Why do people parrot the 'ubuntu is bloated' meme?

>1068 packages

>>55771626
Storage space is no longer a concern with how cheap drives are

>>55771699
If you are OP, then I don't think you understand what bloated means.

Ubuntu is the most bloated Linux distro out there.

>>55771737
Sure, if you use the default installer and keep unity/Amazon. The minimal installer gives you reliability and just as low RAM usage as, say, arch. It's the best of both worlds if a few GB of storage space is nothing to you

>>55771600
Just install Antergos you retarded piece of shit

File: OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.jpg (100KB, 306x288px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 306x288px

>>55771626
try the fedora packages
still better than ubuntu though

>>55771699
>i have more space and ram so sloppiness is OK lol 100
fuck off you cancer

>>55771792
>the i can't read or type spinoff

fuck right off kiddo

>>55771600
Repo. For example if you want to install screenfetch, ubuntu will fetch scrot for you. Thus ubuntu gets bloated upon package installation over the time

>>55771737
No it isn't.desu debian and fedora is more.plus you can do minimal install etc. anyway. most packages are there for a reason.it's like bitching about a windows registry

>>55771969
>dpkg -l | wc -l
>2889
nothing bad happened though and I have all the software I need

>>55771626
>188MiB

File: linuxvoid.png (16KB, 739x421px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 739x421px

>1068 packages
>not bloated

>>55771791
>The minimal installer
at which point you might as well just man the fuck up and use debian or centos.