Is CLion the only good C/C++ IDE?

Visual Studio is better.

>>55157488
No. It's hard to beat Visual Studio, especially for debugging.

>>55157609
I quite like Qt Creator for debugging. At least on Linux. Not used it on Windows.

>>55157609
>What is gdb
>What is valgrind

>>55157693
Don't be a pedantic nigger, you know what I mean. Visual debugging.

>>55157488
Windows only, but Visual Studio is probably the best.

Of the others I tried, this is how I'd rate them (from best to worst):

CLion
KDevelop
Netbeans
Cevelop
Eclipse CDT
QtCreator
Code::Blocks
CodeLite
Anjuta

>>55157733
>visual debugging
>gtk or qt software
not on my gentoo box

>tfw gvim + mingw32-make + gcc/clang
comfy to be honest lads

>>55157733
uh, are those not visual tools?

>>55157488
best IDE for everything, VIM.

>>55159099
oh ya cuz I love having a vim plugin blocking editing until it finishes running.....

emacs > vim by far.

>>55157897
What about bloodshed dev-c++?

>>55159119
I haven't used it in ages. It is what I started with, though back in the day. It has a pleasant UI. But again, Windows only. Now that the VS free editions are good and there are better free cross-platform IDEs there's no real point to using it IMO.

I haven't used CLion since the beta.

I use IntelliJ for all of my work these days, but even I have to admit that Visual Studio is hard to beat for C/C++.

does visual studio still have telemetry?

>>55157488
Until clion supports makefiles, it's only as good as codeblocks

File: stuff.png (208KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1024x1024px

>>55157488
>>55157562
>>55157609
>>55157654
>>55157664
>>55157733
>>55157897
>>55158644
>>55159119
>>55159667
>>55159710
>>55160766
Fucking retards using payshit IDEs cucked by microshit.

>>55158975
>>55159099
Have fun, see >>55159114

pic related with evil is literally the only correct answer

>>55160837
So, how is emacs for debugging?
If it just has a window for gdb then it's worthless.

The best feature an IDE must have is not syntax coloring or autocompletion, but a good debugger.

>>55160837
You are just living in the past and I doubt you develop software professionally.

I'm an emacs/evil user as well. There is no comparison to a good IDE when writing and debugging C++.

>>55157488
PHPStorm is better

>>55160919
>Visual studio
>Good
I mean, maybe you use c# and fbx viewers and iis-express in your C++ workflow, but the rest of us don't.

I use vim most of the time and sometimes visual studio, if you are willing to learn a little vim is better, if not than visual studio is