Why they don't make a new interface for SSDs?

>>55703658
Because that's what companies do: cut corners

File: standards.png (24KB, 500x283px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x283px

>>55703658

How new are you to this

>>55703658
>Why do they use old ones like SATA or PCIe instead of making new ones?
Because then you'll have to force everyone to upgrade everything which basically will kill the adoption rate, which in turn will kill SSDs.

also this >>55703682

>>55703763
Yeah, that is one thing but think of speed improvements and other possibilities.
>>55703707
I soldered my own computers in 80's you newfag.

>>55703658
google M.2

>Only thing that's bottlenecking SSDs are controllers.

unless you're using a high-end SSD like an 850 evo/pro and an older revision of SATA... not really. There's also the overkill PCIE bandwidth to fall back on for a while when mainstream ssd's do get too fast for sata 6gb/s

>>55703658
Motherboards have dedicated NVMe lanes, even CPU chipsets are including them.
AMD and intel are both baking in dedicated high priority pathways for NVMe storage.

>>55703777
More like think of the cost, when SSDs hit the public they had been already available for years for enterprise users. And forcing enterprise to switch all their gear just because a new tech is available is just not gonna happen. Unfortunately they are a big force driving tech adoption.

>>55703796
>google
Not to antagonize but can we change to wiki? it's just a hit for google to get to wikipedia anyway

>>55703864
Oh sorry, is telling people to google something not politically correct enough for you?

>>55704179
Nah, I just hate google

>>55704198
Captcha on this website is run by Google . Whenever you post you leave a fingerprint . Be consistent at least

>>55704258
>he doesn't know about privacy badger
welp