GTX 1060

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-gtx-1060-review,1.html

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73040-nvidia-gtx-1060-6gb-review.html

What am I missing? Anand's is late as usual.

nice power consumption! Lower than 480

good performance as well, better than 480

>>55648981
And price is higher. But overall a good launch.

>>55648995
$250 (as founders) is hardly higher for that much gains

Will need to read a lot of reviews and make an average guess. Toms lists the 1060 at around 20% more powerful than the 480, meanwhile on hexus the gap shrinks to less than 10%

>tfw guru3D benches DOOM in OpenGL, not Vulcan

So overall the performance is very similar to the RX 480, some 5% faster because of the many DX11 games tested. It costs 30% more, and in return consumes 30% less power than the 480. Doesn't really OC very well either (~10%), probably non-existent on retail cards.

Still waiting for AIB 480s.

>>55649008
Founders edition is 300$. Good luck getting one for that money, though.

>>55649008
$300, friend.

>>55649022
5-10% on TPU. Hexus is out, eh? Thanks!

File: bf4_2560_1440.png (28KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x650px

>>55649024
yea man 5%!

File: 24606320.gif (914KB, 370x282px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 370x282px

About what I expected, will save up and grab one with the prices aren't gouged

33% more performance per watt than 480 and I'm willing to pay around 40-50 bucks more for it

>>55649036
it's $250 here in Barbados

File: perfrel_2560_1440.png (44KB, 500x1170px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x1170px

>>55649042
Are you mentally challenged?

>>55649066
that includes shill video games that no one plays of course

>>55649037
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125879&utm_medium=Email&utm_source=IGNEFL071916&cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL071916-_-EMC-071916-Index-_-DesktopGraphicsCards-_-14125879-S0B

Does anyone know what the warranty is on the founders edition? I can't find it anywhere.

It sucks that Nvidia just has to take such a revolutionary leap in GPU performance and jew the fuck out of it with its FE pricing bullshit.

I understand on some level that it is the only way to have AMD still survive and compete with its 16nm semi-failure, but it's maddening.

File: 1060 price.jpg (236KB, 1474x618px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1474x618px

>YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO GET A 1060 FOR LESS THAN $300 AT LAUNCH
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125879&utm_medium=Email&utm_source=IGNEFL071916&cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL071916-_-EMC-071916-Index-_-DesktopGraphicsCards-_-14125879-S0B

>>55649066

are you? look at the overclock page where the card comes within spitting distance of a stock 980ti.

comparing reference vs reference is retarded, you should never pass up 15-25% free performance.

>>55649088
>out of stock
Good one. Now show one that's actually available.

That feel when the GTX 1060 is for sale at 369€ (407 USD) in Spain

>>55649036
it available on nvidia's website right now for $300.

File: 1060 cart.jpg (59KB, 791x240px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 791x240px

>>55649109
Sorry. You need to be faster next time.

>>55649101
Comparing OC results on reference cards is stupid. Get a good AIB of both GPUs and then compare.

http://www.newegg.com/videocards/PromotionStore/ID-1170

All the newegg cards here.

>>55649088
>>55649094
It was in stock for a few minutes. We will what happens to the price when it restocks.

>>55649124
>>55649094
"Should there be actual GTX 1060 cards in the market at $249, then this will destroy any hopes of AMD, because then GTX 1060 will beat it in Performance per Dollar too, with no clear wins left for AMD to convince potential buyers."

>>55649124
I don't want one. The 1060 is probably going to sell the same 1000 units/week as the 1070/80. It's another paper launch. Expect prices to double by tomorrow.

>>55649132
that's the price going forward even 1 month from now

So, like a 20% increase in price for about a 10% gain.

>>55648783
no dx12 no vulkan no non gameworks games lel
that is some nice shill bench tpu

>>55649132
Shows up in stock again. Still $250.

And newegg generally doesn't just increase prices like that.

>>55649125
>Comparing OC results on reference cards is stupid.

they point was that you shouldn't pass up free performance even on a reference card, seems like the AIB cards are OCing even better than goyim edition already too

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1060_Gaming_X/27.html

>>55649137
The 480 is selling like mad. OCUK alone has 5000 units on backorder. And that's just one shop in the UK.
That's why we don't see AIB 480s yet. AMD can't even keep up with the orders on reference cards.

>>55649148
and 30% more efficient in power and temps

Do i upgrade from my 970 to this or to a 1070

>>55649187
Hardly worth the upgrade from a 970.

>>55649142
>Expect prices to double by tomorrow.
Why would the prices double, except at scalpers?

First it was
>YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO GET ONE FOR LESS THAN $300 AT LAUNCH
Now it has become
>IT WAS ONLY $250 DURING LAUNCH. IT WILL DOUBLE IN PRICE SOON

Is it that hard to admit that you were wrong?

>>55649174
>AMD can't even keep up with the orders on reference cards.

hope those people get their preorders refunded. AMD only shipped reference cards for launch day because of the defective PCB and poor yields.

>>55649187
1070

>>55649155
Agreed. The only site that benched DOOM so far ran it in OpenGL, even though Vulcan performs better on both Nvidia and AMD cards.

>>55649187
1060 is more than enough for 1080p 60hz

1070 if you want to do 144hz or 1440p+

File: 1468934805293.png (54KB, 1098x714px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1098x714px

>>55649199
well no we have one result

>>55649195
>Why would the prices double, except at scalpers?

Because those will be the only units on the market, as it is going to be out of stock everywhere. Nvidia has no supply.

AMD FANS BTFO.

>>55649211
Thanks for sharing, havent' seen that review yet.

>>55649216
Anyone who actually wants one can get one. Restocks happen every few days. Unless you're slow as fuck, you can easily get one without resorting to scalpers.

>>55649174
i preordered the sapphire one with 8gb of ram from ocuk, its supposed to come this weekend.

did i dun goof?

>>55649236
Yeah also set up notifications

And http://www.nowinstock.net/ will probably have a tracker soon

>>55649174
>>55649238
>o cuck

How fitting for people who buy gimped budget hardware

>>55648783
>>55648783
So gtx 1060 OC is 5-6fps (average) ahead of the RX 480 OC for 50 freedom bucks more. Which gpu is the better value?

>>55649238
I would cancel or return it if you can

>>55649211
this is what the future will look like.

all the people buying nvidia cards based on last year's DX11 games are stupid. Low level APIs are the future. It'll either be DX12 or Vulkan, and AMD gains in both. The 1060 doesn't hold enough of an advantage now to make up for that.

>>55649238
Nah, I'm planning on a Nitro as well. Sapphire has done very well with the last two series, it'll be a top card.
Lighting might top it, but at a price premium.

>>55649283
Roughly equal, if the difference is $50. RX 480 is the better buy if the price difference is higher, and GTX 1060 is the better buy if the price difference is lower.

>>55649289
Yeah man, all of those people buying a $200 budget card from AMD that performs as well as a last gen budget card are really fowarding-thinking and future-proofing their rigs.

>>55649289
i actually expected many of those "reputable" sites to actually do a fair bench between them but no..

very few used vulcan
even less used dx12 games

no hope

>>55649283
Considering the general trend towards DX12/Vulcan, the 480.
Unless you're mostly playing older games, then maybe the 1060.

>>55649328
Not even close, the 1060 destroys the 480 in DX12 and DX11

Where are the DX12 and Vulkan benchmarks that were all over for the 480

>>55649328
what general trend? the only real dx12 game so far has a huge advantage for nvidia, the rest are just glorified tech demos.

>>55649211

I love how all other review sites and specially retards in this board pretend this image doesn't exist while hurrying people to buy the card.
You guys always said that iSheep was the worst and look at you now.

Fucking pathetic.

>>55649286
why? the only demanding game i like playing is hitman and it looks like it runs that fine.

>>55649373
Depends on how much of a perfectionist you are. The 1060 is better than the 480 in every way, but if you don't want the hassle of a return, then don't worry about it.

File: 214[1].jpg (33KB, 615x630px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 615x630px

>>55649124

>>55649383
well if you take tpu out of the shill bin no 1060 is def not a better card lol..
its behind on dx12
its behind on vulcan
its behind on non gameworks games
pretty much its behind in everything 2016 is shaping to be

File: 1468936039581.png (44KB, 679x844px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 679x844px

>>55649373
>>55649383

File: hitman_2560_1440.png (27KB, 500x650px)

27KB, 500x650px

>>55649373
Hitman DX11, and the 480 still wins. Expect a bigger lead once they polish that DX12 mode (seems to have a couple bugs right now, that's why TPU benched in DX11 mode)

File: dx12.png (30KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x650px

>>55649343
DX12

1060 destroys 480

>>55649211
>min fps: 1
DELET THIS

>>55649434
Haven't you heard, RotTR doesn't count because of reasons
Hitman and Ashes totally count though despite both being AMD sponsored titles

>>55649406
>>55649410
>>55649417
Perhaps DX12/Vulkan will rule all future games. Perhaps not. Perhaps it will take 3-5 years for DX12 to be the norm, same as it did for DX11. We do not know the future. For now though, we have benches of current games, and the GTX 1060 is winning.

>nvidia's lowend office card completely destroys amd's midend gaming card

Kinda sad. But hey at least AMD spends money on cool parties.

File: 1447956963096.gif (1MB, 267x219px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 267x219px

>>55648783
>192 bit

File: amd vs nvidia.jpg (117KB, 680x766px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 680x766px

MY COUNTRY

$294 for an aftermarket 1060
$294 for an reference rx 480

Is it an easy pick for Nvidia?

>>55649456
it took them 7 patches to fix rotr and even that no one actually benched on the latests patch lol i guess using rotr async is a no no
>>55649459
actually we do we already have 16 games out with dx12/vulcan/mantle and we expect 6 more pretty sure its a good start compared to what dx11 did on its first year..(0)

>>55649467
GTX1060 is in no way low end.

File: poo-in-the-gpu.jpg (293KB, 960x655px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 960x655px

>>55649467
Raja spent too much time partying and pooing in the GPU, now AMD is going bankrupt

>>55649488
Yes.

File: RotTR-DX11-vs-DX12-640x640.jpg (75KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 640x640px

>>55649434

>980ti still got near similar average FPS.
>Fury X dropped by 50%

Explain this Nvidiots.

>>55649525
>comparing benchmarks between different setups

Are AMDummies really this retarded?

>>55649478
Dude they could put angel tears running at 500mhz in there as long as it makes it perform well, who gives a fuck about specs, only results matter.

File: CjlgGrXWsAE3jST.jpg (36KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x338px

>fuck yeah our best card right now is mediocre again, better party like there is no tomorrow

Yeah nope.
~€370 for non reference in Portugal so around the same for Spain.
No way it can compete with the RX480 price-wise. I mean if I am gonna spend €370 for a marginally better RX480 I may as well go full retard and get the 1070 for €500.

>>55649478
From the looks of it, doesn't really matter much to be honest.

>>55649537
This is what he does with all the money he got from the idiots who bought a 480

Got a 1060 from Newegg, but I'd prefer a 480. Too bad the 480s are never in stock.

As an aside, here's how fast the 1060 sold out-
Best Buy- 5 minutes
Amazon- 10 minutes
Newegg- Other than that $320- 30 minutes

>>55649530

>Different setup somehow favor more on Nvidia.

KEK NICE JOB GOYIM.

>>55649467
>More expensive card performs better
Amazing.

Hey falcon when are you going to upgrade your i5 2500k 560 ti build?

I have the same and am wondering when in going to get a huge leap for my money

File: value.png (43KB, 500x1210px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x1210px

>>55649596

>>55649467
1060 is not lowend. Moreover, it's more expensive and performs almost on par with the 480. Not only that, but it simply doesn't do async, so the 480 is miles ahead on dx12/vulkan titles.

>>55649488
Almost. Aftermarket is always significantly better than reference, but 1060 can't into async.

The most important part of the decision is whether that pricetag is for the 6GB 1060 or the 3GB version. Not only is 3GB too little nowadays, but the 3GB version is NOT the same as the 1060 except with less ram (as the 480's 4GB version is), but rather a completely cut down version of the 1060 in all aspects.

>>55649604
1060 is both faster than a 480 and a better deal. It's also way more power efficient. As techpowerup said so eloquently:

"Should there be actual GTX 1060 cards in the market at $249, then this will destroy any hopes of AMD, because then GTX 1060 will beat it in Performance per Dollar too, with no clear wins left for AMD to convince potential buyers."

As we've already seen, it is available for $249.

>>55649597
>>i5 2500k 560 ti
>>am wondering when in going to get a huge leap for my money

ILike, now? Or at the very least after the new aftermarket GPU stocks (and prices) stabilize.
Though you can prolly still rock with the i5 for another year or two depending on Zen.

>>55649532
>only results matter.

What results?

1060 is utterly shit.

You either get rx480 or 1070.

Ok, after looking through around a dozen reviews now, average seems to be 10% above the 480. Not enough for the 50€ extra I'm seeing imho. I saw one 1060 for 310€ already, but from experience I'm not touching palit with a 10 feet pole.
Plan is decided, if I find a massive sale over a 970 or above, I don't mind going one generation older, otherwise 480 it is.

>>55649488
1060 is a no brainer, get it before they sell out

>>55649626
yes but tpu is so reliable as me saying im god..

using games that no one plays anymore
not using dx12 games at all
not using doom vulcan at all
literally benching an nvidia card on nvidia games
its stupid beyond understanding and the sad part is they dont even care

Prices revealed in our country, Zotac Amp! GTX 1060 is same price as a reference RX 480 8GB at ~300 USD

>>55649626
I sure hope you get paid to post this crap.

>>55649600
>$200 RX 480 4GB Performace per Dollar
>200% [not pictured]

nvidia still btfo

>>55649626
The keyword is 'should'.

I've only seen 1 reference 1060 design at $250. The rest are all $30+ AIB cards. Given 1060's performance advantage is ~10%, there is no practical difference between the 2 cards' bang for bucks.

>>55649651
Reference 480 8GB is $230 though.

File: rx 480.jpg (59KB, 779x519px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 779x519px

>>55649625
the price is for the 6gb

Im still thinking on risking for possible more vulkan games thats a good title or get better performance for all dx11 games since Im not moving to windows 10.

>>55649238
Any US/Canadian sites doing pre orders for the 3rd party 480? Or only in europe/uk? I really want to pick up a bunch.

>>55649658
There are a lot of reasons to get a 1060 other than the fact that it's faster than a 480.

Mainly uses less power, puts off less heat, runs cooler, runs quieter, also lower failure rates.

>>55649671
Sorry if i live in a country where price is much higher than burger land due to import fees and taxes

>>55649698
86c is less heat? kek

File: 1468649249404.jpg (94KB, 591x596px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 591x596px

>>55649626
Press bribed as fuck as always.
Custom 480 overclocking like crazy is already confirmed.
ASUS model goes 1350MHz out of the box:
http://videocardz.com/62280/asus-rog-announces-strix-radeon-rx-480-available-mid-august

>>55648783
>>55648809
So this turd barely beats an RX 480 in gimpworks games and gets beaten by an RX 480 in neutral or AMD sponsored games.

Nvidia should be glad they only have four cards per shop to sell or the 1060 would be gathering dust on shelves everywhere.

This new GPU generation has been an utter disappointment so far. Either the price of the new GPUs is Jewish as fuck or the performance is lacking.

Still waiting for a 490 then.

>>55649698
I agree with 1060 using less power, but I don't pay for electricity.

I need heat because I live in an igloo.

For reference design, I think both cards would sound similar as they both use the blower design.

Finally, I have boxes of failed Geforce cards (mostly 8800s) while I've only had 1 AMD/ATI card failed on me in the last 14 years.

>>55649597
CPU: Not Skylake. I am a "normal" user: Emails, movies/series/aneme, games, programming. There is absolutely no reason for me to upgrade my CPU right now.

GPU: I am on a 1080p screen. In some modern games (XCOM2, Fallout 4), the 560 Ti does not cut it. But for stuff like Dota 2 and WoW, it is still fine. I live in a third world country, so I cannot justify a new USD$300 card when my current card is (mostly) fine. Such a purchase would be a waste.

...I do look with lust upon the new $200-$300 cards that are out now... I cannot deny that. If such a price is within your budget, and the games you play demand the extra performance, go for it.

File: temp.png (8KB, 500x210px)

8KB, 500x210px

>>55649710
Uhh bro the 1060 only gets to 78C even when overclocked

File: gpu-failure-rate.jpg (139KB, 1404x579px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1404x579px

>>55649737
That's interesting considering AMD cards fail way more often than Nvidia

>>55649754
These days, I can believe Radeon has a higher failure rate. But even with the worst case scenario (failure in the field), the rate is <4% for anything in the last 6 years.

If you are worrty about 4% failure rate, just buy the card with a credit card that has extended warranty.

As an aside, I have a couple of 5850 for mining Litecoin. I continue to use them after Litecoin went out of fashion. Only 1 card had problem (fan) and I fixed that by lubricating the fan bearing. These cards ran 100% for a couple of years.

>>55649754

>We only test Asus, but we wont name our article to Asus brand because they are the only one who sponsored us.
>Mod : in other news let me post this in comment section only for AMD cards
>Asus fail rate : 22%
>XFX fail rate : 12%

Are you too insecure to post the the fucking source?

https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/

File: untitled-1.png (218KB, 652x730px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 652x730px

>>55649745
lets talk about reviewers that actually know their shit

File: 480-house-fire.png (197KB, 776x773px)

197KB, 776x773px

>>55649820
Haha moron, maybe you should've checked the 480 temps

Pic related, way hotter

>>55649869
0.5 degrees more 480 what a disaster
how can this card ever survive

GTX 1060 is a good card. RX 480 is also a good card. Now I comfy wait a year for their prices to drop

>>55649896
Not that long. 2-3 months, based on previous launches.

>>55649809
>But even with the worst case scenario (failure in the field)
You have to deal with both failure figures stated, not just the field. The testing doesn't refer to AMD's testing or anything, but the testing of the prebuilt company that graph comes from.

So failure during testing = card comes out dead from the box or has issues out of the box, and failure in field = fails later

Dealing with RMAs with some companies is a pain in the ass, and not many people prefer to go through that shit.

File: 480-death-by-fire.png (8KB, 500x210px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 500x210px

>>55649890
Bro it's 84C right on the GPU

That's a full 7 degrees hotter than the 1060, and the 1060 also hilariously runs way faster

>>55649926
>So failure during testing = card comes out dead from the box or has issues out of the box

Yes exactly, AMD cards fail way more often right after you buy them, it's a big problem, probably due to shoddy engineering.

>>55649929
using tpu as a refrence of what? i posted a flir image while you posted a number that no one knows

>>55648809
>guru3d
>DOOM
>OpenGL
of course, probably the only way Nvidia would let them test the game

>>55649926

Easy, just don't buy Asus.

>>55649963
Uhh that's the temperature directly from the GPU sensor

>>55649744
Falcon, your the only trip that I accept :)

>>55649980
Check hardware.fr's RMA rates articles.

It's not just asus.

>>55649986
so you are saying while the rest of the reviewers actually did measure the card like you are suppose to
tpu just got it from the sensor right?
so everyone else is wrong
and tpu is right?
whats next? gonna say bf3 crysis wotanks and arkham knight is relevant on 2016?

>>55649986

From where? Surely the source is not your ass, is it?

>>55649322
Both cards will be fine for 1080p.

The 480 will be better and is cheaper though.

>>55649344
>games arent real is they favor amd

can't make this shit up

>>55650006

>Check it
>Gigabyte got the highest failure rate for Nvidia cards

Time to cancel my purchased.

>>55650009
Uhh it's the techpowerup review, check it yourself

>>55649745
>good temps
>shitter cooler

well that's a first. nvidia did good.

Do we really need 100 threads about any new GPU now?

>>55650058
Yup it's nice because the 1060 easily stays below the thermal throttle temp, even with the reference cooler

>>55649410
T...THATS JUST A TECH DEMO

>>55650070
Welcome to /g/. New cards come out once every 2 months, so the hysteria will not last long.

>>55649723
Except none of that is true of you look at the benchmarks

>>55648783
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no_NBTivfgY

File: 13563613_10207901178381230_2030895814_n.jpg (40KB, 531x471px)

40KB, 531x471px

>>55648783
>1060 L I T E R A L L Y doesn't support SLI
How the fuck is this not ringing alarm bells for people? They quite literally don't want you to be able the SLI the damned card because they have no intention of supporting it in the future. Why in the fuck else would they omit such a feature which was present on the fucking 960?

Whoever buys this card is either a mouthbreather or has no tech knowledge.

>>55650157
They don't want people buying two of them to outperform the $700 GTX 1080

>>55650157
Greedy move by nVidia to stop people from getting GTX1080 performance for $500.

>>55650157
Isn't SLI/CF obsolete given DX12/Vulkan?

>>55650175
>>55650179
>>55650198
Wait, so if I pair two different Nvidia cards (lets say gtx 970 + gtx 1070) will they effectively work together in DX12/Vulkan????

>>55650228
you won't be able to pair those cards together because Nvidia certainly won't allow it

In theory though with DX12 an Vulcan you could pair different GPUs like that together.

File: lifeisbutasimplechainofdemandsandpleasures.jpg (15KB, 300x192px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x192px

>>55650130
>I dont have latest drivers so my stats on the 480 are outdated
>oh, and im gonna compare an aftermarket version to the reference 480 lollolol

>also im gonna use nothing but gimpworks titles too, because they're the way it meant to be played(tm)

holy shit, how does this guy have a job?

>>55650228
You can pair even AMD+Nvidia+integrated but no dev is going to see the extra work for it.

>>55650228
The game developer MUST implement it but both Vulkan and DX12 API make it very easy for them to do so but we all know how bad game devs are at using the tools given to them to optimize games (they are underpaid code monkeys on steroids) so it will be a game lottery as to performance same as SLI/CS was.

>>55650249
>>55650228
Actually I forgot that Firaxis is doing exactly that with Civ VI lel.

>>55650228
>>55650198
Games have to implement multicard support themselves.

>nvidia certainly won't allow it
No you can pair them, explicit multi card modes are hardware independent and they don't require extra bridges, you can mix even AMD + Nvidia. But you won't get good results with cards that have more or less equivalent in performance.

>>55650235
only if mGPU is enabled by the developer.

In other words, don't count on it unless it becomes industry standard.

but if they do, you can actually even mix amd and nvidia cards if you want.

File: fdsa.png (72KB, 981x342px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 981x342px

>>55649094
Feels good

PASSMARK when?

>>55650175
nvidia doesnt really have a choice if the market moves away from driver based multi gpu setups and toward API based ones.

>>55650239
>youtube
>job

File: ROTTR DX12 WITH MGPU.png (52KB, 1120x728px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1120x728px

To be honest some of those Rise of The Tomb Raider DX12 benchmarks are weird.

>>55650301

I think he meant something in the lines of what nvidia did to people running a dedicated physx card to an amd main gpu for instance

Should I buy Asus Strix (which one?) or MSI and why?

I'm thinking about MSI because it's a bit cheaper and they give free VR equipment

>>55650422
And I forgot:
>inb4 buy amd. It's almost in the same price

>>55650422
Funnily both have been caught lying on their OC versions benchmarks in the past so do carefully compare them on third party benchmarks sites but if the say a 15% increase over reference assume it is 5% then do the maths price-wise and see if you are happy with price/performance ratios.

File: 45214.jpg (30KB, 547x461px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 547x461px

>>55649113
I know how it feels. Where I live is anywhere from 360 to 400 euros. I can get motherboard frying machine for 310 but I'd rather not.

File: Untitled.png (17KB, 366x128px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 366x128px

>>55649024
>>55649199
>>55649325
>>55649328
>>55649406
>>55649649
>>55649489
>>55650235

v u l K a n
u
l
K
a
n

File: 1311064819621.jpg (282KB, 596x590px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 596x590px

>>55649113
I still hoping non-reference RX480 will save the day.

>>55650499
What's taking them so long anyway? Nvidia partners got their aftermarket models out pretty fast.

>>55650518

Sapphire's out friday apparently, probably the card to get I'd reckon

>>55650518
Latest rumor is reference demand was so high that AMD said "fuck it use the chips allocated to non-reference to make more reference board" to the AIBs. The fucking madmen did it and now everybody is waiting with the PCBs ready for the new GPU chips batches. No Joke and given the 1060 it was a good call by Raja.

>>55650274
>very easy

It's far from easy dude.

just bought the asus strix 1060, upgrading from my 6850. Feels good.

File: 1364135519915.png (44KB, 245x212px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 245x212px

>>55650601
Easier than SLI/CF.

>>55648783
>that power consumption
toppity kek, fuck 480 I'm going team green now

>>55649815
Not to mention asus makes the worst AMD cards, by a huge margin. You'd have to be an idiot to buy one.

>>55649986
>being this retarded

>>55650550
Shit dont matter if Rx480 aftermarket is at the same price at Gtx 1060

if MSRP was followed, maybe I would've picked up a rx480 but no it clearly wasnt.

>>55650684

Last rumor I read was around 330€, pretty decent if it sticks considering the only 1060's I'm finding below 370€ are palit's, which I already had a nightmarish cs experience with.

>>55649702
You are not excused.

>>55650518
They oversold the refs so bad they can't deliver any chips to the partners.
They still have over 80,000 open orders.

>>55650631
SLI/CF Are probably easier to do but less useful.

>>55650755
Sad to hear about Palit, but Im still will buy that brand due to its fan noise being the lowest or so i heard?

I wont mind buying cards around every 3 years if its just the video card anyway.

File: 1468279988110.png (49KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 808x805px

Can someone post the amd-equivalent of this?

>>55651031
R9 390X EXTREME OC for only $349.99

>>55651715
R9 Fury Nitro is only $300 as of today. Or $275 with a paypal promo code.

>>55651031
ok here you go