Is the i7 6700k worth the extra couple hundred dollars more than

>>52523888
/thread

>>52523888
>>52523945
not OP, but fuck off.
at least give the guy a yes or no

>>52523888
buyers guide for maces when?

>>52523788
What kind of work do you do, if any?

>>52523788
>Is the i7 6700k worth the extra couple hundred dollars more than the i5 6600k??

No, unless you're doing professional, high-grade video rendering for a living.

>>52523955
>/g/ is NOT your personal tech support team or personal consumer review site.

>>52523788
if it's just for gaming then not really, but if you are doing more serious stuff then maybe.

>>52523955
not that simple. for games, you don't need an i7, and if you're looking at the 6700k for productivity, you may as well get the 5820k instead.

>>52523967
an x99 system is a better investment for video honestly, 50% more cores for not much more money

>>52523788
it is if you want hyperthreading

>>52523788

i5 6600 is what I put in my gaming/HTPC. If I was doing video editing or streaming while playing, then i7.

Thanks I think I've decided to get the i5, I don't steam or video edit so I doubt I'll need the i7.

What do you guys think of the asus maximus vii for a motherboard?

>>52523788
If you want to make websites you're going to need an i7

>>52525500
>See in a magazine websites (html duh) requiring i7
> Be the one that knows the secret difference between i5 and i7
> Not the only one anymore...

File: huh.png (98KB, 300x197px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 300x197px

>>52523788
>getting a K skylake when you can overclock non K just fine