GTX 1060

yeah yeah you're poor we got it
saged

>>55655876
yeah yeah you're a newfag we got it

ITT: 2 newfags call each other a newfag

>>55656299
>>>/v/

>>55655863
It's a poorfags card, get a 1070 or 1080 if you want something actually good.

AMD has no offerings in the good market.

>>55656299
>>55656320
newfag roodypoo candyass

>>55656338
>AMD has no offerings in the good market.
you need to go back now
>>>/v/

>>55655863
>is only better at low resolutions
>is btfo at anything higher than 1080p on dx11

Because the 480 is better?

>>55656338
You're either trolling, or if you honestly think AMD have nothing to offer in the 'good market' you really can't know much about their products.

1060 is a historic card and is future proof for 1080p owners for at least a decade. Bravo Nvidia.

>>55655863
but all cards are made for that. my cousin bought me a gtx 1080 because its the best for my monitor which is 1980 by 1080. its really good

>>55655876
>poor fag
It's 315€ on my country. Just like nvidia.

>>55656382
>Because the 480 is better?
yes

File: 1395829754912.gif (76KB, 482x412px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 482x412px

>>55656342
>>55656320
>>55656299
>>55655883
>>55655876
Your all newfags

>>55656566
>calling newfags that call other newfags, newfags

pool in the loo not on the silicon

>>55656566
> your

>>55656536
Doom?

>>55656611
>calling a newfag that call other newfags newfags, a newfag
lad

>>55656411
Honestly, I held my GTX 460 for over 5 years. this one might even break that record.

Are there VR benchmarks?

Or ways we can reasonably estimate VR performance?

I imagine it's at least as good as the 970.

>>55655863
>is btfo at dx12

literally 10 FPS higher than the RX480 in ROTTR through the entire benchmark

File: lie.png (175KB, 353x318px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 353x318px

>>55655863
>>is btfo at anything higher than 1080p on dx11

>>55656739
NvIDIOTs using ROTTR and Witcher 3 as examples is like AMDrones spouting off about AOTS and Hitman you stupid faggot

File: TR12_01.png (73KB, 1304x1616px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1304x1616px

>>55656793
not him but even in dx12 inb4 doom, the 1060 is very fast...

>>55656813
and then gets btfo using Vulkan

>>55656739
>literally 10 FPS higher than the RX480 in ROTTR through the entire benchmark

ROTTR is the ONLY DX12/ Vulkan AMD sucks at.

>>55656813
>rise of the tomb raider
>(((dx12)))
Ok schlomo

File: Screenshot_20160719-214444.jpg (357KB, 1136x1335px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1136x1335px

>>55656793
>

File: TR11_01.png (73KB, 1304x1616px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1304x1616px

>>55656841
?

File: Ashes_01.png (73KB, 1304x1616px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1304x1616px

>>55656793
moar?

>>55656862
What are you trying to show here
Amd cards get larger performance increase margins in actual Dx 12 titles
This game is dx11 with dx12 sprinkled on top of it
As you've shown in ashes for example
Obviously a card that is 100$ more (50 if you get 8gb for some reason) will perform better than the latter?
Even then some other titles it gets beaten it. Even if it's slightly
They're both valid cards for their respective price points and all the shilling needs to stop
I'll admit if I had to choose I'd pick amd if it was the same price/performance because I don't agree with nvidia business practices
Regardless I have dual 980tis because nvidia won in the flagship market so you can't call me a shill
Not to mention the 470 is due to come out soon which is a slightly cut down chip of the 480 and should be an even better fps per dollar card

>>55656878
>AA off
>1080p
nice try shill

>>55656982
I thought Novideo was usually better in AA?

>>55657087
they never were better with aa, back in the day nvidia shills used benchmarks with no aa to say that the FX5800 was better than the radeon 9700

>>55657304
I meant this or previous generation, not that long ago.

>>55657343
again they never were

>>55657388
Alright good to hear, it's a shitty company anyway.

File: gpu.jpg (370KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 3264x2448px

AMD = shit

>>55656932
>so you can't call me a shill
shill

>>55657408
you = fag

>>55656844
The only site I trust to be honest.
Hard to read due to google translate but their benchmarks aren't bought out to the highest bidder.

>>55656679
>Implying that by reiterating the term "newfag" you somehow become older and more knowledgeable
Fucking newfags

>>55657780
The term newfag is only used by new people that started browsing 4chan after 2007.

But then again, those new people that started browsing in 2007 might feel old since it's been 9 years since they started browsing.

>>55657408
What do you need two of those for?
Are you doing video rendering? I hear these small pascal cards are still outdoing maxwell quadros, so it'd make sense.