As of nano 2.6.0, it's no longer a GNU project https:/

File: george-tiny.jpg (4KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 125x125px

>>55203578
>nano

fuck stallman

fuck torvalds

fuck amd

>>55203605
keep your hate speech of this board.

File: 1461418411188.gif (1MB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 245x245px

>And, with this release, we take leave of the herd...
>Bye! And thanks for all the grass!

>>55203605
Okay schlomo, what cpu brand do you recommend?

VIA?

Okay dude thanks i'll try it

Backstory?

>Benno (((Schulenberg)))

>>55203805
fuck off pol

I'm actually surprised that it's still maintained.

>>55204000
Found the Jew. I use OS X over Linux because Mac's were created by whites.

>>55204450
So was Linux.

Unless you're buying into the /int/ memes and think all Finns are mongols.

>>55204462
GNU is kike software with a kike license, which is what the kernel is under: GPL.

Hail BSD licenses, a license for proud capitalistic whites.

nano have bugs? Nice, but for quick editing i use vi as it's literally everywhere.

>>55204485
BSD is a cuck software with a cuck license, which is what the kernel is under: KEKlicence

Hail GPLv3, a license that repels your nearby cuckolds

>>55203748
It seems some core developers (Benno) were not happy assigning their copyrights to the FSF so it was the easiest solution. They remain GPL and they want to stay on savannah as well.

>>55204485
ATT laughs on you losers.

>>55204529
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVrQdz_x9hs

>>55204529
>>55204564
Good goyim, forget about capitalism and embrace communism. Don't forget to prep the bull before you go.

>>55203627
VIA processors come with built in random number generators, and they don't bypass the Linux (more like shitnux) pool like Intels do.

I see nothing to suggest that nano is no longer a GNU project, apart from that odd sentence.

It's still licensed GPLv3, nothing on the site even hints at a divergence from GNU, in fact nano's very *existence* seems to be solely because of software freedom:

https://nano-editor.org/dist/v2.6/README

>The nano project was started because of a few "problems" with the
>wonderfully easy-to-use and friendly Pico text editor.

>First and foremost was its license: [...]

>>55203578

Nano is for the retarded people who can't into vi.

>>55204854
nanorc file, the first line has changed from:
>## Sample initialization file for GNU nano.
to
>## Sample initialization file for nano.

>>55204894
Fuck you, I can into vi, I just can't outof it

File: 1zq7d39[1].jpg (14KB, 311x334px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 311x334px

>>55204907

>>55204894
Literally /thread

File: 1458538758377.jpg (18KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x300px

>>55204947

I'm on the GNU maintainers team; I want to clarify a couple things about this:

First, Nano has _not_ left the GNU project; GNU Nano still does and will continue to exist. The current maintainer of GNU Nano---Chris Allegretta---was hoping to add Benno Schulenberg as a co-maintainer, citing numerous contributions by him. Unfortunately, Benno refused to accept GNU's maintainership agreement, and so was not appointed. Benno also did not want to assign copyright to the FSF for his contributions.

Instead, it seems, Benno decided to fork the project. But he did so with hostility: he updated the official GNU Nano website, rather than creating a website for the fork.

It's early, so there's still discussion going on, but again, to be clear: GNU Nano has absolutely not left GNU.

>>55204607
>communism is bad
lol

>>55205748
No need to be so defensive.
You guys still have GNU ed.

File: f6.webm (151KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 540x540px

>>55205748
Benno, the hero we need!

>>55204947
Nice

>>55205780
Come back when you're 18 and ready to grow up and join the alt right.

>>55205791
From: [email protected] (Patrick J. LoPresti)
Subject: The True Path (long)
Date: 11 Jul 91 03:17:31 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.religion.emacs,alt.slack

When I log into my Xenix system with my 110 baud teletype, both vi and Emacs are just too damn slow. They print useless messages like, ‘C-h for help’ and ‘“foo” File is read only’. So I use the editor that doesn't waste my VALUABLE time.

Ed, man! !man ed

ED(1) Unix Programmer's Manual ED(1)

NAME
ed - text editor

SYNOPSIS
ed [ - ] [ -x ] [ name ]
DESCRIPTION
Ed is the standard text editor.

Computer Scientists love ed, not just because it comes first alphabetically, but because it's the standard. Everyone else loves ed because it's ED!

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

And ed doesn't waste space on my Timex Sinclair. Just look:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 24 Oct 29 1929 /bin/ed
-rwxr-xr-t 4 root 1310720 Jan 1 1970 /usr/ucb/vi
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 5.89824e37 Oct 22 1990 /usr/bin/emacs

Of course, on the system I administrate, vi is symlinked to ed. Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1) Generates a syslog message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk quota by 100K; and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

Let's look at a typical novice's session with the mighty ed:

golem$ ed

?
help
?
?
?
quit
?
exit
?
bye
?
hello?
?
eat flaming death
?
^C
?
^C
?
^D
?

Note the consistent user interface and error reportage. Ed is generous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm the novice with verbosity.

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

Ed, the greatest WYGIWYG editor of all.

ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!

>>55205837
When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!! Not a “viitor”. Not a “emacsitor”. Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

TEXT EDITOR.

When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their “edlin” on a Unix standard, did they mimic vi? No. Emacs? Surely you jest. They chose the most karmic editor of all. The standard.

Ed is for those who can remember what they are working on. If you are an idiot, you should use Emacs. If you are an Emacs, you should not be vi. If you use ED, you are on THE PATH TO REDEMPTION. THE SO-CALLED “VISUAL” EDITORS HAVE BEEN PLACED HERE BY ED TO TEMPT THE FAITHLESS. DO NOT GIVE IN!!! THE MIGHTY ED HAS SPOKEN!!!

?

>not using joe

File: 1450989039843.jpg (47KB, 608x348px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 608x348px

>>55204607
>capitalism is good

>>55205837

$ ed
q
$ ed
a
Hello ed.
.
q
?
q
?
q
$ the fuck

>>55205833
Not everyone who disagrees with your ideology is under 18.

omg I hope it still compiles on poonix or pajeet gona cry

File: 1447171254427.jpg (118KB, 1040x1000px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1040x1000px

>>55204529
>v3
>Not the v2

>>55204907
>>55204977
Okay, but the README for v2.6 still says:

>The nano editor is an official GNU package. For more information on GNU and the Free Software Foundation, please see http://www.gnu.org/.

>>55205906
What's so great about v2 vs v3?

File: 1463966715158.jpg (23KB, 500x499px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x499px

>>55205906
>using outdated and buggy licenses

>>55204947
ZQ if not saving
ZZ if saving

>>55205928
Check the git commits, that was removed a few days ago.

I'd post a direct link but this fucking shit thinks it's spam

>>55205869

$ ed test/test.rb
139
,p
def foo(one, two, args={})
  STDERR.puts "one=#{one} two=#{two} args=#{args}"
end

foo('a', 42)
foo('b', 69, extra: 'extra', data: 'data')
2
  STDERR.puts "one=#{one} two=#{two} args=#{args}"
p
  STDERR.puts "one=#{one} two=#{two} args=#{args}"
i
Ed is easy to use, anon.
.
,p
def foo(one, two, args={})
Ed is easy to use, anon.
  STDERR.puts "one=#{one} two=#{two} args=#{args}"
end

foo('a', 42)
foo('b', 69, extra: 'extra', data: 'data')

>>55205934
how?

>>55205983
how what?

File: 1462245375829.jpg (169KB, 990x662px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 990x662px

>>55205934
Not allowing people to privatize your code is outdated?

>>55206007
How is GPL v2 an outdated and buggy license? How is GPL v3 any better?

>>55206015
it's made by the same people and it's a newer revision with things fixed

>>55206014
>>55206015
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.en.html

>>55204894
Nano is literally perfect. Simple and efficient. What more do you want from a text editor?

>>55206034
>not using AGPL
>letting silicon valley hipsters make money off your code without giving back

>>55206057
I wasn't saying AGPL is better (I think it is), just that GPLv3 has an edge over GPLv2.

>>55203578
I saw this on Hacker Jews too

Just use MIT/BSD like a normal person.

>>55205885
You're both faggots but communism is retarded.

>>55206091
if normal people are okay with people taking your code and not giving anything back, I'm glad I'm not normal.

>>55206100
Nah.

>>55206079
hacker news:
>63 points by wtbob 1 hour ago | 65 comments

this thread:
>4 hours ago

>>55203578
Who cares about babby's first editor?
I mean, every person that used GNU/Linux for more than 2 days moves to a real editor. Nano only makes sense if you need a text editor quickly for some fast and small edit of some config file.
mg is the editor to use when you need something quickly in cli.

>>55206131
>I saw this on Hacker Jews too
>I saw this on Hacker Jews as well as in this thread

>>55205748
>Benno
Probably going through midlife crisis.

File: It was only a ruse you baka faggot.png (275KB, 792x520px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 792x520px

>>55206014
>Not allowing people to privatize your code is outdated?
What?

>>55206015
Many of the loopholes in gplv2, including the fact that tivo is allowed is simply a bug.

>>55203578
>using bloatware

>>55206147
its sign that people are more likely to abandon the gnu than joining that cult when something as core as nano cant deal with them anymore

once stallman dies in like ~7 years the FSF that did absolutely nothing for the last decade will wither and die and that gnu bullshit will end with him

anyway it would be more apt to call it systemd/linux if you need to fucking up perfectly good name that 99% of linux world uses

File: betasquad.jpg (66KB, 848x640px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 848x640px

>>55206182
>once stallman dies
Have we decided yet on what's going to happen in an post-RMS world, /g/?

>>55206226
I welcome a world without cuckman or the GPL virus. BSD world is the future.

File: 1350699799422.jpg (83KB, 610x400px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 610x400px

>>55206182
rms birthed an immortal child that will forever serve the goals of the FSF even well after rms' nirvana. That child is the GPL.

>>55206182
>implying the gpl will disappear

>>55206271
the license? Why do people pretend its something awesome?
theres already split against v3...

>>55204450
I use mac

laughingwhores.jpg

>>55206271
he looks adorable in this photo

is there any better feeling than seeing stallman smiling

Upgrade to Windows 10 today.

>>55206318
Stallman dead

File: 1442694416825.jpg (1MB, 3200x2400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3200x2400px

>>55205748
>Schulenberg
>berg
/g/ was right again

>>55206346
hilarious, haha, such a funny man, upvoted

>>55206377
you're an ugly, lonely poophead

File: ishallplayyouthegnusongofmypeople.jpg (267KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 675x900px

>>55206291
There is no conceptual disagreement. Only different levels of understanding copyright law and the 4 fundamental freedoms and how they are/can be protected. rsm reached satori on these matters a long time ago and thus GPL v3 was born. Other lesser enlighten beings but not lesser on their determination to protect the 4 fundamental freedoms will no doubt meditate on the matter. Some will reach satori others will not and sadly will remain trapped in samara.

>>55206377
That's a completely normal German name, you subhuman American mongrel

>>55206419
>how to spot a virgin

Does anyone actually use nano?

Why, when vim exists?

>>55206377
no one gives a fuck about the Reich, because we give a shit about the Kike, make our own money, spend it how we like, getting likes on the like book the face book the kike book, Reich can dingaling tuck, sissy boi

>>55206419
>rsm

>>55206437
Do you asperger? Of course we do for some quick shit
not all of use are comfortable with they way vi behaves

>>55206483
>vim
>vi
lurk moar

>>55206456
Dyslexia and fat fingers are trivial matters not worth pointing out. Those that aspire to self-improvement and reaching nirvana should not be distracted by such mundane things and instead meditate on the truths revealed on >>55206419

>>55206510
vi is in mos of distross I think, same as nano
vim you have to get manually
for quick editing the difference does not matter
do aspies think of nano in similar way as full fledged vim developer setup?

>>55206437
I do, but I don't really write programs. I can't into vi(m) and see no point in learning to, I can into emacs a bit, but I need to look up the commands I forgot so whenever I'm writing a perl or python scrip or I'm editing a config file or some other kind of text file I use GNU nano.

>>55203620
I dont get it

>>55206401
The only good jew is a dead jew.

>>55205837
>>55205847
>>55205869

?

>>55206530
vim comes with most distros, it even comes with FreeDOS, mg seems to come with a lot of distros too (but I haven't seen it in archiso).

>>55206625
?

>>55206650
nigger you crazy?
I am sure as hell sure it does not come with arch, ubuntu, centos and debian

>>55206701
>I am sure as hell sure it does not come with arch, ubuntu, centos and debian
vi is part of the posix standard (or lsb for linux distributions)

>>55206712
and vi =/= vim

File: 1466580166611.png (4MB, 900x1100px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 900x1100px

>>55206377
/g/ is always right

>>55205833
>grow up and join the alt-right
Some of us are a little too old for that.

>>55204450
I don't use computers.Its an evil filthy jewish invention made using jewish physics

>>55205970
Does anyone actually use ed?

Why, when vim exists?

>>55206437
I just found a context in which using nano is better than using vim: editing files from the android terminal...

>>55209660
because it's THE editor

>>55206318
>tfw that laptop was stolen
>tfw stallman broke into tears
feels bad

>>55206666
Nice get

>>55203578
Does anybody even use nano on a regular basis?

File: 1451219983146.png (33KB, 710x632px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 710x632px

>>55206426
>That's a completely normal German name
His last name is Schulenberg, not Ahmed or Muhammad.

>>55209780
Good one

Make sure not to cut yourself on that edge

>>55207625
The alt-right is the only non cuck option among libcucks, centralcucks, republicucks, cuckservstives, cuckitarians, etc.

>>55210001
Please go back to /r/eddit sometime soon, thanks.

>>55203578
Isnt pico just like it?

File: 4L_2JYTnvww.jpg (477KB, 973x742px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 973x742px

>>55203578
>using nano
>not using vim
>in the current year

>>55206701
vim and vim core is installed by default on ubuntu and debian from what i know. type vi and it runs even when you have no vim or vim-tiny or etc installed.

>>55210086
Why would I want to back to /r/eddit when it's full of cucks?

>>55210297
you know very little then.. I have ubuntu and xubuntu as virtual machines, clean install to do some occasional testing
none of them have vim
vi of course... but vimfags dont like vi and they know why

>>55209688
Vimtouch

I only use nano as the default git editor these days.
And just because it is slightly faster at closing.

>>55210250
Emacs is fine too, anon.

>>55210297
Why does typing vi and vim give me vim.basic even without vim installed?

>>55210346
I'll agree with that. I'm #TeamVim but yeah anyone who uses nano should mot even have permission to edit files. Nano is a fucking joke and nano fanboys are confirmed as niggers of the text editor world.

More of these projects need to break free from Stallman and the FSF CLA copyright stealing and bullying.

For far too long Stallman has stolen the copyright of many "GNU projects" and passed them off as his own creations when he does fuck all work and 99% are just clones of UNIX tools that ad a license setting off RMS's autism.

alias nano="echo Fuck off"

>>55210538
I have
alias nano='echo "kill yourself" '

>>55210412
Nano is great if you want a super quick edit and are doing an arch/gentoo/LFS install. But yeah, all these fanboys who use it full time are limiting themselves.

>>55210538

alias nano="sudo rm -rf / --no-preserve-root"

>>55205748
it is not GNU
it is GNU+Linux

Nobody uses ed anymore, not even respected computer scientists. Give it a rest.

what the hell does nano need maintenance for in the first place?

>current year
>using a shitty pico clone
>not using ED
consider suicide

>>55206545
Mascot of gnu.svg

>>55210953
bugs fixing

>>55210994
>2016.07.01 punctuation issue in help window at line 264, fixed

>>55211069
2016-03-31 Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]>
* src/text.c (do_int_spell_fix): Replace a fake 'while', delete a
redundant 'if', rename a variable, and adjust whitespace.

2016-03-30 Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]>
* src/search.c (do_replace_loop, go_looking, findnextstr): Report
"Cancelled" instead of "Not found" when the user aborts a replace
that is taking too long. This fixes Savannah bug #47439.
* src/winio.c (do_replace_highlight): Rename this to 'spotlight',
for clarity, and for contrast with 'do_replace/do_replace_loop'.
* src/winio.c (spotlight): Rename a variable for clarity.
* src/files.c (input_tab), src/prompt.c (get_prompt_string):
Rename a variable to better indicate booleanness.
* src/text.c (do_int_speller): Unwrap a few lines.

2016-03-29 Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]>
* src/nano.c (main), src/text.c (do_justify, do_verbatim_input),
src/winio.c (parse_escape_sequence): Place the cursor in the edit
window also when --constantshow is in effect, after a ^J Justify or
an invalid escape sequence, and when entering a verbatim keystroke.
Leave the cursor off during Unicode input, for extra feedback.
* src/browser.c (do_browser): Improve the wording of a message.
* src/chars.c (is_valid_unicode): Speed up Unicode validation.
* src/text.c (do_int_spell_fix): Allow to stop replacing a word
without aborting the entire spell-fixing session.
* src/search.c (do_replace_loop): Chop a now-unused parameter.

2016-03-28 Benno Schulenberg <[email protected]>
* src/winio.c (statusbar): Don't bother putting back the cursor in
the edit window, as it is off anyway, and will be placed back in the
main loop. This prevents a segfault when trying to open a directory.
* src/search.c (findnextstr): Provide feedback when searching takes
longer than roughly half a second (on average).
* src/*.c: Remove the 'last_replace' variable that is never used.
* src/winio.c (parse_kbinput): Delete a no-op.

>>55211096
JUST

>>55211126
JUST get the fuck off my board famalam

>>55211141
get off my dick son

File: 20160618_075317.png (746KB, 1315x720px) Image search: [Google]

746KB, 1315x720px

>>55203578
>nano
Who the fuck uses nano?

>>55211221
people

>>55211193
>>/gnu/pol/

>>55211284
>>>/lgbt/

>>55203578
Finally!

>>55206147
Zile serves the same purpose as mg and does it much better.

>>55210740

This is why you are an autist virgin. I use nano because I just need to do simple config edits.

Yes I can use vim... no I don't care how much better you think it is to nano. Its a fucking text editor get over it.

>>55211768
>spergs out over a dumb joke
>calls other people autists

not even the guy you responded to

>>55211698
>Zile
Even GNU bash is more compatible with Emacs keybindings than zile. I don't like zile at all.

>>55210576
>hahahaha if somebody types nano into my arch linux shitbox he'll get told to off himself
>I'm so lonely

>>55211855
What important bindings are missing? Zile's help system, key handling (e.g. M-g g doesn't work in mg), and having transient-mark-mode on by default make it much better than mg for me.

>>55203578
The best editor just got better.

>>55212041
Why do you need help in a editor that you use only for small edits when you don't have access to GNU Emacs?

As for broken keybindings, I like to use things like M-- M-c a lot, and that doesn't work in zile.

File: 12d.jpg (31KB, 567x561px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 567x561px

>>55211768

>>55206055
to go through 20 key combinations to put a semi colon at the end of a line.

>>55211126
EMAIL

>>55203595
>>55203599
>>55203605
and yet no one will ever fuck you

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-22 17-23-22.png (11KB, 742x486px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 742x486px

Day 471
Still can't get out of vi

>>55212079
Sometimes it's helpful as some keybindings aren't interpreted the way I'd expect (the one I dislike the most is C-S-/ interpreted as backspace). Plus small easy-to-view docstrings for functions/variables doesn't hurt.

> As for broken keybindings, I like to use things like M-- M-c a lot, and that doesn't work in zile.

That is odd. Though actually, that doesn't work in my version of mg either.

I don't think that's a keybinding issue though, just that Zile's capitalize-word doesn't accept a negative argument properly.

>>55203578
Good riddance.

>>55210001
>LE KEK XDDD

>>55212295
ESC : q RET

>>55212295
Install vimtutor

>>55203578
>Have arch
>Use nano

>Barely use a text editor no reason to Learn 30 combinations on something I will only use 3 times a year

>>55206377
fuck off

File: what.jpg (33KB, 318x438px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 318x438px

You mean the GNU licensed 2.6 version of nano from like 5 days ago.
It's understandable how you could fuck up so bad, seeing as how you find the superior vim too confusing.

>>55209688
I actually find ed to be better for that.

>>55209660
Because sometimes vim doesn't exist.

File: 1458537534438.jpg (25KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 800x600px

>>55214926
>everything that uses the GNU GPL is a GNU project

>>55212042
under-rated as fuck

>>55212295
Click on the "X" in the top right corner of the screen wise guy

>>55210001
Can't wait for trump to lose

>>55218570
>>>Reddit

Why not just use emacs?

>>55220616
Because vim exists

File: 1420730263777.png (31KB, 759x280px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 759x280px

>>55221046
>>55220616

Only recently found out nano supports syntax highliting
bretty gud actually

>>55205748
>GNU Nano still does and will continue to exist. The current maintainer of GNU Nano
You mean nano origin?

>who the fuck uses nano?
vim masterrace.

File: 4L_2tD9oMu1.jpg (360KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 2048x1152px

>>55216195
When vim doesn't exist use vi

How can anyone honestly like vi/m? It's so unintuitive. CTRL+C, which quits like 99% of programs, throws you in a goddamn inescapable loop. When I want to edit a file, I want to immediately edit it, not fuck around trying to get it to where I can actually edit.
Nano just werks. It has nice key combos, most of which are conveniently listed at the bottom.
All the arguments against it are empty statements like "who uses nano". That's not a valid reason.

>>55212295
you have to reboot

>>55205869
w to write to disk or Q to quit without saving

>reading man pages is hard

>>55224837
>pressing 'i' to edit is terrifying and hard
>I am always editing files and never ever moving, copying, pasting, deleting, or doing anything but entering a continuous stream of text

Git gud and learn how to read a man page before bitching about non-issues. Understand also that "non-intuitive" and "intuitive" are merely buzzwords that mean "it's similar to software X that I like and I am afraid of change".

>>55205837
Ed is amazingly compact, here is the full x86 source code:

[ORG 0x100]
top:  mov ah,0x0a
      mov dx, buffer
      int 0x21
      mov ah, 0x09
      mov dl,message
      int 0x21
      jmp short top
message:
         db 10,'?',13,10,'$'
buffer:

>>55206545
When the dolphins returned to their home planet, they said, "Thanks for all the fish".

>>55210412

I'm using it for quick edits to configs, nothing big time. Is your autistic faggot ass really that perturbed that people do this?

>>55225857

>git gud
>buzzwords

You even used quotation wrong.

>>>/v/

>>55225857
What makes you think you have to stop being able to edit just to do those things? And again you give me no real reason vi/m is actually better than nano.

Just google best cli text editor. All the results say vim. If you can't trust google, who can you trust?

>>55223054
Sometimes vi doesn't exist either.

>>55227071
if vi doesn't exist it isn't posix compliant and therefore doesn't matter

>>55227366
vi isn't required for all SUS, stupid. Why not go read the spec?

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/vi.html
>This utility shall be provided on systems that both support the User Portability Utilities option and define the POSIX2_CHAR_TERM symbol. On other systems it is optional.
>On other systems it is optional.

>>55203609

fuck you