font rendering

>>55120415
I can, my computer shows your picture just fine.

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-17 19-10-58.png (242KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1366x768px

>>55120415
I'm happy with mine

>>55120446
Kek

>>55120514
Keep telling yourself that so you can sleep at night, petal. It's fucking unreadable.

>>55120551
Your cleartype font is actually disgusting in case no one told you yet

I never thought I'd see the day where a Windows user brags about their fonts.


Windows 10 is even worse than the older ones because you can't even fucking fix it yourself anymore because mactype is broken for most "modern" apps.

>>55120580
Wincuckolds cannot change their shit fonts anymore

File: Clipboard02.png (719B, 361x30px) Image search: [Google]

719B, 361x30px

>>55120415
no i don't

my eyes aren't so bad that i have to blur everything so it "looks more natural"

File: shit.png (30KB, 1161x791px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 1161x791px

>>55120580
Surely that isn't a Windows screenshot. The file name makes me think Android.

Android has absolutely beautiful font rendering. I am truly perplexed by how bad Windows' is. The Settings area is particularly bad. Just look at this shit. This is with cleartype on and configured to make the fonts everywhere else look passable at least.

>>55120634
>Surely that isn't a Windows screenshot. The file name makes me think Android.
The name is the default template name for screenshots on OS X.

>>55120415
You're better off taking a picture of your screen, a screenshot won't show how it's really displayed. Quality text rendering takes the subpixel layout into account.

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-17 at 12.41.53 PM.png (707KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1920x1080px

hows my hackintosh font rendering?

>>55120834
Legitimately shit.

>>55120834
pretty shit though your image looks compressed to hell and back which doesn't help. When I had a hackintosh on my XPS 13 with a 3200x1800 display it was top notch.

>>55120873
>>55120872
can i make the font rendering better somehow? i think it expects a fuckhuge screen, but i only have 1080p

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-17 05-48-01.png (44KB, 941x567px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 941x567px

we need a way to compare rendering without people's resolution getting in the way

File: tmp_13268-Screenshot_2016-06-17-18-57-22-422440704.png (390KB, 1600x2560px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 1600x2560px

>>55120900
>nothing can beat this
>being beaten by a fucking phone

File: Schermata del 2016-06-17 11-58-12.png (290KB, 1380x754px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1380x754px

>>55120415
You sure?

>>55120958
that is the exact same rendering library

>>55120973
yeah that's trash

>>55120993
You must be blind

>>55121007
No he's right, it is trash. Just like your existence.

>>55121285
Oh no... a piece of shit said my existence is trash... and didn't even post a screenshot

File: SPTimmy.jpg (41KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 320x240px

>>55121318
Here you go, it's a screenshot of you, Timmy.

>>55121453
I have no idea what the fuck you just posted

File: 1455404581279.png (99KB, 540x543px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 540x543px

>>55121473
>someone posts picture of you
>pretend not to know who it is

>>55121552
And still no font rendering screenshot...

Win7, 8 and 10 are both trash for fonts.

Most satisfied I was font-wise was with like, XP 64.

File: 160617-12.05.46.png (121KB, 795x803px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 795x803px

Windows 7, 1080p

>>55120514
gross

File: 1466161722364.png (2KB, 290x150px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 290x150px

>>55121648

File: image_1.jpg (15KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x460px

>>55121595
>being this concerned with winning on the internet

File: kek.png (2KB, 264x184px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 264x184px

>>55121648

>>55121749
And yet again no screenshot...

File: Screenshot from 2016-06-17 07-19-52.png (127KB, 745x898px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 745x898px

R8

>>55121702
>>55121756
how do i even fix the kerning
the option in mactype doesn't seem to do anything

>>55121799
you fix it by not using mactype

>>55121803
cleartype is even worse, though

>>55121811
proper letter placement > everything else

one of the selling points of ClearType was its ability to snap to the subpixel grid, not just subpixel rendering.

That patent has recently expired and freetype2 is using it

see
>>55121772

>>55121768
I'm at work (pretending to work) but if you keep the thread alive for me I'll show you font rendering as god intended, 'kay babes?

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-17 at 14.51.25.png (67KB, 1920x947px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1920x947px

>>55121799
that's probably because the font is shit, no proper pairs

pic is with HintingMode=1 AntiAliasMode=2 RenderWeight=1.0 open sans

File: 2016-06-17 15_29_41-Settings.png (77KB, 2038x1427px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 2038x1427px

>>55120634

File: 2016-06-17 15_31_28-Japan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Firefox Developer Edition.png (788KB, 3332x1748px) Image search: [Google]

788KB, 3332x1748px

>>55120834

I'll raise you Windows 10 font rendering

File: chrome_2016-06-17_23-36-18.png (113KB, 1149x914px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1149x914px

wanblangs 4 lyf

>>55121799
gdipp is better at this, use it

File: wangblowswinsagain.png (64KB, 832x718px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 832x718px

What do I win?
Wangblows, 1080p

>>55123291
>2560 * 1600
>everything is huge

File: Screenshot_2016-06-17-08-59-45.png (466KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1440x2560px

Looks good here

>>55123291
pschepschefagg

File: 1466172485271.png (51KB, 1080x367px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1080x367px

Beat this.

File: Снимок экрана 2016-06-17 в 17.17.14.png (601KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 1920x1200px

>>55123291

>>55123412
>Lagdroid