No speccy thread?

File: muhrig.png (2MB, 1964x793px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1964x793px

aint got a speccy by itself can't be fucked to make one.

File: Speccy.png (34KB, 651x525px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 651x525px

>>55662831

Nice specs. How far did you push 6700k with overclocking?

>>55662846
Haven't touched it yet. It's lighting fast compared to what I was using previously as it is. Once this damned heatwave fizzles out I might consider trying to push it to 4.5GHz though.

>>55662885
don't worry about the heatwave anon, it won't go over 50 most likely.

got my i5 6600k to 4.6ghz and i still have room for more, max's out at 54c at 100% load in games.

File: doodoodoo.png (19KB, 436x364px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 436x364px

my roasty toasty shitposty calculator

File: ss (2016-07-17 at 03.46.56).png (17KB, 454x385px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 454x385px

>>55662801
Sup Slick?

>>55662919
I'm more concerned about the ambient temperature in my room. The room is west facing so with heatwave the air in the room is around 28-29°C in the evenings. Gaming on the computer adds another 3-4°C to that. With the humid UK air, it turns the room into an unbearable sweatbox.

>>55663046
don't they have ac in bongistan?

File: muh_amd.jpg (98KB, 1025x660px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1025x660px

gayming toaster

>>55663090
wtf did u edit out the cpu

>>55663114

fm2+ got wrong cpu temp reading, it fucked so bad it literally house fire, just refer cpu temp to mobo

>>55663144
no worries i understand, my old phenom II used to pretty regularly read a temp of over 300 degrees. AMD cant even figure out how thermometers work let alone design a decent architecture

>>55663058
For the 5 days a year of hot weather? Nope.

File: ss+(2016-07-20+at+12.45.36).png (18KB, 555x322px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 555x322px

>>55663045

File: Speccy.jpg (56KB, 535x397px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 535x397px

Would a a Xeon X5670 be a worthwhile upgrade?
I'm poorfag as fuck and a CPU upgrade to something cooler and lower TDP would be welcome. My i7 idles over 55C because this summer is torture. Ambient room temperature is constantly 35C or higher.

File: main pc speccy.png (22KB, 490x390px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 490x390px

>>55662788
what's up with the 2gb 980 ti ?

>>55663045
nice temp

>>55663262
same as above

File: ss+(2016-07-20+at+02.10.43).png (45KB, 384x492px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 384x492px

>>55663617
speccy bug

File: b49.gif (1MB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 680x680px

>>55662801
>>55662831
>>55662846
>>55663045
>>55663090
>>55663262
>>55663961

>windows 10


NORMIES LEAVE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: speccy 7.png (45KB, 757x604px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 757x604px

Time to post my frankenstein of a rig once more.

File: speccyt.png (85KB, 799x575px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 799x575px

rip


I threw in the r9 390 way later on, so far so good

>>55664470
anyone who plays games and isn't keeping CP on their computer is going to have W10.
It improves general system responsiveness over W7 or W8, and it adds DX 12 support. Not to mention it being free.

The only people who care are privacy cucks who still pretend they're safe and secure in their bubbles, and retards doing actual illegal shit.

>>55663576
yes. went from a W3530 (i7 930 equivalent) to a X5650. more cores and a lower TDP.

>>55664489
even if we are ignoring all the spying and botnet, windows 10 looks like shit. I'd rather use 7 or even 8.1

File: Specccy.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

Few corrections,
The gpus are both 6gb models and i have since enabled SLI it was an early pic.

>>55664530
>he can't even change how his OS looks because he's retarded

seriously, you can make it identical to windows 95 if you want you autistic sack of shit.

>>55664535
why are you so mad, rajesh? doesn't microsoft pay you enough rupees to shill for windows 10?

File: mememachinee.png (40KB, 710x565px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 710x565px

Meme machine incoming.

Should upgrade my gfx, but I don't really play modern games.

>>55664481
DELET

>>55664543
I'm probably whiter than you are mate, i'm almost clear.

>>55664489
Hahhahaa, Wangblows 10 is for tech illiterate morons, it performs the worst in benchmarks compared to 7 and 8,1, is broken and buggy as shit
Only one using windows 10 are cucks that are the "techy" one of their friends :^)
Normies gtfo

>>55664489
Windows 8.1 with start8 will always be the best.

File: Capture.png (194KB, 1070x790px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1070x790px

>>55662846
>2^11-32
>not using windows 10

>>55664568
>>55664470

Meant it for that guy

>>55664551
no need to upgrade gpu, you should still be able to play any title if you tweak your settings.

>>55664561
>it performs the worst in benchmarks compared to 7 and 8,1
Lol source on any of this BS?

Pretty much all benchmarks show (at least where gaming and normal desktop responsiveness are concerned) W10 performs better than any previous windows version.

Seriously, if it performs worse lets see some actual proof, not a cherry picked benchmark, real analysis proving it performs worse.

>>55664561
Not that anon, but you must be high if you think previous windows versions actually perform better, I hate W10 as much as the next guy, but you can't deny it performs better. That's just kind of a fact and easily testable.

>>55664555
>indians
>white

File: 1452183561304.jpg (10KB, 193x181px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 193x181px

>>55664596
I'm not Indian was my point, I was born in the UK in live in the US.

>>55664483
What's with the temps?

>>55664608
amd

>>55664608
They look like load temps and not idle temps, and for load temps they look fine, a bit high but nothing dangerous.

>>55664605
Okay, iqbal

>>55664554
no, I like my little frankenstein of a box.

File: cdm1.png (34KB, 402x367px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 402x367px

>>55664551
I am madly in love with my SM951 though.

>>55664582
I can, but the fps I get in some games do bother me a bit.

File: 2016-07-20 08.30.47.jpg (2MB, 3984x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3984x2988px

>>55664623
oh okay

File: 2016-07-16 09_19_05-CrystalDiskMark 5.1.2 Shizuku Edition x64.png (957KB, 797x685px) Image search: [Google]

957KB, 797x685px

>>55664639
I have a 950 Pro, they're nice. But unless you regularly use the increased speed, it's more just to show off than any real practical benefit.

Boot times are longer than an 850 Pro because SATA boot is much much faster than PCI initialization in order to boot from a PCI device.

Only times I really regularly notice the increased speed is when transferring files between my SSDs.

>>55664727
Is sata boot actually faster? My pc is from cold to win 10 desktop in about 7 seconds.

>>55664760
>in about 7 seconds
I doubt that, go ahead and time it.

During the POST process on every single motherboard i've tested ALWAYS does PCI initialization AFTER SATA. So no matter what, a SATA SSD will boot faster because it skips the PCI initialization part of the POST.

I guess it's possible a motherboard manufacturer has changed their POST process in order to facilitate faster booting from PCI devices, but if they have I haven't heard of it.

>>55664801
>but if they have I haven't heard of it.
Actually I take this back, I have heard of it being done with laptops that don't have SATA devices.


But i've never seen it done on a desktop motherboard.

>>55664801
I timed it, you are right, it is not as fast as it feels.

Still pretty damn fast though. (22 seconds from cold to desktop)

>>55664966
Yeah it's still gonna be damn quick, and you'll hardly be able to tell between SATA and M.2/PCI, the real benefits come from one you're loaded into the OS anyway.

My X99 board takes about 40 seconds to boot up because of all the RAM it has and booting from an M.2 drive. But considering I boot up maybe once a week, not a huge issue.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (242KB, 791x890px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 791x890px

In middle of fucking around with drives and completely missing threads

time for more coffee

File: 1449674201069.gif (1MB, 280x210px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 280x210px

>>55665038
I bet that RAM is AMD branded too

>>55665038
6 screens... You do not need this, you know this.

File: WP_20160720_14_12_04_Pro.jpg (1MB, 1456x2592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1456x2592px

>>55665047
i sent a shinki in to have a look - she says no, it's corsair and that I really need to buy canned air.

>>55665106
and do some cable managment

>>55665136
it was nice at one point, but the years and upgrades have not been kind

>>55665106
This rat's nest

>>55665136
Maybe he didn't build his computer just to post it in guts threads?

File: plsdon'thurtme.png (32KB, 473x471px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 473x471px

Here we go...

>>55665197
dual 730

what

>>55665214
>640x360
wew lad

File: m8PE9wh.jpg (833KB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 4160x2340px

>>55665214
>>55665228
Woops my b

>>55665566

File: Untitled.jpg (91KB, 1016x522px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1016x522px

>tfw 500w power supply

can i even get a graphics card? im worried the power draw will be too high. how shit is my setup?

>>55665989
im op, and im using a 500w psu

File: speccy 6-27-16.png (370KB, 591x696px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 591x696px

>>55665989
I have a 600w PSU.

even with my 5820k at 4.7GHz it barely pulls 350w.

>>55665996
damn really? how does it perform? im thinking of getting a 480 8gb.

>>55666020
damn son your card is fumin.

File: 2016-05-31 10_37_41-Piriform Speccy.png (24KB, 546x481px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 546x481px

>>55666030
>damn son your card is fumin.
it's while playing total war warhammer at 1440p for an hour. Temps are fine. Here is idle.

>>55666030
>thinks 500w isn't enough to get a gpu
>thinks 71c on a gpu is "fumin"

go learn you some shit retard

>>55664561
>it performs the worst in benchmarks compared to 7 and 8,1
sauce or fuck off faggot

>>55664608
load temps and mini-ITX

>>55666070
i recall a calculator for my p6t deluxe board with an i7 920 or w/e, the nehalem chip that's super dank to OC, required 350w so i'm guessing.

>>55665989
I'm this dude >>55664481
and its running comfortably on a 550W Seasonic PSU. You're fine.

>>55666102
Your CPU has a TDP of like 80w. Your motherboard, RAM, SSD/HDD are probably another ~20w. ANY single GPU from 2016 (RX 480 or GTX 1060/70/80) will use less than 200w.

That's about 300w total power draw for your computer including a GPU.

>>55666030
500w is fine for my setup, my i7 has like 80w tdp, the ti has like 200-250.

why is windows 10 so ugly ;_;

>>55666483
Literally designed in powerpoint

File: ss+(2016-07-20+at+02.12.41).png (45KB, 942x761px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 942x761px

>>55666303
very similar/op

: - )

File: downloadfile.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>three dot three dot five

File: laptop specs.png (34KB, 647x474px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 647x474px

Lenovo G50-45

File: desktop speccy.png (26KB, 617x520px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 617x520px

I got a new monitor and got rid of the shitty 720p tv I was using other than that its the same, I'm just to lazy to make a speccy.

>>55666742

>>55666728

File: lol.png (291KB, 887x637px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 887x637px

there's normally 4 760s, but I took out one of the cards for a different rig for testing

>>55666769
lol you got me there. Good catch.

>>55666783
>4 760s
>32gb Ram
What do you compute?

>>55666823
It's alright, I like your pupper even if I hate your use of external hard drives.

>>55666583
>1842x1026
LOL

>>55666877
Most of those drive were free so I took them. When I eventually build a new pc sometime in the distant future I'm turning that into a NAS.

is this the new windows 10 thread

File: 34566475456e457.png (32KB, 713x397px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 713x397px

Here's my speegy

>i7 5775C

>>55665106
I've heard of delidding CPUs, but now waterblocks too?

>>55668132
no, its more

"this fucking thing keeps failing off!"
"fuck the clip broke!"
"is it really that important?"

the joys of cheap AiO coolers - saying that, it does work and hasn't leaked

File: spec.png (49KB, 679x532px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 679x532px

Shitpost machine

>>55662788
Microsoft is part of NSA's mass surveillance program "PRISM":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)

Microsoft informs the NSA about bugs before fixing them:
https://archive.is/OBGB1

Microsoft openly offeres cloud data to support PRISM:
https://archive.is/tW6fu

Microsoft has backdoored its disk encryption:
https://archive.is/2XIvX
https://archive.is/qLRZx

Windows snoops on the users' files, text input, voice input,
location, contacts, calendar records and web browsing history,
even after related settings are turned off:
https://archive.is/thsGd
https://archive.is/sz1nt
https://archive.is/g3QdQ
https://archive.is/ko469
https://archive.is/l6pmO
https://archive.is/zK93U

Micrcrosoft automatically downloads Windows 10 on PCs running
Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 (between 3.5GB and 6GB), even if
users have not opted-in:
http://archive.is/CEvKh

Windows 10 scans for illegal/pirated software:
https://archive.is/vhjwm
https://archive.is/2jehd
https://archive.is/KQsBh

Microsoft proudly presents surveillance statistics:
https://archive.is/MB0Yy

> Over 82 billion photos viewed.
> Gamers spent over 4 billion hours playing PC games.
> 44.5 billion minutes/month spent in Microsoft Edge.
> Over 2.5 billion questions asked of Cortana since launch.
> Windows 10 now active on over 200 million devices.

File: Untitled.jpg (97KB, 700x544px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 700x544px

Built it last week
Actually, i only upgraded my mobo and processor coming from an Athlon x4 860k
i just want to play muh simulator on 60fps

File: speccy.png (17KB, 578x451px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 578x451px

waiting on gpu.

File: poorfag.png (627KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 1360x768px

>tfw poor
At least I have something I guess

File: speccy.png (138KB, 1115x904px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1115x904px

2500k @ 4.4GHz

Eagerly waiting for Zen

>>55667990
Non-E Broadwell CPUs actually exist? I thought Broadwell was a myth

>>55670418
They exist, and they're pretty badass with their 128MB of eDRAM. For certain tasks the eDRAM has amazing performance benefits. and if you use the iGPU of course that eDRAM is fantastic for that use as well.

File: masterrace.jpg (184KB, 576x419px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 576x419px

Read 'em and weep bois.

>>55670611
I've got a better CPU, double the RAM (and a bit faster), better GPU, more storage, and higher resolution monitors.

What am i weeping about?

File: 1443270582193.png (50KB, 1010x593px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1010x593px

>>55662788

>>55670631
>paying substantially more for placebo
You should be weeping my boi.

>>55670645
I got a 5820k for $290, what about that is placebo?
>inb4 muh single core performance

Also how is more storage or higher resolution monitors placebo?

>>55670536
That does sound pretty good, would be great for laptops, which I now read Broadwell was intended for (and AIOs)

>>55670672
1. Human eyes can't see over 120ppi.
2. Human memory can't remember over 4TB.

>>55670693
Yeah, I am really hoping they continue with eDRAM however, I would love to get my hands on a 6 or 8 core with 256-512MB of eDRAM.... Maybe in another ~5 years.

>>55670704
>1. Human eyes can't see over 120ppi.
I use 2x25" 2560x1440p which is 117PPI so we're good on that front.
>2. Human memory can't remember over 4TB.
Good thing I have 17TB of harddrives to hold everything I personally cant

File: Screenshot 2016-07-20 14.19.59.png (379KB, 1440x1153px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1440x1153px

here ya go

File: speccy 7 -16.png (53KB, 716x505px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 716x505px

new vidya card

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgs9g-Q-Zm8

File: 1a2f98b2dd85292641b19ab8d8ce64cb.png (39KB, 659x523px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 659x523px

Bet you can't guess what kind of computer I have.

>>55673006
A piece of shit?

>>55664481
Top lmao

File: laptop.png (714KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 1600x900px

>>55662788
thoughts? Got this fairly recently for what I considered to be a cheap price

>>55670396
>Desktop
>720p
>prebuilt
>250GB hard drive
>6Gb dual channel ddr3 1333mhz
>furry shit wallpaper
>riced out windows 8

This is bait.

>>55665038
Gimme ur old gxf card

File: Seagatepls.png (126KB, 1387x512px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1387x512px

Whats a good HDD Brand /g/? Toshiba?

One of my drives started shitting itself

>inb4 seagate

>>55674230
HGST

>>55674230
Hitachi

>>55666742
What kind of retarded disk setup is that? Why do you have 10 randomly-sized USB disks and 4 randomly sized S-ATA disks? Consolidate them, retard.

>>55673905
specific name?

>>55673006
Is it a Mac?

File: speccy'.png (21KB, 524x423px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 524x423px

I'm wanting to upgrade some things but I'm not really to sure what.
I was think about getting the 1060 when that comes out, but I don't know if that will really be that notice able of an upgrade.

>>55662788
just waiting until friday to get a 1070

File: Capture.png (53KB, 786x579px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 786x579px

>>55674589

>>55674603
Why would you need to upgrade from that?

>>55674544
Get the 1060 and one of those 1440p 27 inch Korean monitors I think.

Also maybe later on see if you can upgrade to a 4590k or 4770k

>>55674589
>>55674603
>Upgrading a 970 for a 1070 for 1080p

why

File: speccy720.jpg (111KB, 1064x735px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1064x735px

Been running the 4690K at 4.4 for about a month now, and it seems to be doing quite well. I'm running a Scythe air cooler (I think it's the Ashura) and temps have been pretty damn good, even under load.

>>55664483
I got a FX8350 and I have to say, undervolting and turning off turbocharge really helped my temps. (From 70+ on full load to a solid 55-60)
Is that a non-reference 390? I got a 390x strix and setting a custom fan curve with MSI Afterburner helps a ton at keeping it at 71 degrees under full load.

File: speccy.png (49KB, 702x572px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 702x572px

>Gaymen

>>55674765
i got a 1440p monitor but just am no hurry to hook it up yet

>>55675115
970 can still handle 1440p on high or ultra settings...

>>55675165
and a 1070 can handle it a lot better. i want the 8gb vram too.

File: 2016-07-04_07h47_29.png (51KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 660x525px

r8

>>55675200
>Upgrading from a 970 to a 1070 after getting cucked by nvidia with 3.5.
What is wrong with you?

>>55675152
With a 5820k doesn't it switch to x8/x8/x4 when you have 3 GPUs?

The 5930k would have given you x16/x16/x8

>>55675391
Not him, but a lot of games still run better on nvidia, even if AMD makes the objectively better cards. Nvidia have done a pretty good job of getting devs to write shit for their cards and cripple AMD.

File: 11-44-01-S-M-FPS1.png (11KB, 572x520px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 572x520px

>>55675391
But there's nothing wrong with the 970.

It's still a 4GB card, capable of using all 4gb without issues and performing exactly as it should between a 960 and 980.

There is nothing wrong with the 970.

>>55675391
970 is just a loaner and buying amd is just....eww. what am i going to do, buy a 480 to get the same performance at the 970, buy a 390/x to get the same performance as a 970 or 480, buy a fury card with shitty thermals or the fury x which the 1070 will outperform?

>>55670409
how did you get windows scaling to not look like shit

>>55675896
It doesn't, unless to somehow fuck it up...

File: speccy.png (43KB, 718x585px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 718x585px

ordered 1070 should be here in a few days

File: Optiplex 745.png (34KB, 649x363px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 649x363px

Pretty old, but it does play GTA V on moderately high settings.

File: rykdr6eia64ai.png (155KB, 1384x604px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1384x604px

Opinions?

>>55676864
Have my trip code lel, Changing it later.

>>55676864
Get a 3GHz Q9650 yorkfield in that bitch, it'll be sweet.

>>55676905
Oh shit man, you read my mind. I was planning to get a Core 2 Quad at 2.9/3GHz soon.

File: Capture.png (39KB, 658x523px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 658x523px

I want to SLI the 970 or upgrade to 1080, not sure yet

File: mememememe.jpg (45KB, 516x387px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 516x387px

check this autism

>>55677114
4790 and 970 was the best setup in 2014, still really good.

>>55677114
>32 GB of RAM
>autism
yup

File: Untitled.png (35KB, 639x481px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 639x481px

>>55665989
I've got a 500w PSU and everything works.

File: 1467673686256-pol.gif (635KB, 174x200px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 174x200px

>>55675057
Nice.