Speakers

>>55753594
Also, Is pic in my OP a good choice?

>>55753594
ok
good luck

>>55753634
lol dude that was clever lol XD

>>55753607
>bose
No

>>55753594
also /g/ is not your blog

>>55753696
I'm aware. it says right in the sticky that I'm misusing it. Luckily I could care less.

File: CREATIVE GIGAWORKS T20 SERIES II.png (133KB, 450x350px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 450x350px

idk how good they are but im getting these

>>55753594
Get something with a dedicated subwoofer or you will just have no low end at all.

File: BF1 bayonet charge.jpg (31KB, 636x642px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 636x642px

>>55753738
im here just to shitpost =D

When you are looking for used speakers a nice rule of thumb is too look at the connectors.
Hardwired speaker cable: cheap stuff
Spring clips: still v low tier
Banana connectors: better, probably sold separate, not part of a system
Bi-wiring (4 bananas): getting fancy

>>55753818
the fucks a banana connector

File: Innovative-Audio-Yamaha-NS-1000M-back.jpg (235KB, 986x1435px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 986x1435px

>>55753818
Doesn't apply to a lot of vintage speakers
A lot of great speakers back then had absolutely garbage connectors for some reason

File: bananaplugs014_lg.jpg (72KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1024x768px

>>55754735
This

>>55753594
some cheap altec lansing's with subs around.

>>55754778
Quick question. If you had a receiver that had RCA input. Could you use these? And would their be any benefit to it other than custom wire length? Can you even get spools of shielded wire?

File: Z623.jpg (111KB, 1500x851px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1500x851px

>>55753594
I have pic related

Also, here's a comparison of some pretty good desktop speakers:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pc-speaker-2.1-channel-subwoofer,2835.html

>>55753607
i have that exact pair and they are great in the 100 dollarinos or less price bracket.

ill be the only one in here not shilling or shitposting btw

>>55756430
what is your biggest complaint about em?

>>55756555
only really that the connecting cord between the 2 speakers arent too long. maybe a tiny bit more bass punch would be nice like the c20's but those arent worth the extra 150 and the bass still is solid

Amazon speakers are cheap and alright quality, plus they look nice.

https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Powered-Computer-Speakers-A100/dp/B00GHY5F3K

File: Speakers.jpg (96KB, 617x943px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 617x943px

Best sounding 2.0 speakers I ever owned were the incredibly rare Logitech Z-10 and they were awesome for their time, my preferred set is the equally rare Klipsch Promedia 2.0 set, both pictured.

>>55753594
These have the best price to performance, have great bass (should EQ it out a bit) and overall sound, get loud, and have 2 audio inputs.
Ignore the creative/logitech meme. Absolute trash.

>>55757897
>these

what are these?

>>55753594

You can't go wrong with some Cyber Acoustics. I've had plenty of their speakers for almost 10 years now and their customer service is great. Good bang for your buck.

http://www.cyberacoustics.com/

File: B55-1018-out7-dw.jpg (40KB, 430x368px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 430x368px

>>55753818
What's this

>>55758175
Proprietary bullshit cheapass PC speakers.

>>55758191
Got them on sale for 250 instead of 400 though

Very nice build quality too

>>55758202
This is because Bose is overpriced garbage.

>>55758214

I agree. The highs tend to be to high for my taste.