Apt or pacman?

Apt always.

Who gives a fuck? Neo /g/ everyone

>>55177366
What makes apt better?

>>55177391
>having no clue what different package managements mean
Neo /g/ everyone

>>55177254
zypper.

pacman is shit. AUR is shit. dpkg is shit

>>55177254
pacman

File: 1461347138079.png (16KB, 361x293px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 361x293px

>>55177394
The dependency hell

Ubuntu packages and even whole DEs break when I compile from source a package I already installed

>>55177717
well duh

>>55177254
I feel like pacman aligns the text to be much more readable than what apt makes it. That's a good thing.

>>55177254
Apt with pacman output.

apt-get

>>55177624

that's a simple

sudo apt-get remove

>>55177254
you just are really starting to trigger me now
just use PORTAGE you IDIOT

File: 1388709311690.jpg (95KB, 789x720px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 789x720px

>>55177254
>he doesn't manually compile from source
Wew when did this place get so pleb?

>>55178217
when you got here
you FUCKING LOSER

File: 1375202386951.png (319KB, 449x429px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 449x429px

dnf
*tips 360 and walk away*

YaST

File: OpenSUSE_official-logo-color.svg.png (69KB, 1280x810px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1280x810px

>>55177254
ZYPPER MOTHERFUCKER!

>>55178389
desu this guy is 100% right
dnf is godly
F24 FUCKING WHEN

>>55178532
If its on schedual, tomorrow

>>55177624
Why the hell are you using the GUI shit?

>>55177254
Anyways, pacman.

pacman, apt is garbage

>>55177254
Emerge

>>55178698
So, month and a half in reality?
When was the last time a fedora release didn't face 1/+ delays?