Technology

>png
>uncompressed

if your favorite technology is formats, you should learn the difference between lossy compression and lossless compression. neither of these are the same thing as "uncompressed"

>>55308841
>370 KB pic
>803KB sample

>>55308921
>>55308922
>implying anyone with this view knows shit from dicks

>>55308841
>compares graphics to audio,
Stfu before the /g/entoomen kill your ass.

>>55308841
Cool story bro. Format C:

>>55308921
I know them, you just think you know so much about it that in your ignorance you're just reading too much into it.

>>55308936
It just so happens sir, that I'm a homosexual, so I've seen some dicks from shit.

>>55308841
>your ears can't tell the difference between these two images
Is this supposed to be surprising? Ears can't see.

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

PNG: 140 KB
JPG: 50 KB (no transparency)
BPG: 18 KB

can you eyes fell for the bpg meme?
pics http://b.1339.cf/xcypnvm.zip

>>55309159
>posting an image 10x bigger than any of the samples
>posting the images on a zip in the internet
>expecting anyone to open it

I know there will be idiots opening it but that's beyond the point.

>>55309254
good post

>>55308841
It doesn't matter if your eyes can tell the difference because it's still there regardless of whether you can see it or not.

File: formats ears.png (420KB, 836x908px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 836x908px

>>55309346
It does, tho.

>>55309346
If there's no apparent difference, then in the specific context of looking at the picture the difference is irrelevant.

File: 1466693306546.jpg (358KB, 602x578px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 602x578px

>>55308841
>803KB
>124KB

>370KB

It's the same image.

>>55309400
What if you see it but you ignore it to fit in with the group?

>>55309429
You don't

>>55308841
we can tell that pic was made by someone who uses Logitech "PC" speakers to play 128kps mp3s