P != NP
It's common sense, why argue further?
>>55615942
The existence of "God" is also "common sense" for most people.
>>55615942
Can you prove it?
>>55616006
Sort of. Why is it so hard to fit NP into P? Because obviously they're fundamentally different.
It's not a formal proof of course, it's an appeal to intuition at best.
>>55615953
*tips trilby*
>NP = P
>(NP)/P = P/P
>N = 1
There, proved it for you.
>>55615942
P = NP
Prove me wrong
>>55616086
>look mom i posted it again
>>55616115
Well, if I give you a NP-hard problem, can you translate it to P?
>>55616086
P=0 is another solution
Leave it to /g/ to sturggle with kindergarten math
>>55616022
it's generally agreed that P is not equal to NP
deriving a formal proof is the entire point of the problem
>>55616143
fucking hell already going on meta-level questions
while your implications are right, it's impossible for me, you can't prove that p ≠ np too
>>55616184
So we both lose the debate
>>55616243
conclusion: p=np problem is unsolvable
case closed
>>55616022
>It's not a formal proof of course, it's an appeal to intuition at best
so... it's not a proof at all
>>55616143
>>55616184
>>55616243
>>55616269
Kys retards