
Fucking hell pajeet who got your panties in a bunch

>>55794733
>480 has terrible yields
[citation needed]

B-but muh Vulkan and dx12!

>>55797095
and freesync

>>55797119
>Doesn't work in window mode
Why bother?

>>55796916
are you stupid? that's all he went on about in his master plan videos. the multi gpu polaris dx12 stuff anyway. the retard even said the next consoles will be multi gpu and got blown the fuck out when sony and ms both confirmed their new consoles to be single gpu.

>>55797134
>Doesn't work in window mode
Who cares?

>>55795946
how long did nvidia use the same node? oh? what's that? just as long?
what a fucking tool

>>55797136
nigger go find a video, link to the timepoint where he says
>polaris will beat maxwell in terms of efficiency

since you lead with that and its absolutely ridiculous accusation.

But feel free to find him saying anything you claim up there

>>55794516
7970 was only rebranded once just like the 680. Your confusion is probably caused by the 380 being a rebrand of the 285 and sharing similar performance to the 7970/280x.

>>55794733
Polaris actually has good yeilds, that's why the price for them isnt going above msrp, while pascal has shit yeilds and has to compensate for that my raising the cards above msrp

File: Noise.jpg (88KB, 643x526px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 643x526px

With the 480 you can at least hear it running.

>>55794516
>>55797160
someone actually said taht 680 was not rebranded?
Anyone ever heard of gtx770?

http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-launches-the-geforce-gtx-770-a-rebranded-gtx-680/33153.html

>>55797156
you're the fanboy, you watch his videos and find it. i aint gonna waste time listening to that drivel for hours.

I'll never buy a nvidia card. Even if Radeon would cost more with the same performance, I'll go for it.

File: e4wjY1D.gif (2MB, 475x324px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 475x324px

>>55797189
I watched his videos
well like 4 of his videos
he is no nvidia fanboy, but he seems level headed and have always reasoning and facts and explains his shit well

if you gonna claim that he is saying that moon landing did not happen I am not going to hunt for it... burden of proof is on you

now go be told loser somewhere else

>>55796318
You're both equally retarded. Only voodoo fans are tech literate.

>>55793874

1060 has no sli support

>>55796251
>tfw jayztwocents and linus are objectively the best hardware youtubers out there

>>55797293
thank god
maybe people stop being retarded
I really wish smaller form factors would take over the market
we dont fucking need ATX cases and mobos as standards
and these stupid first time building fucks always thing that they will be doing sli/cfx in a year or two, and get double the performance for $70 or some shit like that..

Well no one really does it in the end.

>>55797217
this is how crazy fanboys are everyone. fanboys from both sides are fucking retards but i assume you're an amd fanboy and your level of fanboyism and stupidity takes the cake.

>>55797141
>damage control

>>55797331
nvidia can really go suck a dick with
- physx
- cuda
- gameworks

just for that they're not getting my money

>>55797388
Who exactly is suppose to care that freesync is not in windowed mode?

>>55793874
I rate this post 6/10

>>55794703
How is gainward compared to evga?

>>55797392
- physx
who cares

- cuda
is brilliant. helps a lot in premiere pro.

- gameworks
i can't tell if you're retarded or just trolling with this one. the fact that this exists and is implemented in all the biggest games out right now is exactly the reason i'd buy nvidia. fuck buying amd and then getting crippled by 20 fps.

>>55794052
so what you're saying is the overclocked 480 nitro ($300+) loses to base clock gtx1060 even in muh dx12?

>>55797331
>>55797392
>fanboys
AMDrones put all the blame on nvidia and nvidia shills. Let me tell you all a story. One time i was like fuck apple so I never learned their bullshit OS/hated their products, because their ideologies were garbage overpriced crap, etc. Later i got a job and because I pigeon holed myself. Have you ever thought that maybe there's nothing wrong with having something to hide? I'm a very moral person, and if anything using an ad blocker makes me feel better.
The question comes down to whether you think it is possible to enjoy something someone else created without them receiving any compensation for it. Some have no problem justifying this, others don't, and still others are too stupid to realize that it's a moral problem at all. Destroying natural habitat to grow massive amounts of a less than ideal food source is raping the land.
I believe in both supporting and contributing to pirate culture.
It's a moral thing for me, most of Hollywood and the music industry is dominated by liberals.
While feminists tend to complain that women are being held down by the patriarchy and aren't as successful because of prejudices, misogyny, etc,

So to summarize:
>well we've all decided that killing people for no reason is totally accepted norm now get with the times
>well we've all decided to become degenerate rapists
>it's OK because our new culture we made up says so
That leaves us with the law. And as a matter of law, there are no possible justifications of piracy. You can't argue that it is morally unjustifiable at all, there are no arguments you can make against piracy on a moral level because fairness trumps greed.

buy 2 amd cards and you still save $200 from not having to buy a shitty ass gsync monitor

>>55794052
You got any info on what's going on with the undervolted-but-also-overclocked, performance increases for the 480?

From what I've read you ought to want as low a voltage as possible for whatever your overclock is.

>>55794033
Very good work Pajeet, this deserves a large bonus, $0.21 has been transfered to your paypal.

>>55797459
>fairness trumps greed
Like, I know how people are supporting The Donald and all, but can you take it to /pol/?

>>55797331
People like you are killing video game industry. Clearly gameworks is cancer and nobody should ever support it.

>>55797506

epic bro

fight the power. keep buying amd to show nvidia who's boss!!

>>55797504
Just take BSD for example. It is, but it can also get freely stolen by companies to repackage it into their own proprietary solutions and sold, without giving a dime back to the FreeBSD guys. And, this does make a big difference. How is it called? I can't seem to find it... But greed seems to be the name. I'm a very moral person, if they take 'Open source' software, and then make it proprietary, refusing to release the code, they have stolen other peoples freedom.

>>55797506
so i'm killing the industry because i don't want to overpay for the same level of performance?

neck yourself buddy. i'm not some lowlife like you who values his life based on amd's success in the market and would shill for them for free on a korean knitting board. money saved is money saved.

>>55797561
I agree with you! This end-to-end encryption move by Apple can only play into the hands of terrorists and pedophiles!

>>55797577
damn, I have not seen falcon since like forever
do tell, does the increment guide site still works? How much do you clear $ on it after paying hosting and shit?

>>55794476
Yeah, it absolutely is

5% performance difference between the 480 and 1060 in dx11 - and that'll evaporate with driver updates

And 10-20% better performance in vulkan/dx12

Hell yes the 480's a better choice; you'd have to be fucking retarded to buy a pascal card - even a 1070/80. Nvidia even moved their next gen timetable forward because they need to get it out ASAP to compete with AMD's async capabilities.

Anyone buying a 10xx series card right now is getting scammed.

>>55797575
> i don't want to overpay for the same level of performance?
But you are overpaying. And you want to be fucked in the ass you fucking sissy.

>>55794703
>so how come GTX1060 is cheaper than RX480 in Europe ??

Production isn't in Europe

Stock takes time to get there - I'd guess nvidia's either got better supply logistics, and/or AMD's stock is mostly through expensive transit rather than shipping/rail.

>>55797595
Still works. I make enough that I can buy games on Steam when they are discounted and give them away, but not enough that I can buy full-price games and give those away.

Speaking of which, if anyone wants free games, prepare your Steam URL. Unfortunately, I only have medium-quality games right now, so no hype.

File: Untitled.png (136KB, 524x522px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 524x522px

>>55797633
First person to post their Steam URL as a reply to this post gets any game from this list.

File: nvidifags only weakness.png (11KB, 1012x408px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 1012x408px

>Is there any reason to even bother with AMD cards ever again?

>>55795322
It makes little difference right now, and it helped the card stay cheap. But it also means these people are fucked in the ass over the next year or two and will need to upgrade.

And guess who's going to have cards async-ready with top performance in new vulkan/dx12 games over these years at an affordable price?

I'll give you a hint: Not Nvidia

>>55797575
You won't be paying now, but you will be every 2 years.

>>55797650
steamcommunity.com/id/kazblox

File: rottr_1920_1080.png (30KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x650px

>>55797596
more like 12%+

>And 10-20% better performance in vulkan/dx12
>in 1 game with a top of the range i7
see >>55795776

Hell yes the 1060's a better choice; you'd have to be fucking retarded to buy a polaris card. Anyone buying a 4xx series card right now is getting scammed, it's more expensive and performs significantly worse than its nearest competitor, even in relevant dx12 games.

:^)

>>55797650
http://steamcommunity.com/id/mixed007

Papers, Please

>>55795655
>Nvidia released dx12 ready drivers for my 460GTX.

literally just blatantly lying holy fuck is this what nvidiots have been reduced to

>>55797650

I already own all those games.

>>55797458
RotTR is not really a valid DX12 bench seeing how it sees a performance REGRESSION on both AMD and Nvidia when moving from DX11 to 12.

Even in DX11 games the difference isn't all that big for the 1060 and going forward we're going to see more and more good DX12 implementations like Hitman, AotS and Total War: Warhammer.

>>55797650
ayy falconman at it again
just letting you know you're a pretty decent human being

>>55797685
What game?

>>55797687
If the other guy does not want Papers, Please, you can have it.

>>55797685
>>55797702
Original poster here
Papers Please

>>55797686
>Using RotTR as a DX12 bench
>When it runs SLOWER in DX12 mode than DX11 mode

>>55797685
>Currently Offline
>Last Online 76 days ago
I will wait for a short while for ya.

>>55797694
Sorry. Popular games that go on sale very often are not very good to giveaway.

>>55795776

What I see here is if I have an i5 to not bother with the 480.

>>55797719

Yeah, Supreme Commander was the only one that I found fun for over 100 hours, but then the community died.

>>55797708
Friend request sent.

>>55797725
then you'd be retarded

>>55797719
>>55797732

We'll actually, XCOM was great but I played too much out of it.

>>55797735
accepted

>>55797711
Nvidiots love to use that game because its the only """DX12""" game that runs better on nvidia (due to the excessive use of gaymeworks)

>>55797711
are you stupid? ever since the new patch came out most cards get a nice gain in dx12 mode. hell, most amd cards gain more than nvidia cards in dx12 mode but are still behind in general performance.

>>55797739
Why? I don't have an i7 I have an i5.

The Forbes review is the only one I've seen that focuses on this fact.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2016/07/19/crunching-the-numbers-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-versus-amd-radeon-rx-480/#2262ea8e4166

>>55797725
just avoid amd all together with that i5 desu

http://pclab.pl/art60000-21.html

File: 1458108477931.jpg (35KB, 600x549px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x549px

>both gtx 1060 and the rx 480 cost around 400€ in my country
fucking kill me already reeee

>>55797784
Still a shit example of DX12
aots is a better example due to its use of async and CPU core scaling up to 8 cores, games like aots are the future and should be looked to as an example of that DX12 is capable of

File: the guy.png (272KB, 974x585px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 974x585px

He's THE GUY!

File: Untitled.png (133KB, 524x522px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 524x522px

First person to post their Steam URL as a reply to this post gets any game from this list.

File: overheadisameme.jpg (135KB, 570x1057px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 570x1057px

>>55797795
Nice meme faggot, time to go back to /v/ now newfag
>>>/v/

>>55797825

id/jaxteller

shadowrun dragonfall

>>55797842
Friend request sent.

>>55794431
Lol AMD stock tripled in the past couple weeks you fuck

>>55797825
ive got some spare games none of my friends want, want to give em away?

>>55797807
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xuea5nt4TnY

no it's not and this video explains why. amd's gains aren't from async as much as people think. way more due to the gcn optimization of titles such as hitman or ashes. this video goes into everything especially the driver overhead amd fanboys keep denying.

>>55796629
>that picture
I know people can be autistic but that man should burn in fucking hell.

>>55795776
>>55797789
Everything above, or the 2500k itself are fine to pair with a 480.
Dude the I5 750 is seven years old and not overclocked, it actually btfos the gaymurs who say you need the latest I7 to gaym.

File: gift.png (218KB, 1023x663px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1023x663px

>>55797850

thank you.

File: Untitled.png (130KB, 524x522px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 524x522px

>>55797859
Nah, I am good thanks!

First person to post their Steam URL as a reply to this post gets any game from this list.

>>55797789
It's a CPU architecture generation comparison. i7 950 may perform just as shit with 480 as i5 750, but i5 6600k will perform as good as 6700k

File: 390 (2).png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>55797831
>let me post some graph nobody can read and use it as my proof!

off yourself.

>>55797878
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198003172479

Sleeping Dogs

Please

>>55797900
Friend request sent.

>>55797886
>being so stupid he cant understand cyrillic
wew lad

no.not a big gpu fanboy ut nah. just go with nvidia

File: 951dbbbe8680e33e7039697715c95fb1.png (85KB, 663x350px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 663x350px

ayy

>>55797937
>not a big gpu fanboy
>just go with nvidia\
shill spotted

File: Untitled.png (127KB, 524x522px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 524x522px

Last one for tonight. Post Steam URL, get game from list.

>>55797970

Http://steamcommunity.com/id/boezombi
State of Decay

>>55797970
http://steamcommunity.com/id/sdaasddsaadsdsa
xcom

File: hitman[1].jpg (33KB, 675x431px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 675x431px

>>55797884
That's a very weird benchmark to use then.

I have a 4690k

Thing here is with the i5 it seems there's little difference.

At this point it may come down to other things like manufacturer preference.

>>55797970
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198294669492/

Recettear

File: gtav.jpg (33KB, 757x461px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 757x461px

>>55797988
dude, in the most cpu intensive dx11 game in that review the 1060 was ahead by like 15 fps

>>55797976
>>55797978
>>55798003
Better luck next time, folks.

>>55797988
The benchmark uses a 7 year old i5 because some nvidia shills wanted to "prove" how shitty AMD is in the most contrived way possible.

File: sryforbeingakrautfag.png (95KB, 1558x228px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1558x228px

>>55797970
Sweet

>>55797988
>That's a very weird benchmark to use then.
It's for helping people with old CPUs, so they can decide whether upgrading only their GPU worth it.

>>55798062
>>55797961
>>55797875
>>55797817
>>55797794
Have fun!

>>55798026
I used the DX 12 centric ones as future viability since all the fuss is about boosts from that.

I know DX 11 wise it would certainly be a 1060, but I also wanted to see that a 1060 wouldn't be entirely fucked over by a large margin on my setup.

>>55798070
Ah, a bit like when I had C2D and got a 750 ti but wasn't sure how it would run.

>>55793874

480 is a bit cheaper so that justifies the lower performance a bit.

>>55798106
the point of the benchmarks aren't to compare the 480 vs the 1060. it's to see how well the 480 works with older or less capable cpu when running dx12 and it's quite evident that with a top end 6700k it gains a massive boost due to the i7 being able to feed all those ACE's but expect the 480 paired with a lower i5 or an older gen i5 like a 4690k to not gain as much as with the 6700k.

>>55798157
I'm about to buy a MSI R9 390, how fucked am I?

>>55798299
Just reserve a 480 nitro, its more powerful and usualy cheaper

>>55798317
>480
>more powerful than a 390

no. the 390 gains more than the 480 in dx12.

So I'm building a computer soon, because it's an 8 year old computer. Would it be wise for me to just buy a 480 nitro for now while I buy the more expensive quality items such as a PSU, MOBO, CPU and wait for the more powerful gpus of AMD?

>>55798330
the 480 will get better with matured drivers like the 290/390 did

>>55797445
>>55794703
gainward is cheapest utter shit, when it comes to reliability, but if you are planning to upgrade on next generation, it prolly wont matter.

Maybe for the US market but nvidia's 1060 costs about 120 dollars more and that difference in performance ain't worth 120$$$

>>55794703
It isn't cheaper in the vast majority of the countries in Europe

>>55797686
amd need high end cpu than nvidia much this have been comfirmed time and time again.
Whenever shitty i3 cpus are using nvidia literally blow AMD the fuck out of the house its not even funny. Thats why these benchmarks are so funny, while in benchmarks 1060 is ~10% faster than 480, in Real world scenarios its more like 20-25%.

>>55796894
Actually it is still going down, with more people getting the 970s.

>>55798485
I bought a 1080 and put my 970 up for sale, it went straight away. Bought for £199, used it then sold for £150. Wish I could do that with every gpu!!

>>55798485
>still going down
wew lad amd marketshare is back to 30% stop being butthurt fanfag

>>55798456
this is a blatant lie. nearly every eurobro i've spoken to on here or on other forums say the 1060 is cheaper in their country or it's cheaper from where they import from.

>>55798528
where's this proof? if you can't provide it then i'll just assume it's a lie.

File: 1376000533888.jpg (50KB, 544x517px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 544x517px

>wait forever for Nitro RX 480
>it's out
>costs more than the 1060
>two versions
>one is gimped and has no freesync
>better version nowhere to be found yet
>probably going to cost even more
I don't even have a reaction pic that describes my mix of disappointment and frustration over this. I hope someone at Sapphire loses their careers over a fuckup this bad and I'm going to send them emails every fucking day making sure they know in no uncertain terms why they're never going to see a penny out of me.

>>55798547
Not him, but my souce for AMD going down is the steam hardware survey.

>no 480s available
>Only one 1060 available

I love this launch season.

>>55798600
That's a small subsection of the total amount of hardware AMD sells.

Will a 480 be able to play Mount & Blade Bannerlord smoothly on max settings at 1440p ?

>>55798605
So they aren't usually like this? Seriously, the RX 480 reference came out a month ago and none are available to purchase

>>55794417

>A business
>Withholding Ad revenue from people who use competitor products
>Prioritizing business partners during CPU shortages
>Paid partners to not use competitor's products

Bruh, it's just business.

>>55798485
>>55798547
Vendor Discrete GPU Share Q4 2015 Discrete GPU Share Q1 2016
AMD 26.2% 29.4% (+3.2)
Nvidia 73.8% 70.6%

Source: wccftech.com/amd-takes-gpu-share-nvidia-q1-2016/

>inb4 curryshit
they are just reposting something from some other site

Now fuck off back yo where you belong stupid shill.
>>>/v/

>>55798641
Well if you want to include gaming consoles then we also get to include Amazon EC2 G2 instances.

NVIDIA still growing.

>>55798690
Their source is a joke, have you see their site? Looks like they put it up so they could just make up BS.

>>55798690
>desktop gpu share
>22%

wew amd really are going down

>>55798665
Only time it was worse was when buttcoin mining was popular. GPUs weren't available for around 3 months.

>>55798721

In desktops yeah, but they have a fucking deathgrip on mobile and consoles.

I honestly wouldn't really care if they got out of the desktop game entirely actually. I feel like I built my computer at the perfect time and now I really don't care (though I feel bad for anyone needing to build one from here on out). AMD would be just fine as a mobile company.

>>55798690
Oh lulz, they can't even quote their source correctly.

Total Market Share: 15Q4 12.4%, 16Q1 11.8%
http://www.mercuryresearch.com/graphics-pr-2016-q2.pdf

>>55798721
Look at the full marketshare moron

>>55798720
>>55798699
Literal denial of facts and proof

>>55794178
>AMD hasn't released a competitive product in a good while
Lolwut. 6 months ago, the most popular tier of card was the 970/390 tier. And the 390 beats the 970 in like 7/10 games.

>>55798779
What facts? The BS they made up?

See >>55798772
where I actually linked the report they "cited"

>>55798759
>In desktops yeah, but they have a fucking deathgrip on mobile and consoles.

what? i haven't even heard of any phone or tablet using amd chips. also nvidia have the nx now which could potentially be as successful as the original wii which sold like 30 million more than both the ps3 and 360 even though it had peasant tier graphics.

>>55798772
>total market share
you meant the thing that has intel at 75%
retard shill

>>55798661
Bannerlord isn't coming out.

>>55798772
>http://www.mercuryresearch.com/graphics-pr-2016-q2.pdf

>amd only has 20% of the discrete gpu market

KEK

>>55798779
>im just a poor boy nobody loves me

HE'S JUST A POOR BOY FROM A POOR FAMILY

>>55798829
look at total marketshar /v/ spillage

>>55798799
>its made up because i disagree with it

>>55798843
The reports says 20.3% discrete market share, no change from 15Q4 to 16Q1.

THIS IS THE SOURCE THEY CITE. Their site says they went from 26.2% to 29.4%. THESE NUMBERS ARE NOT IN THE REPORT.

So yes, made up.

>>55798834
quality post panjeet

>>55798859
>discrete
look at total you fucking mong

>>55798874
See >>55798772 it fell .6% or just read the fucking report.

>>55798803
>also nvidia have the nx now which could potentially be as successful as the original wii

Right, but for the time being AMD has that market share, so we'll have to wait and see.

>>55798874
>discrete

why are you telling people to ignore discrete when you originally posted >>55798690 with fake discrete market share?

>l-look at muh amd discrete market share
>d-don't look at the discrete market share

File: thumbs up.jpg (12KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 225x225px

>>55794033
>>55794040

Well done tripfag. I kek'd.

>>55798882
"AMD is pleased to announce that in a quarter where overall graphics unit volumes declined by 10.2% sequentially, AMD gained discrete GPU market share (29.4%, +3.2 share points q-to-q) according Mercury Research’s Q1 2016 GPU Market Report. Factors in this surge include the strength of our latest Radeon™ R9 Series GPUs as well as our revitalized driver development strategy, helping AMD gain 1.8 share points in desktop discrete graphics (22.7%, +1.8 share points q-to-q) and a massive 7.3 share point jump in notebook discrete, moving to 38.7% share of this important market."

Total discrete is what matters and total discrete is about 30% for amd, stop being a shill panjeet and go back to /v/, reading charts and analytics isn't for you

>>>/v/

>>55798923
I meant total because it includes intel and fucks up the results, total DISCRETE has 30% for amd

>>55798807
Shut the fuck up. Bannerlord will be out early next year

>>55798933
Q1 report, http://www.mercuryresearch.com/graphics-pr-2016-q1.pdf again that info that you posted IS NOT IN THERE.

>>55798946
20%

File: ds.png (26KB, 487x147px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 487x147px

>>55798933
>>55798946
are you pretending to be retarded? nowhere does it say amd have 30% market share in anything.

>>55798988
average desktop and mobile retard, that is even if you know how to do mat panjeet

>>55797970
http://steamcommunity.com/id/leviarkwright/
Can I have Valkyria?

File: teamgreen.jpg (240KB, 1920x1281px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1920x1281px

Haha, all these poorfags. They will never played the way it's meant to be played™ like I do. I have just purchased my NVIDIA Geforce® 1060: Planned Obsolescence Edition and absolutely love it! With features such as ShadowPlay, found only in NVIDIA GeForce Experience™, I can easily record my gameplay footage and upload it straight to Youtube for others to enjoy! I will only be buying NVIDIA from now on as they offer the best gaming experience to date. Copy and paste the link below and buy yours today!*

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1060

*Terms and conditions apply. Listed prices may vary.

>>55799012
>>55798988
>>55799004
AVERAGE THE MOBILE AND DESKTOP DISCRETE YOU DUMB PANJEETS

>>55799029
It doesn't work like that.

Say you have an average of 1,000,000 where 1 is 20% and 1 is 80%. Then you have an average of 100 where 1 is 35% and one is 65%.

Total % will not be 30 and 70.

>>55799029
sorry m8 but you fucked up.

>>55799016
Apparently you can't do math either because that's not how it works.

>>55798528
where are you getting these numbers from?

http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/197681/umfrage/marktanteile-am-absatz-von-grafikkarten-weltweit-seit-dem-3-quartal-2010/

>>55799060
>>55799062
>panjeets that cant into math
wew lad back to the loo with you

>>55798580
>better version nowhere to be found yet
try moving out of your shithole that you call country

>>55794093
nope, single solutions allow for better optimization for game devs

>>55794177
what? It's actually $50 more expensive

>>55794465
DX12 will only be widespread (or vulkan) in the same amount of time it took you to upgrade from a 760

File: Cant-tell-if-trolling-or-just-very-stupid.jpg (65KB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 360x270px

>>55799174

File: R&D Ausgaben AMD vs. Nvidia.png (38KB, 477x244px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 477x244px

ill just leave this here

when the fuck will 480 custom cards be available? and I mean not out of stock for a month, available for everyone

>>55799233
it honestly shows, 480 is a power/heathog this generation
but falcon still lists it

>>55794177
>>55799204
>lying on the internet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apQj1dP4gBM

>>55799266
October

>>55799285
>Shilling on the internet

>>55799282
>480 is a power/heathog
>150watts
>powerhog
wew lad spotted the nvidia shill

>>55799282
>>55799233
>it honestly shows
kek
you know that pascal is just rebrand of previous gen
smaller litography allows upping the Mhz
clock for clock 1000 series is identical to 900

so really do tell us about R&D showing
nvidia probably lists there development of gameworks shit as well

>>55799285
here
https://www.pccasegear.com/category/193_1838/graphics-cards/geforce-gtx-1060

https://www.pccasegear.com/category/193_1837/graphics-cards/radeon-rx-480

asus 480 - $449 (sold out kek)
asus 1060 - $499 (aftermarket cooler as well)

actually you would be stupid to buy AMD in aus since it looks like all of them are reference

>>55799282
you mean logical increments? the pricing is all fucked up on the uk site. it doesn't even match the amazon prices it links to.

>>55799309
read the whole sentence
>480 is a power/heathog this generation
so that means when you compare it to this generation (1060), it is a power/heathog

>>55799336
>20 watts more
>powerhog
why are you grasping at straws panjeet

>>55799369
$0.03 have been deposited into your account!

>>55799388
>projecting

>>55799403
keep reddit posting