Is there a need to install any other add-ons?

File: add-ons.jpg (35KB, 712x202px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 712x202px

>>55766957
Here's mine.

>>55766957
Replace ublock with ABP and it's perfect.

>>55766957
I use privacy badger instead of noscript.

>>55767123
Why?

You know you need to config NS and add additional filter subscriptions to ABP.

>>55767123
lol no

many sites counter ABP by blocking you back or bypassing it
UB is newer and ive not seen it countered yet.

>>55766957
>No random user agent

what's the extension on the bottom right?

Use the new logo for https everywhere

yes
>canvas fingerprint blocker
>scriptsafe (for google chrome)
>user-agent switcher
hide my ass web proxy is good to have also

NoScript is shit. Replace with uMatrix. HTTPS Everywhere is a meme and completely useless. I wish gorshill would make another awesome add-on so we could have the holy trinity of gorshill.

>>55767396
Please explain why noscript and https are bad

File: .png (7KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1000x1000px

>>55766957
actual truth (also potentially replace https everywhere with greasemonkey)

>>55767406
because only retardeds hates JS.

File: 2000HoursInMSPaint.png (35KB, 513x526px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 513x526px

>>55767329
HTTPS Everywhere

>>55767345
There you go

>>55766957
noscript is deprecated, use umatrix from now on.

ublock has been shit for me

as soon as I leave tab and come back the ads are there

>>55767471
Hello ABP shill spreading lies about ublock and ublock origin.

File: .png (22KB, 513x526px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 513x526px

>>55767430

File: 2000px-Standaard_Nederlandsche_SS.svg[1].png (73KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 2000x1333px

>>55767510

>>55766957
Coincidence detector. You absolutely need that.

>>55767123
>Replace ublock with ABP and it's perfect.

discounting the fact that adblock edge was the hardass fork that didn't want any of that bribe to get put on acceptable ads list and discontinued itself as soon as ublock was getting its final polishes

not to mention the 1~ seconds longer startup time which was directly measurable by people in about:healthreport after switching addons

>>55767199
>You know you need to config NS

whitelist mode ??? works fine after a few painful hours

>>55767294
>many sites counter ABP by blocking you back or bypassing it

they block through a bit of javascript to display or redirect to the block message, there's nothing inherent in ublock that prevents this than slightly more up to date anti-blocking lists (that adp may have a problem accepting or maintaining considering they take bribes to put ads on acceptable ads list)

with the same user configured and updated lists they'll for the most part be functionally identical

>>55767406
>Please explain why noscript

some memes about umatrix being made by gorshill ergo must be better

either way if you're a complete fuckstick like >>55767424 over here you should still be using noscript because it tends to have some of the better xss protection you'll find, better than chromes in some cases (especially if you're using firefox)

>>55767669
>adblock edge was the hardass fork that didn't want any of that bribe to get put on acceptable ads list
All edge did was hide the checkbox. Such an amazing fork, can't believe they discontinued.

Ggblocker, blocks anti gamergate websites like kotaku and the verge

>>55767580
THIS
/Thread

>>55766957
Yes, those are the three essentials, but there are some more that are complementary:
uMatrix (more fine-tuned sidegrade to NoScript)
AdNauseam (basically if uBlockO declared open warfare on ads)
Clean Links
InlineDisposition Reloaded
Decentraleyes
No Resource URI Leak (New!)
Secret Agent

Of course, using all these will make your browser more identifiable unless you take extra care to mitigate that so the trinity might be the best choice especially if one is using TBB.

>>55766957

>MVPS hosts
>Firefox
>>uBlock Origin
>>uMatrix

>>55769065
>AdNauseam
are you retarded?

>>55769756
What's wrong with AdNauseum? It's from the same people that made TrackMeNot and has all the functionality of uBlock Origin. If it doesn't slow your browser down enough to notice, I don't see a con for not using it.

How to use umatrix?

I honest to goodness can't understand how anyone can live without tree style tabs. How many tabs do you guys have open on your computer? Doesn't it get annoying having to scroll horizontally over the fat chunk they take up and searching for the one you want?

File: one-extension-to-rule-them-all.png (47KB, 524x526px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 524x526px

You tell me, OP. Still seems kinda bloaty to me.

>>55766957
uMatrix instead of noscript, other than that it's good.

>>55770901
Doesn't replace https everywhere though.

File: Screenshot from 2016-07-27 01-06-09.png (23KB, 547x197px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 547x197px

>>55771277
huh

Ha, these are the 3 I install when I use the public computers at my university's library.

>>55770815
I don't keep enough open at once that I need to scroll horizontally. If I do its because I opened a bunch for some task I have in progress, and I close them as I deal with them.

organize your shit, baka. if you wanna save more shit than you can fit for later, bookmark it.

>>55770815
Does tree style tabs work with e10s? I can't use Firefox without e10s any more.

>>55771306
are you dumb?

>>55766957
>no random agent spoofer
shit list OP

>captcha: tard opus=

>HTTPSEverywhere
>Privacy Badger
>UblockO

R8

>>55770565
I don't see a pro for using that instead of uBO

Why do you need noscript and ublock?

If you use ublock in advanced mode, it acts just like noscript.

>>55767152
So you will have holy trinity of adware addons in disguise.

>>55770901
uMatrix only block by domain, it cannot block by url or hide shit by css selector like uBlock does.

>>55770815
I rarely have more than 10 at once. Never understand retards who keep tabs that they don't need anymore.

File: 1451483519912.jpg (69KB, 666x570px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 666x570px

>noscript

>>55770815
>How many tabs do you guys have open on your computer?
2

Tree Style Tabs.

File: Brave-Web-Browser.jpg (58KB, 700x400px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x400px

>>55766957

File: 1460326020819.jpg (36KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x460px

>not using Vimperator

File: morpheus.png (128KB, 500x303px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 500x303px

Treestyletab, Noscript + Greasemonkey, Pentadactyl/Vimperator

>>55774988
>what year
2016. And I always laugh when I tear down the "You're using adblock you pig!" shit from the javascripts.
No need to use adblock. Just block the JS. And if you need it, modify it. That's it.

>>55775082
Does it support extensions?
Can I rice the UI?

>>55766957
O
P
E
R
A

Privacy Badger.
Cookie Monster.

I use a combo of NoScript, uBlock Origin, and uMatrix (which is a Request Policy, not a NoScript replacement).

I also use Privacy Badger and https everywhere.

Why do people even use noscript?
YOUR BROWSER CAN ALREADY DISABLE SCRIPTS

>>55775681
No to all but it has all three of those extensions built in. It's a young browser and it does what I need. I would wait for later versions. You can't even change the search engine yet (you're stuck with cuckcuckgo and google).

>>55775759
NoScript gives you finer grained control over script/plugin policy and has some XSS protection.

vimium/vimfx

>>55766957
I find thumbnailzoomplus to be essential

I only use uBlock origin.
is this bad?
why are uMatrix or NoScript considered essential?
I use a VPN (which I have to turn off for 4chan go figure)

>>55775944
>NoScript considered essentia
well it's pretty simple.
99.9% of malware comes from javascript exploits. so by visiting random sites with javascript enabled..well, you're letting the flood gates open, anon.

uMatrix is just another version of noScript.

>>55775981
I use loonix though
I was told this OS is unaffected by malware

>>55771607
I use the same thing.

>>55775981
uMatrix is not a replacement for NoScript, but they do overlap in some functionality.

>>55776239
umatrix shits all over noscript in terms of functionality and usability.

File: Screen Shot 2016-07-26 at 11.13.58 PM.png (176KB, 666x398px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 666x398px

Yes

I don't use noscript because it blocks fucking EVERYTHING and I don't want to take the time to manually set what's good.

What's a good NoScript alternative for Chrome? I'm just using uBlock Origin right now, uMatrix seemed confusing.

>>55776302
I disabled a shitload of web 3.0 features over the years and now some websites don't even work

>>55766957
Umatrix replaced all of these.

File: 83d1590cdc[1].png (56KB, 1230x655px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1230x655px

Rate/hate

Also, has anyone's 4chanx stopped working?

>>55776333
>ABP

no

>>55776343
What's wrong with ABP now? I rarely /g/.

>>55776351
uBlock Origin is way lighter on your resources, and it doesn't have the "allowed ads" bullshit.

There's no reason to use ABP anymore.

>>55776365
Switching now

>>55766957
>no greasemonkey for 4chan x

>>55776395
Has yours stopped working?

>>55766957
Yeah if you like to run custom CSS

File: onorable memba.png (76KB, 188x204px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 188x204px

How do I use uMatrix as efficiently as possible?

Coincidence detector.

>>55767423
where do i even find scripts for gm? does any community make a mega privacy lists and stuff like that?

>>55776315
>Coincidence detector
do you know of any list that explicitly states what scripts exactly allow for functionality on certain cites? i get tired of toying with it on different sites and say fuck it and allow all temporarily often. it would be sweet to have a community share what is what in terms of which scripts do what per site

>>55766957
replace noscript with umatrix>>55766957

>>55775435
it has turned to shit, a lot of default its default bindings are not working out of the box, using vimfx currently which doesn't have half the features but at least its bug free and lighter on the browser

>>55767147
>>55766957
What do they do?

File: 1437638861486.gif (3MB, 315x236px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 315x236px

>>55776648
works for me

You need GreaseMonkey/TamperMonkey for userscripts to make Reek's Anti-Adblock Killer work properly (the block list is only half the solution).

>>55776699
>or just enable it from ublock origin 3rd party filters

>>55776304
ScriptSafe.

File: 0-you-cant-hide.jpg (27KB, 248x227px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 248x227px

>>55774988
2016.

>>55778596
I don't get it? What the fuck are you actually blocking? Do you use a tinfoil hat as well?

File: Screen Shot 2016-07-27 at 6.03.19 AM.png (256KB, 738x1074px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 738x1074px

>>55778596
>not separating parent scripts
but yeah they got us

Yes, firefox has many poor design decisions that are remedied by add ons

>>55778616
Those are currently ALLOWED because they need to be.

>>55778656
why wouldn't they be allowed?

>>55778626
Blocking on protocol level, eh?
I'm not THAT hardcore... yet.

>>55778675
desu its kind of bitchy bc then i have to do it everytime for each new site, but after awhile with repeat visits its work it, for instance at my uni they provide microsoft 365 for free, now i when i use it a lot more quick bc i dont allow the ads and warning about trying to get me to pay for shit or about almost full space
do you know if there is any "mega list" of scripts adn descriptions for major sites regarding no script? it would be cool if there was more community cohesion regarding that kind of thing,but i saw that even with firefox ~40% of people dont use any extensions

File: ss (2016-07-27 at 01.16.17).png (24KB, 746x351px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 746x351px

This is all i need

>>55767123
you have clearly never used either

>>55778725
>gumshoe

What are you tryin' to do, ya cheeky cunt?

>>55778755
N-nothing

>>55766957
Time to move to umatrix grandpa.

nobody use "Bluhell firewall" in combination with ublock origin.

works great ,

>>55766957
You could block bunch of advertisers and tracking sites in your hosts file. Nothing needs to be blocked if requests for unwanted content don't go through.

https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts