TCP/IP General

>>55330732
don't forget the most important layer 8: end user

>your favorite protocol, how you use it
SNMP, works like a charm for IPC (atop unix domain sockets), without needing any of that bloated dbus crap

That's the osi model not TCP IP

>>55330732
TCP and IP don't have 7 layers. Those are protocols that belong in their own layers

And there aren't even 7 layers, there are 5. Get with the times!

File: 800px-UDP_encapsulation.svg.png (30KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 800x500px

>>55330761

>>55330732
All People Seem To Need Deep Penetration

>>55330804
Eh, yeah, you could probably ignore the physical layer most of the time. But there is obviously a difference between bluetooth and wifi

>>55330732
TCP/IP is four layers, not seven. The OSI model is based off a much superior protocol that people in ye olden days, stupidly, did not adopt.

Also, there are 10 layers, not seven.

>>55330908
TCP and IP are actually just 2 layers

bump for non gpu thread

>>55330732
i acctually made my own protocol lossly based off HTTP to do network control of remote cameras

instead of

HTTP/1.0\n\r

i use

RASPI\n\r

>>55330732
Babby just started reading about net+. That's so cute.

File: 1466726822252.jpg (76KB, 633x738px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 633x738px

It's a suite of protocols, you horse-tooth jackals.

And nunya best forget layer 0. It's not just marketing hype.

File: 1466710536017.jpg (65KB, 599x653px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 599x653px

>>55331942
Kick down some reallifecam logins, Holmes

i'm a big fan of rpc/dcom because of asynch proc call stacks

A Pussy So Tight No Dick Penetrates

That's how I remember the layers.