The fact that this graph is not satire really amuses me.

>>55412953

although it wouldn't be unlike nvidia, there haven't been any official releases regarding the 1060, so this may or may not be fake.

>>55412953
the fact that AMD never wins in any of those graphs amuses me

Nvidia = brilliant marketing that takes mundane facts and turns them into misleading, but technically accurate claims (like muh huge leap in performance* *in vr)
AMD = no marketing at all, but over hype/under deliver
Correct?

>>55412953
>wow almost twice as fa--
>oh wait, it's only 15% higher
why is this still allowed?

>>55413727
this

>>55413727
Because retards in /g/ eat it all up.

>>55412953
>power 3 times more efficient
>oh wait, it just went from "1" to "1.5"

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>55413220
Yes.

it's not even official yet you dipshit

>>55414314
>marketing material is done the same day of official release
0.76 cents were deposited into your account

File: nvidia gtx 960.jpg (137KB, 1231x658px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1231x658px

Does it surprise you?

>>55413727
how can the 1060 NOT be faster? the 480 only has 1 performance whereas the 1060 has 1.2 performances.

>>55414527
lolwat

File: 9yyHCpK.jpg (38KB, 403x392px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 403x392px

>>55414527
>49.2 smaller than 45.1

Reminds me of the graph where Nvidia's card had one huge bar over AMD's and the difference was 1 fps in 0.2 increments. I saw it in a video somewhere.

I wish Nvidia and AMD would both stop being shit.

>>55414621
>tfw my graphics card probably only has 0.6 performances

I bet the 1050 will have 1.9 more performances

>>55414527
That can't be real. Please be real.