lol nvidia

It's a fake, those are TitanXs numbers with the 480 OC shopped in top of it

>>55064023
the titan x was 4027 try again nvidiot cuck

File: big-picture.jpg (2MB, 2064x2288px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2064x2288px

Explain this AMD cuck.

File: 1447014742398.jpg (15KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x225px

>>55064154

>>55064154
nvidia got cucked

>>55064009
Why do we keep posting the bullshit benchmark?
23% higher clock = over 23% performance gain? fucking really?

I don't doubt the lower benchmark that puts it between 980 and nano, but fucking bullshit on that overclock. i believe it was just above or just below the fury X when i did the math and that was assuming a 100% tradeoff.

>>55064154
whats to explain, i look at that and see amd and nvidia (fury x and 980ti) are about where i would assume they should be in any game that isn't heavily gameworks infested, with an edge to nvidia at 1080p while amd scales the resolution better.

anything in specific i would be looking at?

but seriously, look at those framerates, i would SO turn aa down or off to get that shit up to 144 hrz in a heartbeat. all it really proves is that 4k is non viable this round just like last round.

1080ti or vega may close that gap, but no... not after seeing 144hrz and 4k... that frame rate is night and day difference, while the resolution just looks like a nice aa filter was put on it.

>>55065264
>replying to a nvidia shill cuckold