/websockets/ general

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
/websockets/ general 2016-06-09 07:23:49 Post No. 54989668
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 4744-refcard_fixed-cover152.png (44KB, 1200x901px) Image search: [Google]

/websockets/ general Anonymous 2016-06-09 07:23:49 Post No. 54989668 [Report]

I feel like they are a feature that simply don't get enough love from the community.

Finally gone are the days of long and short polling. Gone are the days of checkins, wasting gbs of mobile data only to find that there is nothing new to process. What does /g/ think?

Also fuck SQUID, those cunts still meddle with unencrypted connections.

Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:04:43 Post No.54990727
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:04:43 Post No.54990727 [Report]

Squid caches HTTPS too, what do you mean?

Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:15:19 Post No.54990832
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:15:19 Post No.54990832 [Report]

>>54990727
Basically during the initial connect SQUID fails to upgrade the standard HTTP/1.1 request to a persistent socket connection.

There is a lot of material about this online. I know for sure because I made a small chatroom using ws but couldn't connect from work. As soon as I updated to wss it was fine.

More info here: https://github.com/vizorvr/vizor/issues/502

Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:17:28 Post No.54990849
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:17:28 Post No.54990849 [Report]

It does its job well. Why does this technology need more love than what it gets now?

Anonymous 2016-06-09 14:03:51 Post No.54992034
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 14:03:51 Post No.54992034 [Report]

>>54989668
what about ajax?

Anonymous 2016-06-09 14:43:48 Post No.54992457
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 14:43:48 Post No.54992457 [Report]

File: 1448513357838.png (32KB, 1218x529px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1218x529px

>>54989668
>wasting gbs of mobile data only to find that there is nothing new to process.
yep. now websites are wasting gbs of mobile data to load their shitty bootstrap skins and 2000x2000 png images that are scaled into 100x100 through css generated by their shitty script interpreted by an abomination of javascript library which runs on top of a lower level javascript library.
We've come so far gentlemen. the future is now

Anonymous 2016-06-09 15:07:02 Post No.54992726
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 15:07:02 Post No.54992726 [Report]

>>54992457
and underneath of every of that script is shitty C

Anonymous 2016-06-09 17:48:02 Post No.54994865
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 17:48:02 Post No.54994865 [Report]

>>54989668
>don't get enough love from the community

>>>/r/programming

Anonymous 2016-06-09 18:21:04 Post No.54995321
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-09 18:21:04 Post No.54995321 [Report]

File: Motherfucking Website.png (245KB, 1847x1128px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1847x1128px

>>54992457
God, whatever happened to websites having easily readable information without a 10 pound CSS and JS file attached to it.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/