Would you get this next year? What could potentially go wrong?
>>55792209
> What could potentially go wrong?
They could again deliver a shit OS with piss poor multitasking support and other huge deficits, on an overpriced device.
And by multitasking I mean the old multitasking that was advertised for Win95 already. The goddamn ability to run arbitrary software in parallel with the OS scheduling them in a fashion that everything werks.
>>55792269
Stop posting this shit, it's been disproven dumbcunt
>>55792681
I don't get it, how do you "disprove" facts?
>>55792209
No, because I'm not an ant.
>>55792681
how so?
I actually wanted like 15 seconds for the image to load on my phone.