Quick /g/ Vagrant or docker? why?

neither.

both are dumb memes for plebadmins called Dev Ops engineers who don't know shit anyhow.

>>52402236
Docker is an extremely cute whale, Vagrant is just some deformed piece of cheese or something. The choice is obvious.

>>52404635
The cheese right?

File: 1442754093859.jpg (1MB, 2803x1869px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2803x1869px

>>52405614
Cheese is amazing
Cheese everytime

>>52402236
Mint

>>52402236
They are memed apps, See:
>>52402478

A tipical Docker/Vagrant/iTunes user here:
>>52404635

>>52406566
Gentoo

ITT: a bunch of unemployed plebs.

Depends on your use case. If you aren't deploying docker images to prod, vagrant is probably your bro.

File: 9ac5012a145781f89adcdaefbf8ab643.jpg (245KB, 573x800px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 573x800px

Why either?

>>52406933
this!

>>52406989
I support application developers and also do my own config management development. With vagrant the developers can run a simple command and a few minutes later they have a fresh Linux box running on their workstation that looks exactly like a prod box. In the days before vagrant, this phrase was heard all day every day "but it works on my workstation, if it's not working on YOUR servers, something is wrong with YOUR servers, not my code"

>>52406933
> jobs require it
> it must be important
> it must be good

Spring, SOAP, node.js, ... nobody's learning.

>>52407090
I don't think you understand their purpose. I don't hear anyone saying gee vagrant is stupid what a useless tool. It solves many problems.

>>52402236
Both.
Because they aren't mutually exclusive.

You could also use any of the alternatives.

File: mess.png (194KB, 831x793px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 831x793px

>>52402236
>your software is so complex, hard to install and configure you actually have to run it in it's own vm
Have the lunatics taken over the asylum?

>>52407282
from where is that taken? that thing is a fucking safety hazard.

At my place of employment we have use phpunit for our tests and shit.

We have
A Windows Server running on bare metal
An Ubuntu Server vm on the Windows Server
A Docker dev environment (for each developer) that runs on the Ubuntu Server
A python script in each dev env that does some shit then runs a shell script that launches a new Docker image(we're now windows->ubuntu->docker->docker)
Inside that docker image we have a shell script that finally runs phpunit

It's a simple and intuitive workflow.

>>52407591
What? Why?

>>52408236
lol is this a joke?

>>52402236
docker is definitely cuter

File: The_Wire_Cheese.jpg (52KB, 506x316px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 506x316px

>>52404635
cheese?

>>52408236
> tfw I work on windows server daily (via remote desktop)
> it fucking lags
yes If you are asking my ceo is retarded

vagrant = vm that requires memory/cpu assigned to it, and programs running inside only have access to whatever resources you assigned to the vm

docker is a container, it doesn't need resources assigned to it like a VM, stuff running inside docker have access to all of the system's resources

docker is more lightweight, pretty much has no overhead unlike a vm.