Will most programmers be replaced by machines?

>>55679906
Unskilled labour will be replaced first

By the time programmers are replaced, the whole of humanity will be in the process of being replaced and only the jewish lizard-alien overlords will be left to inherit the earth

>>55679906
Programming mostly not repetitive and is creative, machine are far from it yet

>>55679906
They already have been. See compilers.

it's already happening. code generators and high level languages have been reducing the need for programmers and will continue to do that. you should learn more maths.

File: waifu-1.png (389KB, 1152x648px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1152x648px

>>55679913
this

>>55679913
>>55679970
>>55680304
>>55680468
>living in a delusion

All the computer needs is a object anything in between is a obstacle

>>55680478
There is no technology in existence that is even close to doing actual programming. What delusion?

>>55679906
Indians are not machines dickweed.

t. Senior java programmer Gandhi

File: 1466411395894.jpg (37KB, 540x808px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 540x808px

>>55679906
>Will most programmers be replaced by machines?
No. Most programmers will be replaced by mathematicians.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4Yp3j_jk8Q

File: thumbs.jpg (30KB, 301x267px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 301x267px

>>55680468
ur waifu a cute

>>55680599
Yep. Y'all could have went for that real CS degree instead of the IT "degree" from DeVry you neckbeards got, then you might have learned enough Maths to not get replaced.

>>55683462

How much maths is enough maths?

>>55683462
>real CS degree

>>55680599
>Architects draw detailed blueprints before a brick is laid or a nail is hammered. Programmers and software engineers seldom do.

Duh, that's because code requirements change rapidly. You can't tear out the foundation of a building after it's made or scrap entire parts of it; you can with code. If you're working on an operating system or something that needs to be secure, sure, you should plan it carefully in advance.

>>55680599
>>55684890
ok, I see he said this in the video. Bad caption.

Though I'm not sure what it has to do with the video, I agree with your main point, programming is probably going to get more mathematically complex and merge with math as time goes on. Or at least programmers taking advantage of mathematical paradigms will vastly outperform people who don't.

File: 1468636416761.gif (1MB, 450x253px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 450x253px

>>55680468
>streaming anime
>that resolution

[spoiler] Your waifu is trash desu [/spoiler]