BSD And Other Things

Just switch to Linux already

>>55654109
BSD is a deeper level of satori

>>55654093
>>55654134
Can *BSD be made as minimalist as LFS can be?

>>55654319
that's a strange question, minimalist how?

i guess you can install openbsd without X or even the man pages

>>55654319
It's done for you. You get a terminal calculator and a clock, and that's about it. Literally, there's no software beyond what they stole from Linux.

>>55655299
>there's no software beyond what they stole from Linux.
nice meme

Opinions on PCBSD?

>>55655385
clunky when i last used it, maybe it got better

>>55654109
But I already switched from Linux.

>>55655299
>Literally, there's no software beyond what they stole from Linux.
That's a lie, there is quite a bit of native software for *BSD.

>>55656549
>responding to the nothing works retard seriously

What should I use to lock my laptop screen in OpenBSD? I found slim for a display manager but it looks like slimlock relies on PAM

>>55656696
Perhaps you could look into slock from suckless.org

Their programs tend to be designed for portability.

Doesn't xscreensaver also include this functionality?

>>55655299
#rektandburried

>>55656819
stop replying to yourself

>>55656826
>butthurt cannot see IP count

>>55656711
I'm looking for a graphical one so it looks like slock's a no but I'll look into xscreensaver, thanks

>>55656869
more like
>i got banned and i dodge bans because im a little bitch

>>55654109

Linux is for SJW retards. Fuck Linux, Linux politics, Linux and related developers, and Linux SJW feefee commanders.

>>55656879
>Banned
Where do you see I a ever banned?

>>55656901
what the fuck is this post

also are you new? you do know that all bans are not public, right

>>55656907
Does that prove I was banned?

>>55656952
everyone knows you've been banned several times

>>55656907
>He doesn't know mods occasionally make a ban public
Lurk moar newfag

>>55656971
that's exactly what i said though, you fucking retard

>>55656893
BSD is for vegan contrarians. Fuck BSD, *BSD politics, BSD (again, since you're so buttravaged) and related developers and BSD contrarian NEET commanders

>>55656967
You seem to think you are in reddit.

>>55657013
haha you're doing this again

what's next, hipster, macfag, hippie?

i can make a bingo card out of your posts

>>55657031
Do you suffer from post traumatic stress disroder?

>>55657048
oh yeah, that too

thanks, forgot about that

>>55657059
>hipster, macfag, hippie
Seems legit but for the macfag part though

i really miss angela desu

she was a better shitposter

>>55657095
Man I forgot about her

>>55657095
She's from /pol/ and /r9k/

I like when BSD threads gets derailed like this kek

>>55657048
https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/thread/S55255281#p55259881
was this you?

File: ttis_killallmengame.png (93KB, 600x343px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 600x343px

>>55656893
ENJOY YOUR BROWSER OS SENPAI

>>55657155
how does that picture relate

you do know they threatened to sue her if she used the freebsd name, right?

File: 13129702.jpg (11KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 320x320px

>>55657155
>>55657159
My sides

>>55657159
Also, nice supportive community you got there

>>55657188
who would've thought that a company doesn't like it when some insane crackhead uses their name

>>55657204
Wasn't she a BSD dev?

>>55657095
I miss the FreeBSD autist who's only argument against OpenBSD was that backdoor accusation and muh jails.

>>55657219
"dev" is arguable

seems like she only did like single line fixes and some documentation fixes, she was practically useless and i wonder how she got commit rights at all

>>55657219
>she

>>55657232
im pretty sure it's the same guy, he just heeded our advice and changed it up

>>55657234
Is getting commit rights that easy?

>>55657245
This new shitposter hates *BSD in general. The FreeBSD autist loved FreeBSD and really hated OpenBSD. I'm sure they're two different autists.

>>55657253
you have to realize that she's a woman first in a mostly nerd dominated environment

so yes it was easy for her

some other dev was really defending her by saying she apparently submitted a lot of diffs at some point, of course he was the committer so he's biased as fuck, so who knows if he was lying

>>55657265
it's not like we can take his word for it, he is a shitposter after all

i find it funny that he stopped replying after i posted that archive link that proves that yes, he really does this every day

>>55655217
How big would a bare minimal install of OpenBSD be? Just the essentials and only the essentials like how you can get a tiny 10 MB install of GNU/Linux with just the essentials.

>>55657323
hm, never actually tried it, but according to the FAQ it's this:
>OpenBSD can be installed in as little as 512MB, but using a device that small is something for advanced users. Until you have some experience, 8GB or more disk space is recommended.
i doubt a full install actually takes 8GB, it's probably more of a safe recommendation, but 512MB makes sense considering its usage in routers.

you have to keep in mind that a lot of the openbsd packages are compiled with X in mind (unless its really obviously something that will never require X in a million years), so you're on your own if you don't install Xorg