GTX 1060

RIP 480

>>55537452
DELETE THIS

>tomb rider
>forza
AoTs I'm surprised but then again, 5% better for like 20% more the money..

File: NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1060-2-GHz-Overclock-3DMark_1.png (121KB, 1366x599px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1366x599px

>WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>highly OCed 1060 is better than stock rx480

> A card you need a soldering iron "sold separately" to use

RIP AYYMD KEKEKEKEK

AMDead

>>55537530
> rx480
> overclockering

Sorry pal

But those germans proved it's LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE to overclock past 1500 megahertz

FUCK OFF

|
|>
|3
|

Yes that's a good goym

>>55537452
based fucking nvidia.

>>55537530
I don't think that second one is highly overclocked. Although the 480 isn't either.

>>55537452
>For the cheap price of 399 US dollars
Get the fuck out of here with that shit.

>>55537452
> A more expensive card beats a cheaper one
HOLY SHIT, DONE AND FINISHED!!!

>>55537613
Uhhh 1060 is $249

File: 1455648644123.png (422KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 640x480px

>>55537452
>wccftech

File: amd.png (322KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 653x726px

>>55537452
DELET DIS

All this damage control today, its gotta be because of the doom Vulkan patch.

AMDummies on suicide watch

>>55537530

Reference 480 with 4gb AND old drivers.

Newest driver reduced difference with the 1060 by 5%, and Vulkan by 20%.

1060 is going to be shit for the new Deus Ex, Halos, GoW4, and anything else. It is a card for game backlog.

>wccftech
>muh 1.5ghz 480
>reputable source

>>55537583
base boost is 1700 on gtx1060, on rx480 100mhz gives you about 10% performance boost.

if we would take that 200mhz is 7% power boost on gtx1060(as the chart shows 7% is biggest boost)

rx looks better and better every second.

File: DqhBcQ4.jpg (69KB, 900x598px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 900x598px

>i put my poo in there

>>55537641
yes, in 8 months. it will be around 325 initially i suspect

File: poo-in-the-gpu.jpg (293KB, 960x655px)

293KB, 960x655px

Looks like AMD didn't put enough poo in the 480

>>55537707
>I fuck your mom and this fucks your motherboard

>>55537721
1060 MSRP is $249

File: wccftech.jpg (52KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 400x400px

>>55537452
How many times must we go through this? WCCFTECH is a rumour aggregator. It is not a news source.

>>55537730
kek

>>55537739
FE is $299

>>55537739
Too bad the Cuck Edition is the only on you can buy for the first 4 months. Shill on!

>>55537766
those too slow to buy it can buy the slow card (rx480)

>>55537766
Actually all 3rd party boards come out on launch on July 19

Interesting, but given the source I'll take it with a grain of salt, wccf were claiming the 480 is going to beat the 980 after all

>>55537739
and the 1070/1080 msrp is like 30% lower than what they're sold for. it's just a suggestion ;^)

>>55537739
Honestly that's almost irrelevant information at this point. It wont be available at $249 for a while.

>>55537803
Are you sure about that PR Dave? Maybe you should put away those marketing materials and work on async!

>>55537803
>July 19
>nVidia releases expensive and shitty cards
>After market releases cheap and better cards same day

I don't understand, why would nVidia want that?

>>55537837
No idea, but that's literally what's happening.

Look at the 1060 press release, all cards, including 3rd party, will be available on July 19th.

>>55537858
Except none of that is true.

Did you even read the OP? The 1060 is clearly superior.

>>55537837
I dunno. I mean, nVidia is winning, right? So I don't know why they don't want to milk the consumers bone-dry while AMD has nothing.

>>55537858
>yeah the $200 480 will totally beat the 980 ti for $250, and just because it's slower than the 970 doesn't mean anything because the drivers hasn't matured!

>>55537837
From what we have seen from the 1070 and 1080, the non-reference cards do not launch at MSRP, but at above-reference prices. They only go down in price much later.

>>55537889
milking would be releasing FE for first 4 months so that everyone would pay 50bux directly as profit to nVidia.

>>55537613
Announced price in Europe is 10€ lower than RX480. AMD won't sell shit.

>>55537858
>multi gpu
drink beach pajeet
maybe you'll become white

I mean I don't doubt any of the benchmarks, I just don't understand why people think the 1060 is obtainable at $250.

The card will be 299 for months, essentially 50% more than the 480. They both have good price/performance ratios... and they're both valid cards to be buying.

When the 1060 is available at $250, then I will say that it is the better buy.

>>55537926
Announced price.

>>55537502
> $300+ GPU
> Rip $200 GPU

Yeah no, not even close.

File: 1453445759724.gif (574KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 512x288px

>>55537938
>drink beach pajeet
>maybe you'll become white
Why drink beach when that's prime poo area?

File: 1466424821573.jpg (51KB, 400x323px)

51KB, 400x323px

>>55537530

These scores don't even exist on the 3DMark results site

Maybe you can overpay NVIDIA in hopes they actually implement Vulkan and OpenCL 2.0 properly. Just kidding, they'll just keep sucking you idiots dry for shitty products.

>>55538000
they are from OPs article.

File: äräx.png (215KB, 1180x989px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1180x989px

>>55537452
>>55537533
>>55537555
>>55537723
>>55537938

LE AYYYMD IS FINNISHD

>>55538014
So they're fabricated most likely. Otherwise you'd be able to find them.

>>55537530
holy shit it took a max overclocked 1060 to beat a stock 480
LEL

File: 1436955318446.gif (3MB, 386x232px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 386x232px

>>55538076
Aren't Nvidia cards clocked almost 50% higher or something to compete? 2Ghz to AMD's 1200Ghz for example or something crazy. No? Looks desperate.

>>55538108
you can't compare clock speeds between the two like that, retard.

>>55538108
its screams"im fake" all over..

ops numbers are so off not even hubble can find them
not to mention the card is so cut down that it cant possibly provide such numbers

File: 1464340197765.gif (3MB, 319x239px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 319x239px

>>55538133
So AMD runs something more complex or sophisticated? They're able to squeeze more performance with less? Nvidia has to brute force their way to get similar?

>>55538169
do you know how retarded you sound right now?

nobody reply to this uneducated retard.

>>55538133
ofc you can those clock are the max we already saw on the rest of the paxwell cards...

>>55538169
AMD uses more power to get similar performance, so clearly they aren't getting more performance with less.

File: 1443601605371.gif (930KB, 200x133px) Image search: [Google]

930KB, 200x133px

>>55538229
Perhaps the moar power meme is for future proofing considering many of the cards that old enough to go into kindergarten are still top performers.

>>55538229
so we cant compare the clocks but we can compare the power so right after we can compare the perfomance so to we assume the clocks...

right....

>>55538222
>t. retard who can't into architectures and pipelines etc

File: 1467775174547.gif (662KB, 498x280px)

662KB, 498x280px

>>55538221
What did you just fkin say to me you little bitch? 1v1 me fucko

>>55537895
Where the fuck are there $250 new in box 980ti cards? The 970 is going for $270+ on newegg, and that card is a little slower than the $200 RX480.

>>55538268
we know how paxwell cards perform we keep seeing them since early 2014...

>>55538276
>$250 new in box 980ti cards?
now that would be amazing.

>>55538304
I know. Point me to one and I'll buy it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8OLk2y6Aco

>>55538248
You can compare the clocks. it just tells you literally nothing.

>>55538314
if only I could, I would buy two.

>1060 non boost clock is 1500mhz
>boost is 1700mhz
>1900mhz 1060 is barely faster than a stock 480

Why is this card exciting?

>>55538276
I see tons of 970's on craigslist they aren't selling @220. Bunch of crybabies with 1070's and 1080's too bitching about no refunds.

>>55538297
see >>55538268

>>55538346
Apparently there are tearing and other incompat issues with the 1070 and 1080 cards or crashing peoples shit.

>>55538345
It's not.

>>55538332
as numbers yes obviously lol
i mean that those clocks(if real) means the card is on its limit already because the rest of the lineup goes up there...
so the perf you see is what you will get

File: dsfsf.jpg (151KB, 650x650px)

151KB, 650x650px

>>55538353

>>55537452
I usually don't respond to these threads because most of the time it's just NEETs trying to outbullshit each other but this time I can chime in and wholeheartedly say that with AMD's shitty optimization and budget look and play quality, the GTX 1060 is, without a doubt, superior in every way imaginable

>>55538379
Nobody knows what the limit is, so I have no idea what performance you'll get OCd with either card. I'm not gonna look at some chinese wankers benchmarks and go "yup that looks about right".

File: 1416658885645.png (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>55538394

>>55538419
nobody knows? pretty sure the highly clocked paxwell out there is on 2200+mhz...that is the limit of them...

>>55538437
Can you prove that claim?

Oh this is the site that showed the rx480 at 1600mhz. Must be legit

>>55538108
>2Ghz to AMD's 1200Ghz

are you thick? you're comparing the near maximum clock of one arch to the base clock of another arch. if the 1060 was at 2ghz compared to the base clock of the 480 at 1.26ghz it would obviously destroy the 480 but it's a stupid comparison anyway.

it's
>1.5ghz 1060 vs 1.26ghz 480 (base)
>~2.2ghz 1060 vs ~1.4ghz 480 (max)

>>55538465
if you had any graps of technology you would have know where to see it
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=157414

>>55538504
That's not the 1060 you fucking retard. How the hell did you mix up 1060 and 1080?

>>55538515
are you dense? 1060 is a cut version of a cut version not a fucking cucked production line it has the same limit as 1070/80

>>55538515
are you braindead? he was talking about "highly clocked paxwell out there". it is 1080.

>>55538504
>nvidia card goes over 2 Ghz

based fucking nvidia.

>>55538529
Same arch and same process, yeah, but the 1060 is a different chip and will most certainly be on cheaper PCBs than the luxury class 1080s. I highly doubt clockspeeds will be greater than stock 1070s. Just look at what they had 960s running at relative to the rest of Maxwell. Different chips but the same philosophy will apply.

>>55538529
>>55538531
I don't know if you noticed, but this thread is about the 1060. Also, the 1060 is not the same chip as 1080. It's about half its size.

>>55538566
you are really braindead.

>>55538566
exactly. and the smaller the chip the higher the frequencies that can be achieved, generally. the 1060 can probably go higher than the clocks the 1080 achieves.

>>55537452
>Nvidia announce their new graphics cards along with the prices
>The 1080 and 1070 finally launch
>+33%~ price inflation due to artificial stock restrictions, Apple tactics in full play

>Expecting the 1060 to be any different

Enjoy your 40% price hike for 10-15% more performance you cucklords.

>>55538557
different in what way?
are you suggesting that nvidia had another production line while they barely can stock up 1080/70?

no one is stupid enough that early to do such a thing..

also it doesnt matter about the clockspeed they can kick it to 1700 base clock but because it lacks a lot of hardware it wont really matter

>>55538585
This is how I know you have no arguments and are just pulling facts out of your tech-illiterate ass.

File: 1446164334266.gif (2MB, 400x185px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x185px

>>55538603
Then the DX12 and Vulkan benches come out to rub some salt in the wound. Poor faggots spend all their barista money.

>>55538623
you are the one saying that 1060 isnt the same chip because its a cucked version of a higher chip..
literally being this dense lol

>>55538610
>also it doesnt matter about the clockspeed they can kick it to 1700 base clock but because it lacks a lot of hardware it wont really matter

see >>55538268

>>55538643
It's not a fucking "cucked" version, tard. It's a distinct chip. Stop running your mouth when you know literally nothing about technology and stick to shitposting on /pol/.

>>55538675
kek
nvidia opened another production line on tsmc while
apple is on full force
quallcomm is on full force and yet he think nvidia has more money to pay than them to get the waffers

being this idiot

>>55538610
You heard if hear first people. Clock speed officially doesn't matter anymore according to this shill.

>>55538698
enlight us
how a 2000mhz 1060 can pass a 1500 1080

i REALLY wanna hear your answer

>>55538692
Yea you should stop being an idiot, I agree. Good luck.

>>55537986
>damage control

>>55538715
so if i buy a 480 and clock it down to 1 mhz it won't matter right? you did say clock speed doesn't matter and you're obviously some genius when it comes to gpu architectures.

:)

>>55538061
You realize you can do 3DMark benchmarks without uploading them

File: 1462325531365.png (270KB, 600x888px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 600x888px

Nvidia is on full damage control. Pulling videos off youtube showing the RX480 smoking the 980 on Doom w/ Vulkan patch.

>>55538745
im still waiting for you to say
how a 50% version of a full chip literally having half of the hardware will pass it just because of the clocks
i really want your knowledge on uarch designs

File: rock-clapping.gif (2MB, 357x296px)

2MB, 357x296px

>>55538418

>>55538766
who asked that? tell me where in this thread anyone claimed a 1060 can beat a 1080, please show us all.

you claimed clock speeds don't matter at all. so you can tell me how a 480 at 1mhz will perform perfectly fine. :)

>>55538755
the shilling today is insane

>>55538802
did you even followed my post? or just barge in like an orc on minas tirith?
we were talking about a 2100+ mhz 1060 vs the maximum pascal uarch can reach
and that is irrelevant to talk about other pascal cards because it doesnt have the hardware to reach it

>>55537652
>>55537694
>>55537743
>>55537804
This.

>WCCFtech
>Worth reading

File: NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1060-Reviewers-Guide-20_VC.jpg (176KB, 927x1200px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 927x1200px

>>55538418
I'm taking your word for it, huang.

>>55538848
no one knows the true potential of pascal yet. stop talking like you do.

>>55538913
you mean not even hwbox that i posted above?
they literally couldnt past the card from 2200mhz with fucking liquid helium
lel
>true potential
this must be the line of nvidia
>discover our true potential and win some cookies

>RX 480: $200
>GTX 1060: $300

What am I missing here? You pay more money and get the better performing card. Although you're paying 50% more for a card that performs 0-33% faster and has less video RAM.

>>55538848
>and that is irrelevant to talk about other pascal cards because it doesnt have the hardware to reach it

again, who is talking about a 1060 reaching a 1080 performance? are you legit this thick in the head.

>>55537452

>wccftech

Fucking nope, never again

>>55538936
see >>55538598

>>55538952
IT'S NOT FASTER THOUGH AMDRONEEE OMGGGGGGG WHAT DONT YOU GET THE NUMBERS ARE SMALLER! PRICE DOESN'T COME INTO IT ARE YOU POOR REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>55538952
its 33% according to nvidia that cucked 480 65% kek

the reviewers are gonna have hard time explaining that shit if they pull this one out

>480 leaks
>better than 980
It was fake
>1060 leaks
>better than 480
It's fake
>2016
>believing leaks

>>55539119
I don't think these are leaks. They're "leaks" allowed by Nvidia because they want to generate 1060 hype while the 480 is in extremely short supply.

They want people to say
>Eh, maybe I'll wait for the 1060, especially if it's only $20 more than the 480 and it's guaranteed to give me much better DX11 performance.

>>55539119
It's gotten to the point now that if wccftech posted 480 specs right now, weeks after it's released, I still wouldn't believe them. They literally only post clickbait.

>>55539119
videocardz wasnt a week ago that posted that stupid graph 1060 x1.5 better than 480? and got called out for that?

and 5 years later 470 will be as powerful as 1070 kek

>>55539162
This. Funny how they came out after the nitro 480 was announced for July 13th.

Protip: the 1060 will be trash

>>55539398
Protip: the 1060 is better than the 480 in every way

File: 1456677204392.png (650KB, 512x800px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 512x800px

>>55539425
Oh, 1060 does async at hardware level too? Amazing, nvidia, simply amazing, *clap clap clap*

>>55539443
1060 does everything better than the 480

>>55539443
>implying i need that when all games for the next 2 years will be built in dx11

enjoy waiting 2 months for your vulkan/dx12 update whilst i play my games under dx11 and maximizing my gpu's potential right from the launch day.

>>55539498
>actually playing games
>and when doing so they're DirectX
jej, gaymers everyone

>>55537739

500$ dollaruskis in Sweden

>>55539627
SWEDEN
YES

>>55537926

But for people who likes dual card setups it will sell like crazy

Nvidia must be in full damage control and shit scared of the 480 sales to release their own gimped benchmarks like this. Never have I seen them do this in all their GPU launches. Sure they put out graphs with huge scaling. But to actually release their own game benchmarks is unprecedented.

It's obvious. They want Nvidiots to preorder and buy on day of sales to avoid the price hikes and lack of stock. What better way than to 'leak' biased game benchmarks.

They are running scared.

>>55539720
indeed they are.

https://youtu.be/GfrAD3tRqGw?t=24m33s

File: 1430850699549.jpg (13KB, 250x240px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 250x240px

>>55537452
>official performance figures
I bet you believe your governments official unemployment figures, too

With modern videocards that choose their own clocks based on temperature and power settings it's incredibly easy to manipulate benchmarks.

>>55539720
even if you see steam survey you get this
titan x has 0.09
1080 has 0.10
how watch this

titan x had 9 weeks of pure un interrupted sales before 980ti came

1080 has 6 weeks of uninterrupted saled before 1070 came

titan x has sold little over 29.000 cards 1080 something like 30.000

its laughable really and they actually are twisting it like its selling like hot cakes or whatever

File: 960.png (7KB, 734x74px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 734x74px

>>55539720
you are deluded. the 960 had shitty pricing and was on average a bit worse than the 380 last gen yet it still outsold the 380 and was way more popular to a point where it's currently the 2nd most used graphics card in the world on the steam hardware survey. nvidia aren't scared of amd, no one is.

>>55539805
nvidia used ssaa lol literally a filter that even the most paid shill site pcper never used it

>>55539720

I gladly buy the better product. Which is in every single case the gtx 1060.

Your delusion about the RX480 being better than 1080,1070,1060,970 was destroyed. Power draw is a lie, performance is a lie, temperature is a lie, OCability is a lie, drivers non existent, async irrelevant, poo on the street and inside the gpu visible.

>>55539720

>>scared of the 480 sales

kek'd

>>55539848
>nvidia
>better product
pick one
god being this into damage control that doesnt realise its own stupidity

Hello. My cousin works at nvidia.

I can say that 1060 easily beats 480 in every regard. I'm not biased because my other cousin works at amd.

>>55539925
Record them having sex. I want to know who tops.

>>55539909

i pick nvidia and leave you with the poo

kek

File: 81291791987facepalm.png (260KB, 508x352px)

260KB, 508x352px

>>55539544
Them ebin gaymers are the reason why AMD still hasn't kicked the bucket, m8. Gaymers are literally the only reason why AMD is still alive.

>>55539909
>doesn't refute a single point
>y-you stupid!

If I were to buy a new graphic card, it's gonna be atleast a GTX 1070.

Below that is waste of money for games in 1 to 2 years, because they won't be playable at very high quality settings in 2k resolution.

>>55539938
They do not want to have sex. Very incompatible.

Cousin amd is very smelly. He learns bad habits from indians at amd. Cousin nvidia is very respectful. Always showers before sex like a good asian.

>>55539823
When coin miners went nuts a ton of AMD cards were sold that never saw a Steam account so Steam figures can be pretty biased towards Nvidia for that reason alone.

>>55540011
>point
>not a meymey

first there needs to be a point that needs to be refuted.

>>55540025
no, 200-300bux is perfect price for a GPU, you can get 2 cards in 6 years

if you buy gtx1070 you will get 1 card for 600bux and 6 years.

>>55540142

there are multiple points mentioned
are you autistic?

>>55540231
there are multiple maymays there.

File: graphics-market-share.png (228KB, 2367x591px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 2367x591px

>>55540113
Oh really?

Look at AMD's market share, pic related.

RIP AMD

>>55540113
>it's biased because people with nvidia cards actually buy and play games on steam

>>55540165
A $200-$300 GPU doesn't even last 2 years. You can't play current games well with a GTX 760 or a R9 270X.

>>55539909
Nvidia pretty obviously makes better products than AMD at this point.

File: 1460473535836.jpg (513KB, 923x599px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 923x599px

>>55540245

>turning actual points into maymays because of his incompetence to refute any

orbital kek

end your cringeworthy life asap

>>55540252
>that post maxwell dive
F

>>55540270
yea, but 6600GT could.and 970 can.

>>55540025
You already waste your money when you buy high-end, you gotta be smart and sell your flagship card every year without losing money (or keeping loss at 10%)

If you were to buy today you would keep your GTX 1070 in 2018 ? by then every title would be on DX12/Vulkan

not wise

The GTX 1070 is merely 10% faster than a R9 Fury which you can find for as low as $330

And AMD cards see their performance jumping jumping with DX12/Vulkan.


ie:
thinking long term with nvidia is currently NOT wise
thinking short term is where you get most value

File: perfrel_2560_1440.png (39KB, 500x1090px)

39KB, 500x1090px

>>55540312
>The GTX 1070 is merely 10% faster than a R9 Fury
>which you can find for as low as $330
I wonder who is behind this post.

>>55540312
>And AMD cards see their performance jumping jumping with DX12/Vulkan.

We've been over this a dozen times. This merely means that Nvidia already performs amazingly on DX11/openGL.

>>55540312
The 1060 performs better than the 480 in DX12 and Vulkan. Do you really think that the 1070 would perform worse than a 1060? Are you this delusional?

File: 1465209489348.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>55537452
How the fuck is this shit faster even in DX12?

>>55537452

>OC'd to 2.1ghz

wow the 480 is going to blow this thing the fuck out especially when more games get Vulkan

>>55540345
I don't understand ? Your graph states that it's 12% faster
I said 10 %
I'm 2 % off ? wow

Do you want me to take of photo of my amazon.de invoice ?

Jeez man get a fucking grip

>>55540347
Actually, what it means is that people post the same AMD sponsored DX12 titles, and make conclusions based on those.

Ashes? AMD sponsored.
Hitman? AMD sponsored.
Total War: Warhammer? AMD sponsored.

Yet when other people post gameworks titles, they start crying and say that AMD performs badly because nvidia is just sabotaging their performance. But when nvidia cards perform badly in AMD sponsored titles? It's just nvidia's hardware being bad.

>>55540416
Are you so retarded that you think Fury and Fury X are the same cards?

And feel free to link me to a $330 Fury. Not a used one that has been used for mining for a year, obviously.

>>55540349
I don't understand this post either since I was referring to high-end GPUs

Do you consider the GTX 1060 and the RX 480 high-end ?

>>55540416
another person who can't understand basic math. it's nearly a 14% difference.

100/88 = 1.136

>>55540422
Just typical AMDummies denying reality.

They can't handle the fact that AMD is basically dead at this point, and they killed themselves by releasing subpar products.

>>55540422

Gaming Evolved titles only have AMD's rather incompetent in-house devs helping with development, unlike Nvidia sending an armada of angry little Koreans and GameWorks which is an actual part of the game that somehow fucks with everything that isn't the newest Nvidia lineup.

>>55540416
>>55540448

oh shit he said fury, not fury x. that mean's there's a 23% difference between a 1070 and a fury.

480 Vulkan doom.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlzKPBIjZPo
Almost 1070 performance.

>>55540439
I just reread my post and indeed I did some pretty (significant) mistakes
I was talking about the R9 Fury X and €330 (not dollars as previously stated)
I got the November invoice amazon.de, bought during cyber week

Also drop the fucking ad hominem

>>55540448
Do those 4% trigger you?

>>55540531
>gtx 1070
>~£100 cheaper than fury x
>15% faster

you decide.

>>55540512
Calling you a retard isn't an ad hom.

What happened here:
>you said shit that was wrong
>therefore you're a retard

What would be an ad hom:
>you're a retard
>therefore what you said was wrong

For an ad hom, you use the speaker's character to undermine their argument, like in the latter example. We're on an anonymous image board, so I have no clue about you or your character, so that's not something I can do. What I can do is use your argument to undermine your character, so the exact opposite.

>>55540531
oh yeah, go back to school as well. you can't handle simple mathematics you learn when you're 11.

>>55540570
>Supporting Nvidia
>so next year they increace prices even further.

>>55540618
>he has no argument

as expected.

What's up, /g/eeks? I request an advise about the CPU for GTX 1070. Which one won't bottleneck it?

>>55540674
I don't support Nvidia business politics.

>>55537530
The 2nd (middle) card is actually stock.
Oh and as all you types said its before drivers and its reference card.

>>55540708
>starts off by saying fury is much cheaper than 1070 and similar performance
>backtracks because of his retarded comments
>changes it to fury x
>he then goes on to say he'd pay more for significantly less performance because of muh business politics

you do that :^). i'll enjoy my 1070 in the meantime.

Who cares just buy whatever you want now
Either they will run all the shitty games right now

>>55538245
>Perhaps the moar power meme is for future proofing

This is one of the reasons AMD draws more power. My 7950 still gets updates, AMDs freeSync compatible cards date back to 2012. The way GCN is built they dont scrap the entire architecture like nvidia does. The just swap things in and out. AMD also believes in more hardware solutions on the card vs nvidias software solutions.

>>55540942
GTX 480 confirmed for the most future proof card.

Fucking retards.

>the overhyped amd card

Seriously, Fuck AMD

>>55540252
Let's see an up to date graph.

>>55540701
i7-6700

>>55540277
kek better product..
last serious card nvidia released was the 780ti
the last card that can actually do async on hardware level

>>55541003
http://wccftech.com/amd-takes-gpu-share-nvidia-q1-2016/

Not dying quite yet.

>>55538221
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you geforce 256? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class at Radeon University, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret deals with game developers, and I have over 9000 confirmed GFLOPS. I am trained in async warfare and I’m the top engineer in the entire Radeon family. You are nothing to me but just another peasant. I will compute you the fuck out with double precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of developers across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your rig. Your PC is fucking dead, kiddo. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can out-bench you in over nine thousand games, and that’s just with my Mach 64. Not only am I extensively trained in GPUOpen, but I have access to the entire SDK of the Vulkan API and I will use it to its full extent to gimp your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit on your GTX 1080 and all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking toast, kiddo.

>>55537502
This

>>55541044
And then they used GameWorks and over-tesselation to make sure it was obsoleted. This is why you don't buy Nvidia.

>amd

>>55541287
>2016

File: wew.jpg (29KB, 400x250px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x250px

>>55541048
very good lad

>>55537652
/thread

>>55537652
i dont know what is worst to be honest

wccftech quoting videocardz
videocardz being videocardz and never be on the same side of truth
wccftech having amd sources and overinflating stuff

i guess both of them exists for that purpose

>>55537452
>wccftech
wait for the NDA to be lifted

File: 1468344181450.png (19KB, 637x389px)

19KB, 637x389px

>>55537502

rip nvidia you mean?

File: 1467860102737.jpg (22KB, 480x461px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x461px

Compare that charts scores to actual independent benchmarks.

Division - 480: 58.7 | 1060: 53.1
TR (before patch) - 480: 70.4 | 1060: 51.3
Crysis 3 - 480: 58.7 | 1060: 43.6
Ashes - 480: 45.2 | 1060: 36.0
Witcher 3 - 480: 50.0 | 1060: 53.0
GTA 5 - 480: 58.7 | 1060: 60.1

source for 480 benchmarks: http://www.anandtech.com/show/10446/the-amd-radeon-rx-480-preview

Forgetting the fact Nvidia are comparing the 4GB 480 at less than it's potential clock speed of 1266 and gimping the settings in each game so it makes their GPU look better.

>>55542334
Look at that 480 on Vulkan wtfffff

>>55542339
Do I need to call you a retard for a second time for you to learn?

File: 1467042630858.gif (131KB, 400x580px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 400x580px

>>55541044
>the last card that can actually do async on hardware level
Volta
Same exact Paxwell but with Asynch unlocked
Exactly when dx12 is mainstream
A reason to update

I have no doubts that Jewtel and Nvidia just keep innovation up their sleeve untill they will need it.

>>55542405
in order to introduce a hardware sc on the card they gonna have to create something close to 780ti and they already has done it with pascal

well they changed the core layout really and nothing more they made it more gcn like 64 cuda cores per smm but without any of the gcn core capabilities

>>55542339
Hi there!

You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of 4chan are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have compared results from one site to another, but you did not make sure the testing methodologies were the same! Whoops! You should always remember to make sure that the hardware configurations, graphical settings and testing locations between the two benchmarks match before drawing comparisons between them! The results between two benchmarks using different graphical settings can cause very large difference. You should always avoid trying to compare the results of different benchmarks when you're not sure about the testing methodologies!

Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to game benchmarking!

>>55542560
well we cant really trust reviews of amd cards coming from nvidia now can we...

weren't there leaks of the nitro 480 reaching like 1500+ mhz and doing fantastic
could've been fake
meh

All these new cards and I'm sitting here running a 290x at 1440 with everything maxed at 60fps+

feelsgoodman

>>55542635
the nitro wont go that high lol probably 1400 something i guess

1500 only with waterblocks i guess

File: maxresdefault.jpg (149KB, 1920x1080px)

149KB, 1920x1080px

>>55542635
>Going to 1500mhz on a card that already pulls too much power from pcie

>>55542736
Because an 8-pin connector won't help with that.

>>55541048

This goes pretty well with this,

>>55542334

File: kek_sure.png (285KB, 1340x1225px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1340x1225px

the numbers in DX12 are nonsense, I only checked tomb raider and they cut AMD considerably short on two datapoints we already know
RX 480 and gtx960 performance

>>55540398
it actually isn't, I suggest to search for 1440p rx 480 benchmarks and you'll see that a lot of these results don't make any sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC79S9199BU
1440p tomb raider 41,8 fps vs the 27,6 in the given 1060 benchmark, wtf? GTA V, 48,6 fps vs 32,1
wut?

>>55542919
you have to understand the leak came from videocardz that he cut it down from the suggestive pdf nvidia gives...
its literally numbers from nvidia

>>55542919
The problem you made here was using 2 GB 960. Nvidia never stated that they used a 2 GB 960 in their tests.

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Rise-of-the-Tomb-Raider-Spiel-54451/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1184288/
Pretty large performance gains with the 4 GB version.

>>55542920
Hi there!

You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of 4chan are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have compared results from one site to another, but you did not make sure the testing methodologies were the same! Whoops! You should always remember to make sure that the hardware configurations, graphical settings and testing locations between the two benchmarks match before drawing comparisons between them! The results between two benchmarks using different graphical settings can cause very large difference. You should always avoid trying to compare the results of different benchmarks when you're not sure about the testing methodologies!

Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to game benchmarking!

>>55542736
Nigga, I'll buy the devil's one with 4x8 pin, you feel me muthahfucka?

>>55543052
never understood the name of it

it has on the backplate the ring of solomon that was being used to trap demons
and the name of the card is devil..

do you trap demon power everytime you open your pc?

>>55543050
>>55542560
nice damage control

>>55543079
It means that Satan himself is trapped inside the GPU, making the card hotter than hell.

File: AMD-RX-480-Sapphire-Nitro-1[1].jpg (63KB, 800x639px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x639px

>amd's best aib
>2 year warranty
>warranty void if you replace the thermal paste

,,,wow

>>55543149
kek, Sapphire is no EVGA

File: ZOTAC-ZT-P10600A-10L-GeForce-GTX-1060-Graphics-Card-SabrePC.com_.png (265KB, 1026x1190px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1026x1190px

>YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO GET A 1060 FOR LESS THAN $300

>>55540270
Uhh, 2 years ago you could get a 290 for like £220 here in UK, think it was around $250 in US.

970 is 2 years old and was just above $300 on release day. Both do fine in modern games.

>>55540961
It is the reason though, AMD cards have way superior compute capabilities and hardware features ya donut

>>55543028
doesnt matter
RX480 is nowhere near 40FPS

File: amd.jpg (128KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 653x726px

>>55543289
DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW

File: 1467770529568.jpg (104KB, 942x943px)

104KB, 942x943px

>be the current year
>people still believe leaks
>people still believe wccftech

>>55543289
>clock speed
>1506-1708

top kek, what happened to 1.9ghz

>>55543289
kek thats not a founders epic shop

File: 1451383104238.jpg (188KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 600x450px

>bitching over mid range cards

Who fucking cares, picked up a cheap 2nd hand 980ti with 1,5 years of warranty left on it.

>>55543334
Are you retarded?

The pcgh benchmark puts MSI 970 at 44.4. The anandtech and guru3d benchmarks put rx 480 on the same level as a reference 970. If the pcgh benchmark had an rx 480 in it, it would be near 40 fps.

>nvidia fanboys so desperate for an answer they'll just on any rumor like it's gospel

this is even worse than both 480 releases

>>55543388
are you? we actually have the numbers you kike faggot>>55542919

>>55543412
see >>55543028

>>55543424
see >>55543334

>>55543439
see >>55543388

>>55543441
and once again you are proven wrong by the image here... where RX480 is actually shown by numbers>>55542919

now fuck off or bring something to the discussion you jewish fuck

>>55543453
>still insists on using benchmarks of 2 gb 960
Why do you insist on being retarded?

AMD IS BANKRUPT AND FINISHED

>>55543492
>responding to posts about how Nvidia is misrepresenting the 480's performance
>B-B-BUT 2GB 960

Forget the 960. Fuck the 960. A third party tech site using the version with less RAM for their benchmarks has nothing to do with official Nvidia benchmarks showing performance for the 480 that doesn't line up with real world numbers.

>>55543533
>damage control

>>55543533
hint

nvidia suggests ssaa usage.....literally they gonna bend the benches like guru3d does

File: 1436728039710.gif (1MB, 245x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x200px

>>55540036

>>55543533
Okay, let me explain this to you like I would explain it to a child.

>WHY DOES THE NVIDIA BENCHMARK SHOW RX 480 GETTING 40 FPS WHEN IT GETS 60 FPS OR MORE IN THESE BENCHMARKS
Because the testing methodologies are not the same. Firstly, you can see that the nvidia benchmarks use 2xSSAA. The rest don't. This is basically already enough to cause the 20 fps drop, though part of it could be explained by other variables as well.

>IF RX 480 NUMBERS DROP, WHY DON'T 960 NUMBERS DROP. IT'S 30 FPS IN THESE BENCHMARKS AND STAYS AT 30 FPS IN THE NVIDIA BENCHMARKS
The benchmarks you are looking at are using the 2 GB version of 960. The 4 GB version has significant performance gains, around 50%, in Tomb Raider. The 4 GB 960 would not be at 30 fps in the benchmarks you're looking at, but at some 50% more, ~45 fps.

Simple enough for you?

>>55543608
AMDummies aren't interested in facts, they just want to spin it so somehow AMD is doing better, even though the 480 gets destroyed by the 1060

>>55543635
Post independent facts or GTFO. You are the same shitposter shill who keeps posting in every thread how the 1060 will beat the 480 'easily' (I recognise your writing style by now) without actually providing facts and when anyone asks you to put up or shut up you state 'Google it! There are hundreds of thousands of pages proving it!'.

You are a stinking shilling CUNT and need to die in the most painful manner possible.

>>55542334

>If we use our fucking awful OpenGL performance as the baseline, we'll make Vulkan look better than it really is.

>>55543719
Just look at the OP benchmarks, it's pretty obvious the 1060 is way faster than a 480

>>55543738


its compared to both nvidia and amd cards. go kill yourself.

>>55542450
It basically already is 64 cuda shaders per SM, technically 128 but as I understand it the SM blocks operate in discrete 64-core segments

>>55543751

how about we get review numbers instead of nvidas own slied, since the card was released 3-4 days ago?

oh thats fucking right, no reviewer actually has the card yet because nvidia did a paper launch lol.

this is the first time a card has been released and NDA lifted and not a single review in.

>>55543776
now go look how gcn 1.0 chip is fixed

nvidia literally is selling an amd card that is actually perfoming worse on dx12 lol

>>55543811
We also have Firestrike score where 1060 easily beats 480.

>>55543812
Nvidia finally created a GCN1.0 arch tuned for high clocks, but with none of the hardware scheduling and special capabilities [lenny face]

>>55543811
its a non paper launch then kek
that is some shady shit right there i just hope the card isnt a flop

>>55543839
well to be fair gcn 1.0 was a oc monster (for a gcn)

>>55543811
it says on the leaked images that it's under nda until 19th july.

also all the reviewers already have the card, just look around on youtube.

File: 1415820208198.gif (968KB, 208x158px)

968KB, 208x158px

>>55543608
post any english source that says that tomb raider gives 50% more performance on gtx960 4GB vs 2GB

also what exactly you are arguing, that nvidia used worse possible settings with SSAA I guess, and RX480 will slaughter 1060 in reviews because they are not retarded.

Right?

>>55543719
And you should stop trying dismiss benchmarks based on false grounds. People keep claiming that the RX 480 or 960 numbers don't add up, when it's relatively easy to show that they're plausible.

Your doubt should be in the 1060 results, but there's no real evidence you can use to prove them wrong.

>>55543811
Ignore his posts he posts the same shit all the time. He copy pastes the same shit with a few adjustments. His writing style is the same as well. '480 will be destroyed by 1060'. '480 is dangerous to motherboards'. 'it's obvious the 1060 is way faster than a 480'. He's either a curry nigger or a slanty eyed chink. Either way he is a cunt and must be ignored. I wish he would get a trip so I can block him entirely.

>>55537858

SLI and CF configs both suck monkey balls. Just buy a better card FFS

>>55543901
>post any english source
Not gonna entertain you. Feel free to do it yourself.

>RX480 will slaughter 1060 in reviews
Pretty wishful thinking, when everything we know puts 1060 ahead.

>>55543909
there is actually
some of the 1060 number was 8% slower than 1070
who the fuck will create a card of 250 to be THAT close to a card of 450?
only an idiot will believe some numbers coming from the competitors company

File: 1468175486860.png (107KB, 1006x715px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1006x715px

>>55543834
sure

>>55543929
>when everything we know puts 1060 ahead.
>from nvidia
I know thats why you are the family loser

>>55543909
and you have no clear evidence to prove them right either. checkmate.

>>55538346
That's used and still more than a new RX 480 4gig which is slightly faster. It's harder to RMA a bad card used.

>>55543940

"3DMark Firestrike Ultra scores 3014 points while the Radeon RX 480 was scoring around 2750 points. The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 11225 points in Firestrike Performance while the Radeon RX 480 was scoring 10800 points in several 3DMark (reference clocks)."

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb-3dmark-performance-leaked,2.html

1060 easily beats 480 yet again.

>>55543373
That card caught fire and burned like the GTX 480 so they had to downclock the rest of them.

>>55543952
We all know the 1060 is much faster, you can keep denying it until it's released and all the reviews show the same.

>>55543930
>some of the 1060 number was 8% slower than 1070
There have been no benchmarks comparing 1060 to 1070. For cross-site comparisons, see >>55543050

>who the fuck will create a card of 250 to be THAT close to a card of 450?
>uses non-founder's edition MSRP for 1060 and founder's edition MSRP for 1070 to create as big as price difference as possible
Is this intentional?

>>55543985
yes thats why the card is out already without reviews..
literally the first time this every happened since 1999 kek

the card is a flop admit it

>>55544001
because its hard to find 1070 numbers and compare them
LEL

>>55544002
1060 is obviously faster than the 480, really the only question is how much faster

>>55543954
And I'm not trying to prove them right, numbnut.

What I'm claiming is:
1. The RX 480 and 960 numbers in nvidia's benchmarks are plausible. They are not demonstrably wrong as some people claim.
2. The validity of the 1060 numbers are unknown.

>>55537452
its just a refresh op. 1280 cuda cores ?!?!? thats it? thats the low end of the spectrum of whats been made in the past 3 years

you can get 2 times as many streaming processors/cuda cores in a gpu

>>55544033
You may be right.

>>55544046

>>55540270
Actually now that the vulkan patch dropped Doom runs well enough on my 270x. I turned down a few settings and get 50s-80s.

Fallout 4 runs fine on it too.

I was thinking about updating my gpu, but I'm set for a little while longer.

The 480 and 1060 were tempting, but I think I'll go with Vega or whatever price drops the high end pascal gets early next year. (Or get a 980/fury/390x/480/1060 when people are tossing them cheap for the next new stuff)

If I'm going to drop some cash might as well make it count. I bought my 270x for $125 used back in October 2014. If I go new it'll be all out. HBM or bust. Used I'm going to need a sweetheart deal like last time.

>>55544021
kek it literally has the 55% of the hardware of 1070
it cant be faster 480 is 10% slower than a 1070 on dx12 if you think nvidia will actually price 1060 so low and be so close to 1070 you need to wake up

>>55544166
480 is like 50% of a 1070.

1060 is obviously higher and falls right in line.

File: eaetUhw.jpg (81KB, 460x613px)

81KB, 460x613px

>>55544209
kek
50% faster

>>55537662
Yeah the vulkan difference is amazing. Amd torched nvidia, 480 posting about 22% faster after vulkan. Nv no change at all.

>>55544335
I am no Nvidia fanboy (I own a 290) but that just means the OGL 4.5 drivers for Nvidia wrere already performing well. AMD's 4.3 OGL drivers on the other hand were already gimped so Vulkan is just evening things up to where the cards perform as they should have in the first place.

Even I am not stupid enough to believe one brand is worse than the other on this particular topic.

>>55544370
I've a 290x but I've bought cards from both over the years so idc. But if vulkan has this much difference in comparison to ogl (and d3d) then let's hope Devs start implementing it

Can we keep this shit in one thread, please.

>>55544433
The thing is AMD has been pushing on raw computer power to get over the bump for years based on past architecture and API differences. With the right API that hardware has always been able to complete with Nvidia's offerings but was always stuffed due to DX11 and Microsoft Windows prior to Windows 10. Now all bets are off and the playing field has been leveled. It's now down to the game developers to actually put that API into their titles and we will finnaly know who offers the best price to performance ratio.

So it is worse than a 970?

>>55544491
Ehhhh I've a slightly longer memory amds real trouble began when they bought ati. What should have been an amazing combination turned it very badly, and burned through cash and ended up bifurcating the company. They became amd and global foundries. When amd lost their own foundry they had to buy silicon production and queue up like everyone else. They no longer could have control over their own dies production and quality and have been way behind in thermal and power tech ever since

>>55544723
Well yeah. AMD were more interested in their CPU arm and the GPU arm was a sideline and as such it got sidelined. Also they cut staff who moved to Nvidia.

i'm ok with my gtx470

only game I haven't been able to play is witcher3 and I heard it sucks so w/e

IT'S FUCKING OVER

>>55544879

>>55544879

>>55544879

>AMD shills crying about reputable source when they've been circle jerking to fake Korean shoop of 480RX for a month - using the same website.

Just hang yourself you subhuman hypocrites. Amd poorfags are the worst.

>>55537452
>Posting these benches when it's already been proven that they're actually from Nvidia's own 1060 review guide when the full guide shows the 480 with old drivers and games with tesselation settings set to hell and back
Yes, I know you're a tad desperate to bash the 480, but at least wait for benches from parties other than the manufacturer of the GPU the benches are trying to promote...

game over

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyuoQIuEZj0

>>55542745
I think it's time for you to see optometrist and get glasses. 3.5/20 vision is pretty bad. Missing all threads where they mentioned fix for pcie issue.

>>55544936
>N/v/idiots always balked a leaks on the RX 480
>Now when there's a leak on the 1060 N/v/idiots are complaining about amDrones doing the same thing they were doing a few weeks ago
In all seriousness, now that we know where these leaks are from ("review guide" sent to reviewers by Nvidia themselves with loads of suspicious factors) after they leaked the materials these benches are from in their entirety we can be pretty sure these figures are suspicious to say the least.

File: 1468138959993.jpg (745KB, 2400x3600px)

745KB, 2400x3600px

>>55545092

I remember just after GTX 1080 announcement some leaked video of Doom on Vulkan running at NINE TRILLION FPS on Pascal.

Guys, go for 480 CF (all at once or when you really need it) or wait for Vega. Nvidia is gonna shit its pants very soon. Future wise they have a shitty product hard to manufacture.

>>55544894
>>Heard it sucks
Yeah all those best game ever awards and people saying its the best thing to happen to games in years are all wrong.
Not just your salty attitude because your too fucking poor to play it