i hate javascript i am unable to visit many webpages because

>>55053207
Something like 98% percent of users have javascript enabled. I agree it's shit, but building an entire 2nd version of your website for 1-2% of your users seems retarded.

>>55053245

Whatever the fuck happened to progressive enhancement?

Question: Why do you hate javascript?

Actuslly there are sites that use JavaScript to load the whole content.

File: 1453596229798.png (8KB, 290x232px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 290x232px

Making a another website for tinfoil hat javascript disabling tards.

Go away Stallman.

>>55053207
I hate it too, but it's used everywhere so you just have to deal with it.

>>55053207
Why the fuck should websites care about you? You aren't going to up their ad view counter.

>>55053207
>doent use userscript to generate the catalog
lel

>>55053207
What I hate most about it is that there are sites that load so many JavaScript scripts that the whole browser freezes. It's been countless times when I had to kill -9 or Ctrl-Shift-Esc kill it and restart it.

I'm always offered a little window that says "Stop the script / Wait (let it run) / abort", but every time I click on "stop the script", it does nothing.

File: swt.jpg (60KB, 343x317px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 343x317px

I believe so many web dev don't get the point of javascript. Simply hover animation is now written in javascript. You're a shit web dev if your clients can't navigate your site without javascript enabled

I hear you. Still, even having to whitelist domains, noscript provides a better experience than executing all the scripts your browser comes across.

>>55053207
>Adblock Plus
use Ublock Origin as it is more lightweight, doesnt give you any problems, has a robust element blocker and blocks all ads, whereas Adblock Plus shows "acceptable" ads, yeah fuck no

>>55053518
Kek I agree. I love JS.

>>55053207
as if i'd want tinfoil freetards visiting my website in the first place.

>>55053486
Disable JavaScript and visit CNN com/politics

>>55053207
almost all people who hates JS is because don't understand it, blocking whole JS on clearnet is stupid just block untrusted sites.

>>55053207
>2016
>using ABP

>>55055492
>using javascript so you don't have to use javascript

>>55058134
10 commits have been deposited to your github account

>>55053207
Truth is there are no reasonable motives to block JS anymore, so nobody cares about your tinfoil beliefs.

>>55061518
these days there are more motives than ever before to block JavaScript, because retarded web "developers" build bloated, shitty, and insecure websites by abusing JS/jQuery

>>55061518
how to spot the retard who knows zero about computer security and whose comp is a virus orgy right now

>>55063415

>virus orgy

spotted the wandows user

>>55053486
While I'm pro-js I agree some websites misuse it and are way too dependent on it. Basic text content should be loaded in server-side a la php or other preprocessors. Js should only be used for client-side frills like drag/drop uploading or making stuff respond to user input the server cannot see

>>55059215
>executing js code that can change with every request
it's like you actually want to get fucked in the ass

>>55053446
Too hard for rockstar developers, ninjas, and other oven dodgers.

>>55061518
I block JS on my old boxes because if I don't the internet slows to an unusable crawl for no good reason, it's an incredibly shitty, inefficient language that brings nothing to the table for most of the sites that rely on it heavily.

File: 202341.png (711KB, 739x607px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 739x607px

>>55053207
>I can't code properly so I hate it

Best you can do for 4chan is probably 4chan x and use its catalog instead of native one, then disable js so it loads non-js captcha. I would also recommend uMatrix instead of NoScript. Pages loaded noticeably faster for me when I switched.

>>55063878
well, the only ones who can't code properly are the web developers who make sites that won't work at all without JS

They should not make 2 versions of a site for javascript fags and non javascript fags
They should make only 1 version, 1 that doesn't require javascript to function.

It's like people aren't aware that HTML itself can load resources for you.

>>55053486
I do this on some parts of my website. I have subsection on a side menu that load the content into the main container, and then delete it and load the new content when the user clicks on a different menu.

Get on with the times, not using JavaScript for the internet is like running windows 3.1

>>55064409

Cancer.

>>55064135
Take off everything after "developers" and you got it right.

Is this a meme or are people being serious?

What alternatives are there to JavaScript?

>>55065130
it's a sub-meme of privacy meme

>>55064409
>not doing that on the server side
Good luck achieving a good pagerank score.

>>55056514
What kind of poverty machine or ghetto browser are you using? I've rarely, if ever, had a tab crash on my shitposting laptop with a Celeron, 2GB of RAM and Chrome, and the few times I remember it happening it was always the Twitter tab after the infinite scroll has been loading crap for hours on end.

>>55053463
>why do you hate a shitty language that breaks the website if you disable it while not even used the way it was intended and almost always used to steal user data?
Gee anon I have no idea.
The language is absolute shit, it has nothing to do with Java but was called JavaScript just so it could get some attention.
Almost everyone save maybe 10 people in the entire world don't use it correctly at all.

>>55053207
will someone post the "clean webpage manefasto"

>>55053207
Is javascript the same as userscript?

>>55065130
HTML and CSS, with dynamic content handled on the server side where possible

>>55065910
An userscript is a user defined javascript file, the user has controll over the contents.

>>55065899
There is one? Link so I can mail it to every fucked up website I know.

b2t, javascript is cancer, and every website that doesnt work without javascript wont be visited in the future, easy af.

>>55066087
sadly I don't have it.
It was about how a webpage should be designed with HTML/CSS only.
And let JS be handled by end users.

>>55064409
I hope you at least use pushState.

>>55066198
hm okay, will keep a look in the future, maybe I find it.

But why the fuck does everyone needs to deal with js? Why not just html/css frontend, and any other shit language as backend, as long as the user doesnt have to deal with it?
Makes 0 sense to me.