GTX 1060 vs RX 480 Benchmarks

>>55676484
>1080p
How poor are you? 1080p and gtx 1060 are literally the shit you'll buy when you live in a cardboard box.

File: 1469067980384.png (110KB, 1591x639px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1591x639px

>>55676484
ok kid

>>55676484
>1060 is the same damn price as the 480 for way better performance.
Stupid AMD shill. The nVidia ®GTX 1060™ is $150 CHEAPER than the poorboi's RX480.

lol BO3 is basically made not to optimize their game for either

File: 1469067768949.png (108KB, 1596x635px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1596x635px

>>55676484
in vulkan...

>>55676523
Maybe an aftermarket 480

>>55676523
i will ahve to disagree with ou on this one my friend

it appears that 1060 is only faster in performance but you will be struck with grief soon afterwards knowing you supported the bad man and the bad man will screw you soon

>>55676512
>on average is faster
>therefore the 480 can't be faster in any game whatsoever
Kill yourself you retard

>>55676555
I am right now writing a full scientific essay that will destroy your arguments!

(Please, feed me facts for my essay)

File: 1469067906447.png (105KB, 1591x637px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1591x637px

>>55676562
here's some gameworks to cheer you up
o wait

>>55676594
>>55648575

File: dancing-idiot.gif (3MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x281px

>>55676555
But Raja is the bad man. Look at him partying with your money you wasted on a 480.

Another DoA AMD product! Now that's unheard of.

>>55676512
>>55676549
from where?

I'm still buying the 480, nvidia can go and stay go

>>55676620
kek

>>55676620
another retarded nvidiot
see >>55676512
>>55676549
>>55676605

>>55676658
make sure its the nitro though
see >>55676605
>>55676549
>>55676512
based sapphire does it again

Dumb stupid poorboi AmD shills have been defecating all over /g/, and it is now time to put a stop to these legion of anus-cavities. Let us put all the facts on the table, eh?

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has excellent and spectacularly superb performance in FULL High Definition
-The AmD poorboi RX480 can only barely manage to play games in 1080p (1080p is a pathetic 75% LESS than ultra High Definition)

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is very quiet! You can barely hear it.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 generated dozens of DECIBELS of noise. Warning: Being in the vicinity of dozens-of-decibels CAN damage your hearing!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ consumes only a tiny amount of power. It is very efficient!
-The AmD poorboi RX480 has been seen to gulp down a cringe-inducing 167 Watts of power! 167 Watts can run several electronics devices simultaneously.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ can be had for as low as $249.99! An amazing and generous price.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is available for purchase for as much as $370! What a scam!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is from nVidia, a company that makes Graphics Processing Units. They are professionals.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is by AmD, ewwwwww!!!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is for independent thinkers, people who value freedom and dignity.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is known to have been purchased by Communists.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ will provide years and years of fantastic gaming performance.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is a gimped card, sold to the exploitable and uneducated masses.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ creates an aura of respect and professionalism.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is for like, you know, losers, omg.

File: value.png (43KB, 500x1210px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x1210px

1060 is officially the #1 best value GPU you can buy.

>>55676718
Yeah, I'm just waiting for them to put it up for sale.
Hell, I'd probably preorder it just so I don't have to wait for it to not be sold out

>>55676746
Legit

>>55676747
>$250
lol that doesn't exist

>>55676812
Minor tweak:

Dumb stupid poorboi AmD shills have been defecating all over /g/, and it is now time to put a stop to these legion of anus-cavities. Let us put all the facts on the table, eh?

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has excellent and spectacularly superb performance in FULL High Definition
-The AmD poorboi RX480 can only barely manage to play games in 1080p (1080p is a pathetic 75% LESS than ultra High Definition)

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is very quiet! You can barely hear it.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 generated dozens of DECIBELS of noise. Warning: Being in the vicinity of dozens-of-decibels CAN damage your hearing!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ consumes only a tiny amount of power. It is very efficient!
-The AmD poorboi RX480 has been seen to gulp down a cringe-inducing 167 Watts of power! 167 Watts can run several electronics devices simultaneously.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ can be had for as low as $249.99! An amazing and generous price.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is available for purchase for as much as $370! What a scam!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is from nVidia, a company that makes Graphics Processing Units. They are professionals.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is by AmD, ewwwwww!!!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is for independent thinkers, people who value freedom and dignity.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is known to have been purchased by Communists.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ will provide years and years of fantastic gaming performance.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is a gimped card, sold to the exploitable and uneducated masses.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ creates an aura of respect and professionalism.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is for, like, you know, losers, omg.

I respect myself. I am not a loser. I am not pathetic. That is why I will purchase the nVidia® GTX 1060™ (maybe two of them, for SLI). What about you? Are you a wonderful nVidia supporter, or an AmD poorboi loser?

>>55676746
Saved

>>55676825
There are actually a lot of $249 1060s. That's why AMD is in such trouble.

There is literally no reason to buy AMD.

>>55676841
the only one in stock is $300 now fuck off back to /v/ nvidiot shill

>>55676746
>-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is for independent thinkers, people who value freedom and dignity.
kek

>>55676893
>>>/v/
you don't belong on /g/

>>55676908
Check newegg, there should be a lot for $249. If they're out you can set up a notification.

>>55676893
>There is literally no reason to buy AMD.

Pretty much. When Nvidia is even beating AMD in the value game, they are really really screwed.

>>55676922
They will be hiked up like the 1080 and 1070 were after the first time they sold out, do idiots like you never learn from the past?

>>55676930
With dx11, AMD even failed to offer better value thanks to their overwhelming driver overhead.

That won't be fixed until dx12 and vulkan become the only used APIs.

You wouldn't notice it in benchmarks because most of them use shit like i7 5960x or 6700k.

>>55676938
No the 1060 is actually selling for the MSRP, check newegg.

>>55676930
leave
>>>/v/

File: 2016-07-20_23h22_24.png (36KB, 571x184px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 571x184px

>>55676950
I did this is the only one that came back in stock and suprise suprise they hiked the price just like i said.

>>55676994
Looks like you will have to setup notifications for the $249 ones

There's a lot of them here: http://www.newegg.com/VGA/EventSaleStore/ID-1170

>>55676994
>$290 for gigabyte 960
That's actually a pretty good deal, considering reference housefire piece of shit motherboard burning 480s were sold for $250

>>55677026
1060*

when is aftermarket sapphire card released?

>>55677052
tommorow
for benchmarks see >>55676512
>>55676549
>>55676605

>>55677026
Yeah pretty much anything is better than those buggy housefire reference 480s

>>55677190
>150 watts
>housefire
nvidiots

>>55676615
That was before the 480 even launched.

>>55677225
>runs hotter than a gtx1080
>uses almost as much power as a 1080
>one third the performance
Lol

>>55676484
>same price
At best it's $50 more. And that's ignoring the fact that all the $250 options are sold out.

>>55677409
power consumption is only a issue for niggers literally burning gasoline for electricity

>>55677011
And when they come back in stock they won't be $249, you mouthbreathing fucktard

>>55677453
Kek, AyyMD fags mad when power consumption nullifies their whole "better value" argument

>>55677453
Like most poorfag nvidia shills from india, i guess thats why they try to make the "muh power consumption" argument.

>>55677495
Im sorry that you have to burn gasoline to keep the power on panjeet.

I don't even know who's the shill anymore

>>55677495
a typical gpu draws 300w under full load
at a average rate of $0.10/kwh, and 4 hours a day EVERY DAY at full load, it only costs you $43.68 a year

>>55677484
Yeah they will, 1060 is $249 to stay.

>>55677453
Power consumption = heat

That's why AMD cards are housefires

>>55677602
No, they won't. That has literally never happened with any GPU, ever. If it sells out day one, when it comes back in stock the price is higher. This is not a guideline, it's a rule, and the 1060 is not an exception.

>>55676484
WHERE THE FUCK IS THE DOOM RETARD VULCAN BENCHMARK??

>>55677627
Lol that's not true at all.

The 1060 is $249 and it will keep being $249. Come back in a week or two and see, I'm going to screenshot your post and laugh at you.

>>55677627
its like you're rooting for a card to be at a higher price, i swear the AMD shills are the worst thing i have ever seen and make me ashamed that my pc is all AMD and that im considering Zen if it's price and performance are respectable...

>people here are literally defending a card that was showcased and promised to be $199 but AMD pulled b8 and switch and the RX480 is a slightly lower performing card than the 1060 with typical AMD issues

>>55677653
Based on what evidence? Wishful thinking is meaningless, and you're a spineless cuck shill.

>>55677602
>>55677653
50 nvidia points have been deposited to your account panjeet

>>55677675
The RX 480 is $199, the only "issue" has already been fixed, and it was released before the 1060, so I don't know where the fuck your "b8 and switch" comment comes from. Get the fuck out, shill.

>>55677683
Wishful thinking? It's just the truth, the prices don't change.

Like I said, I'm going to post a screenshot of your post in 2 weeks and make a thread laughing at your stupidity.

>>55677705
>>55677683
>>55677627

when they are back in stock for $250 in 3 days will you do everyone a favor and just end yourself

>>55677675
Seriously these AMDtards are awful. The worst kind of people.

>>55677732
>the prices don't change
They have in the past and they will again. You have no evidence whatsoever to back up your statement, stop talking out your ass. I really hope no one's paying you to say this shit, you're a really bad shill.

File: 7lpRrX2.png (134KB, 299x321px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 299x321px

Nvidiots on suicide watch. Custom AIB RX480s about to wipe the floor with 1060s @ 2GHz

>>55677746
>>55677732
>>55677675
>>55677653
>>55677602
samefag shill pls go

>>55677732
>the prices don't change.
what is the 1080
what is the 1070

>>>/v/
leave nvidia shill

>>55677751
It's going to be really funny when the 1060 stays at $249 and you look really really stupid.

>>55677764
See >>55677761
It's going to be really funny when they all come back at $300+. Seriously, just kill yourself, you'll be doing this board and the entire world a favor.

>>55677772
Lol you just keep digging a deeper hole.

Should I screenshot the whole thread?

1060 will stay at $249

>>55677764
Its going to be really funny when you die of ebola panjeet.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cured-in-Liberia-man-tests-positive-for-Ebola-in-Delhi/articleshow/45197216.cms

>>55677784
Great, I have the word of some random shill on an anonymous mongolian pottery forum, surely I can trust that! Kill yourself, you turbonerd faggot

>>55677784
already btfo
see >>55676994

>>55677801
You don't have to trust me. Just come back here in a week or two and I'll make a whole thread just for you, showing the 1060 at $249.

>>55677815
You do that, see >>55677810. It's OK to cry, little shill.

>>55677815
dont have to
see >>55676994

>>55677821
Sorry you can't handle the truth.

>>55677602
$249 for unicorn 3GB 1060 that have never even actually been stocked anywhere because nVidia is paper launching all of their cards due to yield issues
$239 for every 8GB RX 480 that is actually in stock and far more available than the GTX 10X0 cards because they're actually able to get target yields and didn't retardedly paper launch everything to try and hurt competitor market shares but actually had products to produce on release day.

Seriously anon, I'm not saying that the nVidia 1000 series GPUs aren't good, but they could've at least been honest and said "hey, we're releasing this card in six months and distributing the initial yields to reviewers only" instead of pretending to release them when they don't have the yields.

>>55677837
I can't handle the truth? The truth is here >>55676994, deal with it and fuck off.

File: 249-1060.png (103KB, 978x324px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 978x324px

>>55677845
Uhh there are plenty of $249 1060s right here:

http://www.newegg.com/VGA/EventSaleStore/ID-1170

Pic related

>>55677815
There is no point anon. AMDrones are extremely desperate right now, clinging to DX12/Vulkan(reminder that mantle failed, kek). Objectivly the 1060 is the better card right now. There is no doubt that it'll probably be better down the line, but it's a ~$250 card, how long are you really gonna use it?

You should buy what you need now and not what'll become ''good'' later.

>>55677845
>we might actually see another 1.7% in our lifetime
lol

>>55677850
There are plenty of $249 1060s right here: http://www.newegg.com/VGA/EventSaleStore/ID-1170

>>55677856
They're all out of stock, you retarded fucking shill. And when they come back in stock, they won't be $249. Why do we have to keep going over this?

>>55677858
>it performs worse under DX12/Vulkan
>it'll probably be better down the line
Pick one faggot

File: 1347987836120.png (560KB, 330x559px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 330x559px

>>55677856
>they're all out of stocks

>>55677845
Uhh 480 isn't in stock either

>>55677869
See >>55677875 and then kill yourself.

>>55677875
They don't change the prices you silly goose.

The 1060 is $249 and will stay $249.

See http://www.newegg.com/VGA/EventSaleStore/ID-1170

>>55677875
DX12 and Vulkan are not the standard and no matter how much you lie on an anonymous vietnamese crab trading forum, it's not gonna change the fact that DX12 will not become relevant anywhere near soon and you people said the same shit about mantle that you now do about Vulkan.

Shill harder, pajeet.

>>55677890
Sorry you must be really mad that the 1060 is way better than the 480

>>55677653
It's already a lot of $269 for 3GB and out of stock for everything else dickbag

File: 2016-07-21_00h41_18.png (198KB, 1232x942px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1232x942px

>>55677856
>resorting to photoshop to shill
wew lad real pic incoming

>>55677896
DX11 wasn't the standard a few years ago. DX12 will be in the future, no matter how hard you shill.

>>55677904
Stop samefagging.

>>55677893
They have in the past. See every flagship GPU ever.

>>55677911
Uhh there is no 3GB 1060

>>55677904
see >>55676512
>>55676549
>>55676605

>>55677914
What?

I see a bunch of $249 1060s right there.

>>55677904
>>55677896
>>55677893
>>55677869
>>55677858
>>55677856
>>55677837
>>55677815
>>55677784
>>55677764
>>55677747
>>55677746
>>55677732
>>55677675
>>55677653
>>55677602
mods pls

File: Screenshot_20160721-014213.png (407KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1440x2560px

Search 1060 on Jet.com

$250 after coupon. I think there are 30% off coupons floating around too, not sure and don't care enough Google it.

>>55677926
See >>55676484

>>55677935
>1 fan

>>55677928
They're not in stock, you blind shill. And when they do come back in stock, the price will go up.

>no it won't
Yes it will, you flaming dickbag

>>55677935
It's actually cheaper on newegg: http://www.newegg.com/VGA/EventSaleStore/ID-1170

>>55677944
>2ghz 1060 is faster than a reference 480 at base clocks
here are some non reference cards
see>>55676512
>>55676549
>>55676605

File: 1464781280970.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>55677916
>DX12 will be in the future
And how exactly is that interfering with my statement? I said you should buy what you'll need now and not later. Right now DX11 is widely support and it's gonna stay that win until microshaft finds a way to force more people into W10, which isn't going to happen anytime soon. The overwhelming majority of gaming is done on W7 and that doesn't support DX12.

>b-but in 3-4 years when DX12 is finally supported you'll see that the 480 was faster..!

>>55677952
1060 will stay at $249 of course. I'll even come back here and make a thread to show you.

>>55677962
Die of a terminal illness newfag

>>55677970
So you're saying the 480 is a better long term card if you don't plan to upgrade soon?

>>55677983
Are you mad that the 1060 is so much better than the 480?

>>55677970
>>55677972
>>>/v/
n/v/idia shills belong back on /v/
spillage go back

>>55677950
It's not a housefire 480

>>55677970
Buying for right now and not planning for a year or two from now is retarded. That's like buying a car because it works right now and not caring if it works in a year or two.

>>55677602
This was a promotional deal. They put it up at that price and virtually no one got one at that price. Look, I'm not an AMD fangay but don't peddle bullshit, esp. if you aren't even sure you know what you're talking about.

>>55677985
No the 1060 is a much better long term card

>>55677996
see >>55676512
>>55676549
>>55676605

now get out shill

>>55677985
I would argue so. I'm solely getting the 1060 because I usually upgrade every 2-3 years.
I wouldn't expect huge distances in performance tho, these cards are very similar in performance.

>>55678005
It's not a promotional deal, 1060 is literally just $249.

Check new egg, the price is still $249.

>>55677884
I was at the Columbus Ohio micro center today and there were 8 RX 480 8GB XFX cards in stock for $249

There were also 2 GTX 1080 FE cards and 1 GTX 1070 FE card for about $50 over the FE MSRP

>>55678013
see >>55676549
no it isn't

>>55677999
You won't have any problems with that card in just 1 or 2 years haha. You people pretend like these cards are some huge investments and are gonna stay relevant in 3-4 years.

>>55678030
It is much better. Nvidia cards always last much longer than AMD ones because they have way better support.

>>55678024
>its out of stock
do you ever get tired of shilling for nvidia panjeet?

>>55676511
buy a gf faggot

File: perf_oc.png (29KB, 500x570px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x570px

>>55678050
It's in stock at jet.

File: vcvvlUe.png (17KB, 506x292px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 506x292px

>>55678045
>way better support
sure thing buddy

>>55677856
I just looked and the only ones that are in stock are $269 and it's like two 3GB cards that are already back ordered, just like they were yesterday. Try again anon

>>55678050
All the new cards are out of stock. Check 480s on new egg also.

The point is the 1060 is $249, see http://www.newegg.com/VGA/EventSaleStore/ID-1170

>>55678042
In 1-2 years DX12 will be the standard dumbass.

>>55678063
>BF 3
nice try panjeet

>>55678067
You might want to check again because there is no such thing as a 3GB 1060

>>55677861
What does this even mean?

>>55678074
And it's out of fucking stock. And when it's back in stock it won't be $249.

>>55678066
what kind of retard shit is that and how could these cards possible reach ridiculous numbers such as
>performance increased 138% over 2.5 years.
That would make the card over twice the amount better that it was at the beginning.

>>55678086
1060 actually beats the 480 in DX12 so that is good news too.

>>55678096
1.7% yields during Fermi meant prices were extremely high.

>>55678098
Of course the 1060 will stay at $249.

That's why the 1060 is so much better than the 480.

There is literally no reason to buy a 480 anymore.

>>55678106
>being this much of a shill
wew lad
>>>/v/

File: 1365811831064.png (63KB, 156x158px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 156x158px

>>55678086
>people widely oppose windows 10
>somehow Microsoft is magically gonna convert all reaming users of windows 7 to convert in the next year

>>55678120
It's true though, check the benchmarks yourself, the 1060 actually beats the 480 in 3DMark's new Time Spy DX12 benchmark.

>24 unique posters
>140 posts

>>55678132
>people widely oppose windows 10

You mean a couple of nerds that are using linux anyway?

>>55678145
>outwardly claiming support for windows 10

Embarrassing.

>>55678099
It's made up numbers by some AMDtard.

AMD fans are so desperate they are literally making things up now.

>>55678153
Took the free upgrade 2 days. Great so far.

>>55678142
Nvidia shilling at work anon

>>55678145
No m8, I mean that most people widely oppose windows 10.
>https://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0
>w7 at almost 50%
>w10 at barely 20 even though the free upgrade is running out

Also I would love to guess how many of those 20% are AMD users :^)

>>55677920
Really anon, remember the 4GB 970?
sure there will physically be 6GB but we all know that 3 of them datas will be gimped beyond usability

>>55678158
>AMD shilling at work anon

Fixed that for you

>>55678099
>>55678154
>not being able to math
wew lad the intelligence of nvidiots is mind blowing

>>55678145
back to >>>/v/ you piece of underage shit
Actually people who need to get job done are complaining about botnet 10. Gaymur faggots don't care what they run as long as they can install their shitty steam.
Kill yourself.

>>55678165
Actually the 1060 has a full 6GB, check the reviews

>>55678167
You should rather explain then, pajeet.

>>55678166
>>>/v/
when will you go back to /v/ nvidiot shill?

>>55678137
>one
>synthetic
>benchmark
literally meaningless

>>55678162
W10 is the most popular OS on steam at 43%. Lots of people only upgrades when they buy new computer because it's the OS installed when they buy it, but these people don't play games anyway.

File: 8b6e30605b7e2cbecf7f62c4a30d5498.png (137KB, 287x275px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 287x275px

>>55678182
>Unironicly implying panjeet is smarter than you
TOP KEK

>>55678184
1060 also beats the 480 in Ashes (DX12) and Tomb Raider (DX12)

It's pretty sad when the 1060 is beating the 480 even in AMD sponsored games.

>>55678172
How is needing a job and W10 related?

File: 821963510137.jpg (9KB, 200x200px)

9KB, 200x200px

>>55678183
>streeshitter spamming the /v/ boogeyman

>>55678201
>shilling this hard

aftermarket 490x when?

>>55678042
Can't SLI 1060
Why even waste my time? I'll be getting an RX 480 to hold me over till prices stabilize and I can compare the Vega and big pascal cards for 4k120Hz gaming and monitors next summer

>>55678204
>/v/ leakege implying hes not from /v/
fuck off you aren't convincing at all also manly tears is based af
>>>/v/

>>55678193
Steam isn't representative of the whole pc gaming market

File: 1.png (2KB, 161x132px)

2KB, 161x132px

>>55678222
You can spam that /v/ boogeymen as much as you want, kiddo. It's not gonna make your statements over AMD not being shit any truer.

>>55678232
fuck off back to /v/ so you can cry about manlytears

>>55678208
>facts are shilling

Interesting

File: image.jpg (80KB, 438x575px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 438x575px

>>55678088
>Thinking all 6GB will be functional on a 60 series nVidia GPU
>[the current year]

>>55678217
Because SLI/Crossfire is shit m8. You're willingly choosing to suffer.
>r9 280x in crossfire
I know what I'm talking about.

>>55678225
But it's convenient to use when you want to say the 970 is the most popular gaming card right?

Fucking hypocrites I swear.

>>55678249
>facts are believing whatever nvidia tells you
fuck off back to /v/ you cuck
>>>/v/

>>55676484
> same damn price
> 25% more expensive for extra 5fps on dx11
> 480 is $50 cheaper and still more future proof (Vulkan)

>>55678114
Kek it explains the $100 price jumps for same series cards over the GTX 9X0 generation

>>55678245
No! ;^)

>>55678118
>What is CF and SLI
>both of these are things the 1060 cannot do because "if you want to SLI the 1060 you should just buy the 1070"

File: 3PDDu3n.jpg (2MB, 3000x2001px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x2001px

>>55678271
do you like manlytears, i like manlytears

File: 1433301402278.jpg (51KB, 585x511px)

51KB, 585x511px

>>55678265
I can almost smell the amount of butthurt coming from you just by typing out that
>>>/v/
kek

>>55678290
>amdrones suddenly defend multi gpu
lmao

>>55678267
>5 more fps on dx11
not for long
see >>55676512
>>55676605

File: 1366102785724.png (471KB, 551x550px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 551x550px

>29 posters
>Over 175 replies

Same 2 or 3 people arguing with themselves, just like every Nvidia vs. AMD thread.

File: manly-tears-o.gif (1004KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

1004KB, 320x180px

Do you like manlytears, i like manlytears, only because /v/ hates him.

>>55678306
>see these two cherry picked benchmarks over the same two cherry picked games that heavily favor AMD GPU's as a source of evidence

File: 1413243792159.png (13KB, 381x380px)

13KB, 381x380px

>>55678327
>29 posters
>2 or 3 people

>>55678178
>Still not getting it
>I mean c'mon [anon] it's [the current year]!!!!

>>55678334
>crysis and the witcher
>heavily favor amd
one is literly a gameworks game you fucking massive shill

>>55678337
Yes, the remaining posters post once or twice, then realise they're basically pissing into the wind and decide it's smarter for them to just leave.

>>55678340
Don't you believe that they've learned their mistake, pajeet?

>>55678343
One image of one particular benchmark does not indicate the superiority of a card. Try find me some more benchmarks to prove your statement. It's not like you can, because the 1060 is the better card.

>>55678257
Good god anon you're retarded, I'm running a shitty R9 280 and know better than to waste the money on CF anything under 6GB, hence the allure of the 8GB 480 CF idea, nearly 1080 performance for $200 less 1440p120Hz ultra easy for between $480-520

>>55678367
>being this btfo
its ok panjeet just go back
>>>/v/

>>55678372
It's not the amount of vram that bother me but the amount of incompatible games or games that just refuse to acknowledge me second card. I'm not sure if it's exclusive to AMD, but this horrendous experience isn't worth the extra performance.

>>55678367
>http://www.golem.de/news/geforce-gtx-1060-vs-radeon-rx-480-das-bringen-direct3d-12-und-vulkan-1607-122214.html
They re-benched 7 DX12 titles
http://imgur.com/a/AtDcb

File: 1368729641234.jpg (5KB, 175x154px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 175x154px

>>55678378
>not refuting my statement or providing other benchmarks
>street shitter AMDrone calling someone else pajeet

>>55678304
When has anyone not defended multiGPU?
I have always supported that, preferably with GTX 780 Ti or 980 Ti or 7990 or R9 390(X)
But that's just me.
The fact that the option to SLI a 1060 doesn't even exist is annoying as shit because if I buy a 1060 and rock it for 1080p ultra and eventually decide I want to do 1440p ultra I can't just buy another 1060.
I have to spend twice as much as the original investment to upgrade to an entirely new card setup.
RX 480?
Get one and rock it for 1080p ultra.
Decide in six months I want to do 1440p ultra and buy a second and run in CF for the same additional investment as I originally spent.

Not being forced to spend an additional $500 to upgrade to 1440p ultra is a good option and a good marketing point anon

>>55678411
Lol

This AMDrone guy who keeps spamning /v/ has made like 90% of the posts in this thread

File: 480 best.png (56KB, 668x384px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 668x384px

$199 4GB 480 flashed to 8GB is the true price performance king. Get them while you still can boys.

File: manlytears.jpg (9KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x256px

>>55678411
/v/ is back that way newfag
>>>/v/

>>55678395
Yeah Crossfire & SLI are just plain dumb. They're riddled with issues. It's always better to get one card.

>>55678351
Never, Kim
Not even once

>>55678397
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Nvidia-Geforce-GTX-10606G-Grafikkarte-264678/Tests/GTX-1060-Review-1201931/2/
>Geht man vom unverbindlich empfohlenen Preis der günstigsten Partner-Karten aus und setzt 280 Euro an, übernimmt die GTX 1060 gar die Führung in Sachen Leistung pro Euro - die folgenden Tage werden zeigen, wie sich die Preise in den Shops einpendeln.

>>55678430
>>55678411
>AMDrone
nice samefagging m8

>>55678327
It's this weird AMD shill who keeps spamming /v/

He's made like 100 posts in this thread

>>55678432
Just out of curiosity, would you post a picture of your skin color?

>>55678460
>>>/v/
go back

>>55678267
plus they're testing the 6GB version which is actually $100 more than the base 480

the real question is what effect aftermarket coolers and custom pcbs will have

File: 123123123123123.png (87KB, 676x667px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 676x667px

>>55678448
AMDrone is a universal term, m8

>>55678476
see >>55676512
>>55676549
>>55676605

>>55678479
MSpaint is a easy program to use panjeet

>>55678426
>When has anyone not defended multiGPU?
Not the same anon but always? It has always been suggested to get one gpu rather than SLI/CFing unless you already have one gpu and looking to extend the life of it. This is becoming even more pointed as CF/SLI becomes more niche than it already was.

>>55678476
Actually the 6GB 1060 is the same price as the 480

That's why AMD is in so much trouble

>>55678505
I'm sure I've shopped that picture in the 1 minute that I had to reply, kek.

People simply disagree with your street shitter opinion.

lol
>killing GPUs
2010: http://betanews.com/2010/03/18/nvidia-admits-geforce-drivers-responsible-for-fan-problems-issues-updates/
2013: http://modcrash.com/nvidia-display-driver-damaging-gpus/
2016: http://wccftech.com/nvidias-latest-game-ready-driver-allegedly-killing-gpus-plagued-issues/
There was even another one that ahppened to some 800M series GPUs as well, but I can't seem to find mentions anymore, but the three listed should suffice.

>chrome crashes
Documented here in march 2014, first mention I could quickly find: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=350547
But if you weren't such a newfag you'd have seen starting early 2015 that every week there would be at least one thread here of people complaining about this.
Fixed only in june 2015, over a year after they first found the issue on chromium: http://techreport.com/news/28551/nvidia-353-38-hotfix-driver-fixes-chrome-crashes-g-sync-lag

>windows 10 support issue
http://techfrag.com/2015/07/25/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-owners-unable-to-get-windows-10/

>>55676835
Are you legit actually fucking dumb?
The 1060 doesn't support SLI.
Also in Australia anyway, the RX 480 ref 8gb is $370
The 6gb ref 1060 is $550.
For like 3 less frames; I'll take the 480 thanks.

Also, fanboying one company is just dumb.

>>55678526
I could do it so im sure that a paid shill could do it to

>>55676484

wow, look at all those shitty games I have no interest in playing

Daily reminder that:

>8800 GTX ran over its TDP and overstressed PSUs

>Mobile GeForce 8000 series de-solder themselves http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/gpus-igp-nb-desoldering-themselves.582158/

>Fermi GF100 hot chips yield 1.8% success https://semiaccurate.com/2010/02/17/nvidias-fermigtx480-broken-and-unfixable/ http://www.zdnet.com/article/nvidia-fermi-gf100-gpus-too-little-too-late-too-hot-and-too-expensive/

>Nvidia pays developers to inject unnecessary amounts of tessellation into games http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/173511-nvidias-gameworks-program-usurps-power-from-developers-end-users-and-amd/2 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYL07c74Jr4&feature=youtu.be&t=1m46s]

>GTX 480s caught fire http://forums.evga.com/My-GTX-480-SC-just-shot-fire-out-of-the-top-fan-intake-m626592.aspx

>GTX 590s caught fire demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRo-1VFMcbc

>GTX Titan had no drivers until 3 months after launch

>NVIDIA launched drivers that melted GTX 780s

>GTX 960 beating the Titan Black and GTX 780 Ti because of nerfed drivers

>970 ram nerfing http://www.anandtech.com/show/8931/nvidia-publishes-statement-on-geforce-gtx-970-memory-allocation

>Law suits against Samsung and Qualcom for questionable stuff

>Nvidia using non G-Sync technology on G-Sync branded laptops

>Nvidia speed up batman demo to make it look more fluid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsjmLNZtvxk&t=24 listen to the thugs voices

>Windows 10 drivers brick laptop displays https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/862417/geforce-drivers/windows-10-official-353-62-drivers-are-killing-samsung-and-lg-notebook-lcd-display-panels/1/

>Now we had DX12 test, granted it's just one DX12 test, but it's DX12 nonetheless... Nvidia sucks big fat cocksicle on it, and how do they react? They blame the devs.

>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/28/windows_10_update_nvidia_driver_conflict/ Release Win10 drivers being flat broken

File: Shh-No-Tears-Only-Dreams-Now-Rustled-.png (496KB, 500x547px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 500x547px

>>55678540
I bet you could pajeet, your getting money to do so. I hope that dollar you've made today is gonna be well spend.

>>55678561
I bet you could pajeet, your getting money to do so. I hope that dollar you've made today is gonna be well spend.
>>>/v/

>>55678555

No matter how hard you try, Nvidia will always win at the end of the day.

>>55678590
No matter how hard you shill, AMD will always run better at the end of the day.

This thread is so funny. The fact that you idiots align yourself with a brand on an emotional basis undermines any respect anyone has ever had for that tiny little bit of intelligence you people actually have.

>>55678610

Right, where is AMD's answer to the 1070 and 1080?

Oh, that's right! You have to wait! LOL

>>55676512
where can i see these benchmarks? which site?

>>55678620
>being a impatient child
you have to be 18 or older to post here

>>55678641
4chan

>>55678641
They're unofficial leaks from Sapphire, posted on leddit. It's 99.9% certain they're bullshit.

>>55678620
>end of the day
He literally means after a year or three.

>>55678641
reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4tum2s/sapphire_rx_480_nitro_benchmarks_crysis_3_w3_gta/

File: amd dx12.png (2MB, 1450x3400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1450x3400px

>mfw dx12

>>55678669

>/r/amd

go back there, shill.

>>55678661
>>55678669
welp

>>55678674
if you post this enough you might actually get people to believe it. maybe.

>>55678661
>its bullshit because it makes nvidia look bad

also
>going to reddit
>>>/v/
>>>/reddit/

File: princess.png (958KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

958KB, 1200x1200px

>>55678669
>/r/Amd
That's very credible and unbiased source.

File: 9fe5bc72ea47f606944751ccc2ee8f3d.png (362KB, 604x451px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 604x451px

>>55678680
make me

>>55678692
All the graphs in the picture are real, and still occur

For example, from just a few days ago

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_1060_fcat_frametime_analysis_review,6.html

> in here you can see the GeForce GTX 1060/1070/1080 and Radeon R9 Fury, just a little extra for comparison's sake. As you can see, in the intro scene the Fury produces some stutters, I can visibly see these on screen.

>>55676484
I only play doom on Vulkan so I guess I'll get an Rx 480

>>55678680
>>55678703
>>>/v/

>>55678616
this, holy shit you dipshits are stupid

>>55678712
>They test the GTX 1060
>They don't test the RX 480

Hmm

>>55678726
>only play doom
How boring.

File: 1464917258236.png (328KB, 462x418px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 462x418px

>>55678712
You have extreme autism now stop samefagging.

>>55676746
AND filtered

>>55678726
Reverse trolling from Nvidiots is really lame desu

>>55678747
>Not playing 16-bit Weeaboo Panty Sniffing Simulator 2016: F-Zero

>>55678744
>This typically is the moment where we dive into FCAT results. FCAT however requires a DVI connector, which the Radeon RX 480 does not have.
AMD didn't want people to see their card stutter.

>>55678763
>implying AMDrones are not stupid enough to post shit like this

>>55676746
I knew you were a shill 6 years ago. You just got yourself on my shitlist young man.

File: 1467860102737.jpg (22KB, 480x461px)

22KB, 480x461px

>>55678770
>They could not afford a DP to DVI connector
What?

>>55678768
I'm looking forward to some strategy games like Master of Orion and Civ VI. Then there's current games like Overwatch and GTAV. Or indie games like SPAZ2 or the various free/cheap HL2 spin offs. Then there's also the nascent VR games. . .

>>55678757
>being this butthurt

>>55678775
>AMDrones
stop samefagging every thread hoping that your nvidiot counter-buzzword will catch on because it isn't and
>>>/v/

>>55678815
>samefagging
Proof or are you merely sperging out?

>>55678795
That wouldn't work. FCAT measurement is a bit more complex than that.

>Alright, a quick recap for you to get a grasp of what we are doing. We have our traditional game PC with the dedicated graphics card installed. We start up a game or benchmark sequence. The game is rendered, passes several stages and then frames rendered are ready and served towards the monitor. It is precisely at that stage where we make a bypass. The DVI-DL monitor output cable we connect to a Dual Link DVI Distribution Amplifier (or high resolution capable DVI switch). We connect our graphics card to the input of the switch. Now the switch will clone the signal to two outputs on that switch. One output we connect the monitor to but the second output we connect to a framegrabber AKA Video Capture Card. Ours is a Single Channel 4 lane PCI Express bus with maximum data rate of 650 MB/sec and support for a maximum canvas of 4kx4k HD video (we wanted to be a little future proof) capture for all progressive and interlaced DVI/HDMI modes. This card is 1,500 EUR alone. We are not there yet though as we need to place the framegrabber into a PC of course. Fast is good, so we are using a Z77 motherboard with a Core i7 3770K processor. The encoding process is managed by the processor on the framegrabber in real-time too, if I/O is managed fast enough, we'll have less than 10% CPU utilization while capturing 2560x1440 @ 60 Hz streams in real-time.

>>55678770
You have autism now go back to the containment board
>>>/v/

>>55678824
Prove that you aren't, /v/ spillage

Everyone please report the guy who is spamming /v/, it's against the rules

>>55678838
>Prove that you aren't
It is no one's obligation to prove you wrong.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

>>55678854
>being a snitch because you are butthurt that people are telling you to go back to the containment board

>>>/v/

File: amd nvidia.jpg (192KB, 863x259px)

192KB, 863x259px

Accurate description of /g/

>>55678861
Because you can't.

>>55678887
GO BACK PANJEET
>>>/v/

>>55676484
>can't into math
Go away. Kids shouldn't be posting in 4chan.

What Nvidia gpu would be best for my wifes son?

>>55678888
Because it is your job to prove a teapot is orbiting the sun if that is what you claim, Bertrand. Your failure to prove what you claim is not dependent on anyone else even trying and your attempt to 'double dog dare you' to do something retarded like that only shows how desperate you are.

>>55678827
Sounds like they need to get with the times and make a new FATCAT for DP to me.

>>55678920
Prove me wrong nvidiot shill

>>55678431
DELET THIS

>>55678946
Why should I? Because I am obligated to? That has already been proven wrong. Because you 'double dog dare' me to? That's already been noted as retarded.

>>55678918
Well Nvidia is good at cucking so best go with that one.

>>55678887
The applies to AMD fans in general. There's less chance of having a constructive discussion with AMD fans then there is during discussions with nvidia fans.

>>55678918
GT 710, was just released this year, good bang for yo buck

>>55678967
Fuck off and stop shilling nvidiot cuck

File: 1467775533985.jpg (17KB, 450x370px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 450x370px

>>55678982

File: yes.jpg (11KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 259x194px

yae mean i huff dead froges to get supra highg on the wakend

>>55679003
>responding with memes
>>>/9fag/

>>55676841
i ordered zotac for $279 but i could find plenty of gtx 1060s for $249 but i did not wanted, cuz 5 years warranty, all my amd cards died in 2.5 years so better safe than sorry if i change brands.

Dumb stupid poorboi AmD shills have been defecating all over /g/, and it is now time to put a stop to these legion of anus-cavities. Let us put all the facts on the table, eh?

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has excellent and spectacularly superb performance in FULL High Definition
-The AmD poorboi RX480 can only barely manage to play games in 1080p (1080p is a pathetic 75% LESS than ultra High Definition)

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is very quiet! You can barely hear it.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 generated dozens of DECIBELS of noise. Warning: Being in the vicinity of dozens-of-decibels CAN damage your hearing!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ consumes only a tiny amount of power. It is very efficient!
-The AmD poorboi RX480 has been seen to gulp down a cringe-inducing 167 Watts of power! 167 Watts can run several electronics devices simultaneously.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ can be had for as low as $249.99! An amazing and generous price.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is available for purchase for as much as $370! What a scam!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ uses advanced technology, such as Gameworks, G-sync, PhysX, and more!
-The AmD poorboi RX480 suffers from total and complete lack of features.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is from nVidia, a company that makes Graphics Processing Units. They are professionals.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is by AmD, ewwwwww!!!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has superior drivers with an excellent track record (more like chauffeurs, really).
-The AmD poorboi RX480 failed to offer better value thanks to their overwhelming driver overhead.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ will cool your house
-The AmD poorboi RX480 causes literal housefires (Google "RX480 California housefire of 1998")

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is beloved and admired by all
-There is literally no reason to buy the AmD poorboi RX480

(1/2, the idiocies of the disgusting AmD poorboi RX480 will be continued in the next post)

>>55679021
You're trying too hard to be edgy, son

>>55677875
>>55677876


Being slow as fuck, what a bunch of grandpas, i ordered my zotac amp gtx 1060 yesterday from amazon and it will be shipped to europe in 3 days

>>55679037
(2/2)

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has a warranty for 2-3 YEARS! That shows the level of quality and commitment you get from nVidia.
-The AmD poorboi RX480's warranty is only a FEW dozen MONTHS. Pathetic!

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is friendly, helpful, and nice to your motherboard.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 will FRY and DESTROY your motherboard, because it draws TOO MUCH power from the PCEi lanes! This cannot be fixed by poorboi AmD! (Google "RX480 PCEi power issue).

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ simply works.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 causes crashes when using Chrome.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ benchmarks speak for themselves. This is science and you cannot deny it.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 benchmarks comes from sites that were bribed or coerced into portraying AmD poorboi products in a positive light.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is often the choice of people who prefer democracy and peace.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 can be found in the homes of people who live in dictatorships. Be good, and do not support the suffering of these people.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is for independent thinkers, people who value freedom and dignity.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is known to have been purchased by Communists.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ will provide years and years of fantastic gaming performance.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is a gimped card, sold to the exploitable and uneducated masses.

-The nVidia® GTX 1060™ creates an aura of respect and professionalism.
-The AmD poorboi RX480 is for, like, you know, losers, omg.

I respect myself. I am not a loser. I am not pathetic. That is why I will purchase the nVidia® GTX 1060™ (maybe two of them, for SLI). What about you? Are you a wonderful nVidia supporter, or an AmD poorboi loser?

File: 1453973426321.jpg (96KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 960x640px

>>55679038
loweles i like funni mememes

>>55679037
>actually instigates flamewars
So now you show your true colors.

>>55679062
Half of what I wrote is copy/pasted from this thread. I am archiving.

>>55679073
Believable since nvidiots say the most outlandish shit possible

File: lolpng.png (149KB, 1120x977px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1120x977px

>amdrones being this triggered

>>55679037
>>55679042
Your AMD bias is showing again, Falcon.

>>55679073
So the other half is your own shilling then?

I hope you don't deny that there's a high amount of AMD shilling here too.

We can start with posting dubious benchmarks as if they were true in >>55676512, move to denial of facts everyone should be aware of here >>55676825 and then making up excuses for being wrong here >>55676908 (RX 480s being out of stock never matter for price comparisons).

That's just from the beginning of the thread.

File: 073.jpg (3MB, 4320x3240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4320x3240px

>AMD release a card built with the future APIs in mind

>Nvidia tells everyone what they're allowed to bench for 1060

>Liek omg amdead amirite?!

http://imgur.com/a/AtDcb

>nvidiots when no one believes their shilling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4PTf7LgsIE

File: 1439530549484.jpg (17KB, 396x384px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 396x384px

>>55679144
>being this much of a shill
wew lad

>>55679127
are you pic related

File: AMD.png (1MB, 1075x778px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1075x778px

>>55679144
It doesn't even AMDrones here that post stupid shit. Even AMD PR posts stupid shit.

>>55679248
>>55679220
samefag

>>55679252
How desperate does one have to be to resort to calling someone a 'samefag,' or attacking the poster's character rather than the post? Are you that emotionally attached to AMD that you feel somehow required to defend them?

File: DSC_0053b.jpg (3MB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x2000px

>>55679135
>>55679144
I am NOT a shill, or AMD biased! In fact, I have the nVidia GTX 970 with me. Pic related is proof.

On a more serious note:
>I hope you don't deny that there's a high amount of AMD shilling here too.
No one can deny that. But there is also shilling for nVidia as well, and it is as bad. I am not anti-nVidia or anti-AMD, but the amount of fanboyism and stupidity has gone to comical levels.

>>55679281
>I am NOT a shill, or AMD biased!
If you are not AMD biased then why are you stockingpiling stupid shit nvidiots would say? Is that not, in essence, supporting the other company? Or are you stockpiling stupid shit AMDrones say as well just to preserve your "unbiased" claim?

>>55679281
>Falcon usesthe 3.5gb meme card

comical

>>55679281
Nice To-do list

>>55676484
as long as AMD supports windows 10 and DX12 they´ll stay shit no matter how much performance their shit gains in DX12
fucking gaymers messing up everything for people

>>55678674
>implying AMDrones are smart enough to notice stuttering

>>55679266
stop samefagging

File: Enough.png (1MB, 2536x1420px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2536x1420px

>>55679300
When the GTX 1080 and 1070 launched, there was only a little stupidity from AMD fanboys here.

When the RX 480 launched, it was a complete faeces shower. See pic.

And right now, you can browse /g/ by catalogue, and you will find that there are more pro-1060 or anti-480 threads. Significantly more.

So from my perspective, there needs to be a "counter-stupid" copy/pasta for one side. If you want to make another copy/pasta to document all the idiotic things said by the other side, go ahead. I am not stopping you.

>>55679354
Pretty desperate it would seem.

>>55679358
For fucking months retarded AMD faggots came up with the most retarded FUD about the 480 I don't even know why you try to claim you're not biased, it was only because the 480 was such a disappointed that it humbled them

>>55679358
>When the GTX 1080 and 1070 launched, there was only a little stupidity from AMD fanboys here.
Bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit. We got plenty of calls for "wait for the 480" it'll be better in DX12 and half the price or "paper launch" or . . .

>When the RX 480 launched, it was a complete faeces shower.
And yet we still got plenty of threads "muh mgpu" and "muh async" and we still do.

You have only further convinced me of your AMD bias as you disregarded or failed to notice the AMD stupid shit that has been rampant here for the past few weeks.

>>55679358
Simple, nvidia has payed shills here and it has been proven many times in the past.

>>55678918
For your wifes son get a GTX 1070. For yourself buy the RX 480 you cuck

>>55679386
Paid shills does not in any way prevent AMDrones from posting stupid shit in /g/.

>>55676512
So only the 1070 and 1080 can run Crysis 3 1080p at 60 fps?

>>55678703
Literally fanboy central.

Criticise AMD slightly and lo and behold, fanbois will assail you with bullshit and downvote you to oblivion.

>>55679146
>AMD releases a card built with the future API in mind
>nVidia tells everyone not to adopt any new API until their cards support the new API

>>55679395
>Paid shills does not in any way prevent AMDrones from posting stupid shit in /g/.
ENGLISH PANJEET

>>55679381
I was there for all 4 launches. It is not possible to go back and document the exact amount of pro-nVidia or pro-AMD shitposts that accompanied each launch, so we can compare. All I can offer is what I remember, and I remember that the RX480 got the maximum amount of faeces. Of course there are pro-AMD shills, and they did post plenty of FUD, but it was far less.

>>55679358
You'll never reach silicondoc in shitposting, you failed tripcancer. Not to mention IN Elite. Just an hero already, you piece of shit.

File: 1465402320579.png (167KB, 709x636px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 709x636px

>>55679392

>>55679438
How do you explain everything being posted only by nvidia shills?

>>55679452
Back to /v/ butthurt nvidiot
>>>/v/

>>55679455
#triggered

>>55679452
>SiliconDoc
>IN Elite
>Mod<3
Glory days ;_;

>>55679451
>I was there for all 4 launches.
Where did I say that you weren't?

>It is not possible to go back and document the exact amount of pro-nVidia or pro-AMD shitposts
Where did I say that you did?

The point was not that you weren't here or that you didn't document everything pro-nvidia or pro-AMD but that your AMD bias influenced you to overlook stupid shit AMDrones have and still are posting.

>All I can offer is what I remember
Exactly. Your bias affects what you pay attention to and thus what you remember.

I still await for you to explain how your conduct in stockpiling stupid shit said by nvidiots in this thread is not, in essence, supporting the other company. It seems all you can do is present excuses of how you do not hold AMDrones to the same standard you hold nvidiots to in this thread.

>>55679489
Because nvidia is far worse with the shills, just get over it and stop being a fanfag.

>>55679516
Not even close, honestly I just came back to /g/ around the launch of the 480 and could have sworn this was essentially AMD's PR platform, it's that bad.

>>55679516
>Because nvidia is far worse
No question was raised about quality but how you can rationally conclude that everything is done by shills. Thank you for proving your just soapboxing rather than actually bothering to read and respond to questions asked of you, ie. you cannot be bothered to hold your part of anything even loosely resembling a substantive discussion.

>>55679489
>5000 on team red
>5000 on team blue
>250 anus-excavators from team red
>28 anus-excavators from team blue
Which team do you think will provide more material for "stupid crap said by team [x]"?

Here, try this experiment: I found it easy to make a "stupid things said by nVidiots" copy/pasta using the comments in this thread. If the same number of dumb comments is being made by BOTH sides, you should find it easy to use this thread to make a "stupid things said by AMDrones" copy/pasta.

...right?

>>55679547
>Which team do you think will provide more material for "stupid crap said by team [x]"?
Let me see if I understand you correctly. You are admitting your bias and trying to change the point to justifying your bias?

>>55679423
I still don't understand how nVidia has not yet been sued under antitrust laws

>>55679559
Unfortunately, you did not understand correctly.

>>55679574
Please explain how it is incorrect rather than just presenting a conclusory (and self-serving) response.

>>55679574
Of course he didn't hes a retarded nvidiot fanboy.

>>55679583
Friend, I did the exact same thing when Sandy Bridge was released:

https://sandybridgetruth.wordpress.com/

Just took all the dumb and silly FUD and collected into one nice copy/pasta so people can read it and laugh. Ask yourself if that makes me "Intel biased", and fit that with your accusation that I am "AMD biased" at the same time.

And since whatever I say makes you think that I am biased, then add this to the mix: I buy, use, and recommend nVidia products. So I am "nVidia biased" too.

File: 1448423384306.png (1MB, 1360x1176px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1360x1176px

>>55679516
>8 out of 10 people are nvidia owners if using a vague translation of the market share
>somehow there are more ams posters everywhere I go even though they're the smallest minority
>literally every single youtube comment section of 1060 reviews is full of amdrones shilling with them all having the top rated comments which are full on damage control butthurt
>strawpoll done by some random anon confirmed most people who browse /g/ own amd (ie fat neckbeard virgins who don't even game yet still shill for their gpu vendor)
>same anon found the majority of people on /v/ own nvidia (ie people who, you know, play fucking games or at least discuss them)

Amdrones are truly sad people.

>>55679638
You're clearly wrong. Anyone with half a brain can see that.

File: YJLTG2.jpg (144KB, 658x799px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 658x799px

>>55679638
>Friend, I did the exact same thing when Sandy Bridge was released:
Because Sandy Bridge has any bearing on the AMD/Nvidia discussion? Because you couldn't have a bias in regards to one component of your computer but not another? You canont dislike or be biased for AMD without being biased against Intel? You seem a never ending font of bullshit.

I'm done wasting words dealing with your bullshit and will demonstrate your bullshit in a final and I hope very clear fashion.
You claimed in >>55679547 that:
>I found it easy to make a "stupid things said by nVidiots" copy/pasta using the comments in this thread.
Your first post in this thread was >>55676523
>Stupid AMD shill. The nVidia ®GTX 1060™ is $150 CHEAPER than the poorboi's RX480.
No post in this thread prior to this post made any mention of cost between the two cards. Then a few posts later in >>55676746 you state many stupid shit that you now claimed was available in the thread. But no post prior to this laundry list was mentioned previous to your laundry list post such as:
>The nVidia® GTX 1060™ has excellent and spectacularly superb performance in FULL High Definition
Any mention of FULL High Definition before your post? Nope.
How about:
>The nVidia® GTX 1060™ is very quiet! You can barely hear it.
Any mention of comparative quietness or even any mention of fan noise prior to your laundry list post.

You sir, are a liar. A proven liar. You clearly have an AMD bias and try to defend it with excuses and lies.

>>55676484
Good thing I only play Hitman and Doom.