Resolution vs Refresh rate

>>55421015
refresh rate

You can't downscale refresh rate, you can downscale resolutions.

>>55421015
1440 @144 lyfe

>>55421070
underrated post

>>55421070
1440p@144hz is harder to do than 4k@60hz

>>55421015
2560x1440 165Hz here. It was what I wanted.

>>55421116
Overrated (you)

>>55421147
As someone who also owns a 2560x1440@144hz, I know this but don't care. It's much nicer to have the growing room.
Besides that, having freesync means that you don't need to reach that 144fps to have something that feels good.

>>55421015
Resolution, screen real-estate is more important than refresh rate with modern flicker free displays, unless you are gaymen then get back to /v/

>>55421015
still waiting for a decent, affordable 3840x2160@120 display

>>55421015
>mfw crt
>mfw 1024x768@135hz
>mfw 1600x1200@80hz
>mfw 2048x1536@60hz

Already has a dead pixel, I'm going to be so sad when it dies.

1680x1050 90hertz