>He didn't buy an MLC SSD

I bought an HDD instead.
Excepting a head crash any minute now.

File: Screenshot_2016-06-26-22-35-24(1).jpg (81KB, 720x1059px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 720x1059px

V-NAND is far superior.

HOWEVER as long as you have a high capacity MLC SSD then that's fine too. It's the best choice when shopping for a budget SSD too. I saw the 480GB Sandisk SSD Plus for $99 last week.

>tfw you did not fall for the tlc flash meme
Samsung 830 here, I remember alot of ssd having big controller issues back them. Also the people fell for the ocz meme.

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-26 23-14-57.png (165KB, 908x497px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 908x497px

>>55277450
im eyeing this one. its mlc and has tons of good reviews.

>>55277857
Don't it's shit.

I got one a year ago and it's trash.

Started at 300/200 then within the span of one week it slowed to 150/30, slower than the fucking HDD it replaced.

>>55277880
Do you get the MLC version?

b-but muh v-nand

File: 1456985779340.jpg (109KB, 1248x640px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1248x640px

>>55277900
That's what it says.

>>55278046
Oy vey.

This is like anudda shoah. Now what SSD do i buy?

>>55278083
I ended up getting a Crucial BX200, been pretty consistent with speeds. It was 480GB and $130 though, not nearly as thrifty per GB as the cheaper brands, but after reading up all the shady shit and SandForce jewery, SSDs are one thing I'm not going to skimp on anymore.

It's a real crapshoot at the <$50 level it seems.

>>55278146
And right as I read this I find that the 500/500 speeds I'm getting are only if I stay within the 6GB cache limit in one burst. Fuck everything.

>>55277450
anyone have any experience with samsungs 950 pro? is it any good?

>>55277338
SSDs are a meme

Anybody who needs speed and more IOPs just buys RAM with battery and HDD backup

File: 3D-XPoint.png (507KB, 1421x819px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 1421x819px

>THEY FELL FOR THE NAND SSD MEME