I did not see a watch thread. Discuss your dreams and latest purschases.
>>55700373
ARCHAIC TIME-TELLING DEVICES ARE NOT TECHNOLOGY
>>>/fa/
I like the seconds hand
Just bought a Christopher Ward C60 Trident Pro 600, before they start making them with their shitty new logo instead
>>55700443
Those mechanics have been in place for literally 400 years, hence archaic.
>>55700974
Plz no bully
>>55700974
>spring drive
>400 years old
go back to your iPhone vs Android thread fag
>>55700974
>old technology is not technology
Meet a watch in 2016, one that is actually useful while also holding aesthetic value, despite substancial price.
>>55704498
>aesthetic
>pseudo 3d
>>55706248
pseudo 3d that can hold actual information... you can read books from your watch, does your rolex do that?
>>55707131
>you can read books from your watch, does your rolex do that?
this is like when retarded linux users point out that they can install linux on a toaster as if that magically proves linux is better at anything other than running on toasters.
>>55707131
My Rolex gets me laid.
I want to get a Vostok, does it matter where I buy from and which model i get?
>>55707131
no, but that only shows it is useful, not that lcds are aesthetic
watches really don't serve much purpose anymore with phones being so common. maybe usefulness is the original purpose, but does the purpose of something really ever matter more than what it actually does?
Biel detected.
>>55700443
is this thread going to be about that stuff or is it going to be about pretty watch faces and watch bands?
oh look your friends have already made that decision for you:
>>55704498
>>55707270
>>55707270
chistopolcity.com has decent stock. I prefer the 110 case.