>they promised us 2x performance per watt >they gave us

ALL HAIL THE POO GOD

15 rupees have been deposited into your loo

RAJA KODURI

CERTIFIED POO WRECKER

>tfw nvidiafags are on sweatwatch

>>54862795
>>54862726
>>54862732
>nvidiots so wrecked they have to fall back on racism

Nice try lads, but it's not going to work.

>>54863177
I dont like pajeets either, but 240 shekels top performance gpu.. cant say no to that.

File: based su.jpg (116KB, 665x782px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 665x782px

QUEEN SU COMING THROUGH

>>54863324
Raja isn't a pajeet, he's a top class GPU engineer.

File: duke_keller.png (157KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 450x300px

BASED SHITWRECKER

>>54863363
She must have been a math teacher in a previous life.

>>54863396
She's hot

>>54862693
Any reason why every tech company has to palm their product all the way up like it's a boxer that just won a bout?

>>54863743
they want to feel like steve jobs


>caring about any tech press conference other than Apple's

I seriously hope you /g/entoocucks don't do this

>>54862693
Nvidia just got
C U C K E D
U
C
K
E
D

File: image.jpg (29KB, 480x600px)

29KB, 480x600px

>>54863921
>I don't care about the cutting edge of technological innovation

>>54863974
>first useable smart phone, before the Iphone smartphones were just blackberryesque abomanations with trackballs and other gimmicky shit

>first tablet, before the iPad tablet computers were initially thought to use a full fledged OS, apple was ridiculed for using IOS for its tablet OS by neckbeards, huurrrr le big ipod touch meme xD


without iPhone your chinkdroid phone wouldn't exist

File: image.png (112KB, 700x550px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 700x550px

>>54863974
You're certainly cutting yourself on that edge, Mr. Fedora

>>54862693
>still waiting for zen APUs
BASED KELLER
BASED RAJA

>>54864039
Holy fuck how can anyone be this dumb?

File: 1376169139721.jpg (62KB, 437x437px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 437x437px

BASED PAJEET BUTTERFINGERS

>>54863177
>>nvidiots so wrecked they have to fall back on racism
wtf ever. poo is used so much now its almost a term of endearment.

>>54862693

POST SOME INFO GRAPHICS OR SOME SHIT

>>54863162
>sweating at 98%

>>54865066
You sound bitter.

File: 15Yg65E.jpg (66KB, 691x960px)

66KB, 691x960px

>>54865071

when can I preorder?

File: novideo.png (96KB, 797x832px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 797x832px

I laugh every time

File: pottery.gif (982KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

982KB, 500x333px

>>54865564

>No links
>No benchmarks
>No credibility

10RS has been deposited into your account

>>54865656
>I did not watch the live stream event yesterday

>>54864039
>Not knowing that android isn't older that shitOS.

>>54865564
Kek

>>54865826
>1080 launch event
>about as much data as during poolaris presentation
>nvidiots shit up entire board

it's ok when nvidia does it

>>54865883
>android
woosh

This makes me proud as an Indian and a designated loo shitter

>>54865564
>an Nvidia

File: file.png (533KB, 500x525px)

533KB, 500x525px

Where were you when AMD won?

>>54866475
It's pronounced en vidia

stop using my fucking jimkeller and rajeet pooduri OC you niggers

File: Jen-Hsun_Huang.jpg (34KB, 332x315px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 332x315px

I can fuck you up if I wanted to, poo boy.

>>54867516
I bet lisa su could step on this manlet then rajeet could poo on it then the CSW could wreck his shit up

>>54867516

I see his tiny nipple.

We've got another month or two of this shit

>>54867516
His face is tiny

>>54867516
Get your saggy mantits outta here!

File: NVIDIA-CEO-at-GTC-Drive-PX.jpg (127KB, 576x384px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 576x384px

>>54862693
Raja Poodurinl looks like a fag as he holds that up

Meanwhile you can see the power and reliability of Nvidia in all of their reveals

File: ayy MD.jpg (65KB, 375x200px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 375x200px

>polaris stronk
>ATI lost vegas even stronkter

What are the chances of Vega taking Fijis place and Fiji being rebranded to 490 and 490x?

I just saw a Mechanical Turk job for shitposting about AMD on social media.

>>54867484
This whole twitter is fucking adorable. Amada Kokoro is the best mascot ever.

>>54868015
screenshot?

File: muhnips.png (84KB, 197x300px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 197x300px

>>54868030

>>54868057
How have you not killed yourself yet?

>>54868071
the average human is really that dumb?

>>54867965
With all those weird plastic thingies it doesn't even look like a graphics card, lel

>>54868083
He's getting paid by nVidia...

>Why do you think he was looking on Mechanical Turk in the first place, that's where nvidia posts the shill jobs...

>>54868026
shes posting curry
fitting for AMD

>>54868101
Regardless of what anyone says, I'm jealous of raja for his abilities and his position within AMD.

No matter where he goes, he's guaranteed a good job with good pay.

>>54868015
>Implying you need a human to do that

>>54867434
taking a massive shit while watching the livestream.
holding onto my wallet as the Nvidiot devil tempted me with a 1080
then St Pajeet came to soothe the money and heat
as he dragged Nvidia off to death, he handed me the Rx 480.
"Ask and you shall receive" he said.

>>54868279
Jealous.

Why does AMD keep changing their naming schemes

>>54868341
Gotta keep things fresh

GO AMD GO

>>54862693
call me again when they have linux drivers that work

not even an nvidia fanboy, I just want working drivers that's all

>>54862693
2 new AMDs in SLI to equal 1 1080.

>AMD winning

>>54868416
it's kind of like saying 2 960s in SLI beats a 980, so that's plausible in certain cases.

>>54867965
>mfw he's just covering the wood screws

>>54868416
200 dollar AMD *2 trades blows with 700 dollar Nvidia?

I'd be happy with only one if it's that good.
390x performance, a third the tdp, a hundred dollars cheaper.

>>54863396
she has math and engineering degree though

>>54868457
>being proud on being poor

>>54868457
I've heard they might have been using 8GB version cards, which rumor from 229.99 to 249.99 each
still, 500USD to compete with 700USD (potentially 600 if the price ever drops) isn't bad at all

>>54868071
>being this autistic

>>54868010

Zero

poolooris fab too strong architecture too strong

>all these epic poo and Indian memes
I really wish that ass fractured Indian never started this. I really do. Even cuck wasn't this annoying.

File: laughing pajeet.gif (553KB, 320x238px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 320x238px

>>54868536

>>54868536

poocuck btfo

>>54868536
>being an ass fractured PooInLoo

>>54868536
It's funny purely because the butthurt indian did it to himself, feeling proud that they don't shit in any old street, they have designated shitting streets

>>54868536
It was funny for a while, but the /r/4chan audience REFUSES to stop posting it even while the humor is gone.

>>54868486
Even $250 for the 8gb version isn't a bad deal, I'm sure you can OC it to fury /nano performance.

>>54865564
DELETE THIS!!!

AMD IS BACK

>>54868582
BACK AGAIN

>>54865564
The Nvidia probably offered no comment because the 1060 and 1050 are not announced yet.

File: Nvidia on suicide.png (480KB, 1156x568px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 1156x568px

>>54867434
>Watching the Livestream at 3am in Bongland
>"And you can see that the 1080 is very sveety"
>Shout BASED FUCKING PAJEET"
>Wake neighbours up
>Police knock on my door
>"Ello ello ello, is everything alright sir?"
>"Oi Mate, Nvidia is kill!"
>"No?!?"
>"Get fucking Hype"
>I do a 360 and walk back inside for cosy sleep

Everything would have been perfect. Why did they have to take a literal street pooper from the customer phone service to do the presentation. Now nobodys going to take it seriously

File: 1464774385119.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

Notice how the AMD wojak is wearing a snow hat? It's because he didn't get a 1080/1070 housefire.

>>54868616
he looks like he's at the funeral for the 1080

>>54868629
Who?

File: jim k.png (105KB, 255x345px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 255x345px

>>54867516
You sure about that?

>>54868629
>from the customer phone service
Anon....
http://www.amd.com/en-us/who-we-are/corporate-information/leadership

>>54868641
well shit
that's why everyone was wearing flowers
it was the fucking funeral for nvidia

>>54868571
>>54868572
Exactly. It was funny because the Indian brought it on himself like the Irishman who said "too much ass" about those women lined up along a fence and everyone called anyone who said anything about an ass being too big Irish.

But these faggots just won't quit. Calling a top of his field GPU developer a "pajeet" or "pooinloo" just isn't funny. It's just fucking retarded and you might as well be posted facebook frog and POOPOOPEEPEE for what you post is worth.

>>54868616
That graph is 100% cherrypicked bullshit by the way.
While the AMD cards are very cost effective, they're not high performance in anything but dx12

>>54868655
>top of his field GPU developer
It's AMD wer're talking about
also:
>buttblasted pooinloo detected

>>54868656
That's exactly how AMD is marketing them though.
That's the whole point of Polaris. It's not until Vega will we see the big guns.

>>54868655
No matter what brand you use for something on here, someone will call you a Pajeet because Indians work at every company in silicon valley. It's fucking annoying. The userbase here is so underage.

>>54868674
Only a bootyblasted indian would say something like that. Lean to use the loo, Pajeet

>>54868501
Dropping the racism bomb is a silencing tactic

>>54868674
It's just a passing meme, family.

>>54868656
Both sides do cherrypicking, of course, but that's pretty clearly marked "DX12" in particular.

>>54868665
I would rather read 50 consecutive posts of "AMD IS FINISHED AND BANKRUPT" than a single poo or pajeet meme.

I really wonder if that Indian cunt is proud of what he has done.

>>54868693
>Passing meme
No, this one is too embedded here to disappear within the next few years. This is just as popular as house fires and wood screws and we still see that today.

This pajeet shit is never going to go away

>>54868671
Well the graph is bullshit mainly because it's comparing dual cards to a single one.
DX12 works much better with dual cards than dx11. Dual cards in dx11 games would not have the cards scale like that, it wouldn't be 2x performance of one card, it'd be 1.2x performance of one card, so in dx11 games the 1080 wins even in cost effectiveness.
And ashes is used because it's the only dx12 game.

If ashes is all you play then go for it.

Oh and mantle games of which there are significantly more than one game.

>>54868641
>>54868652
Absolute pottery in motion, well spotted lads.

>>54868656
Ok lets say that the game is cherrypicked, it still stands to reason that this 480 will be as good as a 980 if the specs are to be believed.

>Less W (Why do Nvidiots cry "mah power consumption" yet call AMD poorfags?)
>$200 - Like did you miss this part? This is amazing value.
>Based AMD have thrown money at the fan pushing for a better API and it's finally paying off, for both parties.

File: 1450594680989.png (184KB, 659x609px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 659x609px

>>54863366
this, im all for the street shitting Pajeet meme. But if this guy can keep pulling this magic out his ass, ill wipe it for him.

>>54868690
The "argument" is just GPU fanboys fighting. It's not a serious political discussion. You took things way to literally for the level of seriousness of the conversation, so I accused you of having autism.

No don't ever (you) me or my husband's daughter again.

>>54868693
It's needs to pass faster.

>>54868718
>Like who are you quoting

File: honkycracker425.jpg (131KB, 740x544px)

131KB, 740x544px

>>54868723
Thats mighty white of you

>>54868718
>>Ok lets say that the game is cherrypicked, it still stands to reason that this 480 will be as good as a 980 if the specs are to be believed.
Yes?
I didn't say anything about the card you defensive AMD shitter.
Card is actually looking pretty good, just that cherrypicked benchmark is unrepresentative bullshit.

>>54868716
Well the graph is bullshit mainly because it's comparing dual cards to a single one.

"AHHHH why are you using a $200 card>twice?? not fair"

DX12 works much better with dual cards than dx11.

>Stop using newer APIs!! I need my Crippppled DX11 Benchmarks to stay viable!!

Dual cards in dx11 games would not have the cards scale like that, it wouldn't be 2x performance of one card, it'd be 1.2x performance of one card, so in dx11 games the 1080 wins even in cost effectiveness

>Guys please, stop using APIs that are not catered to my single clock speed efficient card!! How dare you scale up at 2x for less money, we should all agree that Nvidia are better because they cost more!!

And ashes is used because it's the only dx12 game.

>And it always will be!! And even if it isn't I'll buy the next Nvidia card that finally has Hardware Async

>DELETE YOUR POST!!

>>54868071
Stop defending the streetshitters

Nvidia is literally ran by a gook

>>54868777
welcome to marketing 101
AMD is doing what everyone else is
I know it doesn't make it any better, but get used to it

>>54868784
You are literally butthurt.

Check out the upcoming DX12 games dude.

>>54868790
>Nvidia is literally ran by a gook

http://www.amd.com/en-us/who-we-are/corporate-information/leadership/lisa-su

There are no white people left in silicon valley.

>>54868815
Everyone does it but /g/ is still stupid enough to gobble it down and think it means anything.

Nvidia releases their bullshit graphs:
>AMD IS FINISHED POO IN LOO GET KEKKED

AMD releases their bullshit graphs:
>NVIDIA IS FINISHED FANBOY TEARS HOUSEFIRE GOOK GET KEKKED

Every fucking time

>>54868385
As if you need a GPU for loonix...

>>54868835
it's less about consumerism overtaking the board (which many claim), but more about every anon wanting to make the new hot meme.

>>54868385
AMDGPU had fixed most driver issues

>>54868784
Protip: By the time DX12 games come out and are common, there will be one or two new generations of cards from both AMD and nvidia. When you buy a graphics card you are buying to play the games that are out right now and the ones that will be out before the next generation of cards.
Buy the best for the current games.

That might actually still be the 480 since it's very well priced, but you're not doing anyone any favors by being a rabid butthurt piece of shit

>>54866370
Are you fucking kidding me? The whole fucking board was full of amdegenerates saying the 1080 is worse than the holocaust

>>54868888
You have selective memory. That's okay, both set of fanboys do.
The truth is that there are simply more nvidia fanboys shitting everywhere because of marketshare. If your perception of who shits more contradicts the marketshare of the two camps then you should consider that your perception is wrong.
You don't understand though- the 1080 is better than the holocaust means that it's a really good card.

>>54868865
Protip: If we only ever buy cards that are meant for NOW, and NOT for a couple years, then how come my 280x is still viable and is a refresh of a 5yo GPU??

Oh yeah forgot Nvidia users are used to yearly upgrades once the previous gen is cucked.

And I think it's a slip of communication personally, I don;t think Raja is saying, "here, 2 cards = better than 1 card" I think the fact he said "For $700, this is what you could have" and that's pointed out by the fact for $400-500 you can have two cards, that function as good, if not better than a 1080, for less.

Nvidia can have the High end in my opinion, it's a tiny market and they can charge a kidney, it's not "poorfag" it's common sense.

>>54868937
>then how come my 280x is still viable and is a refresh of a 5yo GPU??
Why wouldn't it be?

But I hit the nail on the head on you being an AMD fanboy.

I have a 7850 dude.

File: 1912045941.jpg (73KB, 600x457px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x457px

>>54862693

So when do these damn things go on sale so i can buy one and stash it away for my upcoming zen build?

File: 1464446318409.jpg (90KB, 563x675px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 563x675px

>>54868959
Sauce?

>>54863377
I don't think king keller actually did anything with polaris, he was all about zen

>>54868979
Pan de peace

>>54868984
He had to atleast touch it because muh APU

i was up for amd but not any more

how can i purchase anything amd when i know this poo is the face of it

File: 1464761142392.jpg (252KB, 800x484px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 800x484px

>>54868959

>>54868952
You really didn't hit anything, the fact you failed to grasp that the majority of buyers won't spend $700 on a card that can be attained by a CF 480 is proof enough that you don't live in the real world.

Throwing fanboy around is the get out card of /g/, I could right a blog on both card manufacturers doing shit that fucked users over, but /g/ is not for blogs, read around a bit on actual tech sites and see that while Nvidia has been crippling the market with DRM hardware and software and "the way it's meant to be played", AMD have gone the other way and forced new fair APIs, sorted there shit drivers out, and while I see VR as a gimmick, they have taken another gamble for US the Gamers/Enthusiasts/Shitposters whatever.

>>54869006
I can't wait until you see the DX11 480 benchmarks and you start crying or whatever.
Better start preparing your excuses, like

>it's 2016
>why are you still playing dx11 games

or

>No-one cares about dx11 games

or

>still cheaper than the 1070

or

>who really needs more than 60fps anyway

or

>Turn down the settings, save $200


Okay my example excuses ended up becoming reasonable but that's the point, there are good reasons to get a 480 but ashes of the singularity is not one of them.

>>54868997
Might as well not buy anything from Apple either, and Intel since some of Raja's expertise ended up in their iGPU's through IP

>>54869043
I guess you missed the fact that many tech nuts speculate the 480 will be somewhere between the 970/980 in performance..... so even for DX11, it will still be viable.

And here's the thing most of /g/ misses, not everyone buys a new card every year.

If you are 7850 man, then for you to jump from that to a 1080 is a big cost, and brings big gains yes, but AMD offer another option of: Lower cost, and just below the BIGGEST gains, why not, for the same money, buy 2?

And even in the worst performing games on Crossfire, 1 card is akin to having a 390x according to specs and stuff, so for 1080/1440p this is far more than needed, hell even a 1080 is too much for 1080/1440.

There's more to GPU market than "buy the fastest, most powerful one there is"

>>54868616

I really like this post mate

>>54869078
>there are good reasons to get a 480
>so even for DX11, it will still be viable.

Guess which one of these sentences was literally in my post.

>>54868858
Like the part where AMD's blob drivers can no longer support the latest generation of GPUs because they wanted to merge ~70kloc of middleware abstractions and other enterprise code into the kernel and the kernel devs said “no”?

(and the part where the free drivers are *still* shit)

>>54868846
>buy our GPUs goy
>no drivers
>a-as if you needed our GPUs anyway
classic AMDrone

>>54869094
>there are good reasons to get a 480 but 'ashes of the singularity is not one of them.'

I like how you missed that part out, but nice shitpost. We will have to wait for benchmarks, and if the 480 is total ass, then I'll give it another month for Vega to compete, but it's not looking likely to be anything more than a great Mid for single card or high fo x2 cards at this rate. I personally, do not want to be DRM locked into Nvidia ever again.

>>54869122
>goy
intel is the Jew company, get it right

>>54868385
AMD open source drivers work really well for me on both my Linux PCs.

HD5450 and r7 250x here.

>>54863694
She looks like a lesbian...

>>54868726
That's racist towards autists

>>54869238
Do they support 4K60 Hz?
Vsync in multi-monitor environments?
Even with one of the monitors rotated?
Even with the monitors at different refresh rates?
Even with the monitors at different bit depths?
(Do they support 10-bit backbuffers with native 10-bit output via DP at all?)

>>54869286

did the GT610 you cuck?

>>54869352
>GT610
I don't care, I use a GTX 970 which supports all of these.

I'm talking about graphics cards that would be of relevance in the next generation. I really want to switch to AMD for many reasons, but every single time I did so I've been disappointed by their ridiculously shitty drivers. Don't want it to happen again

>>54869268
THAT'S HOTTER THAN A 390X

>>54869396

I wouldn't call the HD5450 relevant to the next generation senpai

Nvidia is over 2X performance per watt

AMD 150W only gives you performance from 3 years ago, 290/390

Nvidia 150W gives your performance better than TITAN X

>>54869509
talking about the open source drivers

>>54869396
short answer is yes.

the only bad thing about amd drivers is raptr imo.

>>54869536
Nvidia open source drivers are trash and getting proprietary drivers to work on my gt520m was such a pain that I just opted to use the igpu instead

File: acconciature-trash-9-573796.jpg (40KB, 800x686px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 800x686px

I have a 560Ti, would the 480 be a reasonable upgrade?

>>54869540
>the only bad thing about amd drivers is raptr imo.
Wait what? AMD is pushing that garbage on Linux too now?!

>>54869512
$200 vs $600.

>>54869565
Yes, familia

>>54869581
>$600
try $700 or $800

>>54869565
>going from a 560ti to a 480 housefire

Enjoy your woodscrews and exploding VRMs :')

>>54862693
Is semiaccurate.com a legit site? do they really have nVidia insiders?

>>54868695
>Nvidiot is a tumblr 'muh hurt feelings' fairy
I shouldn't be surprised.

>>54869512
>AMD 150W

Stop spouting this bullshit. 150W are the absolute maximum power the Polaris cards can use. Their power consumption is more likely to be in the 100 - 110W ballpark.

Also, there is no Nvidia card that consumes only 150W and offers Titan X performance. Stop believing Nvidia's lies, you moron.

>>54869711
It consumes more, Nvidia is blatantly lying about power usage estimates

>>54868693
It isn't. 4chan seems to be getting more redneck everyday.

>>54869754
Oh no, how unfortunate

>>54869711
>consumes only 150W and offers Titan X performance
There's no AMD card that can do this either.

>>54870193
AMD might be less efficient than Nvidia, but the gap is seriously insignificant now.

150w for the 480, 230w for the 1070.

>>54870383
The gap was always insignificant.
At least until electricity stops being cheap. An extra 100 watts, assuming 4 hours of gaming a day, costs you $14-18 more a year in electricity. Doing the calculation with your own electricity rate (I did this with my rates) will verify this.

If you're spending more on a graphics card to save on watts, it'd best not be over $30 more.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility

>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.

>>54863324

Why would they sell a new gpu for 62 dollars?

>>54869077
>buying apple
like i was, ever
>or intel
pff no botnet bellow ring 0 for me thx

>>54868959
>>54869001
I like these. Make moar!

Nvidia confirmed for cheating

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4m692q/concerning_the_aots_image_quality_controversy/

>>54870441
>hardocp
You might as well link to nvidia.com.

File: mindblown.jpg (549KB, 1278x1345px)

549KB, 1278x1345px

>>54870899
Thats not a news really.

>>54870592
62 dollars? Which one? I need an upgrade from my gtx 260.

>>54870899
I can't take anything he says seriously after his nano meltdown.

At least he was more subtle before...

>>54871174
I think you quoted wrong post.

File: GTX1080.jpg (141KB, 1696x878px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1696x878px

>>54868656
>cherrypicking

>>54870990
Nvidia gets caught cheating every year anyway. It's not news if you cheat all the time. It'd be news if nvidia stopped cheating

>>54863921
people still using cuck non ironically?

>>54871287
Welcome to company released slides.
Nvidia does it too, AMD does it, if you don't do it you look like an idiot.
But if you actually believe any of it you're the idiot who didn't get that it was supposed to be bullshit

>>54871295
Nvidia's cheating has to be pointed out from time to time because deluded fanboys have an attention span of about 5 minutes and a long-term memory of maybe 1 or 2 days.

>>54871217
Whoops, I meant >>54870441

Correction https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4m692q/concerning_the_aots_image_quality_controversy/

>>54868642
Wojak warrior in polish slangl

File: 1430850699549.jpg (13KB, 250x240px)

13KB, 250x240px

>>54870899
>At present the GTX 1080 is incorrectly executing the terrain shaders responsible for populating the environment with the appropriate amount of snow.
>The GTX 1080 is doing less work to render AOTS than it otherwise would if the shader were being run properly.
fucking gold

>>54866475
>an hour

>>54872916
Its a feature. MORE FPS.

>nvidia cheaps out on color rendering
>nvidia cheaps out on snow rendering

ITS FASTER!!!

File: RIPNVOODIA.png (477KB, 1156x568px)

477KB, 1156x568px

>>54868641
>>54868616

>>54869500
Keked

>>54868616
holy fuck no way

Every fucking time a new AMD card gets released, the AMD fanboys scream "RIP NVIDIA LEL" then go quiet until the next amd gpu gets released, looping in a cycle.

Most of the benchmarks for both companies are cherrypicked anyway, just wait for user benchmarks.

File: intel.jpg (38KB, 765x510px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 765x510px

>>54868644
Just try and take me on, AMD boi

amd so shit they have to give things away to not be bankrupt.

toppest of all keks

maybe amd will start putting gpus in cereal boxes instead of computer boxes

>>54864039
>first usable smart phone
If you had been alive in the 90s you'd know this is wrong.

>first tablet
Not even close, the first commercial tablet came out in the 80s.

>>54862693
Ok so can someone interpret this for me, I'm as newfag as it gets, I just built my first pc a month ago, waiting for the proper GPU.

>So the 8Gb 480 will be $250?
>and it will be as good as a 980Ti?
>and if i run two 480's, I will essentially have the best offering outside of two 1080s, as of 2016?
>will my 620w PSU run this on top of my i7-6700?

I feel lost researching gpu's, theres so much shitflinging on /g/.

can anon's give me a concise simple answer to these questions?

>>54873190
We can only hope, i wouldnt mind a rx 480 in my next box of corn flakes.

>>54873252
you will need a new psu, get a 750 watt to be sure.

File: Fury X.jpg (66KB, 620x640px)

66KB, 620x640px

Hardwarewise AMD has always been better than Nvidia. AMD just has shitty marketing.

>>54873252
Two 480 = 300W
i7-6700 = 65W
Rest of PC = 55W

The 620W PSU is already 200W too much.

>>54873169
Last time keller did that he wrecked intel

But intel being the jew IDF company it is, forced vendors to use their shit.

>>54873285
okay thank you!
if I'm only spending $250 on the 480, then that should be no problem.

I am just trying to decipher between shitposts, marketers shilling, and people defending their own purchases. My only goal is to make an educated purchase.

>why come to 4chan?
because honestly, it's the best place outside of logicalincrements. I've gotten some gold nugget posts from here.

>>54873330
620w - 10% inefficiencies = 550w

combined usage = 420w (DUDE LMAO)

550w - 420w = 130w headroom for OC/10+ extra periphirals

File: speccy.png (47KB, 662x528px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 662x528px

>>54873330
>>54873369

the plan was to get a 750w or higher when i upgraded.
I got a seasonic 620w on sale for $26 so I figured it was fine until i needed to upgrade my main rig.

File: image.png (39KB, 671x532px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 671x532px

>>54873398
Fuck, wrong speccy

>>54862693>>54862693>>54862693>>54862693
>>54862693 Why is everyone freaking out? >>54862693
>>54862693 we don't even know how the >>54862693
>>54862693 cards will really perform. >>54862693
>>54862693 It's best to reserve our >>54862693
>>54862693 opinions until we see how >>54862693
>>54862693 the cards actually are. >>54862693
>>54862693>>54862693>>54862693>>54862693

>>54873369
A 620W PSU with 90% efficiency does provide 620W power. It just draws 690W out of the wall socket.

>>54873252
https://ssl-images.newegg.com/BizIntell/tool/psucalc/index.html

they also put out drivers that has completely fucked 380/390 gfx line.

FUCK YOU AMD

>>54873465
Proof?

>>54873503
5 seconds in google you mongoloid.

>heavily tweaked game in favor of AMD shows "upsetting" benchmarks
Wow, I'm waiting for some real life benchmarks where this card will show its true colours: low budget

>>54868090
normal distribution. by definition 50% of the population have an IQ <= 100

File: RajaKoduri.jpg (49KB, 427x460px)

49KB, 427x460px

You're casually walking and see this man take a huge dump on Nvidia street. How do you respond?

>>54873778
Hi would you mind cooking curry together and watching Bollywood movies on my PC? You bring the Graphics Cards and i go shopping for the ingredients for some hot as fuck thai curry that burns 2 times. That Nvidia Chinese leatherjacket cringe guy can fuck off tho

>>54863177
shitskins >>>/out/

the females can stay, though.

>>54873778
I'd kick him in the cunt.

>>54864039
Nobody fucking cares, get off of this amd thread

>>54865564
>no IMMEDIATE comment
how much time is "immediate"? 5 minutes? 5 hours? 5 days?

we don't know, it could have been 5 seconds.

"Well I just sent an email and I haven't received a reply yet, I guess they won't officially comment! I better post this article.."

"Journalism" at its finest.

>>54873287
>AMD just has shitty marketing

They made that painfully obvious during the RX 480 presentation.

>>54868071
so I can gather and infer my own information since I am white and my iq falls in that range of which is required?

File: 1033388636.jpg (82KB, 1000x541px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1000x541px

>>54862693
And sieg heil to you too you Nazi faggot

I have a GTX 770,

Decisions, decisions.

Serious question: 5 years ago I put a 560 Ti in my machine. This has been able to play everything on maximum on 1080p, including Crysis, Farcry 3, and Skyrim, etc

This card can now be bought new for under $100

Why the fuck would anyone buy one of these new cards, let alone spend hundreds on one or 2? Seriously I'm so confused

>>54874908
Some people want more than 1080p 30fps, some people like buying new things, some people have worse cards than you, some people are doing their first builds/builds for other people, list goes on.

>>54868616

>X2

File: 1342637684034.gif (2MB, 390x285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x285px

shhhhhhit i bought a gtx 970 for 300 euro only 4 months ago

>>54875128
>buying anything near the well known release date of a new series of graphics cards

>>54875030
>30fps at 1080p

Uh try a consistent 50+ fps with those games on max settings.

Games graphics have marginally improved over the past few years, so even if these new GPUs are that much better (they are probably only marginally too), then what's the point?

No reason why anyone should be paying more than 200 or 300 for a GPU in this day and age, unless they're doing professional rendering or some shit.

People who need the latest and greatest tech for the sake of it really are the worst

>>54875186
My 670 doesn't even get that with those settings so I know you're just shitting.

raja is one hell of a pimp smoking nvidia ashes
http://i.imgur.com/thCSaDS.gif

this was taken after the macau event

>>54873885
Good lad. I think I'll join you two.

>>54875177
>4 months
>still a month of waiting
>nearly half a year of waiting
Nope. Pretty sure he can sell his 970 for something like $200 and get a 480 for $100 from his pocket (euros have like 200% for their 'free' healthcare and unis and such).

>>54875427
not really
e3 is close and lisa said they will unleash the whole lineup ranging from 100 to 300
480 4g is just 200 a 8g will be 30-50 more..
i expect to either see a 480x full chip with 2800+shaders or a 490 variant

>>54875468
Vega will probably be $300+ (so some $500 in euroland at least), to be released in August-September (so he would have waited some 7-8 months).

>480 4g is just 200 a 8g will be 30-50 more..
I know it is but that's just for the US. Different countries have different tariffs/import taxes/etc.

>i expect to either see a 480x full chip with 2800+shaders or a 490 variant
I'm looking forward, though all I know is that the RX 480 4/8gb will be up for sale on June 29th for $199 and $230 respectively.

E3 has big Vega afaik, little Vega I have no idea. Probably around next month like you say.

Then there's nothing until next year with Navi and the 1080ti going up against one another.

File: frt66uz7.png (845KB, 891x667px)

845KB, 891x667px

well time to sell the 970 befor chad finds out

>>54875532
vega will be the last BIG chip amd will ever create

so no it wont be at all at 300 more like 500+ and its going to have hbm2 from top to bottom so no it wont be released this year at all

vega will be from 15 to 18 billion transistors as per amd if they release it now it would surely stomp everything on both api's its not meant to go head to head with 1080 at all its about the ti and the next titan

>>54875612
So the vega chip that's going to be released in August-September, the one that was supposedly delayed but no back on schedule, that's little vega? So this month is just the 480 being released? I was under the impression that Navi is meant for next year as a 1080ti competitor. Vega a 1070/1080 competitor later this year. And the 480 to just anally rape the <$250 GPU market.

Idk dude, this is what I keep reading.

File: 00.jpg (100KB, 800x568px)

100KB, 800x568px

>>54875128

>getting yourself jewed by Nvidia

>>54872963
Just came back to the thread. Well made anon, well played indeed.

>>54875751
vega has nothing to do with june or 2016 for that matter
hard ocp rumor is just trash as always

polaris is set to be released as a line up on e3

if 480 delivers quite a punch on dx11 expect the second hand market and every single card below 1080 to be irrelevant that is a fact..

>>54875878
1070 could claw its way back to relevance if Nvidia slashes prices down to a reasonable level.

I think the $380/$450 non-ref/ref split was them trying to be able to shift downwards if AMD was aggressive and to gouge their customers if they didn't, but they were unprepared for AMD to go down to the $200/$230 level.

A 1070 at $300 would be something I would at least consider. $400 no way though.

File: designated2.png (502KB, 485x723px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 485x723px

>>54863177

>implying Raja is a poo
Poos only want to poo everywhere that isn't the loo. They live for the poo. Raja however, is for GPUs. The man wants AMD to triumph.

>>54877703

he only wants to shit on Nvidia

File: Screenshot_2016-06-02-15-45-07.png (1MB, 1920x1080px)

1MB, 1920x1080px

Doesn't matter if AMD's product is good their marketing cant hammer down a way to sell the stuff. Here's the most cringe-worthy release I've ever seen

>>54877451
they could yes but last time they did this was on 2008 because of the 4870

amd literally had a card performing like a gtx 280 for 300 less bucks
nvidia after a week stopped producing the gtx 260 cutted down quite a lot of the price on gtx 280 and people went mad because of this..
the result was for 3 qs nvidia lost quite a lot of share


also im just leaving this here
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20160085551.pdf
if anyone is interested to see what amd brought on the gcn 4.0

>>54877894
you forget that amd recently grabbed the former head of nvidia pr department

also how is this a release? this is cherry picking youtubers and giving hardocp a big middle finger because they are fags

>>54868090
The dunning kruger is strong with this one.

>>54877903
>http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20160085551.pdf
>if anyone is interested to see what amd brought on the gcn 4.0

please summarize this shit or at least give some context.
my 30 seconds of skimming and uninformed background makes this just sound like they are trying to do variable width wavefronts/warps to cut ALU processing waste.

how much does this improve over past GCN, and how much comparative advantage if any will it bring over what Nvidia is already doing?

>>54878038
ok
till so far amd had a really big problem on dx11
the cores where just sitting doing nothing because of the card being highly paraller and dx11 being highly serial api

now this patent shows us that amd changed their core with power gating tech meaning that they will only activate the needed cores while powering down everything else that is not in use
that makes the base clock of any card with such a tech irrelevant because while you can see a 1GHZ let say those cores can be boosted for some ms to 2/2.5ghz while the rest of the card is sleeping thus creating the bigger than expected effiencency we saw(2.5x said glofo that their 14ff node gives amd said it has 2.8x)

nvidia currently doesnt have any flexibility on their cores pascal is just a maxwell on a die shrink and nothing more volta will be the one card that will actually be competitive on dx12

>>54878132
what you say might all be true, but the patent linked to describes a GPU with multiple width SIMD subunits where different sized parallel workloads can be routed to in order to cut waste.

nothing about overclocking or power gating at all.

File: 4chan.jpg (54KB, 607x428px)

54KB, 607x428px

>AMD Using Ashes of Fucking Singularity as a benchmark
>480 SUPPOSEDLY has higher fps over the 1080 in 1 GAME
>Does not show DX11 or Vulkan performance

You guys are getting shilled by AMD so hard and you cucks are eating that shit up

File: 280d58e5_IMG_20160405_142239.jpg (93KB, 1007x479px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1007x479px

>>54878234
Right now a GCN CU looks like this

Do you see SIMD0, 1, 2 and 3? Each are separate SIMD units with a 16 lane vector ALU.

What the document you linked suggests is that RTG have changed the organization of these Vector ALUs so that they can match the incoming workload. Meaning that the Vector ALUs can automatically re-arrange themselves to suit incoming workloads and thus leave far less units idling (boost in efficiency)

overclocking=boost clock

>>54866475
"An" It's applied to either words that starts with a vowel or words that starts with letters that SOUNDS like a vowel.

>>54878268
Don't worry we will get a Hitman benchmark at E3.

>>54878316
>Benchmarks of more games that are shit
>AMD RX 480

WEW. This GPU is DOA and no one even knows it yet. I'm not an nvidia fan boy but this is blatantly obvious

Crossfire is always fucking gay and useless every time I try it, almost never has a profile for whatever fucking common game and only uses one GPU, and when it does work frame latency is so high the game runs worse.

Every time /g/ users that haven't ever used crossfire say "things have improved lol it wrong" it's still fucking gay. Stop forcing this meme, buy a single Rx 480 or wait for 490.

Crossfire HD5870? Fucking gay. Crossfire HD7950? Fucking gay. Crossfire r9 290? Still fucking gay.

>>54878316
nah we will get deus ex on e3
also tw too..
and the new hitman
and the watch dogs 2 too
and half life 3 (it will be on e3 tho not sure on the date :P )
and the first tv's with freesync/adaptive sync tech
the new consoles
amd is actually shipping quite a big cringy show on e3

but we kinda expect this a cringe worthy show to launch awesome products

Probably gonna buy a 480 now and wait for vega/1080ti

>>54878268

>crossfire 480s able to even come close to the 1080 in any game at all
>while costing $199 each
>1080 MSRP alone is $600 for the non founders edition meaning you still have to tack on $40-$50 for marketing judaism
>double 480s still cost $200 less
>AMD doesn't need to show DX11 performance because DX12 is out now and DX11 is old news
>the Wall Street Journal has already published that the 480 will perform as well as the 980 and Fury cards
>about 70% of the market buys cards that cost $250 or less
>Pascal is just Maxwell on a node shrink, aka Paxwell

there doesn't seem to be a debate here, if you want to get jewed go buy Nvidia, if you value perf/$ then go AMD

>San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050
DESIGNATED SHITTING STREET

>>54874908
Bullshit.
It may run 5 year old games on max but not current games.
Source: I have a 560ti.

>>54874908
All those games you listed are like 4 years old now.

Nowadays, how much could an used 280x be sold for?

>>54879153
not much but it could still get you half of what you need for the 480

com'on son it's $200 just go mow like 1-2 lawns a week for a month and you'll be able to afford it by the time it's out.

>>54879205
Yeah it's not expensive, I was just thinking of selling this to save some.

I just don't know when it's coming out so I don't want to go on with intel 4600hd for months. Also I'm very paranoid about that thing lacking support for like a full year on linux.

Is Crossfire really a nightmare to work with?
Are there any other applications for it other than gaming?

File: The_Simpsons-Jeff_Albertson.png (69KB, 250x369px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 250x369px

in my opinion they've gone for the wrong market at release. it's obviously great value for the performance its offering but i feel they have missed out on a great opportunity here. i mentioned it in another thread yesterday when i said that everyone i know have said they're going to be upgrading to the gtx 1070 even though they know of the 480x's low price and good performance and when asked why they all said that it looks like a weak offering for playing games at the highest settings. this is obviously understandable because most of them have 390/970 and by upgrading to a 480x they're getting marginally better performance so its not weird that they want that 980 ti (1070) performance as an upgrade, but whats funny is that even the people i've asked that are running pc's with 5 year old gpu's have all said they would rather get the 1070 over the radeon 400 series. what i'm trying to say is that amd have missed an opportunity to trump nvidia in a price/performance range that actually matter and sells the most. as we saw last gen the 390 and 970 were by far the best sellers and the most popular gpu's because of their fantastic price/performance. amd had the 380/x series which were superior to the gtx 960 but even that didn't give them a massive sales boost and had little to no impact on their market share.

to round off, i believe that nvidia have won in the price/performance bracket most people will be looking at and i get this feeling that we'll see another repeat of the 970 by which i mean the 1070 will become the most popular gpu with the most sales (and not the 3.5gb vram issue lol). amd really should have put out a competitor alongside their lower midrange 480/x cards.

remember this is just my personal opinion.

File: 1462459755626.png (46KB, 802x799px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 802x799px

REMOVE THIS THREAD!

But vat about a $700 solution? Vat about a $700 solution? No no I want the video put up the video PUT IT UP PUT IT UP NOW ALALALALALALA

>>54879640
>But vat about a $700 solution?
triple crossfire

>>54879543
Not at all, it just works better in some titles than other. Same is true with SLI.

>>54879700
sorry, thats just $600-$690, familio.

>>54873287
The 2900XT was pretty shit not gonna lie

>>54879742
1080 MSRP is $600 :^)

>>54873369
>He thinks 80 plus is applied to output wattage not input wattage.

>>54879761
I've come to expect very little from this board, and his post still disappointed me.

>>54879567
in my opinion, it's perfect. there is absolutely no con in recommending someone an amd card when the rx480 hits the market.

where as if you want better performance, the 1070 might have come down in price

>>54862693

AMD esta resurgiendo y ya no esta en bancarrota!!!

File: 1442978449485.jpg (30KB, 247x248px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 247x248px

>>54878294
do you honestly think the average /g/ user can even decipher this diagram?

>2x performance per watt
>The card has still a 150W TDP

When will we finally get a decent <50W TDP passive cooled card?

>>54872955
>>54872916
Didn't they do the same thing for fury x and titan x? How did that end?

>>54873524
So you can't even provide proof, but chose to waste my time instead?

>>54879863
Define decent.

150W TDP is the max the 6 pin + PCIE lane can output. The real card will only draw max of about 110-130w.

>>54869565
An rx 480 is basically a gtx 980 while your card is weaker than the gtx 950 (which is stronger than a 580)

>>54880054
>Define decent
1080p with 60FPS in current games

File: 1461576392080.jpg (239KB, 848x848px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 848x848px

benchmarks when ?

>>54880448

probably not long after E3, AMD is doing an actual release of polaris then, they told their investors this most recent even was a "polaris update"

>>54879753
>using the smiley with a carat nose

>>54863162
>99% and oversweating enabled

>>54880054
Isn't it 225w?

>>54880321

>current

never

File: 1457464196512.png (59KB, 162x200px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 162x200px

>>54880517
>meme arrows

1981+35

>>54879863
That is Polaris 11.
Its competing against the GTX 950 while drawing 50w. That puts it close to the Radeon R9 380 as well. Pretty solid for an entry level and mobile GPU.

>>54880590
> slot + nuffin = 75W
> slot + 6pin = 150W
> slot + 8pin/2x6pin = 225W
> slot + 6pin + 8pin = 300W
> slot + 2x8pin = 357W

In actuality, no card pulls the full 75W off the slot since power draw fluctuates between frames a lot and it's not good for host system stability to have huge periodic swings.

A 6 pin card like the RX 480 will probably draw no more than 40W off the slot for a total around 115W.

The 1070 has 225W available like the 1080, but it seems to only use 130-140W in games.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility/

>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.

NVIDIA WON

>>54880835
kyle pls you're embarrassing yourself.

>Buying Poolaris HOUSEFIRES
>any year

POO IN THE LOO
O
O

I
N

T
H
E

L
O
O

>>54868752
>newfags dont know greentext is an easier way to do bullet point style lists

>>54880781
Maxwell cards have been shown to pull up to 220w from the pcie when overclocked.

NVIDIA WON

>>54863177
two curry chickens are coming at your way.
enjoy Pajet muhamed rajed

https://twitter.com/hardwarecanucks/status/737845240724234240

TOPPEST LELKEK, AMDPOORFAGS

IT'S OVER, AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

may i offer a rebutal my good sirs:

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

you guys are praising something that's being market by the makers, while there's still no real benchmark, how much savage monkeys are you guys ?

first bring it to the arena, then we can discuss.

>>54880991
Even if only 50% performance of 1080, it's 30% the cost so it's very worth it.

Current benchmarks put it on par with 390x, but drivers will need time to mature.

>>54880911
the PCIe 6/8 pin supplemental power cables maybe, not from the slot, which frankly might melt under that much load.

NVIDIA WON
V
I
D
I
A

W
O
N

File: 09-58-19-05-Asus-GTX-960-Strix-75-Watts-Limit_w_600.png (66KB, 600x422px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x422px

>>54881027

>>54880991
Because we have seen some 3DMark benches. And it was running Doom maxed at capped 60FPS 1440p. Everything we seen so far hints on performance level of GTX 980. For 200$ its a steal.

>>54881286
>>54880911
that's pretty spooky, but remember that where the card draws power from is entirely up to the AIB manufacturer and not the GPU, which doesn't care about anything other than its power pins being maintained at an adequate voltage.

>>54881405
I've never seen an AMD card pull over 50w in reviews, from the pcie.

Not even the 295x2.

That's the only reason I'm sticking to AMD for now.

You guys know the 480 isn't going to be their only card, right?

>>54881567
Yes. What do you mean?

>>54880911
>pull up to 220w from the pcie
>>54881286

even though it's still a shitty card design, that's still extremely transient.

shaking my head at you, Asus.

> other 960 vendors not great, but much more competent apparently:
> http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/nvidia-geforce-gtx-960,review-33113-8.html

>>54881663
AMD will release other cards that compete more directly with the higher priced Nvidia cards. People are getting a little carried away with the comparison of unlike things.

>>54881699
Other nvidia cards still do pull more than 75w, but nowhere near as much as asus.

>>54881801
>will
And Nvidia will release even the titan and 1080ti to shit on them when they do.

>>54881875
Funny how the 290x and 390 are beating the 780 ti now.

>>54881911
Rebrandeon is still busy selling those cards and have driver optimizations for them. the 780ti has been grandfathered and doesn't have any performance enhancements due to architectural differences.

>>54881875
so you admit that the 1080 is basically a product with a 6 month lifespan designed just to lighten the wallet of NVcucks by $700?

>>54881929
Exactly.

I'd rather buy an AMD every 3-4 years instead an equally expensive nvidia every 2 years.

t. Regretful gtx680 owner

>>54881932
>6 month lifespan
Nvidia also have the excellent option of cutting prices once these newer products come out.
Which they inevitably do.
Then you can crow about how you can get 2 1080s that shit on whatever the flagship AMDerp garbage is out ok?

>>54881984
>Every 2 years
It uses far more power, and has terrible optimizations out of the box. Your 290x was at some point $800-$1000 in price so stop pretending that it's some sort of budget option. If you bought a GTX 680 your fucking card is so old the fans are probably dying. If you bought a r9 290x and used it heavily the fans and coolers are already probably dead.

Have fun hunting around for a cooler and installing it/pulling the card apart so you can 'have a longer lifespan' than intended.

>>54882023
as bad a deal as the 980 ended up being, it at least was only $550.

the 1080 being $650-$700 is almost insulting knowing that Vega and GP102 will be out Q1'17.

>>54882063
290X rapage was thanks to buttcoin miners, not AMD going full kike.

IIRC its release price was $550, same as the 980.

>>54882096
So it's Nvidia's fault that AMD sold cards to buttcoin miners?
No, the effect is the same, stop pretending that AMD is always the cheaper option, market forces work for a reason.

>>54882077
>knowing that it will come out
No, you don't know when things in the future are going to happen, You might get hit by a truck before this happens instead of enjoying superior graphics performance.

>>54882142
AMD didn't raise the price, retailers did.

>>54882209
>Retailers did,
AMD did NOTHING to alleviate the issue because they couldn't keep up with demand.

>>54882241
If your product suddenly started selling faster than you could resupply it, would you stop it completely?

Look at it from a business perspective.

>>54882465
Yeah so, $1000 cards.

>>54882473
I paid $200 for my reference 290, slapped on the cooler from my old 5870, and I'm happy so far.

>>54882557
>I'm happy so far
>nigger rigging 3 year old cards

Poorfags gonna poor