Gentoo users, what does it feel like having Arch Linux cuck you

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-07-03 01:17:20 Post No. 55384296
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: serveimage.jpg (28KB, 1200x732px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1200x732px

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:17:20 Post No. 55384296 [Report]

Gentoo users, what does it feel like having Arch Linux cuck you guys on literally everything? What is it like having a shit package manager?

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:23:02 Post No.55384356
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:23:02 Post No.55384356 [Report]

That's why I use exherbo, it cucks everyone.

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:36:44 Post No.55384510
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:36:44 Post No.55384510 [Report]

I use Sabayon. Gentoo based, Gentoo backward compatible. I get to use entropy AND portage. Arch has nothing for me at this point.

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:45:24 Post No.55384617
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:45:24 Post No.55384617 [Report]

>>55384510
Why did you use a Gentoo based distribution if you weren't going to compile all of your code?

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:47:47 Post No.55384650
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-03 01:47:47 Post No.55384650 [Report]

>>55384617
The only reason would be portage but still pointless if he isn't doing it the Gentoo Way

Anonymous 2016-07-03 04:37:24 Post No.55386382
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-03 04:37:24 Post No.55386382 [Report]

>>55384617
Somethings I can compile if I want and some things aren't necessary to compile and won't result in any difference. I get to keep the package management style of Gentoo (none of the splitting hairs bullshit of debian ripping libs from their parent packages). I got rolling release, Bleeding edge with full control of source, portage, ebuilds, while keeping simplicity of binary package management for the basics.