>AMDiscount fags thinking this would have fury performance

>around 390X/980 performance level
This is what's expected of stock.

With OC, this is supposed to go near Fury tier. It would make sense if the OC potential is above 15%, it would be near Nano tier. @ 20% OC, it would be at Fury tier.

>>55077112
>comparing stock to oc
Your comparison does not hold, because if we would overclock the 980 and the 390x aswell they would still end up above the 480.

>>55077143
Or at least the 980 would

>$199 for performance rivaling Nvidia's last gen flagship using only 1 6 pin power connector


This is even better than I expected desu

>>55077162
>980
>nvidia's last gen flagship
Lol no, and as you can see it does not rival it, although it comes close

Yeah but if you OC the 480 shouldn't you use the OC rating of the Fury X too?

And wouldn't OCing the 480 kind of neccesitate the need for a 8-pin or larger power connector because of the larger draw?

-Completely clueless about dem GPU bois

>>55077203
You can't oc a fury x

AMD literally advertised a card as the overclockers dream which doesn't overclock for shit

>>55077191
>>55077044
>>55077143
Nvidiots on full damage control mode! Suicide watch imminent!

>>55077257
>suicide watch over a budget card with last years midrange performance

Yeah...no

>>55077269
>GTX 980
>Midrange
Cool Story

>>55077203
>OC needs 8 pin
Not necessarily. You need to factor in what the regular power draw is and then add in power to it. If the 480 consumes about 100w, then OC hunger might reach to 140w or so.

Thats sitll enough for 6 pin

Fact of the matter is, if this card can OC, there will be so much butthurt from 1070 owners.

>>55077679
Yeah I'm sure AMDiscount fags don't consider that mid range, but it is

>>55077740
>butthurt for having 980ti performance for 380$
Hah, I doubt it

File: mpv-0065.jpg (141KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1280x720px

>>55077758
>he fell for the $380 meme/myth

File: 1465619579806.jpg (31KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x300px

>>55077742
Damage control
A
M
A
G
R

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

>>55077191
the 980 was the best nvidia card for 9 months, it counts as being a flagship

Buy 2 then

>>55077742
>mid range
>$500-$600 card that reigned on top chart for months
kek

Stop with the downplays. Jesus christ, this is just too cringy.

>>55077143
It does make sense, because you can't really OC the Fury cards, and the 980 would still cost a good deal more and maxwell lacks A-sync support

Begeezus guise.
Yes the 480 is a great deal and yes the best gaming experience will be on team green. Team red is as always adequate.

>only 5708 in firestrike extreme

this is slower than a 970 by a huge margin, http://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search/gpu/fs/X/982/6000?minScore=0&gpuName=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

seems like AMD is generating fake leaks and fake hype now because they have a shit product

>>55077910

here's the highest result for a single 970 on firestrike extreme:

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7804987

~36% faster. sounds like the 480 is roughly 380x performance.

>>55077789
It's only $450 right now because partner cards have not hit the market yet

>RX 480 does better than expected (naysayers were putting it between 390 and 390X).
>People think this is somehow good for nvidia
Bitches please, I prefer Nvidia (and was planning on building with a GTX 970), but the RX 480 is just too amazing at its price point.

>>55077942
>right now
So you're saying it won't be like the 1080, where all the partners were overcharging even past the FE tax?

>>55077975

[citation needed]

there are several 1080s for less than the FE pricing on newegg right now, including the acx 3.0 cards.

File: 1448702541401.jpg (36KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x460px

>>55077808
>amd fags consider 980ti high end

>>55078006
*980

>>55077203
>6 pin is not enough for the RX 480 to OC
>8 pins are fine fine for muh gtx 1080!

Just

File: nvidiotargument.jpg (145KB, 1162x651px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1162x651px

>>55077910
>>55077930
Except its anomaly. I hope you guys actually know it and just baiting.

>>55077991
Dudewhat.exe

Just checked newegg, all 1080s start at 699$ and are sold out. You can grab a 999$ asus ROG 1080 tho, that's not sold out.

>>55078104

there are thousands of 970s above the stated rx 480 score.

It looks like it's the best $200 3D mark card

>>55077896
only decent reply to this thread

>>55078124
Why defend Nvidia's jewery? The RX 480 looks like it's closer to a 980 than a 970, just wait 2 weeks for the real benchmarks

>>55077896
Maybe if you want to spend the money for a 1080 and high end G-sync display, the average person is better off with a 480 and less expensive free-sync display

If only Vega would come out sooner

>>55078110
there are always bundles in stock, theyre just really hard to find
you can only buy a 1080 if you buy a power supply or some RAM too

>>55078157
>Why defend Nvidia's jewery? The RX 480 looks like it's closer to a 980 than a 970, just wait 2 weeks for the real benchmarks

how am i defending nvidia? all i'm doing is stating facts about the 480's performance.

File: 1457829055112.png (509KB, 593x655px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 593x655px

What did they mean by this?

>>55078170
Let me translate this, happy Muslim Easter

>>55078167
I dont see any facts. Just butthurt nvido fanboy.

>>55077203
AMD does not use spec with power pins. Haven't in years. Could very well use 200 peak.

>>55078190

you must be blind then, plenty of evidence was given showing the 970 is considerably faster than the 480. the onus is on AMD to put out a product worth buying at this point.

File: XxhXDJKP2x6Z9jPMP7XgjD-650-80-1.png (153KB, 650x388px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 650x388px

>>55078208

According to /g/ the 970 is faster than a fury x, so make of that what you will.

File: ss+(2016-06-14+at+01.26.24).png (21KB, 618x222px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 618x222px

>>55078006
so does passmark. your point?

>>55078208
Point me to any evidence in your posts.

>>55078238

Passmark has the 290x only slightly ahead of a 780 yet in games the 290x murders it. Even ignoring that passmark is an awful gpu benchmark as it flatout does not support dual chip cards.

Even as a cpu test passmark is kind of meh.

>>55078208
If >>55078104 this is your evidence, then 33% of GTX 970s are faster than GTX 980s.

>>55078258

yeah, you clearly are blind

http://www.3dmark.com/search#/?mode=advanced&url=/proxycon/ajax/search/gpu/fs/X/982/8000?minScore=5708&gpuName=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

>88566 RESULTS FOUND.

the 970 is unequivocally faster than the 480.

>>55078294

not him, but an OCed 970 will easily outperform a stock 980.

Yeah but is it faster than a 6970?

>>55078299
>88566 RESULTS FOUND.
>all sli
I guess you`re just stupid.

So when is AMD going to release their new flagship card? A few months?

>>55078406
next year

>>55078393

>all sli

except that the search was limited to systems with 1 gpu, so that's 88,000 results before the SLI stats would be included.

>>55078393
>>55078299

Holy fuck, nice catch. So what is the typical score of stock 970?

The point is that it is 199 for a 980 like card, except it is extremely efficient and can be overclocked quite a bit

>>55078478
How are you so confident it can oc so well?

File: retard.jpg (171KB, 1214x713px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1214x713px

>>55078459
You cant be that retarded.

>>55078498
Benchmarks

>>55078498
It has a smaller architecture, uses much less power and unlike the 1070 doesn't run at 80C idle :^)

>>55078406
October iirc

File: Screenshot_20160614-150710.png (273KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1080x1920px

>>55078006

>>55078498

Every AMD chip has been a decent overclocker until fiji. Even the nuclear inferno hawaii overclocks nicely if you can cool it.

>>55078498
Because they're trying to delude themselves into thinking it'll be some amazing overclocker even without confirmed or reliable benchmarks.

File: Screenshot_2016-06-09-17-05-25.png (3MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1440x2560px

>>55077044
GPU scoring charts provided by the Pittsburgh Penguins

>>55078923
You should go

the last few AMD releases haven't been exactly impressive in the overclocking department.
i loved my 280 and my 390 but let's be honest, they're not great for overclocking.
it's a bit shameful to expect future AMD cards to be "amazing" overclockers.
we'll see with time, but for now, please stop with this "AMD / NVIDIA IS FINISHED" nonsense.
WAIT FOR ACTUAL RELEASE INFORMATION.

File: 1445946364n.jpg (84KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 900x600px

>>55078170
AMD's stock is owned by some very colorful individuals.
Some of which are known for their Yemen based non profit charity organizations - aka ISIL.

So think twice if you're thinking of buying an AMD card. You might be providing funds for the next attack on European or American soil.

File: neat.png (242KB, 492x478px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 492x478px

>>55077044
I told you guys. In fact, I'm impressed it even gets that close to a 980. For $200 it's an amazing card, but as always, WAIT FOR ACTUAL BENCHMARKS.
On another note, my ass isn't ready for the RX470. If it gets 970/390 performance, then I'm buying one to replace Tahiti and wait for Vega at the end of the year or early next year.

File: 1368226826627.jpg (16KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 533x800px

>mfw amdrones were screaming from the rooftops about how accurate that chink benchmark and about how accurate 3dmark is
>mfw now they're all saying "i-it doesn't matter, b-benches are never reliable anyway!"

This just gets better and better. They were literally saying it was 1070 performance just yesterday. Enjoy your sub 980 performance, fags.

>>55079021
There is always the very vocal minority. I've been posting that "don't delude yourself" post several times since it was getting out of control. I expected more than 970/390, that's it. If it does deliver, then it's a win for all of us.

>>55079021
For $200 I will.

>>55078985
280 is fine at over clocking
Base clock is 827mhz and it'd OC to 1200mhz on average.

Problem is no GCN GPU design could reliably breach 1200mhz, and the later ones like Hawaii and Fiji were clocked closer to it.

>>55079096
I personally did not have the same result with my 280. My best OC was around 950MHz, and that ran really hot. :(
silicon RNG ftl

File: 290x max overclock.png (1MB, 1860x823px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1860x823px

>>55079096

GCN as a whole prefers to sit in the 800-900mhz range for poerformance vs power draw. Those absurdly high clocks of hawaii and fiji give the arch impressive performance but a not so enjoyable TDP.

Pic semi-related, a borderline suicide run on air.

>>55079095
That's not the point. They've been saying this for weeks about how it's going to be like a fury nano and then even more recently they've been saying it's 1070 levels of performance. You could tell they legitimately believed it as well.

>>55079167
That's exactly the point. Even if it was 200$ for a 970-like it would be sweet.

Also, muh 2x Titan X performance. But back then it was "clearly marketing and noone should believe it".

>>55079167
Again, vocal minority. I never believed any of the last few images circulating around the RX480 much less that OC version. It's just rumors.

>>55077044
Is this supposed to be a bad thing?

It's GTX 980 performance for $200, absolutely amazing desu senpai.

>>55077044
>thinking this would have fury performance

Nobody ever said that, we all said it would be 980 tier, which your chart clearly shows is the case.

>>55077942
It's not even $450 now, it's like $550, these nvidia cards are overpriced garbage

I have a Fury X running a 100Mhz overclock on core

Temps are so fucking great with clc on a graphics card

Why won't AMD make another Fury X?

>>55079165
i has to go further than that, fans are only at 20% and load is 0.

>>55077044

Was going to buy a Nano but this is far more tempting....

>>55079272

your VRMs will fail eventually. fury x can't withstand any increased voltage with the stock cooler.

>>55079287
Nano is like $300 more, no way is it worth it.

RX 480 has ridiculous price performance, it's the value king.

>>55077112
Please never mention OC as a shit eating AMD fanboy. We already had this conversation with 390 blowing away 970 gtx till you started comparing OC benchmarks.

>>55077143
>We get to overclock to Fury/1070 speeds for $199. That's why we laugh at you.

>>55079281

There are no fans plugged into the fan header (virtually n gpu actually checks that, unlike cpus) due to using custom cooling and its at 0% load as it completed the benchmark (barely). Still the average overclock for a 290x is 1150mhz - my particular card will do 1200mhz but the voltage required is obscene.

>>55079329

But it's cute =\

>>55077810
Listen I'm glad that you're happy for being 2 years behind Nvidia players but hit me up when your based Pajeet actually develops a card that can compete with current lineup. Thanks.

>>55077143
Except the 980 costs twice as much now? You're funny.

>>55079355
Have fun wasting your money on overpriced bullshit so you can run minesweeper at 9000 fps

File: perfrel_3840_2160.png (39KB, 500x1050px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x1050px

>>55079355

Its taken until the 1080 for Nvidia to catch up to the 295x2 - it remained the fastest card in existence from release until now.

File: Screenshot_18.png (58KB, 380x324px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 380x324px

Who shills harder

>>55079355
Legit curious, how many of you are serious?

>>55079383
You're just as bad as the other anon. Multi GPU cards are garbage.

>>55079383
the x2 was insane

>>55079383
>295x2
>Counting as a single card

Haha, no. I don't understand why AMD always post the same retardation and then get very upset when people call them out on their bullshit.

>>55079362
And its 2 years older, if AMD has to compare their cards to two year old tech to get a price/performance win its pretty pathetic

>>55079411

>titan z

Also the 295x2 is a single card, not single die. A subtle distinction.

>>55079411
Its still a single card no matter what you want to believe.

>>55079010
I'm gonna buy 1000 of them then!

>>55079411
>Two CPU's on one card
>Not one card

It technically is one card

>>55079010
Time to buy ALL the AMD GPUs then. MAGA.

>>55079419
Gtx 980 is a pretty high end card, that's why it's still on that list from whoever made that image

>>55079475
It was a high end card, and it got replaced, that's what happens with new tech.

File: 1310483412100.jpg (36KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 413x395px

>>55079459
>two cpu's

>MUH 2016 CARD IS BETTER THAN YOUR 2014 CARD

AMD logic at its finest.

>>55079491
Your delusion is hilarious

>>55079516
Lol what?
You are comparing last generation cards with new generation cards and you are calling me delusional

Typical AMD fanboy

>>55079507
>My $200 card is better than your $550 card

Fixed.

>>55079525
You have no idea what high end even means

>>55079541
>amd's flagship card is a budget card with last years mid range performance
fixed

>>55079315
But the VRMs have a heatpipe on them

>>55078512
Why is 3DMARk search so shit?

>>55079557
Maybe a 980 would be high end to you, to me 980ti or titan x level is high end.

>>55079579
Thank you for proving my point.

>>55077044

>they don't even bother to scored the 970.

So much for "most popular" card in the world.

As time goes technology becomes cheaper and more accessible. Same happened with LCD TVs. I remember times when that shit was ridiculously expensive and a 40 inch TV costed $1500, now you can buy one for $200. You're literally pants on head retarded by being proud of something that naturally happens. You don't see Nvidia fans insulting Titan X owners who paid two times more for 1070 gtx performance. You know why? Because they're smart enough to realize that those people could enjoy games like W3 in ultra details and 1440p 2 years before we can do it with 1070. Seriously, just off yourself or shut up and enjoy your 1080p scraps after Nvidia owners jump to 1440p.

>>55079599
Someone sounds really buttmad that they wasted their money on overpriced nvidia garbage

>>55079592
That high end is arbitrary and depends on the persons wishes? It should have been obvious.

A 980 is not high end, it was barely able to sustain 60 fps on 1440p with the highest settings.

If you call that shit high end you set the bar pretty low.

Which is probably why you think the 480 is such a great card

>>55079611
High end is literally a market term and you still don't know what it is

>>55079610
There is no arguing with a moron like you.

>>55077143
>390X
>stock

It's just a 290X overclocked out of the box and barely moves above that. The Fury can't overclock for shit either. If the 480 overclocks well, it'll beat both comfortably.

>>55079628
Sorry the truth hurts

>>55079626
It isn't, your standards are just low

>>55079681
>I have no idea what I'm talking about

>>55079633
But the 980 overclocks like a beast

>>55079691
Well at least you admit it

>closed loop cooler is insignificantly more expensive than an aftermarket or reference air cooler (durr metal shroud nvidia let's drive up manufacturing cost)
>closed loop cooler fucks any air cooler up the ass for temps and noise
>clc clearly the best cooling for a graphics card unlike a CPU which has some downsides

>nvidia STILL releasing their $700 high end card with a fucking blower air cooler

I swear I'm done with air cooled graphics cards. Fuck that jet engine taking off when you overclock it a bit.

>>55079712
>I don't even know what a quote is

http://videocardz.com/61064/amd-polaris-10-and-polaris-11-specifications

a couple of new leaks (slides)
So, it appears AMD has decided to go with a leaner line of SKU's.
Rx 460
Rx 470
Rx 480

probably a good move, cutting unecessary products that fall below the iGPs baseline. I'm guessing that they'll probably still keep selling some cut down chips to OEM's (but that's coming from my own ass and justified by the unfathomable crave that oem's seem to have for ultra low end discreet gpus)

>>55079745
490 reserved for dual gpu then

>>55079745
they are filling the gap ndivia left

90% will not buy a 300+ card

>>55079715

CLC is trash unless it's full cover. a good aftermarket air cooler will both be sufficient for an OCed card and virtually inaudible. i have the acx 2.0 970 (the worst cooler you can buy, one of the heatpipes doesn't even make contact) and it still stays inaudible under load, even with an overclock to 1500mhz boost.

>>55079775
Yup.

Unless nvidia comes out with something comparable soon, AMD will own the market.

>>55079770
Yeah, people were a bit lost if the RX 490 would be a theoretical 40 CU Polaris chip or Vega itself. These slides seems to point towards the latter.

I like this move to reduce the clutter on the final consumer space.

>>55079770
>>55079855
or rather. I doubt they would change the naming scheme of xx5 reserved for dual chips. I think that a 295 works a lot better than 6990 for clarity.

File: AMD-Radeon-RX-400-Polaris-5-900x506.jpg (93KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 900x506px

hinting at scorpio or the next playstation?

>>55079923
285

>>55079971
Both.

>>55079419
Stop pretending these cards are the same size and fuck off. Learn how to make a basic comparison before you open your fat mouth kid.

>>55079971
Very likely AMD will be making the chips for the next PS and Xbox

>>55079971
Playstation 4.5 is likely to use Polaris 10
Poplaris 11 is a bit faster than PS4

WAIT FOR VOLTA

AMD will be btfo

>>55079745
samefag

lesser clickbait source (+2 more slides):
http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/amd_release_rx_400_series_polaris_info/1

It's quite obvious AMD is aiming for the entry level market of gamers which is 95% of them according to Steam. Until 4K monitors mature and come down in price (forget 2K it's just a stop gap) AMD are trying to dominate that area and could quite possibly do so for the next year or two.

Nvidia faggots will buy high end gear and gloat no matter what. Proof again that class warfare is still running rampant.

'Most' gamers are not richfags.

AMD know this.

>>55080300
>According to Steam


According to Steam the most popular GPUs are the GTX970 and the GTX960, thats the entry market, those people aren't going to do a side upgrade to a 480.

>>55080349
Look at the total share, 95% of the cards are below $200

>>55080349
those 2 cards account for less than 10%. there is a ton of people looking for an upgrade now because of all the hype surrounding the new architectures.

>>55080300
>(forget 2K it's just a stop gap

1440p monitors are the absolute sweet spot for gaming and productivity right now.

>>55080638
2k are the sweet-spot. Any bigger is pointless because you can't see the difference unless you glue it to your face.

>>55077044
Weren't last gen AMD cards also better in benchmarks, but fall behind in actual games?
We should wait for real life testing.

>>55080638
4k is the point where you really don't need any AA and it looks amazingly sharp. WQHD is still not quite perfect.
Once good 4k monitors drop to 500 bucks everyone will buy 4k.

>>55080696
I can see pixels on my 27" "2.5k" monitor and I actually need new glasses.
4k is the future

>>55080754
Try not using a resolution of 640x480 maybe.

>>55077044
>poolaris

>>55078200
Did you mean nvidia?

>>55078706
/thread

>>55081637
You know that is buzzword google advertisement and a 980 ti is not 200$ and ti is a rapper

>>55077112
fuck off cunt every AMD card i had almost didn't OC so no thanks i won't fell for that AMD OC meme again.

>>55082648
There are already benchmarks showing the 480 can OC all the way to fury x levels.

>>55079770
490 dual gpu? Fuck off with this adored tv fud. It's already confirmed to be single gpu based on the fact we know the xbox scorpio is running an rx490 as seen in their 3d render and by calculations.

>>55084727
Nah, the adored thing is for Navi. Vega is full enthusiast chip with HBM2. If it's anything cheaper than $600, then I would be surprised.

>>55080384
That's objectively false. It's more like 60% of cards are below $300. A lot of the cards had a price point above $300 at release so you can't compare current price to launch price of those cards. Also like 70% of all steam users still use intel igpu.

>>55084757
The xbox will be running a very slightly cut down rx490 and 12gb of gddr5 or 8gb of g5x. It'll probably be gddr5 though. Also rumor has it that MS will be selling these new consoles between the $400/500 price range so the rx490 can't be that expensive or else they won't be able to target that price range without a massive loss per unit sold.

File: 1465920936408-b.jpg (7KB, 250x192px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x192px

>>55077143
Actually not they won't. Neither of those older cards have a smaller die then the 480. Also the 480 has finfet transistors. I'll bet you 2 grand that the 480 oc can outperform a 390x and 980 overclock performance.

You can't argue with physics kid.

all I can say is, amd never can be top tier. only cheap fags buy amd

>>55077044
What is this even for? 1600x900? We are 4K now.

>>55077720
>If the 480 consumes about 100w,

that's exactly what PooInLooTech is now reporting...
> http://wccftech.com/amd-rx-480-faster-than-nano-980/