>Desktop grade components in the palms of your hand Why even

>>54864519
If you don't need one, don't buy one.

>>54864519
That's funny, I don't remember desktops having shitty ARM octacores which can barely decode a HD video in software

>>54864519
Same reason you didn't replace your desktop with a pocket PC.

>angry birds processor
>desktop grade
Kek

>Gimped no interface board
>Desktop grade

File: 1460409192509.jpg (70KB, 535x535px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 535x535px

I started using teamviewer on my phone to connect to my desktop and holy FUCK what a time it is to be alive, there is almost no latency, quality is great, and it's super easy on battery life.

LITERALLY desktop components IN MY POCKET. Absolutely blew my mind when I started using it.

Sadly it has rendered my ThinkPad useless.

OP here

Before anybody gives me scrutiny for this, this was from an HTC 8x, a WINDOWS product. It's basically the same as any other enthusiast grade desktop.

>>54864769
WEW LAD

>>54864769
Yes, yes it it... except it cant run any respectable software.

>>54864519
> desktop-grade
A bad desktop, perhaps.

>>54864519

>qualcomm
>samsung
>synaptics

nigga that's hardly even laptop grade hardware

>>54864519
no interfaces
no expandability
useless architecture
limp-dick operating system
limp-dick software hobbled by oversized touch interfaces for ham planet fingers
cancerous dev communities
ugly styling
uselessly small for anything productive

you know the drill, that's why you made this a bait thread instead of an actual discussion thread

>>54867097
You're great at spouting memes and opinions.

It is the cutting edge of technology. We are all benefiting from the tech.

>>54867173
>someone says something I don't like but I have no counterpoints against it
>"that's a meme!"
you sure showed me
even though OP's "smartphones are basically desktop-level now guys I swear!" bait is one of the oldest memes in the book

File: 1409691411460.jpg (16KB, 391x391px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 391x391px

>it's another /g/ jerks off to smartphones because they have BIG MEGAHERTZ thread

File: 1464355436659.jpg (106KB, 797x694px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 797x694px

>>54864519
>>Desktop grade

>>54864519
Some people need to do more than fuck off on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

That's literally all smart phones are: social media devices and police detective aids.

>>54864519
>Desktop grade
By definition you can't have desktop grade in the palm of your hand, there will be always something better ON THE DESKTOP.

>>54868927
worse than thermi, confirmed

>>54864519
If you are a manchild with no job sure.

I prefer my keyboard and mouse to actually be productive and not some smudgy touchscreen.

>inb4 hook up a bluetooth kb + mouse

That still doesn't change the fact that any smartphone gives a subpar user experience for productivity.

>>54868234

You forgot to add "shitpost on a Tibetan monk study guide BBS assistance device"

>Newest android phones will have 6 GB of RAM
Well now low and middle tier PCs can be replaced by high tier phones I think.
Only if you can connect them a mouse & keyboard and a monitor in an easy manner that is.

>>54871260
>Well now low and middle tier PCs can be replaced by high tier phones I think.
Please be bait.

>>54864519
A phone you can dock into a laptop or desktop would be neat.

Specs are definitely there for it

>>54864519
because some of us really work.

>>54864519
I don't see the GP102 3840Shader HBM2 on that pic. Did I miss it? How can it run ME:Andromeda in 4k?

>6gb of ram in a smartphone

Too bad android is too retarded of an OS for this to be useful

>>54873083
Fucking this, Android is a waste with anything more than 2 GB RAM.

>>54872962
>muh vidya

>>54873194
>Muh Octacore smartphone
Who needs more than 2 cores and 1 GB RAM on a phone to browse websites and read Emails?

>>54873360
Ugh

>>54867009
Not even a bad desktop. Even a 10 year old pentium 4 computer with 512MB of RAM is better than OP's angry birds phone motherboard.

At least with the desktop you can run x86 programs.

>>54873360
Everyone does. Websites are bloated and app devs can't optimize for shit. Only solution is more CPU and RAM resources.

Granted those things have become relatively cheap. You can get phones with 2GB of RAM and 4 A53 cores for less than $100 nowadays (ie ZTE Warp Elite).

The next Lumia will basically be a Supercharged PC

>>54873568
I got a Z2 with a 2.3 GHz Quad and 3 GB RAM. I don't know how to utilize that. I hope it will serve me at least until 2020. Otherwise Im going for my 2006 phone again.
>Spending 600 € on a fucking phone

>>54873569
Windows phones are dead. I sold my barely used 640 on ebay for 5 fucking dollars. Nobody fucking wants them, the buyer probably just wanted to phone for spare parts.

>>54873580
>I hope it will serve me at least until 2020
lmao it won't. Remember when the ZTE Blade used to be hot shit and everyone thought it would last until 2015? It didn't.

>Spending 600 € on a fucking phone
You don't need to. You can get phones with good enough specs for $100 every year. By year 2020 you'll probably be able to buy a 4GB RAM, 8-core CPU, 1440p res phone for $100.

Thing is the Jews have us by the balls with technology and the only way to win is to buy the bare essentials every 2-3 years instead of the latest flagship phone.

Buying 10 $100 bare essential phones over your lifetime: $1,000

Buying 10 $700 flagship phones over your lifetime: $7,000

File: 1459487588767.jpg (78KB, 340x314px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 340x314px

>>54864519
>crossboarders continue to fall for the desktop smartphone meme because they look at component and see big numbers

>>54864601

>I can't into concurrent programming
>it's the CPU's fault!

Go away, intelkid.

>>54873715
No but for real ARM processors are dogshit. Yes you can code mobile operating systems around them but in the end they're still shit. This is why 99% of servers and supercomputers don't use ARM. ARM is more power hungry compared to x86 and you have to re-compile software for it in order to do anything besides play angry birds on it.

>>54873799

You've obviously never dealt with ARM and are just talking out of your own shitty experience with Android.

Android is painfully slow because of Java. ARM CPUs aren't great, but they aren't dogshit either.

>>54873833
>Android is painfully slow because of Java.
You've obviously never programmed in Java, the current Java VM is fast as fuck, like near native code speed.

>ARM CPUs aren't great, but they aren't dogshit either.
They are dogshit which is why performance is so much better on the Zenfone 2. Most ARM processors excel in everything except integer/floating point raw performance which is what actually matters in the end. The only reason we use them on phones is because using Core-M processors would be prohibitively expensive.

>>54864519
good luck doing something useful with it

>>54873881

>the current Java VM
That's super nice, isn't it? Too bad Android uses Dalvik/ART...

>muh zenfone meme
Haha you caught me, took me long enough to realize you were just trolling! ;^)

File: hqdefault.jpg (20KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x360px

>>54873799
>ARM is more power hungry compared to x86

>>54873901
When did ZenFone become such a meme here on /g/? Sometimes it seems as if this blog is full of Intel/Asus reps...

>>54873881
>You've obviously never programmed in Java
You say that as if it was a bad thing.

>>54864519
>rows of caps around the SoC

modern PCBs are legit art

>>54873905
Call me when ARM has something that competes against the Xeon-D 1540, which has the multi-core performance of a desktop i7 and a max TDP of 45 watts.

File: images.png (7KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 205x246px

>>54873699
>/g/ retards still fall for the bait
>every
>time

>>54873921
Because it can literally run Windows 7 in a VM and no samshit/lg phone comes close to the bang for the buck it offers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Smcq8qLEY

File: central-processing-unit-26-638.jpg (71KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 638x479px

>>54864519
Because RISC isn't CISC

>>54874324
Actually modern "CISC" processors (ie amd64 ones) are really just a RISC core with a CISC interpreter.

Strangely though ARM processors manage to be more power hungry than amd64 ones.

>>54874324
CISC is incredibly outdated

>>54874399
Indeed but like I said modern CISC processors are not 100% CISC. 100% CISC processors don't exist anymore.

>>54864519
You can't platy DOOM 2016 on your overpriced android phone

>>54873973

>because it can run Windows
Wintel shill detected, opinion descarted! Fuck off, Rajesh!

>>54874620
It can also run a VM of gentoo you autistic piece of shit

>>54874681

So can any ARM chip with Hyp mode, you braindead mouthbreather.

>>54874745
Fuck you, you ARM shill. That joke a cpu architecture is what caused phones to only be useful for making calls and playing angry birds.

>>54874849

You mean Java.

>>54874977
Here we go again. Back to your cuckshed you icuck.

>>54875047

Not an argument.

>>54874849
I guess that's why it's being so widely embraced, right? Because it's so bad?

File: Processor_families_in_TOP500_supercomputers.svg.png (1MB, 2000x1422px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1422px

>>54875089
lol

File: D-Wave.jpg (57KB, 648x348px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 648x348px

>>54874399
Classical CPUs are incredibly outdated. The future is quantum computing.

>>54875135

>top 500 memes

Nice memeing, but I happen to work with scientific computing, and I'm familiar with dozens of supercomputers running MIPS, ARM and SPARC.

Fuck off, Intel shareholder!

>>54871260
>i-it has lots of gigabytes guys
why are smartphone tards literally soccer mom-tier

>>54875135
>muh 0.01% of market
lol

>>54875135
>500 meme computers vs. every single cellphone out there counting up to a billion
I see now that I'm arguing with a teenager Intel fanboy tech illiterate. Call me back when you're an actual IT professional who works with those machines and speaks out of personal experience instead of what you've read online.

File: ubuntu-edge-should-be-the-surface-phone.jpg (44KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1024x576px

When I can run Windows 7 from a device in the palm of my hand with the same or better levels of performance as my current laptop (quad i7/16GB/etc) and just set the phone on a cradle/dock (using pogo pins not a hardline connector like microUSB or even USB-C either) and do everything I need to do with an attached keyboard/mouse/monitor/etc then let me know and I'll buy it at any price up to maybe $1000 USD.

Until that happens, I don't give a fuck about anything else on the market today or in the near future.

The Ubuntu Edge phone a few years ago had the right idea but it was obviously going to be running Ubuntu - the smartest fucking thing Microsoft could do right this second would be this:

- buy the design/form factor/patents on everything related to that Ubuntu Edge device (pictured)
- get an Intel Atom processor in it
- make it workable with the desktop version of Windows 10 not some fucking ARM based bullshit like the Surface RT devices (and then I'd find a workaround to get Windows 7 on it)
- market it as the Surface Phone - I mean look at the god damned picture, it fucking looks like the original Surface tablet, has the same design, has the same styling, same angles, same everything just in the palm of your hand)

Microsoft, what the fuck are you idiots doing? Why won't you do what's smart and make the god damned Surface Phone using that dead Ubuntu Edge design/form factor? It's fucking perfect for a Surface Phone. If I didn't know better I'd say someone at Microsoft based the Surface design on the Ubuntu Edge in the first fucking place.

I MEAN REALLY, LOOK AT THE PICTURE, IT'S PERFECT FOR A SURFACE PHONE.

>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all

File: HP-Touch-21-G01.jpg (53KB, 600x387px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x387px

>>54875196

Nice meme.

File: lenovo-n308-live-01.jpg (158KB, 640x538px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 640x538px

Wow, I'm glad to see the success of ARM and MIPS SoCs and Android is really making some fanboys butthurt.

Success breeds jealousy!

File: end of the line.jpg (309KB, 534x674px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 534x674px

>>54875135
>dotcom bubble and PCs surpassing the "good enough" threshold severely hit non-x86 vendors
>Intel and Red Hat finish them off with the Itanium hype train
>Intel ditches Itanium, leaving IBM and Oracle as the last non-x86 vendors with HPC-suitable products
>Oracle, being Oracle, shoots SPARC in the foot
>IBM supercomputing designs are expensive and often custom-built for a particular customer
>the rest of the vendors are forced into sub-par x86 because that's all that's left and it's cheap enough that you can just order thousands of them and outdo better architectures by sheer brute force

>somehow this even has any bearing on drastically different consumer use cases especially when most supercomputing applications are better done on GPUs anyway

File: awful g posts #4.png (43KB, 792x358px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 792x358px

>>54875326
Wow, I'm glad to see the success of Facebook and Google services and datamining platforms is really making some privacy fanboys butthurt.

Success breeds jealousy!

>>54875423

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_analogy#False_analogy

>>54875240
>I don't like that! MEME MEME MEME MEME MEME
when will reddit leave forever
if RAM was all that mattered in performance then we'd all still be running core 2 duos with 8-16GB

but alas, all the RAM in the world doesn't matter for shit when the rest of your hardware is shit, it's slow, or your use case simply doesn't utilize it

not that you'll agree with that, because anything that doesn't justify your mindless consumption on BIG NUMBERS is a "meme"

>>>/r/eddit

Because touch screen, how the fuck can any sane person enjoy doing anything with that shit?

>>54864519
Because in my leisure I'd rather sit in a comfy computer chair at a healthy distance from a 20 inch monitor with an efficient comfortable keyboard and mouse.

Learn2ergonomics

>>54875335
>Intel and Red Hat finish them off with the Itanium hype train
>Oracle, being Oracle, shoots SPARC in the foot

these hurt the worst

>>54875486
>wiki link to a logical fallacy

This would be 10/10 shitpost but this is modern day /g/

>>54875506

>kids who do nothing but play videogames all day and believe in the "16GiB of RAM is a meme" meme

RAM IS all that matters in the virtualization age.

In one of my recent jobs I took a crappy dual-core second-generation Opteron Supermicro server, loaded it up with tons of RAM and made it into a virtualization powerhouse.

Why are we letting tech illiterate teens control the frame of debate on /g/? If you're not an IT professional, you shouldn't be here! Go back to your GPU thread!

>>54875600
This. Memory capacity is everything these days because most of the time your CPU is being massively underutilized, so you just virtualise everything up, and RAM dictates how many virtual machines you can have.

>>54875554

Oh yeah, I forgot neo-/g/ doesn't care about logic. Sorry about that mistake, won't happen again.

>>54875506

B-but I am still running on old Core 2 Duos. I run a server farm on old laptops. AMA.

>>54875506
>>54875635
>b-but servers and virtualization...
just what the fuck does that have to do with anything? we're not talking about servers, we're talking about phones and consumer desktops with drastically different target use cases, having 6 GB of RAM in your facebook telescreen is not going to trample all over a desktop solely because it has more memory, the same way my NetBurst server with 18 GB can't touch a modern system with 8 GB.

File: index.png (6KB, 288x175px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 288x175px

>>54864519
That is currently physically impossible, and likely always will be.

Unless you are only talking about limited web browsing and other light usage, which a tablet or net book do better given screen space and typically more power.

If you remember Landauer's principle from basic circuity class and adjusting for current hardware realities you see that such claims are thermodynamics unsound.

Given that node size has one of the largest influences on energy consumption, with a ceteris paribus assumption software of course which actually can have significant effects and noting node size across chips by time is relatively the same as the manufacturing crosses market boundaries very quickly. Then the power to to flip a bit is roughly the same regardless of the chips casing. This goes both for memory and processing. We will ignore classical hard drive arm movements in the calculation given solid states are widely available for desktops as well. So as you can see in such a basic framing that such computational power is physically dependent on electrical power and the rest of this argument should be self evident.

>>54876352
>Landauer's principle
Nigga, current silicon processors don't even work at the Landauer limit.

Oh and look we actually made some magnetic circuits that operate fucking close to the Landauer limit:
http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/03/11/magnetic-chips-low-power-computing/

Reversible computation also beats it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_computing

File: Sadi_Carnot.jpg (14KB, 215x263px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 215x263px

>>54876487
Of course that is why I said to adjust for "current hardware realities". You can use a simple empirical based multiplier to scale for an accurate approximation.

Also if you had bother reading the original Berkley papers your article references you would know it was a state change demonstration with a low energy laser, not a working chip. Very impressive, but now where near practical for actual use even in the extreme military and industrial markets.

Yes, before you go citing some of the actual single atom systems, I already know of several. Most notably a similar size systems that where experimented in 2004 for military use by Sandia, but production defects were near 100% to the point each individual chip had to custom architecture and BIOS modification making it non-viable, also any UV or temperatures over 50C permanently destabilized the few that survived the messy manufacturing method.

Do you even know the difference between informational entropy and physical entropy?
Yes, they are related and such an informational reversible system has advantages. But it is a huge, and sadly common, mistake to mix the two distinct idea.

I suggest reading Carnot's original notes his brother published after he died, it helps complete the historical thought development of the ideas we call now entropy. I found it to be most insightful on the matter.

>>54875759

Desktop CPUs haven't seen actual speed increases in half a decade now, only core-count increases. Phones these days can run Microsoft Office and NOVA 2, what more could you ask for? OP is right.

>somehow this tiny piece of shit able to match 600w of top notch computing power
kek, enjoy playing angry birds at 30fps

>>54864519

If you can do all your computing on a phone, then that's fine.

I need my desktop to edit documents, write code, edit video, and do 3D modeling.

They're different tools, with different capabilities. Choose what suits your needs.

>>54876946
mobiles have been able to run Office and other traditionally desktop applications forever, Winmo even had an official Photoshop port and shipped with Office as a standard

but just being able to run it doesn't mean it runs it well or effectively, even when the market was dominated by denser, more accurate stylus interfaces and software tried to be as desktop-like as possible it was still shit, just like it always will be because phone screens are too tiny to be useful for anything but dicking around, and nobody wants to deal with a touch keyboard for anything more than firing off a shitty tweet

File: hp-slatebook-14-g01.jpg (43KB, 775x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 775x500px

>>54877258

That's why Android desktops/laptops are taking over the market, kiddo. See >>54875240 and >>54875326 and pic related.

>>54876949

Holy shit doomfags sure are rectally shattered over Angry Birds becoming a bigger more successful franchise than their shitty first-person shooters that need cutting edge CPUs and GPUs but are no fun to play except for a few select screwed up teenagers raised by single moms.

>>54873715
video encoding/decoding are pretty much as parallel as you can get. So no, its the processors that are shit, faggot.

>>54877573
Still up to the dev to implement it properly, smegmalord.

>>54877517
>desktops are dead! phones are the future!
>but they aren't
>yeah they are, someone told me they run office!
>no they aren't, they've done that for years and they're garbage at it
>android is taking over desktops!
???
ok

even if it was relevant to the discussion, Microshit is nowhere near finished because a declining OEM tried to cash in on old people too stupid to use Windows with a giant stationary tablet that can only run phone apps

>>54875759

Thin clients are becoming the norm, that's what it has to do. Within your lifetime, everything will live on the cloud. What CPU your desktop sports will become irrelevant.

>>54877694
>He thinks its not implemented properly
lmao

File: screenshot_2014-11-11-16-09-07-100530080-orig.png (184KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1280x800px

>>54877707
>someone told me they run office

>>54877758
>in java
Pajeet, pls.

File: 1356374486915.jpg (107KB, 848x900px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 848x900px

>Android phones are slow because of ARM not because of Java

Jesus H. Jones, shills out in full force today!

>>54877728
just like every house was going to have a central mainframe in the '60s
just like time-sharing systems were going to be good enough for everyone in the '70s and '80s
just like net-booted diskless workstations were going to be the next big thing in the '90s
just like thin clients and zero clients were real desktop killers in the '00s, we swear this time

most of the people who believe this shit have never used a thin client for anything serious beyond dicking around with an old Winterm on a home server on their local network with no other concurrent users

maybe I'll screencap your post and look back on it in 10 years when I'm chilling out on my cloud device hooked up to an Itanium server running BeOS enterprise

File: protodojo.jpg (139KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 600x450px

high performance, practically unusable hardware

Phones are finally reaching that peak of performance that sandy bridge brought us now we are only going to get small increases in performance that being said arm is pretty shit I wish Intel would make a good mobile processor cheap but they wont

>>54877788
>interface fucked up and bloated to make it more conducive to ham planet hands
>dropdown menus everywhere
>half of the screen devoted to a shitty software keyboard that will fuck everything you do with predictive typing as soon as you start using it, unless you clunk out your shit with an overpriced bluetooth keyboard
what a revolution indeed

>>54877849
they are if i cant use it on my desktop pc without lag

>arm
>desktop
pick one

>>54873662
how about you just fucking buy last years flag ship for cheap

>>54878923
Because I don't buy bastard phones with worn out batteries and internal NAND.

>>54878950
Who the fuck said you should buy them used?

>>54878966
Are you now implying I'm going to shellout more than $100 for last year's flagship phone? Do you think I'm some kind of retard?

>>54878996
>be a nigger and buy second hand flagship for $100
>be a retard and buy the latest flagship for $600
>be semi retarded and buy some mid range phone for $400
>or be smart and buy last year's flagship for $200

I wonder what the best choice is.

>>54864519
Please show me a phone that can fully edit a video at the capabilities of adobe premier pro or sony vegas at 1440p

>>54878081
>Phones are finally reaching that peak of performance that sandy bridge brought us
No they're not. The best they're reaching the same performance as mobile sandy bridge 2GHz i3s but nothing more than that. They are still behing 5W TDP Core-M processor.

>>54879023
>>or be smart and buy last year's flagship for $200
That's still $100 more than I'm willing to spend.

File: 1447194561808.jpg (57KB, 567x561px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 567x561px

>>54864519
try running that with
>Phtoshop
>ArcGIS
>Adobe Premear
>AutoCAD

Shit ain't desktop grade

>>54879056
OK I'm not comparing the performance to sandy bridge I am saying that it's like the release of sandy bridge it will only be small improvements now unless they do some vape trick or put core ms in phones

>>54879131
Premiere*

They aren't desktop grade.

Snapdragon 820 and shit are still slower than desktop core 2 duo, much slower.

>>54879266
>They aren't desktop grade.
You can't even run x86 software on it. If you try to by emulation you'll get like a %1000 performance reduction penalty.

>>54864519
>battery life
>heat
>even the biggest (too big) phone screens are too small
>even tablets
>shit ain't powerful
>like, seriously
i don´t give a crap what you think phones are capable of or do with your, just don't leak your autism here, we are running over capacity already

>>54879266
Isn't there a reason why desktops haven't moved to 8 core as mainstream?
Why is Qualcomm doing it?

>>54864519
>workstation
>work station
>work
>W O R K
>O
>R
>K

Tfw no PISC to end the CISC RISC

>>54879404
>tfw Poo InstructionSet Computers will never exist

>>54879056

You just admitted they can replace desktops, because most people I know don't even need that much performance.

>>54880048
They can't. While it's true most people don't need an 8-core i7 to do most things they do need and x86 processor to use their uhh well x86 software and OSs.

Not to say phone's won't replace desktops for a majority of people but it will require x86 processors and the full version of desktop windows.

This has already been achieved on tablets btw, the chinks even went 1 step farther and made said table dual-boot desktop windows and Android, and sold the tablet PC with 2GB RAM/4000mah battery/1080p screen/ and 32GB of internal memory for $100.

http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Android-Tablet-Features-Screen/dp/B01AN6BBKI/

File: screenshot_2014-11-11-15-50-17-100530075-orig.png (403KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1280x800px

>>54880214
>to use their uhh well x86 software
Like Microsoft Office? Oh wait...

>>54880370
No, I was thinking of things like the desktop version of: photoshop, microsoft word, Chrome, Firefox, foobar2k, MPC-HC, VLC, and other useful x86 programs.

Anyway the chinks have made x86 computers cheap as fuck so you don't have to chose anymore. Hell you can even run shitdroid on it for shits and giggles.

>>54873901
>using the smiley with a carat nose

>>54880048
>You just admitted they can replace desktops, because most people I know don't even need that much performance.
Depends who you surround yourself with. If all of these people you know just check facebook then that statement is true. For me and my friends Desktops are not replaceable because they are where we program, play video games, and watch porn.

>>54880214
>>54873545
>>54879304

>x86 software
>x86 OS
how retarded are you? get off /g/

>>54880758
What's wrong with what he said? x86 software and OSs are superior to ARM software, period.

>>54864519
gee, i wonder

if they were even remotely comparable, why don't desktop motherboards have smartphone SoC's on them?

oh, right.

>>54880771
approximately 0% of the software I run is programmed in x86 assembly.

>>54880841
That's not what people refer to when they say "x86 software". They just refer to software that needs an x86 operating system in order to be executed.

>>54881052

Like?

>>54864760

>LITERALLY

No.

>>54864769
>Enthusiast grade

You fucking what?

>>54864519
>actually buying a raspi

Y o u   h a v e   b e e n   t r o l l e d
o                                       e
u                                       l
                                        l
h                                       o
a                                       r
v                                       t
e                                        
                                        n
b                                       e
e                                       e
e                                       b
n                                        
                                        e
t                                       v
r                                       a
o                                       h
l                                        
l                                       u
e                                       o
d e l l o r t   n e e b   e v a h   u o Y

>>54881052
>an x86 operating system

get. out.

>>54868927
High voltage likely popped the top off that BGA adjacent to the red circle.

>>54881516
Alright Autismo, tell us exactly what problem you have with that terminology.

>>54882050

How tech illiterate can one be? What are you doing on /g/?

>>54882338
Do you wanna explain what's wrong with that or are you gonna 'sperging?

>>54882395
Keep* 'sperging, rather.

>>54882050
come on man. just leave. come back when you stop using "an x86 operating system"

>>54880370
Nobody wants to use that awful touch garbage.

>>54883057

Use a mouse then, you nigger.

>>54864519
>ARM
no

>>54864519
My desktop has 12 cores and 40mb of l3 cache running at 3.00ghz for it's CPU(s).

What smart phone has that performance?

>>54864760
sorta cheating tho since you still have to have the desktop

Still, this idea is probably the future.

>>54864519
bump

>>54881516
How do you distinguish between x64 and x86 software?

>>54881516
>he thinks x86_64 isn't x86
64bit extensions don't make it not x86, you know.

>>54864519
having a 10 year old pc processing power is not good anon.
Oh but wait you only care about "MUH 128 CORES" and in small script 0.01mhz.