>mfw fell for the pascal meme

>>55677443
>tfw fell for the 'fell for the meme' meme

>>55677443

I fell for it too, nvidia drivers for the 1000 series are absolutely SHIT right now, let's see how long will it take to fix it

>>55677562
when was the last amd update

>>55677657

no idea, my last amd card (ati actually) was the 9700 pro

>>55677657
they released a new beta driver less than 24 hours ago.

>>55677657
About a week ago?

File: Capture.png (8KB, 529x127px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 529x127px

>>55677657
It's WQHL as well.

>>55677562
>broken english
>shit in all caps

you've outed yourself, pajeet

>>55677785
>broken english
are you actually retarded?

>>55677443
I don't understand. Why is Luigi angry?

>>55677685
>beta

>>55677800
It should be "how long it will take".
That doesn't mean anon isn't retarded, though, of course.

>>55677443
Why do you keep making garbage threads like this?

File: 1469040044789.jpg (70KB, 810x780px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 810x780px

>>55677657
9 days ago (16.7.2.) and it got certified as WHQL ~12 hours ago.

There have been like 15 updates in past month, Senpai

File: 1468561995386.png (29KB, 882x1289px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 882x1289px

>>55677443
>the same

>>55677443
i googled the latency thing before i ordered a 1080 and it doesn't affect all 1080s.

some users posted the High latency and others showed no such issues with the same games.

Nvidia already said they had a fix in the works
new cards have issues

>>55680418
>new cards have issues
Meanwhile there is still constant shitposting about the ref 480.

Double standards?

>>55680451
meh, AMD is an easy target.
i owned a 5970 and got so much shit for it
110C stock
95C 290x
87C RX480s
AMD never learns.

>>55680471
Meanwhile on the "Green Team"

>GTX480 hits 120*C
>GTX480's literally catching fire
>Woodscrews
>BF3 drivers killing cards
>GTX 780 getting outperformed by an R9 290, despite kicking it's ass on release
>Killing laptop displays by wiping the EDID

Both are as bad as eachother. Trying to say which is better is pointless.

I'm just sitting here laughing at all the early adopters of both sides, everyone with half a brain knows you wait until 6 months after a GPU comes out to see if it's worth buying or not.

>>55677754

Wasn't the one that turned off everyone's fans WHQL certified too?

>>55680615
Hey, wasn't the nVidia one that outright killed cards WHQL too?

No it wasn't

>>55680644
>>55680615
WHQL means fuck all.
It doesn't mean the driver works any better, or worse than one that isn't.

All it says is that Microsoft received payment from the manufacturer to slap that tag on it.

>But it means it works with windows properly!

nVidia released a WHQL Win10 driver that killed laptop displays.

>>55678350

Why you have to be so mad, nvidiot?

EVGA 1080 FE Works For Me™

No issues whatsoever. People just shit on their own systems by downloading crap and then blame AMD/NVidia.

>>55680510
>meanwhile anon posts about a gpu released in 2010.

we are on the 10xx series now. Anyhting under the 9xx range isnt worth talking about

Wait wait, is 1070 a good buy or not?

I placed 10 of those in my business plan, i'm gonna get fired if those faggots don't work like they should

>>55678308
> asks when the latest update was
> gets btfo
> moves goalposts
Classic /g/

>>55678595
>There have been like 15 updates in past month, Senpai
>be unstable enough that 15 updates were needed just within 30 days

>>55683329
> AMD don't push enough updates through!
> AMD push TOO many updates through
Holy shit, what's next? AMD pushing the exact right amount of updates through, but they don't fellate you at the same time?

>>55682298

It's shit, wait for vega

>>55683406
hurr durr wait for this wait for that theres always gonna be a new card afterwards
>>55682298
1070 is great go for it

>>55683426
> not waiting for the GTX 5080
come on now, it's gonna completely destroy the 1080

1060 btfo

https://imgur.com/a/AtDcb

>>55683435
Jesus fucckign Christ

The past 7 months people -here- were like
"oh you should wait for Pascal and Polaris that die shrink is sooooo going to change everything I'm telling you"

Turns out it didn't now get the fuck out. The motto is pretty simple.
Buy the best you can with the money you have (except if it only allows you to buy mid-tier shit like a RX 480 or a GTX 1060)

File: amdcuck.png (486KB, 2513x1442px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 2513x1442px

>>55677443

>>55683329
Enjoy your 2 year old GeForce™ Experience™ drivers then fampai.

As >>55683358 said, you're a dumbass, basically

>>55677443
>goes on tech support forum
>finds people in need of tech support

>>55677443
>The hotfix driver is available for download:
>https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/951723/geforce-drivers/announcing-geforce-hotfix-driver-368-95/

get fucked, AMDrone

File: IMG0031587.png (51KB, 380x240px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 380x240px

>>55686630
>nvidia releases driver
IT'S OVER AMD IS BANKRUPT AND FINISHED

>nvidia has shit drivers just like amd
>nvidiots care about power consumption as if they're poor

glorious

>>55688018
lol
AMD tech support is more like...
X game doesn't run
X hardware configuration results in Windows crashing

>>55688018

halving the instructions executed can double battery life and big data sets bring big opportunities for better software and algorithms: Reducing the number of operations from N x N to N x log(N) has a dramatic effect when N is large ... for N = 30 billion, this change is as good as 50 years of technology improvements.

>>55686654
is that one of those samsung m.2s?

>>55680793

>nVidia released a WHQL Win10 driver that killed laptop displays.

Before anyone claims bullshit, I actually have a source for that.

https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/862417/geforce-drivers/windows-10-geforce-drivers-are-killing-samsung-and-lg-notebook-lcd-display-panels/

Note: I haven't checked if the link still works as the geforce forums have a nasty habit of deleting threads that point out major disasters like this. The gist of the problem if the link doesn't work is the driver was deleting the monitor's EDID.

>>55688281
You don't need EDID information to use a display.