lo/g/os

Good logos.

Was that the logo? No wonder it didn't make it through.

File: 1439911528186.png (14KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 640x480px

>>55672268
good times
pre /g/ - graphic cards ;_;

>>55672454
No, pic related was the logo, and it was glorious

Anyone wanna fork it?
https://github.com/install-logos/logos

File: 1458497405726.png (17KB, 460x460px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 460x460px

>>55672544
god dammit forgot pic

File: 1453858522112.png (146KB, 3542x4998px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 3542x4998px

https://mega.nz/#!vocnTSDR!I4dpkby6Dew3O0ur3BUJEX1ULJDFMX2tLjFfX3-BWKw

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:3e69fa5202d10f9325c3de90e3e8830637184a9c&dn=logoslinux-2015.03.13-dual.iso&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969

/g/ has "tried" to make over 100 projects in the last 5 years. They always fail for the same reason - /g/ VIEWS PROGRAMMING AS BUTT DIDDLING.

There are no two "programmers" on /g/ that will ever agree on anything because /g/ views programming as the source for their special snowflakeism, which is why you see no corporate job help threads on here and just 101 dropout tier threads about how if linebreaking after { or not is the way to go.

Once the initial novelty is gone hoping that they'll get featured on some gay news site that they spent their entire lives saying is shit anyway, the IRC "conversation" will go like this:
>hey guys, in order to get this started, we would need to make (something). let me go do that
>5 minutes pass
>here it is
>1001 replies of ">not using some obscure dead hipster 80s ironic lang"
/g/ is chock full of that loser who keeps taking cis 101 for 8 years in a row so he can show off to everyone in the class that he only uses fortran on netbsd on a laptop from 1999

>>55672485
>pre /g/ - graphic cards ;_;
c'mon this lo/g/os shit was like less than a year ago or something guys

>>55672690
>not using a laptop from 1999

Leave inmediately

>>55672268
>ジ
>not ぢ
you had one chance, and you wasted it.

>>55672690
>Hopped on /g/ for the first time today
Am already sending the pseudo intellectualism.

>>55672690
logos was dead the second they picked arch, non-neets don't want arch and neets want vanilla arch, there was literally no user base

>>55674049
Retard

>>55674184
That's not really true. Non-neets want arch, except stable and easy to interact with (i.e. GUI installers and configuration tools). The fantastic package repositories (with AUR) along with the outstanding wiki makes it a non-neet's dream OS.

It's true that neets either want vanilla arch or not-arch-at-all, however.