Shortly to be beaten by the 1080Ti

Thats a Pro Duo, not Vega

>>55694432
>Oh! Then shortly to be beaten by a Titan X then.
Fixed.

>>55694426
>CAPSAICIN
> CAP SAI CIN
> CAP SIE SIN
>Capsizing

What did they mean by that?

>>55694450
Capsaicin is hot and spicy, just like your PC when you install an AMD card

NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>55694426
The Radeon Pro Duo is 16 TFLOPS.

You really think the Ti will almost double the normal 1080 performance?

>>55694445

pro duo is already beaten by other 28nm cards, it's as slow as a nano in games that don't support memefire (which is nearly all of them).

File: I_378.jpg (25KB, 720x504px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 720x504px

>>55694611
Great, now FLOP/S are the new meme unit to be thrown around just because the /v/tards saw muh benchmark and spec sheet with FLOP/S as a highlighted feature. Go rope yourself.

>>55694611
Titan X is SLI capable :)

AMD will NEVER win on performance.

>>55694814
FLOP/S actually mean something with low level APIs.

Spicy GPU

File: 1452024863961.gif (89KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 256x256px

>>55694426
>Capsaicin

I guess they're just embracing it at this point.

>>55694426

those tubes are pumping Milk to cool it.

>>55695411
Doesn't fucking matter when it's just a crossfire setup on a single card, crossfire or SLI will never bring 1+1=2 performance.

>>55695379
The highest Timespy benchmark scores are from quadfire Fury X setups. Figured it's relevant because you're talking about SLI.

File: genkiamada.jpg (288KB, 698x909px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 698x909px

Only important thing is
Will it have Amada?

>>55694814

He is sort of right though. Both the pro duo and historically the titan are/were aimed at compute heavy tasks (such as mining).
That being said, the new titan specs strike me as odd, with the increase in specs and power countered by the lower clocks. Aiming for long term stability possibly?

>>55696880
Cards of that level most definitely approach a "prosumer" level and thus it makes sense that they'd aim for stability over pure performance.

With that said I see no reason why a TitanXU or whatever can't hit 1900Mhz+ when every other Pascal design is capable of 2100

>>55697731

I'd say it is more likely a marketing tool for nvidia, rather that an purpose oriented card. As we established, this is more of a "closest it gets from a quadro without going business range", not truly aimed towards gaming.

>>55696060
underrated

>>55694611
flops on GPU is basically as good of a metric as engine HP on cars

they do mean something but don't linearly translate to real world performance if other aspects of the design are lacking

>>55699215
No its not. It would be a measure of displacement.
It means literally nothing by itself, some 5L engines shit all over other 5L engines.